Loading…

Reevaluation of Energy Use in Wheat Production in the United States

Energy budgets for agricultural production can be used as building blocks for life‐cycle assessments that include agricultural products, and can also serve as a first step toward identifying crop production processes that benefit most from increased efficiency. A general trend toward increased energ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of industrial ecology 2006-01, Vol.10 (1-2), p.149-167
Main Authors: Piringer, Gerhard, Steinberg, Laura J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4229-fc4f7bbe81ea2b820f05c6d60595004ad7b110bbe52051ee86b924bccc1b807a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4229-fc4f7bbe81ea2b820f05c6d60595004ad7b110bbe52051ee86b924bccc1b807a3
container_end_page 167
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 149
container_title Journal of industrial ecology
container_volume 10
creator Piringer, Gerhard
Steinberg, Laura J.
description Energy budgets for agricultural production can be used as building blocks for life‐cycle assessments that include agricultural products, and can also serve as a first step toward identifying crop production processes that benefit most from increased efficiency. A general trend toward increased energy efficiency in U.S. agriculture has been reported. For wheat cultivation, in particular, this study updates cradle‐to‐gate process analyses produced in the seventies and eighties. Input quantities were obtained from official U.S. statistics and other sources and multiplied by calculated or recently published energy coefficients. The total energy input into the production of a kilogram of average U.S. wheat grain is estimated to range from 3.1 to 4.9 MJ/kg, with a best estimate at 3.9 MJ/kg. The dominant contribution is energy embodied in nitrogen fertilizer at 47% of the total energy input, followed by diesel fuel (25%), and smaller contributions such as energy embodied in seed grain, gasoline, electricity, and phosphorus fertilizer. This distribution is reflected in the energy carrier mix, with natural gas dominating (57%), followed by diesel fuel (30%). High variability in energy coefficients masks potential gains in total energy efficiency as compared to earlier, similar U.S. studies. Estimates from an input‐output model for several input processes agree well with process analysis results, but the model's application can be limited by aggregation issues: Total energy inputs for generic food grain production were lower than wheat fertilizer inputs alone, possibly due to aggregation of diverse products into the food grain sector.
doi_str_mv 10.1162/108819806775545420
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36691296</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>995227471</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4229-fc4f7bbe81ea2b820f05c6d60595004ad7b110bbe52051ee86b924bccc1b807a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0D1PxDAMBuAKgcTnH2CqGNgKdtokzYiq4_gSIODEGKU5FwqlhaQF7t-T4xADDDDFip7Xsh1F2wh7iILtI-Q5qhyElJxnPGOwFK0hTyFRTMFyqANI5mI1Wvf-AQBTwWAtKq6IXk0zmL7u2rir4lFL7m4WTzzFdRvf3pPp40vXTQf7KcJff0_xpK17msbXvenJb0YrlWk8bX29G9HkcHRTHCVnF-Pj4uAssRljKqlsVsmypBzJsDJnUAG3YiqAKw6QmaksESEAzoAjUS5KxbLSWotlDtKkG9Huou-z614G8r1-qr2lpjEtdYPXqRAKmRJ_QlSpYihVgDs_4EM3uDYsEUyWC8k4BsQWyLrOe0eVfnb1k3EzjaDn19e_rx9CchF6qxua_SOhT45HBWbzmZJFsvY9vX8njXvUQqaS69vzsT4Mex6pq1NdpB9dYZQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194867251</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reevaluation of Energy Use in Wheat Production in the United States</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Piringer, Gerhard ; Steinberg, Laura J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Piringer, Gerhard ; Steinberg, Laura J.</creatorcontrib><description>Energy budgets for agricultural production can be used as building blocks for life‐cycle assessments that include agricultural products, and can also serve as a first step toward identifying crop production processes that benefit most from increased efficiency. A general trend toward increased energy efficiency in U.S. agriculture has been reported. For wheat cultivation, in particular, this study updates cradle‐to‐gate process analyses produced in the seventies and eighties. Input quantities were obtained from official U.S. statistics and other sources and multiplied by calculated or recently published energy coefficients. The total energy input into the production of a kilogram of average U.S. wheat grain is estimated to range from 3.1 to 4.9 MJ/kg, with a best estimate at 3.9 MJ/kg. The dominant contribution is energy embodied in nitrogen fertilizer at 47% of the total energy input, followed by diesel fuel (25%), and smaller contributions such as energy embodied in seed grain, gasoline, electricity, and phosphorus fertilizer. This distribution is reflected in the energy carrier mix, with natural gas dominating (57%), followed by diesel fuel (30%). High variability in energy coefficients masks potential gains in total energy efficiency as compared to earlier, similar U.S. studies. Estimates from an input‐output model for several input processes agree well with process analysis results, but the model's application can be limited by aggregation issues: Total energy inputs for generic food grain production were lower than wheat fertilizer inputs alone, possibly due to aggregation of diverse products into the food grain sector.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1088-1980</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-9290</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1162/108819806775545420</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>238 Main St., Suite 500, Cambridge, MA 02142-1046 USA: MIT Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; carrier mix ; Economic models ; Efficiency ; Energy ; energy balance ; Energy efficiency ; Energy resources ; Environment ; Fuels ; grain ; input-output model ; Life cycles ; process analysis ; Statistics ; Studies ; Triticum aestivum ; U.S.A ; Wheat</subject><ispartof>Journal of industrial ecology, 2006-01, Vol.10 (1-2), p.149-167</ispartof><rights>Copyright MIT Press Journals Winter/Spring 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4229-fc4f7bbe81ea2b820f05c6d60595004ad7b110bbe52051ee86b924bccc1b807a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4229-fc4f7bbe81ea2b820f05c6d60595004ad7b110bbe52051ee86b924bccc1b807a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,33222,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Piringer, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinberg, Laura J.</creatorcontrib><title>Reevaluation of Energy Use in Wheat Production in the United States</title><title>Journal of industrial ecology</title><description>Energy budgets for agricultural production can be used as building blocks for life‐cycle assessments that include agricultural products, and can also serve as a first step toward identifying crop production processes that benefit most from increased efficiency. A general trend toward increased energy efficiency in U.S. agriculture has been reported. For wheat cultivation, in particular, this study updates cradle‐to‐gate process analyses produced in the seventies and eighties. Input quantities were obtained from official U.S. statistics and other sources and multiplied by calculated or recently published energy coefficients. The total energy input into the production of a kilogram of average U.S. wheat grain is estimated to range from 3.1 to 4.9 MJ/kg, with a best estimate at 3.9 MJ/kg. The dominant contribution is energy embodied in nitrogen fertilizer at 47% of the total energy input, followed by diesel fuel (25%), and smaller contributions such as energy embodied in seed grain, gasoline, electricity, and phosphorus fertilizer. This distribution is reflected in the energy carrier mix, with natural gas dominating (57%), followed by diesel fuel (30%). High variability in energy coefficients masks potential gains in total energy efficiency as compared to earlier, similar U.S. studies. Estimates from an input‐output model for several input processes agree well with process analysis results, but the model's application can be limited by aggregation issues: Total energy inputs for generic food grain production were lower than wheat fertilizer inputs alone, possibly due to aggregation of diverse products into the food grain sector.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>carrier mix</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>energy balance</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Energy resources</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Fuels</subject><subject>grain</subject><subject>input-output model</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>process analysis</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Triticum aestivum</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><issn>1088-1980</issn><issn>1530-9290</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0D1PxDAMBuAKgcTnH2CqGNgKdtokzYiq4_gSIODEGKU5FwqlhaQF7t-T4xADDDDFip7Xsh1F2wh7iILtI-Q5qhyElJxnPGOwFK0hTyFRTMFyqANI5mI1Wvf-AQBTwWAtKq6IXk0zmL7u2rir4lFL7m4WTzzFdRvf3pPp40vXTQf7KcJff0_xpK17msbXvenJb0YrlWk8bX29G9HkcHRTHCVnF-Pj4uAssRljKqlsVsmypBzJsDJnUAG3YiqAKw6QmaksESEAzoAjUS5KxbLSWotlDtKkG9Huou-z614G8r1-qr2lpjEtdYPXqRAKmRJ_QlSpYihVgDs_4EM3uDYsEUyWC8k4BsQWyLrOe0eVfnb1k3EzjaDn19e_rx9CchF6qxua_SOhT45HBWbzmZJFsvY9vX8njXvUQqaS69vzsT4Mex6pq1NdpB9dYZQA</recordid><startdate>200601</startdate><enddate>200601</enddate><creator>Piringer, Gerhard</creator><creator>Steinberg, Laura J.</creator><general>MIT Press</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200601</creationdate><title>Reevaluation of Energy Use in Wheat Production in the United States</title><author>Piringer, Gerhard ; Steinberg, Laura J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4229-fc4f7bbe81ea2b820f05c6d60595004ad7b110bbe52051ee86b924bccc1b807a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>carrier mix</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>energy balance</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Energy resources</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Fuels</topic><topic>grain</topic><topic>input-output model</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>process analysis</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Triticum aestivum</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Piringer, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinberg, Laura J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of industrial ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Piringer, Gerhard</au><au>Steinberg, Laura J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reevaluation of Energy Use in Wheat Production in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Journal of industrial ecology</jtitle><date>2006-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>149</spage><epage>167</epage><pages>149-167</pages><issn>1088-1980</issn><eissn>1530-9290</eissn><abstract>Energy budgets for agricultural production can be used as building blocks for life‐cycle assessments that include agricultural products, and can also serve as a first step toward identifying crop production processes that benefit most from increased efficiency. A general trend toward increased energy efficiency in U.S. agriculture has been reported. For wheat cultivation, in particular, this study updates cradle‐to‐gate process analyses produced in the seventies and eighties. Input quantities were obtained from official U.S. statistics and other sources and multiplied by calculated or recently published energy coefficients. The total energy input into the production of a kilogram of average U.S. wheat grain is estimated to range from 3.1 to 4.9 MJ/kg, with a best estimate at 3.9 MJ/kg. The dominant contribution is energy embodied in nitrogen fertilizer at 47% of the total energy input, followed by diesel fuel (25%), and smaller contributions such as energy embodied in seed grain, gasoline, electricity, and phosphorus fertilizer. This distribution is reflected in the energy carrier mix, with natural gas dominating (57%), followed by diesel fuel (30%). High variability in energy coefficients masks potential gains in total energy efficiency as compared to earlier, similar U.S. studies. Estimates from an input‐output model for several input processes agree well with process analysis results, but the model's application can be limited by aggregation issues: Total energy inputs for generic food grain production were lower than wheat fertilizer inputs alone, possibly due to aggregation of diverse products into the food grain sector.</abstract><cop>238 Main St., Suite 500, Cambridge, MA 02142-1046 USA</cop><pub>MIT Press</pub><doi>10.1162/108819806775545420</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1088-1980
ispartof Journal of industrial ecology, 2006-01, Vol.10 (1-2), p.149-167
issn 1088-1980
1530-9290
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36691296
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Agricultural production
Agriculture
carrier mix
Economic models
Efficiency
Energy
energy balance
Energy efficiency
Energy resources
Environment
Fuels
grain
input-output model
Life cycles
process analysis
Statistics
Studies
Triticum aestivum
U.S.A
Wheat
title Reevaluation of Energy Use in Wheat Production in the United States
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T04%3A20%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reevaluation%20of%20Energy%20Use%20in%20Wheat%20Production%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20industrial%20ecology&rft.au=Piringer,%20Gerhard&rft.date=2006-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=167&rft.pages=149-167&rft.issn=1088-1980&rft.eissn=1530-9290&rft_id=info:doi/10.1162/108819806775545420&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E995227471%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4229-fc4f7bbe81ea2b820f05c6d60595004ad7b110bbe52051ee86b924bccc1b807a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194867251&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true