Loading…
IPO failure risk
We explore the factors associated with historical IPO failures by developing an IPO failure prediction model that includes accounting information as well as proxies for the role of information intermediaries and other IPO deal-related characteristics. We document statistically significant difference...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of accounting research 2007-05, Vol.45 (2), p.333-384 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 384 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 333 |
container_title | Journal of accounting research |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Demers, Elizabeth Joos, Philip Wysocki, Peter D |
description | We explore the factors associated with historical IPO failures by developing an IPO failure prediction model that includes accounting information as well as proxies for the role of information intermediaries and other IPO deal-related characteristics. We document statistically significant differences in failure models applicable to nontech versus high tech IPOs, and these structural differences are largely driven by accounting-based proxies for firms' investments in intangible assets, operating performance, and financial leverage. We also develop parsimonious, predominantly accounting-based, strictly out-of-sample (i.e., no hindsight) IPO failure forecasting models for each of the two sectors. We find that our forecasts are negatively associated with one-year post-IPO abnormal returns. A pseudo-hedge strategy of going short (long) in high (low) failure risk portfolios yields returns of economically significant magnitudes over the one-year horizon, and is robust to alternative returns methodologies. Further results suggest that IPO long-run returns anomalies may persist, but they take different forms for high-tech and nontech IPOs. Reprinted by permission of Blackwell Publishing |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2007.00237.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36645760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>36645760</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_366457603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYFAwNNAzBAL9LD1DE3NTXTNzywg9IwMDcz0DAyNjc70KFgZOIMtQ18LE1IyDgau4OMvAwMDS1NiQk0HAM8BfIS0xM6e0KFWhKLM4m4eBNS0xpziVF0pzM6i5uYY4e-gWFOUXlqYWl8TnZhYnp-bkJOal5pcWxxubmZmYmpsZGBOtEADYvzBb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>36645760</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>IPO failure risk</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>JSTOR Journals and Primary Sources</source><creator>Demers, Elizabeth ; Joos, Philip ; Wysocki, Peter D</creator><creatorcontrib>Demers, Elizabeth ; Joos, Philip ; Wysocki, Peter D</creatorcontrib><description>We explore the factors associated with historical IPO failures by developing an IPO failure prediction model that includes accounting information as well as proxies for the role of information intermediaries and other IPO deal-related characteristics. We document statistically significant differences in failure models applicable to nontech versus high tech IPOs, and these structural differences are largely driven by accounting-based proxies for firms' investments in intangible assets, operating performance, and financial leverage. We also develop parsimonious, predominantly accounting-based, strictly out-of-sample (i.e., no hindsight) IPO failure forecasting models for each of the two sectors. We find that our forecasts are negatively associated with one-year post-IPO abnormal returns. A pseudo-hedge strategy of going short (long) in high (low) failure risk portfolios yields returns of economically significant magnitudes over the one-year horizon, and is robust to alternative returns methodologies. Further results suggest that IPO long-run returns anomalies may persist, but they take different forms for high-tech and nontech IPOs. Reprinted by permission of Blackwell Publishing</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2007.00237.x</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Accounting methods ; Failure ; Initial public offering ; Insider dealing ; Risk aversion ; Risk management ; Stock exchange</subject><ispartof>Journal of accounting research, 2007-05, Vol.45 (2), p.333-384</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,33203</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Demers, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joos, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wysocki, Peter D</creatorcontrib><title>IPO failure risk</title><title>Journal of accounting research</title><description>We explore the factors associated with historical IPO failures by developing an IPO failure prediction model that includes accounting information as well as proxies for the role of information intermediaries and other IPO deal-related characteristics. We document statistically significant differences in failure models applicable to nontech versus high tech IPOs, and these structural differences are largely driven by accounting-based proxies for firms' investments in intangible assets, operating performance, and financial leverage. We also develop parsimonious, predominantly accounting-based, strictly out-of-sample (i.e., no hindsight) IPO failure forecasting models for each of the two sectors. We find that our forecasts are negatively associated with one-year post-IPO abnormal returns. A pseudo-hedge strategy of going short (long) in high (low) failure risk portfolios yields returns of economically significant magnitudes over the one-year horizon, and is robust to alternative returns methodologies. Further results suggest that IPO long-run returns anomalies may persist, but they take different forms for high-tech and nontech IPOs. Reprinted by permission of Blackwell Publishing</description><subject>Accounting methods</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Initial public offering</subject><subject>Insider dealing</subject><subject>Risk aversion</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Stock exchange</subject><issn>0021-8456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYFAwNNAzBAL9LD1DE3NTXTNzywg9IwMDcz0DAyNjc70KFgZOIMtQ18LE1IyDgau4OMvAwMDS1NiQk0HAM8BfIS0xM6e0KFWhKLM4m4eBNS0xpziVF0pzM6i5uYY4e-gWFOUXlqYWl8TnZhYnp-bkJOal5pcWxxubmZmYmpsZGBOtEADYvzBb</recordid><startdate>20070501</startdate><enddate>20070501</enddate><creator>Demers, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Joos, Philip</creator><creator>Wysocki, Peter D</creator><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070501</creationdate><title>IPO failure risk</title><author>Demers, Elizabeth ; Joos, Philip ; Wysocki, Peter D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_366457603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Accounting methods</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Initial public offering</topic><topic>Insider dealing</topic><topic>Risk aversion</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Stock exchange</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Demers, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joos, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wysocki, Peter D</creatorcontrib><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of accounting research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Demers, Elizabeth</au><au>Joos, Philip</au><au>Wysocki, Peter D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>IPO failure risk</atitle><jtitle>Journal of accounting research</jtitle><date>2007-05-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>333</spage><epage>384</epage><pages>333-384</pages><issn>0021-8456</issn><abstract>We explore the factors associated with historical IPO failures by developing an IPO failure prediction model that includes accounting information as well as proxies for the role of information intermediaries and other IPO deal-related characteristics. We document statistically significant differences in failure models applicable to nontech versus high tech IPOs, and these structural differences are largely driven by accounting-based proxies for firms' investments in intangible assets, operating performance, and financial leverage. We also develop parsimonious, predominantly accounting-based, strictly out-of-sample (i.e., no hindsight) IPO failure forecasting models for each of the two sectors. We find that our forecasts are negatively associated with one-year post-IPO abnormal returns. A pseudo-hedge strategy of going short (long) in high (low) failure risk portfolios yields returns of economically significant magnitudes over the one-year horizon, and is robust to alternative returns methodologies. Further results suggest that IPO long-run returns anomalies may persist, but they take different forms for high-tech and nontech IPOs. Reprinted by permission of Blackwell Publishing</abstract><doi>10.1111/j.1475-679X.2007.00237.x</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8456 |
ispartof | Journal of accounting research, 2007-05, Vol.45 (2), p.333-384 |
issn | 0021-8456 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36645760 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; JSTOR Journals and Primary Sources |
subjects | Accounting methods Failure Initial public offering Insider dealing Risk aversion Risk management Stock exchange |
title | IPO failure risk |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T18%3A40%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=IPO%20failure%20risk&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20accounting%20research&rft.au=Demers,%20Elizabeth&rft.date=2007-05-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=333&rft.epage=384&rft.pages=333-384&rft.issn=0021-8456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2007.00237.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E36645760%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_366457603%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=36645760&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |