Loading…
Are Household Production Decisions Cooperative? Evidence on Pastoral Migration and Milk Sales from Northern Kenya
Market-based development efforts frequently create opportunities to generate income from goods previously produced and consumed within the household. Production within the household is often characterized by a gender and age division of labor. Market development efforts to improve well-being may lea...
Saved in:
| Published in: | American journal of agricultural economics 2006-08, Vol.88 (3), p.525-541 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692X-3c347cb210fcf2010e241414169de370e03344219065cdc3b788e894adac89b73 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692X-3c347cb210fcf2010e241414169de370e03344219065cdc3b788e894adac89b73 |
| container_end_page | 541 |
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 525 |
| container_title | American journal of agricultural economics |
| container_volume | 88 |
| creator | McPeak, John G. Doss, Cheryl R. |
| description | Market-based development efforts frequently create opportunities to generate income from goods previously produced and consumed within the household. Production within the household is often characterized by a gender and age division of labor. Market development efforts to improve well-being may lead to unanticipated outcomes if household production decisions are noncooperative. We develop and test models of household decision making to investigate intrahousehold decision making in a nomadic pastoral setting from Kenya. Our results suggest that household decisions are contested, with husbands using migration decisions to resist wives' ability to market milk. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00877.x |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36581096</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3697747</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00877.x</oup_id><sourcerecordid>3697747</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692X-3c347cb210fcf2010e241414169de370e03344219065cdc3b788e894adac89b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUVtv0zAUjhBIlME_QMLigbcEX1JfnlDVdStjg2ljUsWL5TonW7o07ux0tP8ee0F9QCBhP9jH30XH58syRHBB4vq4KkjJRS6p4AXFmBcYSyGK3bNsdACeZyOMMc0VVvRl9iqEVSwxUXKUPUw8oLnbBrhzbYUuvau2tm9ch47BNiFeApo6twFv-uYRPqHZY1NBZwFFyqUJvfOmRRfNbcLjk-mqWLX36Nq0EFDt3Rp9db6_A9-hL9DtzevsRW3aAG9-n0fZzcns-3Sen387_TydnOeWK7rImWWlsEtKcG1rigkGWpK0uaqACQyYsbKkRGE-tpVlSyElSFWayliploIdZR8G3413D1sIvV43wULbmg7ifzXjY0mw4pH4_g_iym19F3vTlDHCaSkTSQ4k610IHmq98c3a-L0mWKcg9Eqnees0b52C0E9B6F2UXgzSn00L-__W6cnZZHaWsAQl5AlYRD82-Lnt5h9u-d-6eDuoVimzg45xJUSZppUPcBN62B1g4-81F0yM9XzxQ0_Hp1cnVB3rq8h_N_Br47S59U3QN9cxJhaTklLEif0C54rCjg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>233162486</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are Household Production Decisions Cooperative? Evidence on Pastoral Migration and Milk Sales from Northern Kenya</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Access via Business Source (EBSCOhost)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>McPeak, John G. ; Doss, Cheryl R.</creator><creatorcontrib>McPeak, John G. ; Doss, Cheryl R.</creatorcontrib><description>Market-based development efforts frequently create opportunities to generate income from goods previously produced and consumed within the household. Production within the household is often characterized by a gender and age division of labor. Market development efforts to improve well-being may lead to unanticipated outcomes if household production decisions are noncooperative. We develop and test models of household decision making to investigate intrahousehold decision making in a nomadic pastoral setting from Kenya. Our results suggest that household decisions are contested, with husbands using migration decisions to resist wives' ability to market milk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9092</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8276</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00877.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJAEBA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>age ; Agricultural economics ; agricultural products ; Agriculture ; Consumption ; Cooperation ; D130 ; Decision making ; Division of labor ; Economic models ; Economic statistics ; Family ; farm income ; farm management ; Food aid ; food marketing ; Gabra ; Gender ; gender differences ; Group decision making ; Herding ; Herds ; Household economics ; household income ; household production ; Households ; intrahousehold ; Investigations ; Kenya ; Management decisions ; Marketing ; marketing channels ; Men ; Migration ; milk prices ; Milk production ; noncooperative models ; O150 ; Pastoral nomads ; Pastoralism ; Production management ; Q120 ; Rain ; Rice ; Risk sharing ; Sorghum ; Studies ; Wives ; Women</subject><ispartof>American journal of agricultural economics, 2006-08, Vol.88 (3), p.525-541</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 American Agricultural Economics Association</rights><rights>Copyright 2006 American Agricultural Economics Association 2006</rights><rights>2006 Agricultural and Applied Economics Association</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Aug 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692X-3c347cb210fcf2010e241414169de370e03344219065cdc3b788e894adac89b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692X-3c347cb210fcf2010e241414169de370e03344219065cdc3b788e894adac89b73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3697747$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3697747$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33224,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McPeak, John G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doss, Cheryl R.</creatorcontrib><title>Are Household Production Decisions Cooperative? Evidence on Pastoral Migration and Milk Sales from Northern Kenya</title><title>American journal of agricultural economics</title><addtitle>American Journal of Agricultural Economics</addtitle><addtitle>American Journal of Agricultural Economics</addtitle><description>Market-based development efforts frequently create opportunities to generate income from goods previously produced and consumed within the household. Production within the household is often characterized by a gender and age division of labor. Market development efforts to improve well-being may lead to unanticipated outcomes if household production decisions are noncooperative. We develop and test models of household decision making to investigate intrahousehold decision making in a nomadic pastoral setting from Kenya. Our results suggest that household decisions are contested, with husbands using migration decisions to resist wives' ability to market milk.</description><subject>age</subject><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>agricultural products</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>D130</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Division of labor</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economic statistics</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>farm income</subject><subject>farm management</subject><subject>Food aid</subject><subject>food marketing</subject><subject>Gabra</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>gender differences</subject><subject>Group decision making</subject><subject>Herding</subject><subject>Herds</subject><subject>Household economics</subject><subject>household income</subject><subject>household production</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>intrahousehold</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Kenya</subject><subject>Management decisions</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>marketing channels</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>milk prices</subject><subject>Milk production</subject><subject>noncooperative models</subject><subject>O150</subject><subject>Pastoral nomads</subject><subject>Pastoralism</subject><subject>Production management</subject><subject>Q120</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rice</subject><subject>Risk sharing</subject><subject>Sorghum</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Wives</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0002-9092</issn><issn>1467-8276</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUVtv0zAUjhBIlME_QMLigbcEX1JfnlDVdStjg2ljUsWL5TonW7o07ux0tP8ee0F9QCBhP9jH30XH58syRHBB4vq4KkjJRS6p4AXFmBcYSyGK3bNsdACeZyOMMc0VVvRl9iqEVSwxUXKUPUw8oLnbBrhzbYUuvau2tm9ch47BNiFeApo6twFv-uYRPqHZY1NBZwFFyqUJvfOmRRfNbcLjk-mqWLX36Nq0EFDt3Rp9db6_A9-hL9DtzevsRW3aAG9-n0fZzcns-3Sen387_TydnOeWK7rImWWlsEtKcG1rigkGWpK0uaqACQyYsbKkRGE-tpVlSyElSFWayliploIdZR8G3413D1sIvV43wULbmg7ifzXjY0mw4pH4_g_iym19F3vTlDHCaSkTSQ4k610IHmq98c3a-L0mWKcg9Eqnees0b52C0E9B6F2UXgzSn00L-__W6cnZZHaWsAQl5AlYRD82-Lnt5h9u-d-6eDuoVimzg45xJUSZppUPcBN62B1g4-81F0yM9XzxQ0_Hp1cnVB3rq8h_N_Br47S59U3QN9cxJhaTklLEif0C54rCjg</recordid><startdate>200608</startdate><enddate>200608</enddate><creator>McPeak, John G.</creator><creator>Doss, Cheryl R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>American Agricultural Economics Association</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200608</creationdate><title>Are Household Production Decisions Cooperative? Evidence on Pastoral Migration and Milk Sales from Northern Kenya</title><author>McPeak, John G. ; Doss, Cheryl R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692X-3c347cb210fcf2010e241414169de370e03344219065cdc3b788e894adac89b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>age</topic><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>agricultural products</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>D130</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Division of labor</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economic statistics</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>farm income</topic><topic>farm management</topic><topic>Food aid</topic><topic>food marketing</topic><topic>Gabra</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>gender differences</topic><topic>Group decision making</topic><topic>Herding</topic><topic>Herds</topic><topic>Household economics</topic><topic>household income</topic><topic>household production</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>intrahousehold</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Kenya</topic><topic>Management decisions</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>marketing channels</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>milk prices</topic><topic>Milk production</topic><topic>noncooperative models</topic><topic>O150</topic><topic>Pastoral nomads</topic><topic>Pastoralism</topic><topic>Production management</topic><topic>Q120</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rice</topic><topic>Risk sharing</topic><topic>Sorghum</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Wives</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McPeak, John G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doss, Cheryl R.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>American journal of agricultural economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McPeak, John G.</au><au>Doss, Cheryl R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are Household Production Decisions Cooperative? Evidence on Pastoral Migration and Milk Sales from Northern Kenya</atitle><jtitle>American journal of agricultural economics</jtitle><stitle>American Journal of Agricultural Economics</stitle><addtitle>American Journal of Agricultural Economics</addtitle><date>2006-08</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>525</spage><epage>541</epage><pages>525-541</pages><issn>0002-9092</issn><eissn>1467-8276</eissn><coden>AJAEBA</coden><abstract>Market-based development efforts frequently create opportunities to generate income from goods previously produced and consumed within the household. Production within the household is often characterized by a gender and age division of labor. Market development efforts to improve well-being may lead to unanticipated outcomes if household production decisions are noncooperative. We develop and test models of household decision making to investigate intrahousehold decision making in a nomadic pastoral setting from Kenya. Our results suggest that household decisions are contested, with husbands using migration decisions to resist wives' ability to market milk.</abstract><cop>Malden</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00877.x</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0002-9092 |
| ispartof | American journal of agricultural economics, 2006-08, Vol.88 (3), p.525-541 |
| issn | 0002-9092 1467-8276 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36581096 |
| source | EconLit s plnými texty; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Access via Business Source (EBSCOhost); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
| subjects | age Agricultural economics agricultural products Agriculture Consumption Cooperation D130 Decision making Division of labor Economic models Economic statistics Family farm income farm management Food aid food marketing Gabra Gender gender differences Group decision making Herding Herds Household economics household income household production Households intrahousehold Investigations Kenya Management decisions Marketing marketing channels Men Migration milk prices Milk production noncooperative models O150 Pastoral nomads Pastoralism Production management Q120 Rain Rice Risk sharing Sorghum Studies Wives Women |
| title | Are Household Production Decisions Cooperative? Evidence on Pastoral Migration and Milk Sales from Northern Kenya |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A56%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20Household%20Production%20Decisions%20Cooperative?%20Evidence%20on%20Pastoral%20Migration%20and%20Milk%20Sales%20from%20Northern%20Kenya&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20agricultural%20economics&rft.au=McPeak,%20John%20G.&rft.date=2006-08&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=525&rft.epage=541&rft.pages=525-541&rft.issn=0002-9092&rft.eissn=1467-8276&rft.coden=AJAEBA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00877.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3697747%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692X-3c347cb210fcf2010e241414169de370e03344219065cdc3b788e894adac89b73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=233162486&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3697747&rft_oup_id=10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00877.x&rfr_iscdi=true |