Loading…

Does seeing more deeply into a game increase one’s chances of winning?

The substantively rational value of the games studied in this paper does not help predict subject performance in the experiment at all. An accurate model must account for the cognitive ability of the people playing the game. This paper investigates whether the variation in measured rationality bound...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Experimental economics : a journal of the Economic Science Association 2006-09, Vol.9 (3), p.297-303
Main Authors: McKinney, C. Nicholas, Van Huyck, John B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-2119aa70db6a4144ba0a503afa0a8a230f88ea77fcfadf2295e22f7023f50b293
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-2119aa70db6a4144ba0a503afa0a8a230f88ea77fcfadf2295e22f7023f50b293
container_end_page 303
container_issue 3
container_start_page 297
container_title Experimental economics : a journal of the Economic Science Association
container_volume 9
creator McKinney, C. Nicholas
Van Huyck, John B.
description The substantively rational value of the games studied in this paper does not help predict subject performance in the experiment at all. An accurate model must account for the cognitive ability of the people playing the game. This paper investigates whether the variation in measured rationality bounds is correlated with the probability of winning when playing against another person in games that exceed both players' estimated rationality bound. Does seeing deeper into a game matter when neither player can see to the end of the game? Subjects with higher measured bounds win 63 percent of the time and the larger the difference the more frequently they win. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10683-006-9129-x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36567849</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1079235401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-2119aa70db6a4144ba0a503afa0a8a230f88ea77fcfadf2295e22f7023f50b293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkD1OAzEQhVcIJELgAHQWBZ1hbO96vRVC4SdIkWigtiabcdhoYwc7EaTjGlyPk-AoVFTvafS9mdErinMBVwKgvk4CtFEcQPNGyIZ_HhQDUdWK60aZw-yV0bzMk-PiJKUFgBCVLgfF-C5QYomo83O2DJHYjGjVb1nn14Ehm-OSsm8jYSIWPP18fSfWvqFvcy449tF5n7M3p8WRwz7R2Z8Oi9eH-5fRmE-eH59GtxPeKl2tuRSiQaxhNtVYirKcImAFCl1Wg1KBM4awrl3rcOakbCqS0tUglatgKhs1LC73e1cxvG8ore2ySy31PXoKm2TzFV2bcgde_AMXYRN9_s1KKQ00GkSGxB5qY0gpkrOr2C0xbq0AuyvW7ou1uVi7K9Z-ql9jJWvI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222809601</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does seeing more deeply into a game increase one’s chances of winning?</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>McKinney, C. Nicholas ; Van Huyck, John B.</creator><creatorcontrib>McKinney, C. Nicholas ; Van Huyck, John B.</creatorcontrib><description>The substantively rational value of the games studied in this paper does not help predict subject performance in the experiment at all. An accurate model must account for the cognitive ability of the people playing the game. This paper investigates whether the variation in measured rationality bounds is correlated with the probability of winning when playing against another person in games that exceed both players' estimated rationality bound. Does seeing deeper into a game matter when neither player can see to the end of the game? Subjects with higher measured bounds win 63 percent of the time and the larger the difference the more frequently they win. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1386-4157</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6938</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10683-006-9129-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Behavioral sciences ; Bounded rationality ; Correlation analysis ; Economic behaviour ; Economic models ; Experiments ; Game theory ; Games ; Games of strategy ; Microeconomics ; Rationality ; Studies ; User interface</subject><ispartof>Experimental economics : a journal of the Economic Science Association, 2006-09, Vol.9 (3), p.297-303</ispartof><rights>Economic Science Association 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-2119aa70db6a4144ba0a503afa0a8a230f88ea77fcfadf2295e22f7023f50b293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-2119aa70db6a4144ba0a503afa0a8a230f88ea77fcfadf2295e22f7023f50b293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/222809601/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/222809601?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,12847,27924,27925,33223,33224,36060,36061,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McKinney, C. Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Huyck, John B.</creatorcontrib><title>Does seeing more deeply into a game increase one’s chances of winning?</title><title>Experimental economics : a journal of the Economic Science Association</title><description>The substantively rational value of the games studied in this paper does not help predict subject performance in the experiment at all. An accurate model must account for the cognitive ability of the people playing the game. This paper investigates whether the variation in measured rationality bounds is correlated with the probability of winning when playing against another person in games that exceed both players' estimated rationality bound. Does seeing deeper into a game matter when neither player can see to the end of the game? Subjects with higher measured bounds win 63 percent of the time and the larger the difference the more frequently they win. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Behavioral sciences</subject><subject>Bounded rationality</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Economic behaviour</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Games</subject><subject>Games of strategy</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Rationality</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>User interface</subject><issn>1386-4157</issn><issn>1573-6938</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkD1OAzEQhVcIJELgAHQWBZ1hbO96vRVC4SdIkWigtiabcdhoYwc7EaTjGlyPk-AoVFTvafS9mdErinMBVwKgvk4CtFEcQPNGyIZ_HhQDUdWK60aZw-yV0bzMk-PiJKUFgBCVLgfF-C5QYomo83O2DJHYjGjVb1nn14Ehm-OSsm8jYSIWPP18fSfWvqFvcy449tF5n7M3p8WRwz7R2Z8Oi9eH-5fRmE-eH59GtxPeKl2tuRSiQaxhNtVYirKcImAFCl1Wg1KBM4awrl3rcOakbCqS0tUglatgKhs1LC73e1cxvG8ore2ySy31PXoKm2TzFV2bcgde_AMXYRN9_s1KKQ00GkSGxB5qY0gpkrOr2C0xbq0AuyvW7ou1uVi7K9Z-ql9jJWvI</recordid><startdate>20060901</startdate><enddate>20060901</enddate><creator>McKinney, C. Nicholas</creator><creator>Van Huyck, John B.</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060901</creationdate><title>Does seeing more deeply into a game increase one’s chances of winning?</title><author>McKinney, C. Nicholas ; Van Huyck, John B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-2119aa70db6a4144ba0a503afa0a8a230f88ea77fcfadf2295e22f7023f50b293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Behavioral sciences</topic><topic>Bounded rationality</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Economic behaviour</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Games</topic><topic>Games of strategy</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Rationality</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>User interface</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McKinney, C. Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Huyck, John B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Experimental economics : a journal of the Economic Science Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McKinney, C. Nicholas</au><au>Van Huyck, John B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does seeing more deeply into a game increase one’s chances of winning?</atitle><jtitle>Experimental economics : a journal of the Economic Science Association</jtitle><date>2006-09-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>297</spage><epage>303</epage><pages>297-303</pages><issn>1386-4157</issn><eissn>1573-6938</eissn><abstract>The substantively rational value of the games studied in this paper does not help predict subject performance in the experiment at all. An accurate model must account for the cognitive ability of the people playing the game. This paper investigates whether the variation in measured rationality bounds is correlated with the probability of winning when playing against another person in games that exceed both players' estimated rationality bound. Does seeing deeper into a game matter when neither player can see to the end of the game? Subjects with higher measured bounds win 63 percent of the time and the larger the difference the more frequently they win. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s10683-006-9129-x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1386-4157
ispartof Experimental economics : a journal of the Economic Science Association, 2006-09, Vol.9 (3), p.297-303
issn 1386-4157
1573-6938
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36567849
source EconLit s plnými texty; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature
subjects Algorithms
Behavioral sciences
Bounded rationality
Correlation analysis
Economic behaviour
Economic models
Experiments
Game theory
Games
Games of strategy
Microeconomics
Rationality
Studies
User interface
title Does seeing more deeply into a game increase one’s chances of winning?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T20%3A46%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20seeing%20more%20deeply%20into%20a%20game%20increase%20one%E2%80%99s%20chances%20of%20winning?&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20economics%20:%20a%20journal%20of%20the%20Economic%20Science%20Association&rft.au=McKinney,%20C.%20Nicholas&rft.date=2006-09-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=297&rft.epage=303&rft.pages=297-303&rft.issn=1386-4157&rft.eissn=1573-6938&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10683-006-9129-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1079235401%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-2119aa70db6a4144ba0a503afa0a8a230f88ea77fcfadf2295e22f7023f50b293%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222809601&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true