The effect of the London congestion charge on road casualties: an intervention analysis

• Published in: Transportation (Dordrecht) 2008-01, Vol.35 (1), p.73-91
• Main Authors: Noland, Robert B., Quddus, Mohammed A., Ochieng, Washington Y.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Applied sciences; Bicycling; Casualties; Cities; Congestion; Congestion charging; Economic Geography; Economics; Economics and Finance; Engineering Economics; England; Exact sciences and technology; Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction; Impact analysis; Injuries; Innovation/Technology Management; Intervention; Intervention analysis; Logistics; London; Marketing; Mortality; Motorcycles; Negative binomial; Organization; Payment systems; Pedestrians; Regional/Spatial Science; Road traffic; Road transportation and traffic; Roads & highways; Speed limits; Statistical analysis; Studies; Time series; Traffic accidents; Traffic accidents & safety; Traffic casualties; Traffic congestion; Transportation planning; Transportation planning, management and economics; Trends; United Kingdom; Urban areas
• ISSN: 0049-4488; 1572-9435
• DOI: 10.1007/s11116-007-9133-9

The introduction of the congestion charge in central London on the 17th of February, 2003, led to a reduction in congestion. One factor that has not been fully analysed is the impact of the congestion charge on traffic casualties in London. Less car travel within the charging zone may result in fewer traffic collisions, however, as the number of pedestrians, cyclists, and motorcyclists increased after the introduction of the congestion charge, the number of traffic casualties associated with these groups may also have increased. Reductions in congestion can also lead to faster speeds. Therefore, there could be increases in injury severity for those crashes that do occur. An intervention analysis was conducted to investigate the effect of the congestion charge on traffic casualties for motorists, pedestrians, cyclists, and motorcyclists, both within the charging zone and in areas of London outside the zone. This was done for killed and serious injuries (known as KSI in British terminology) and for slight injuries to examine whether there were any shifts in severity outcomes. Our results suggest no statistically significant effect for total casualties in London, but within the charging zone there has been a statistically significant drop in motorist casualties, and possibly an increase in cyclist casualties. There is an associated effect of an increase in casualties of motorcyclists and cyclists in some areas outside the charging zone, suggesting that changes in the design of the congestion charge may be needed to achieve reductions in casualties.