Loading…

Race, Paternalism, and "California Pastoral": Rural Rehabilitation and Mexican Labor in Greater Los Angeles

In Southern California, regional and national myths of agrarian life as pastoral became entwined with paternalistic policy and racialized visions of the Mexican laborer. Re-worked in the context of the New Deal and increasing strike activity across California after 1928, these rural myths and polici...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Agricultural history 2007-01, Vol.81 (1), p.1-35
Main Author: Lewthwaite, Stephanie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1194-77bd9ab995e43b92c2771c004605d0d7536a54317942fc02d8396267b41a6f83
container_end_page 35
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Agricultural history
container_volume 81
creator Lewthwaite, Stephanie
description In Southern California, regional and national myths of agrarian life as pastoral became entwined with paternalistic policy and racialized visions of the Mexican laborer. Re-worked in the context of the New Deal and increasing strike activity across California after 1928, these rural myths and policies shaped plans for the resettlement of Mexican-American workers in self-sustaining villages within Los Angeles County. Under the direction of government officials, reformers, and employers, these plans articulated diverse ideologies and agendas: the New Dealer's commitment to reform and rehabilitation through planning and paternalism, and the employer's drive to segregate and racialize labor under a pastoral ideal. Yet the village schemes foundered; weakened by employers' lack of commitment to worker welfare and fears of rural sedition, by the inconsistencies of the New Deal rehabilitation policy, and by an inability to manipulate the realities of agribusiness. This failure bore testimony to the mythic nature of an agrarian tradition in California.
doi_str_mv 10.1215/00021482-81.1.1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36665694</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4617798</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4617798</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1194-77bd9ab995e43b92c2771c004605d0d7536a54317942fc02d8396267b41a6f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkDFPwzAUhC0EEqUwszBYHZia1s927JitqqAgFYGq7paTOOCSxsVOJfj3JBQY0A1Pp_veDYfQJZAJUEinhBAKPKNJBpNOR2gAKWNJRhU5RoM-Tfr4FJ3FuOksUMIG6G1lCjvGz6a1oTG1i9sxNk2JR_POVD40znRhbH0w9egGr_bdxSv7anJXu9a0zjff_KP9cIVp8NLkPmDX4EWwfSde-ohnzYutbTxHJ5Wpo734uUO0vrtdz--T5dPiYT5bJgWA4omUealMrlRqOcsVLaiUUBDCBUlLUsqUCZNyBlJxWhWElhlTggqZczCiytgQXR9qd8G_721s9dbFwta1aazfR82EEKlQvANH_8CN3_crRA0qA6KE7NumB6gIPsZgK70LbmvCpwai--H17_A6A92p-7g6fGz62f5wLkBKlbEvpbB8JA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198109678</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Race, Paternalism, and "California Pastoral": Rural Rehabilitation and Mexican Labor in Greater Los Angeles</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Lewthwaite, Stephanie</creator><creatorcontrib>Lewthwaite, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><description>In Southern California, regional and national myths of agrarian life as pastoral became entwined with paternalistic policy and racialized visions of the Mexican laborer. Re-worked in the context of the New Deal and increasing strike activity across California after 1928, these rural myths and policies shaped plans for the resettlement of Mexican-American workers in self-sustaining villages within Los Angeles County. Under the direction of government officials, reformers, and employers, these plans articulated diverse ideologies and agendas: the New Dealer's commitment to reform and rehabilitation through planning and paternalism, and the employer's drive to segregate and racialize labor under a pastoral ideal. Yet the village schemes foundered; weakened by employers' lack of commitment to worker welfare and fears of rural sedition, by the inconsistencies of the New Deal rehabilitation policy, and by an inability to manipulate the realities of agribusiness. This failure bore testimony to the mythic nature of an agrarian tradition in California.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1482</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-8290</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1215/00021482-81.1.1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGHIAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Durham: University of California Press</publisher><subject>Agrarian society ; Agribusiness ; Agricultural land ; Agriculture ; California ; Contract labor ; Crops ; Employment ; Hispanic people ; Labor ; Labor shortages ; Los Angeles ; Mexicans ; Migrant workers ; Myth ; New Deal ; Pastoralism ; Paternalism ; Race ; Racial attitudes ; Rural areas ; Stereotypes ; U.S.A ; Urban agriculture ; Welfare ; Workers ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>Agricultural history, 2007-01, Vol.81 (1), p.1-35</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 Agricultural History Society</rights><rights>Copyright Agricultural History Society Winter 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1194-77bd9ab995e43b92c2771c004605d0d7536a54317942fc02d8396267b41a6f83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4617798$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4617798$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12847,27924,27925,33223,33224,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lewthwaite, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><title>Race, Paternalism, and "California Pastoral": Rural Rehabilitation and Mexican Labor in Greater Los Angeles</title><title>Agricultural history</title><description>In Southern California, regional and national myths of agrarian life as pastoral became entwined with paternalistic policy and racialized visions of the Mexican laborer. Re-worked in the context of the New Deal and increasing strike activity across California after 1928, these rural myths and policies shaped plans for the resettlement of Mexican-American workers in self-sustaining villages within Los Angeles County. Under the direction of government officials, reformers, and employers, these plans articulated diverse ideologies and agendas: the New Dealer's commitment to reform and rehabilitation through planning and paternalism, and the employer's drive to segregate and racialize labor under a pastoral ideal. Yet the village schemes foundered; weakened by employers' lack of commitment to worker welfare and fears of rural sedition, by the inconsistencies of the New Deal rehabilitation policy, and by an inability to manipulate the realities of agribusiness. This failure bore testimony to the mythic nature of an agrarian tradition in California.</description><subject>Agrarian society</subject><subject>Agribusiness</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Contract labor</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Hispanic people</subject><subject>Labor</subject><subject>Labor shortages</subject><subject>Los Angeles</subject><subject>Mexicans</subject><subject>Migrant workers</subject><subject>Myth</subject><subject>New Deal</subject><subject>Pastoralism</subject><subject>Paternalism</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Racial attitudes</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Stereotypes</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Urban agriculture</subject><subject>Welfare</subject><subject>Workers</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>0002-1482</issn><issn>1533-8290</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkDFPwzAUhC0EEqUwszBYHZia1s927JitqqAgFYGq7paTOOCSxsVOJfj3JBQY0A1Pp_veDYfQJZAJUEinhBAKPKNJBpNOR2gAKWNJRhU5RoM-Tfr4FJ3FuOksUMIG6G1lCjvGz6a1oTG1i9sxNk2JR_POVD40znRhbH0w9egGr_bdxSv7anJXu9a0zjff_KP9cIVp8NLkPmDX4EWwfSde-ohnzYutbTxHJ5Wpo734uUO0vrtdz--T5dPiYT5bJgWA4omUealMrlRqOcsVLaiUUBDCBUlLUsqUCZNyBlJxWhWElhlTggqZczCiytgQXR9qd8G_721s9dbFwta1aazfR82EEKlQvANH_8CN3_crRA0qA6KE7NumB6gIPsZgK70LbmvCpwai--H17_A6A92p-7g6fGz62f5wLkBKlbEvpbB8JA</recordid><startdate>20070101</startdate><enddate>20070101</enddate><creator>Lewthwaite, Stephanie</creator><general>University of California Press</general><general>Duke University Press, NC &amp; IL</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070101</creationdate><title>Race, Paternalism, and "California Pastoral": Rural Rehabilitation and Mexican Labor in Greater Los Angeles</title><author>Lewthwaite, Stephanie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1194-77bd9ab995e43b92c2771c004605d0d7536a54317942fc02d8396267b41a6f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Agrarian society</topic><topic>Agribusiness</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Contract labor</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Hispanic people</topic><topic>Labor</topic><topic>Labor shortages</topic><topic>Los Angeles</topic><topic>Mexicans</topic><topic>Migrant workers</topic><topic>Myth</topic><topic>New Deal</topic><topic>Pastoralism</topic><topic>Paternalism</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Racial attitudes</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Stereotypes</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Urban agriculture</topic><topic>Welfare</topic><topic>Workers</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lewthwaite, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Agricultural history</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lewthwaite, Stephanie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Race, Paternalism, and "California Pastoral": Rural Rehabilitation and Mexican Labor in Greater Los Angeles</atitle><jtitle>Agricultural history</jtitle><date>2007-01-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>35</epage><pages>1-35</pages><issn>0002-1482</issn><eissn>1533-8290</eissn><coden>AGHIAZ</coden><abstract>In Southern California, regional and national myths of agrarian life as pastoral became entwined with paternalistic policy and racialized visions of the Mexican laborer. Re-worked in the context of the New Deal and increasing strike activity across California after 1928, these rural myths and policies shaped plans for the resettlement of Mexican-American workers in self-sustaining villages within Los Angeles County. Under the direction of government officials, reformers, and employers, these plans articulated diverse ideologies and agendas: the New Dealer's commitment to reform and rehabilitation through planning and paternalism, and the employer's drive to segregate and racialize labor under a pastoral ideal. Yet the village schemes foundered; weakened by employers' lack of commitment to worker welfare and fears of rural sedition, by the inconsistencies of the New Deal rehabilitation policy, and by an inability to manipulate the realities of agribusiness. This failure bore testimony to the mythic nature of an agrarian tradition in California.</abstract><cop>Durham</cop><pub>University of California Press</pub><doi>10.1215/00021482-81.1.1</doi><tpages>35</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-1482
ispartof Agricultural history, 2007-01, Vol.81 (1), p.1-35
issn 0002-1482
1533-8290
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36665694
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Agrarian society
Agribusiness
Agricultural land
Agriculture
California
Contract labor
Crops
Employment
Hispanic people
Labor
Labor shortages
Los Angeles
Mexicans
Migrant workers
Myth
New Deal
Pastoralism
Paternalism
Race
Racial attitudes
Rural areas
Stereotypes
U.S.A
Urban agriculture
Welfare
Workers
Workforce
title Race, Paternalism, and "California Pastoral": Rural Rehabilitation and Mexican Labor in Greater Los Angeles
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T06%3A01%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Race,%20Paternalism,%20and%20%22California%20Pastoral%22:%20Rural%20Rehabilitation%20and%20Mexican%20Labor%20in%20Greater%20Los%20Angeles&rft.jtitle=Agricultural%20history&rft.au=Lewthwaite,%20Stephanie&rft.date=2007-01-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=35&rft.pages=1-35&rft.issn=0002-1482&rft.eissn=1533-8290&rft.coden=AGHIAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1215/00021482-81.1.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4617798%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1194-77bd9ab995e43b92c2771c004605d0d7536a54317942fc02d8396267b41a6f83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198109678&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4617798&rfr_iscdi=true