The Structure of Social Capital: An Austrian Perspective on its Nature and Development

As the literature on social capital has emerged over the past two decades, both advocates and critics of the concept have grappled with the question 'what is the nature of "social capital?"'. By viewing this question through the lens of Austrian capital theory (particularly under...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Review of political economy 2008-01, Vol.20 (1), p.41-58
Main Author: Chamlee-Wright, Emily
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Austria
Capital accumulation
Cultural Capital
Development
Economic growth
Growth theory
Human capital
Social capital
Social entrepreneurship
Social Networks
Studies
Theories
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:As the literature on social capital has emerged over the past two decades, both advocates and critics of the concept have grappled with the question 'what is the nature of "social capital?"'. By viewing this question through the lens of Austrian capital theory (particularly under Lachmann's influence) we can understand social capital as being structural in nature, made up of heterogeneous and often complementary elements. This way of thinking about social capital opens the door for understanding the role of the 'social entrepreneur' as discovering new combinations within the social capital structure. By carving out a role for the change agent, we see social capital development as a process of social learning that extends the cognitive reach of individuals beyond what they can know directly. An Austrian approach to social capital advances the theoretical debate by linking the literature on network analysis (in which the focus is on individualistic accumulation of social capital) and broader questions of social capital embedded within community-wide norms. Further, an Austrian understanding of social capital informs policy debates, such as the question of whether social capital development can be, or needs to be, part of a deliberate development strategy.
ISSN:0953-8259
1465-3982
DOI:10.1080/09538250701661806