Loading…
Does seeing more deeply into a game increase one’s chances of winning?
The substantively rational value of the games studied in this paper does not help predict subject performance in the experiment at all. An accurate model must account for the cognitive ability of the people playing the game. This paper investigates whether the variation in measured rationality bound...
Saved in:
Published in: | Experimental economics : a journal of the Economic Science Association 2006-09, Vol.9 (3), p.297-303 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-2119aa70db6a4144ba0a503afa0a8a230f88ea77fcfadf2295e22f7023f50b293 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-2119aa70db6a4144ba0a503afa0a8a230f88ea77fcfadf2295e22f7023f50b293 |
container_end_page | 303 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 297 |
container_title | Experimental economics : a journal of the Economic Science Association |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | McKinney, C. Nicholas Van Huyck, John B. |
description | The substantively rational value of the games studied in this paper does not help predict subject performance in the experiment at all. An accurate model must account for the cognitive ability of the people playing the game. This paper investigates whether the variation in measured rationality bounds is correlated with the probability of winning when playing against another person in games that exceed both players' estimated rationality bound. Does seeing deeper into a game matter when neither player can see to the end of the game? Subjects with higher measured bounds win 63 percent of the time and the larger the difference the more frequently they win. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10683-006-9129-x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36567849</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1079235401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-2119aa70db6a4144ba0a503afa0a8a230f88ea77fcfadf2295e22f7023f50b293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkD1OAzEQhVcIJELgAHQWBZ1hbO96vRVC4SdIkWigtiabcdhoYwc7EaTjGlyPk-AoVFTvafS9mdErinMBVwKgvk4CtFEcQPNGyIZ_HhQDUdWK60aZw-yV0bzMk-PiJKUFgBCVLgfF-C5QYomo83O2DJHYjGjVb1nn14Ehm-OSsm8jYSIWPP18fSfWvqFvcy449tF5n7M3p8WRwz7R2Z8Oi9eH-5fRmE-eH59GtxPeKl2tuRSiQaxhNtVYirKcImAFCl1Wg1KBM4awrl3rcOakbCqS0tUglatgKhs1LC73e1cxvG8ore2ySy31PXoKm2TzFV2bcgde_AMXYRN9_s1KKQ00GkSGxB5qY0gpkrOr2C0xbq0AuyvW7ou1uVi7K9Z-ql9jJWvI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222809601</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does seeing more deeply into a game increase one’s chances of winning?</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>McKinney, C. Nicholas ; Van Huyck, John B.</creator><creatorcontrib>McKinney, C. Nicholas ; Van Huyck, John B.</creatorcontrib><description>The substantively rational value of the games studied in this paper does not help predict subject performance in the experiment at all. An accurate model must account for the cognitive ability of the people playing the game. This paper investigates whether the variation in measured rationality bounds is correlated with the probability of winning when playing against another person in games that exceed both players' estimated rationality bound. Does seeing deeper into a game matter when neither player can see to the end of the game? Subjects with higher measured bounds win 63 percent of the time and the larger the difference the more frequently they win. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1386-4157</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6938</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10683-006-9129-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Behavioral sciences ; Bounded rationality ; Correlation analysis ; Economic behaviour ; Economic models ; Experiments ; Game theory ; Games ; Games of strategy ; Microeconomics ; Rationality ; Studies ; User interface</subject><ispartof>Experimental economics : a journal of the Economic Science Association, 2006-09, Vol.9 (3), p.297-303</ispartof><rights>Economic Science Association 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-2119aa70db6a4144ba0a503afa0a8a230f88ea77fcfadf2295e22f7023f50b293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-2119aa70db6a4144ba0a503afa0a8a230f88ea77fcfadf2295e22f7023f50b293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/222809601/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/222809601?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,12847,27924,27925,33223,33224,36060,36061,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McKinney, C. Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Huyck, John B.</creatorcontrib><title>Does seeing more deeply into a game increase one’s chances of winning?</title><title>Experimental economics : a journal of the Economic Science Association</title><description>The substantively rational value of the games studied in this paper does not help predict subject performance in the experiment at all. An accurate model must account for the cognitive ability of the people playing the game. This paper investigates whether the variation in measured rationality bounds is correlated with the probability of winning when playing against another person in games that exceed both players' estimated rationality bound. Does seeing deeper into a game matter when neither player can see to the end of the game? Subjects with higher measured bounds win 63 percent of the time and the larger the difference the more frequently they win. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Behavioral sciences</subject><subject>Bounded rationality</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Economic behaviour</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Games</subject><subject>Games of strategy</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Rationality</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>User interface</subject><issn>1386-4157</issn><issn>1573-6938</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkD1OAzEQhVcIJELgAHQWBZ1hbO96vRVC4SdIkWigtiabcdhoYwc7EaTjGlyPk-AoVFTvafS9mdErinMBVwKgvk4CtFEcQPNGyIZ_HhQDUdWK60aZw-yV0bzMk-PiJKUFgBCVLgfF-C5QYomo83O2DJHYjGjVb1nn14Ehm-OSsm8jYSIWPP18fSfWvqFvcy449tF5n7M3p8WRwz7R2Z8Oi9eH-5fRmE-eH59GtxPeKl2tuRSiQaxhNtVYirKcImAFCl1Wg1KBM4awrl3rcOakbCqS0tUglatgKhs1LC73e1cxvG8ore2ySy31PXoKm2TzFV2bcgde_AMXYRN9_s1KKQ00GkSGxB5qY0gpkrOr2C0xbq0AuyvW7ou1uVi7K9Z-ql9jJWvI</recordid><startdate>20060901</startdate><enddate>20060901</enddate><creator>McKinney, C. Nicholas</creator><creator>Van Huyck, John B.</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060901</creationdate><title>Does seeing more deeply into a game increase one’s chances of winning?</title><author>McKinney, C. Nicholas ; Van Huyck, John B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-2119aa70db6a4144ba0a503afa0a8a230f88ea77fcfadf2295e22f7023f50b293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Behavioral sciences</topic><topic>Bounded rationality</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Economic behaviour</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Games</topic><topic>Games of strategy</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Rationality</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>User interface</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McKinney, C. Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Huyck, John B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Experimental economics : a journal of the Economic Science Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McKinney, C. Nicholas</au><au>Van Huyck, John B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does seeing more deeply into a game increase one’s chances of winning?</atitle><jtitle>Experimental economics : a journal of the Economic Science Association</jtitle><date>2006-09-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>297</spage><epage>303</epage><pages>297-303</pages><issn>1386-4157</issn><eissn>1573-6938</eissn><abstract>The substantively rational value of the games studied in this paper does not help predict subject performance in the experiment at all. An accurate model must account for the cognitive ability of the people playing the game. This paper investigates whether the variation in measured rationality bounds is correlated with the probability of winning when playing against another person in games that exceed both players' estimated rationality bound. Does seeing deeper into a game matter when neither player can see to the end of the game? Subjects with higher measured bounds win 63 percent of the time and the larger the difference the more frequently they win. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s10683-006-9129-x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1386-4157 |
ispartof | Experimental economics : a journal of the Economic Science Association, 2006-09, Vol.9 (3), p.297-303 |
issn | 1386-4157 1573-6938 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36567849 |
source | EconLit s plnými texty; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature |
subjects | Algorithms Behavioral sciences Bounded rationality Correlation analysis Economic behaviour Economic models Experiments Game theory Games Games of strategy Microeconomics Rationality Studies User interface |
title | Does seeing more deeply into a game increase one’s chances of winning? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T20%3A46%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20seeing%20more%20deeply%20into%20a%20game%20increase%20one%E2%80%99s%20chances%20of%20winning?&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20economics%20:%20a%20journal%20of%20the%20Economic%20Science%20Association&rft.au=McKinney,%20C.%20Nicholas&rft.date=2006-09-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=297&rft.epage=303&rft.pages=297-303&rft.issn=1386-4157&rft.eissn=1573-6938&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10683-006-9129-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1079235401%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-2119aa70db6a4144ba0a503afa0a8a230f88ea77fcfadf2295e22f7023f50b293%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222809601&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |