Expertise and Scientific Uncertainty: Understanding Trust Amongst Professional Stakeholders in Environment and Health

There is a substantial literature on notions of public trust in relation to risks from environmental and technological hazards. Rather less work has sought to explore trust in terms of professional interstakeholder relations in this context. Drawing on a case study for northern England, we consider...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environment and planning. A 2008-03, Vol.40 (3), p.696-714
Main Authors: Dunn, Christine E, Crowley, Philip, Bush, Judith, Pless-Mulloli, Tanja, McKinney, Patricia A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Case studies
Empirical research
Employees
England
Environment
Health
Science
Trust
United Kingdom
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:There is a substantial literature on notions of public trust in relation to risks from environmental and technological hazards. Rather less work has sought to explore trust in terms of professional interstakeholder relations in this context. Drawing on a case study for northern England, we consider dimensions of trust amongst those with a ‘professional’ involvement in the arena of environmental hazards and public health. We explore specifically the interrelated themes of scientific uncertainty and expertise, which were central to the shaping of trust relations. Against a background of indeterminacy in the scientific search for causality in environment–health relationships, the empirical work on which the paper is based is also set in a context of change and insecurity in organisational terms. The notion of ‘independence’ was brought into question through aspects of role demarcation while concerns about levels of expertise were superimposed with a sense of exclusion of community groups from ‘official’ environment–health debates. We argue that a simple deficit approach was being adopted on the part of salaried professionals towards community involvement in such debates.
ISSN:0308-518X
1472-3409
DOI:10.1068/a3993