Loading…
The Study of Islamic Culture and Politics: An Overview and Assessment
Among the four major world cultural traditions-Confucianism, Hinduism, Islam, and Christianity-Islam appears to have the most pervasive role in contemporary politics. The vast and varied spectrum of the scholarly works that have addressed this distinctive phenomenon started with a tradition that pre...
Saved in:
Published in: | Annual review of sociology 2002-01, Vol.28 (1), p.359-386 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-fb2e2348ffede3258809a50e53d9915e039321a514998c62fcc5ad4fcd9f27b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-fb2e2348ffede3258809a50e53d9915e039321a514998c62fcc5ad4fcd9f27b3 |
container_end_page | 386 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 359 |
container_title | Annual review of sociology |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Moaddel, Mansoor |
description | Among the four major world cultural traditions-Confucianism, Hinduism, Islam, and Christianity-Islam appears to have the most pervasive role in contemporary politics. The vast and varied spectrum of the scholarly works that have addressed this distinctive phenomenon started with a tradition that presumed a conflict between Islam and political modernity, while noting the centrality and universality of the faith for Muslims. This conception runs contrary to the admission of the reality of secular politics in historical Islam. If there is, on the contrary, a congruity between Islam and modernity, one still needs to provide an account of the speecificity of Muslim politics. Addressing this issue, another tradition stressed that because of its very survival into the modern era, the great Islamic tradition can play a significant role in political modernization and nation building. While this argument may be true in the cases of the historical experiences of a number of Islamic countries in the early twentieth century, it is not consistent with the overly transnational and other worldly objectives of radical Islamism of late. A third tradition opted for the analysis of the macro social processes in order to account for the rise of political Islam, while a fourth focused on the micro processes of the objectification of religion and the fragmentation of religious authority to explain Muslim politics. These explanations, however, would be incomplete without a serious assessment of the role of the rentier economy in the rise of Muslim exceptionalism. Following a critical assessment of the extant literature, this essay makes several suggestions for future research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.140928 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36804508</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A92528470</galeid><jstor_id>3069246</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A92528470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-fb2e2348ffede3258809a50e53d9915e039321a514998c62fcc5ad4fcd9f27b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkV1rFDEUhgdRcK3-Ay8GUa-c9eRrJhFvlqXVQqGCex_SzEnNkk1qMrPSf290lgpScnHgnCcvyXma5i2BNSG8_2hinDMe1yXZNZW1Bz2QNeGgqHzSrIjgoqOEiKfNClgPHYiBPm9elLIHACKArprz3Q9sv0_zeN8m116WYA7etts5TDW5NXFsv6XgJ2_Lp3YT2-sj5qPHX38nm1KwlAPG6WXzzJlQ8NWpnjW7i_Pd9mt3df3lcru56iznaurcDUXKuHQOR2RUSAnKCEDBRqWIQGCKUWIE4UpJ21NnrTAjd3ZUjg437Kx5v8Te5fRzxjLpgy8WQzAR01w06yVwAbKCb_4D92nOsT5NE6UG2stBVejDAt2agNpHl6Zs7C1GzCakiM7X9kZRQSUfoOLdI3g9I9aVPcZ_XnibUykZnb7L_mDyvSag_-jTJ3266tNU6kWfXvTV6-9OXzDFmuCyidaXfxlMDpRLVrnXC7cvU8oPcwa9orxnvwElV6ZL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199726879</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Study of Islamic Culture and Politics: An Overview and Assessment</title><source>Criminology Collection</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Annual Reviews Complete A-Z List</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Moaddel, Mansoor</creator><creatorcontrib>Moaddel, Mansoor</creatorcontrib><description>Among the four major world cultural traditions-Confucianism, Hinduism, Islam, and Christianity-Islam appears to have the most pervasive role in contemporary politics. The vast and varied spectrum of the scholarly works that have addressed this distinctive phenomenon started with a tradition that presumed a conflict between Islam and political modernity, while noting the centrality and universality of the faith for Muslims. This conception runs contrary to the admission of the reality of secular politics in historical Islam. If there is, on the contrary, a congruity between Islam and modernity, one still needs to provide an account of the speecificity of Muslim politics. Addressing this issue, another tradition stressed that because of its very survival into the modern era, the great Islamic tradition can play a significant role in political modernization and nation building. While this argument may be true in the cases of the historical experiences of a number of Islamic countries in the early twentieth century, it is not consistent with the overly transnational and other worldly objectives of radical Islamism of late. A third tradition opted for the analysis of the macro social processes in order to account for the rise of political Islam, while a fourth focused on the micro processes of the objectification of religion and the fragmentation of religious authority to explain Muslim politics. These explanations, however, would be incomplete without a serious assessment of the role of the rentier economy in the rise of Muslim exceptionalism. Following a critical assessment of the extant literature, this essay makes several suggestions for future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-0572</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-2115</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.140928</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARVSDB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews</publisher><subject>19th century ; 20th century ; Analysis ; Authoritarianism ; Culture ; Democracy ; Fundamentalism ; Historiography ; Islam ; Islam and politics ; Islamic countries ; Islamic culture ; Islamic studies ; Islamism ; Middle East ; Modernity ; Muslims ; Political aspects ; Political conflict ; Political movements ; Political structures ; Politics ; Radicalism ; Religion ; Religious fundamentalism ; Secularization ; Social aspects ; Sociology ; Sociology of religion ; Traditions</subject><ispartof>Annual review of sociology, 2002-01, Vol.28 (1), p.359-386</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2002 Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, California USA</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2002 Annual Reviews, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Annual Reviews, Inc. 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-fb2e2348ffede3258809a50e53d9915e039321a514998c62fcc5ad4fcd9f27b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-fb2e2348ffede3258809a50e53d9915e039321a514998c62fcc5ad4fcd9f27b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/199726879/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/199726879?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4182,11688,12847,21376,21394,21395,27344,27924,27925,33223,33224,33611,33612,33769,33770,33774,34530,34531,36060,36061,43733,43814,44115,44363,58238,58471,74221,74310,74639,74895</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13872483$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moaddel, Mansoor</creatorcontrib><title>The Study of Islamic Culture and Politics: An Overview and Assessment</title><title>Annual review of sociology</title><description>Among the four major world cultural traditions-Confucianism, Hinduism, Islam, and Christianity-Islam appears to have the most pervasive role in contemporary politics. The vast and varied spectrum of the scholarly works that have addressed this distinctive phenomenon started with a tradition that presumed a conflict between Islam and political modernity, while noting the centrality and universality of the faith for Muslims. This conception runs contrary to the admission of the reality of secular politics in historical Islam. If there is, on the contrary, a congruity between Islam and modernity, one still needs to provide an account of the speecificity of Muslim politics. Addressing this issue, another tradition stressed that because of its very survival into the modern era, the great Islamic tradition can play a significant role in political modernization and nation building. While this argument may be true in the cases of the historical experiences of a number of Islamic countries in the early twentieth century, it is not consistent with the overly transnational and other worldly objectives of radical Islamism of late. A third tradition opted for the analysis of the macro social processes in order to account for the rise of political Islam, while a fourth focused on the micro processes of the objectification of religion and the fragmentation of religious authority to explain Muslim politics. These explanations, however, would be incomplete without a serious assessment of the role of the rentier economy in the rise of Muslim exceptionalism. Following a critical assessment of the extant literature, this essay makes several suggestions for future research.</description><subject>19th century</subject><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Authoritarianism</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Fundamentalism</subject><subject>Historiography</subject><subject>Islam</subject><subject>Islam and politics</subject><subject>Islamic countries</subject><subject>Islamic culture</subject><subject>Islamic studies</subject><subject>Islamism</subject><subject>Middle East</subject><subject>Modernity</subject><subject>Muslims</subject><subject>Political aspects</subject><subject>Political conflict</subject><subject>Political movements</subject><subject>Political structures</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Radicalism</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religious fundamentalism</subject><subject>Secularization</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sociology of religion</subject><subject>Traditions</subject><issn>0360-0572</issn><issn>1545-2115</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BGRYB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M0O</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNptkV1rFDEUhgdRcK3-Ay8GUa-c9eRrJhFvlqXVQqGCex_SzEnNkk1qMrPSf290lgpScnHgnCcvyXma5i2BNSG8_2hinDMe1yXZNZW1Bz2QNeGgqHzSrIjgoqOEiKfNClgPHYiBPm9elLIHACKArprz3Q9sv0_zeN8m116WYA7etts5TDW5NXFsv6XgJ2_Lp3YT2-sj5qPHX38nm1KwlAPG6WXzzJlQ8NWpnjW7i_Pd9mt3df3lcru56iznaurcDUXKuHQOR2RUSAnKCEDBRqWIQGCKUWIE4UpJ21NnrTAjd3ZUjg437Kx5v8Te5fRzxjLpgy8WQzAR01w06yVwAbKCb_4D92nOsT5NE6UG2stBVejDAt2agNpHl6Zs7C1GzCakiM7X9kZRQSUfoOLdI3g9I9aVPcZ_XnibUykZnb7L_mDyvSag_-jTJ3266tNU6kWfXvTV6-9OXzDFmuCyidaXfxlMDpRLVrnXC7cvU8oPcwa9orxnvwElV6ZL</recordid><startdate>20020101</startdate><enddate>20020101</enddate><creator>Moaddel, Mansoor</creator><general>Annual Reviews</general><general>Annual reviews</general><general>Annual Reviews, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020101</creationdate><title>The Study of Islamic Culture and Politics: An Overview and Assessment</title><author>Moaddel, Mansoor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-fb2e2348ffede3258809a50e53d9915e039321a514998c62fcc5ad4fcd9f27b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>19th century</topic><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Authoritarianism</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Fundamentalism</topic><topic>Historiography</topic><topic>Islam</topic><topic>Islam and politics</topic><topic>Islamic countries</topic><topic>Islamic culture</topic><topic>Islamic studies</topic><topic>Islamism</topic><topic>Middle East</topic><topic>Modernity</topic><topic>Muslims</topic><topic>Political aspects</topic><topic>Political conflict</topic><topic>Political movements</topic><topic>Political structures</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Radicalism</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religious fundamentalism</topic><topic>Secularization</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sociology of religion</topic><topic>Traditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moaddel, Mansoor</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Annual review of sociology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moaddel, Mansoor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Study of Islamic Culture and Politics: An Overview and Assessment</atitle><jtitle>Annual review of sociology</jtitle><date>2002-01-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>359</spage><epage>386</epage><pages>359-386</pages><issn>0360-0572</issn><eissn>1545-2115</eissn><coden>ARVSDB</coden><abstract>Among the four major world cultural traditions-Confucianism, Hinduism, Islam, and Christianity-Islam appears to have the most pervasive role in contemporary politics. The vast and varied spectrum of the scholarly works that have addressed this distinctive phenomenon started with a tradition that presumed a conflict between Islam and political modernity, while noting the centrality and universality of the faith for Muslims. This conception runs contrary to the admission of the reality of secular politics in historical Islam. If there is, on the contrary, a congruity between Islam and modernity, one still needs to provide an account of the speecificity of Muslim politics. Addressing this issue, another tradition stressed that because of its very survival into the modern era, the great Islamic tradition can play a significant role in political modernization and nation building. While this argument may be true in the cases of the historical experiences of a number of Islamic countries in the early twentieth century, it is not consistent with the overly transnational and other worldly objectives of radical Islamism of late. A third tradition opted for the analysis of the macro social processes in order to account for the rise of political Islam, while a fourth focused on the micro processes of the objectification of religion and the fragmentation of religious authority to explain Muslim politics. These explanations, however, would be incomplete without a serious assessment of the role of the rentier economy in the rise of Muslim exceptionalism. Following a critical assessment of the extant literature, this essay makes several suggestions for future research.</abstract><cop>Palo Alto, CA</cop><pub>Annual Reviews</pub><doi>10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.140928</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-0572 |
ispartof | Annual review of sociology, 2002-01, Vol.28 (1), p.359-386 |
issn | 0360-0572 1545-2115 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36804508 |
source | Criminology Collection; EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Annual Reviews Complete A-Z List; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Sociology Collection; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | 19th century 20th century Analysis Authoritarianism Culture Democracy Fundamentalism Historiography Islam Islam and politics Islamic countries Islamic culture Islamic studies Islamism Middle East Modernity Muslims Political aspects Political conflict Political movements Political structures Politics Radicalism Religion Religious fundamentalism Secularization Social aspects Sociology Sociology of religion Traditions |
title | The Study of Islamic Culture and Politics: An Overview and Assessment |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T05%3A36%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Study%20of%20Islamic%20Culture%20and%20Politics:%20An%20Overview%20and%20Assessment&rft.jtitle=Annual%20review%20of%20sociology&rft.au=Moaddel,%20Mansoor&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=359&rft.epage=386&rft.pages=359-386&rft.issn=0360-0572&rft.eissn=1545-2115&rft.coden=ARVSDB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.140928&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA92528470%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-fb2e2348ffede3258809a50e53d9915e039321a514998c62fcc5ad4fcd9f27b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199726879&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A92528470&rft_jstor_id=3069246&rfr_iscdi=true |