Loading…

IPO failure risk

We explore the factors associated with historical IPO failures by developing an IPO failure prediction model that includes accounting information as well as proxies for the role of information intermediaries and other IPO deal-related characteristics. We document statistically significant difference...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of accounting research 2007-05, Vol.45 (2), p.333-384
Main Authors: Demers, Elizabeth, Joos, Philip, Wysocki, Peter D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 384
container_issue 2
container_start_page 333
container_title Journal of accounting research
container_volume 45
creator Demers, Elizabeth
Joos, Philip
Wysocki, Peter D
description We explore the factors associated with historical IPO failures by developing an IPO failure prediction model that includes accounting information as well as proxies for the role of information intermediaries and other IPO deal-related characteristics. We document statistically significant differences in failure models applicable to nontech versus high tech IPOs, and these structural differences are largely driven by accounting-based proxies for firms' investments in intangible assets, operating performance, and financial leverage. We also develop parsimonious, predominantly accounting-based, strictly out-of-sample (i.e., no hindsight) IPO failure forecasting models for each of the two sectors. We find that our forecasts are negatively associated with one-year post-IPO abnormal returns. A pseudo-hedge strategy of going short (long) in high (low) failure risk portfolios yields returns of economically significant magnitudes over the one-year horizon, and is robust to alternative returns methodologies. Further results suggest that IPO long-run returns anomalies may persist, but they take different forms for high-tech and nontech IPOs. Reprinted by permission of Blackwell Publishing
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2007.00237.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36645760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>36645760</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_366457603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYFAwNNAzBAL9LD1DE3NTXTNzywg9IwMDcz0DAyNjc70KFgZOIMtQ18LE1IyDgau4OMvAwMDS1NiQk0HAM8BfIS0xM6e0KFWhKLM4m4eBNS0xpziVF0pzM6i5uYY4e-gWFOUXlqYWl8TnZhYnp-bkJOal5pcWxxubmZmYmpsZGBOtEADYvzBb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>36645760</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>IPO failure risk</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>JSTOR Journals and Primary Sources</source><creator>Demers, Elizabeth ; Joos, Philip ; Wysocki, Peter D</creator><creatorcontrib>Demers, Elizabeth ; Joos, Philip ; Wysocki, Peter D</creatorcontrib><description>We explore the factors associated with historical IPO failures by developing an IPO failure prediction model that includes accounting information as well as proxies for the role of information intermediaries and other IPO deal-related characteristics. We document statistically significant differences in failure models applicable to nontech versus high tech IPOs, and these structural differences are largely driven by accounting-based proxies for firms' investments in intangible assets, operating performance, and financial leverage. We also develop parsimonious, predominantly accounting-based, strictly out-of-sample (i.e., no hindsight) IPO failure forecasting models for each of the two sectors. We find that our forecasts are negatively associated with one-year post-IPO abnormal returns. A pseudo-hedge strategy of going short (long) in high (low) failure risk portfolios yields returns of economically significant magnitudes over the one-year horizon, and is robust to alternative returns methodologies. Further results suggest that IPO long-run returns anomalies may persist, but they take different forms for high-tech and nontech IPOs. Reprinted by permission of Blackwell Publishing</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2007.00237.x</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Accounting methods ; Failure ; Initial public offering ; Insider dealing ; Risk aversion ; Risk management ; Stock exchange</subject><ispartof>Journal of accounting research, 2007-05, Vol.45 (2), p.333-384</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,33203</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Demers, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joos, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wysocki, Peter D</creatorcontrib><title>IPO failure risk</title><title>Journal of accounting research</title><description>We explore the factors associated with historical IPO failures by developing an IPO failure prediction model that includes accounting information as well as proxies for the role of information intermediaries and other IPO deal-related characteristics. We document statistically significant differences in failure models applicable to nontech versus high tech IPOs, and these structural differences are largely driven by accounting-based proxies for firms' investments in intangible assets, operating performance, and financial leverage. We also develop parsimonious, predominantly accounting-based, strictly out-of-sample (i.e., no hindsight) IPO failure forecasting models for each of the two sectors. We find that our forecasts are negatively associated with one-year post-IPO abnormal returns. A pseudo-hedge strategy of going short (long) in high (low) failure risk portfolios yields returns of economically significant magnitudes over the one-year horizon, and is robust to alternative returns methodologies. Further results suggest that IPO long-run returns anomalies may persist, but they take different forms for high-tech and nontech IPOs. Reprinted by permission of Blackwell Publishing</description><subject>Accounting methods</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Initial public offering</subject><subject>Insider dealing</subject><subject>Risk aversion</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Stock exchange</subject><issn>0021-8456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYFAwNNAzBAL9LD1DE3NTXTNzywg9IwMDcz0DAyNjc70KFgZOIMtQ18LE1IyDgau4OMvAwMDS1NiQk0HAM8BfIS0xM6e0KFWhKLM4m4eBNS0xpziVF0pzM6i5uYY4e-gWFOUXlqYWl8TnZhYnp-bkJOal5pcWxxubmZmYmpsZGBOtEADYvzBb</recordid><startdate>20070501</startdate><enddate>20070501</enddate><creator>Demers, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Joos, Philip</creator><creator>Wysocki, Peter D</creator><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070501</creationdate><title>IPO failure risk</title><author>Demers, Elizabeth ; Joos, Philip ; Wysocki, Peter D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_366457603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Accounting methods</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Initial public offering</topic><topic>Insider dealing</topic><topic>Risk aversion</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Stock exchange</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Demers, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joos, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wysocki, Peter D</creatorcontrib><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of accounting research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Demers, Elizabeth</au><au>Joos, Philip</au><au>Wysocki, Peter D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>IPO failure risk</atitle><jtitle>Journal of accounting research</jtitle><date>2007-05-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>333</spage><epage>384</epage><pages>333-384</pages><issn>0021-8456</issn><abstract>We explore the factors associated with historical IPO failures by developing an IPO failure prediction model that includes accounting information as well as proxies for the role of information intermediaries and other IPO deal-related characteristics. We document statistically significant differences in failure models applicable to nontech versus high tech IPOs, and these structural differences are largely driven by accounting-based proxies for firms' investments in intangible assets, operating performance, and financial leverage. We also develop parsimonious, predominantly accounting-based, strictly out-of-sample (i.e., no hindsight) IPO failure forecasting models for each of the two sectors. We find that our forecasts are negatively associated with one-year post-IPO abnormal returns. A pseudo-hedge strategy of going short (long) in high (low) failure risk portfolios yields returns of economically significant magnitudes over the one-year horizon, and is robust to alternative returns methodologies. Further results suggest that IPO long-run returns anomalies may persist, but they take different forms for high-tech and nontech IPOs. Reprinted by permission of Blackwell Publishing</abstract><doi>10.1111/j.1475-679X.2007.00237.x</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8456
ispartof Journal of accounting research, 2007-05, Vol.45 (2), p.333-384
issn 0021-8456
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36645760
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; JSTOR Journals and Primary Sources
subjects Accounting methods
Failure
Initial public offering
Insider dealing
Risk aversion
Risk management
Stock exchange
title IPO failure risk
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T18%3A40%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=IPO%20failure%20risk&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20accounting%20research&rft.au=Demers,%20Elizabeth&rft.date=2007-05-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=333&rft.epage=384&rft.pages=333-384&rft.issn=0021-8456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2007.00237.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E36645760%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_366457603%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=36645760&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true