Loading…

Interpreting sustainable development and societal utility in Norwegian GMO assessments

This article examines the process of assessing applications for genetically modified (GM) crops or plants for import or commercial planting in Norway. GMO legislation in Norway is closely linked to the EU through the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA), to which Norway is a party. A centra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European environment 2008-07, Vol.18 (4), p.243-256
Main Author: Rosendal, G. Kristin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3613-f2ba69f86d4bc679d90f193e521a6581a1add0b23f1fc2f02c5d903ffd49d2a63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3613-f2ba69f86d4bc679d90f193e521a6581a1add0b23f1fc2f02c5d903ffd49d2a63
container_end_page 256
container_issue 4
container_start_page 243
container_title European environment
container_volume 18
creator Rosendal, G. Kristin
description This article examines the process of assessing applications for genetically modified (GM) crops or plants for import or commercial planting in Norway. GMO legislation in Norway is closely linked to the EU through the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA), to which Norway is a party. A central difference with the EU processes emanates from specific clauses in the Norwegian Gene Technology Act on ‘sustainable development’ and ‘societal utility’, which provide a potentially wider leverage for Norwegian authorities to turn down the applications. Research material indicates evidence of an increasingly restrictive practice in the Norwegian evaluations, raising the question of how this can be explained in the face of increasing global acceptance of GMOs. A related question is to what extent and how this result is affected by the trends in the EU. An increasingly restrictive practice may be explained by changes in the access structure to the evaluating body, or it may be due to learning and a growing acceptance of the precautionary principle in this sector. Third, a higher number of rejections may largely be associated with the interest structure pertaining to GMOs in Norway. Final decisions are pending and there are uncertainties concerning how Norwegian authorities will apply the specific criteria of the Gene Technology Act. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/eet.483
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36978345</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>36978345</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3613-f2ba69f86d4bc679d90f193e521a6581a1add0b23f1fc2f02c5d903ffd49d2a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c1O3DAUBWALtRJTingFiwVdVKH-ixMvKzQdEBSQGNql5UmukWnGGXyd0nn7ZpSqCyTE6m6-e6SjQ8gRZ6ecMfEFIJ-qWu6RGWfGFMxU-h2ZMaN5wRQr98kHxEfGmCy5mpEfFzFD2iTIIT5QHDC7EN2qA9rCb-j6zRpipi62FPsmQHYdHXLoQt7SEOl1n57hIbhIF99vqEMExN0DfiTvvesQDv_dA3L_bb48Oy-ubhYXZ1-vikZqLgsvVk4bX-tWrRpdmdYwz42EUnCny5o77tqWrYT03DfCM9GUI5Het8q0wml5QE6m3E3qnwbAbNcBG-g6F6Ef0Eptqlqq8m2oZMWV2SUev4CP_ZDiWMIKzoUulalH9GlCTeoRE3i7SWHt0tZyZncr2HEFO64wys-TfA4dbF9jdj5fTrqYdMAMf_5rl35ZXcmqtD-vF3bJL8_vLk1tb-VfcU6X6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211265498</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interpreting sustainable development and societal utility in Norwegian GMO assessments</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Rosendal, G. Kristin</creator><creatorcontrib>Rosendal, G. Kristin</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines the process of assessing applications for genetically modified (GM) crops or plants for import or commercial planting in Norway. GMO legislation in Norway is closely linked to the EU through the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA), to which Norway is a party. A central difference with the EU processes emanates from specific clauses in the Norwegian Gene Technology Act on ‘sustainable development’ and ‘societal utility’, which provide a potentially wider leverage for Norwegian authorities to turn down the applications. Research material indicates evidence of an increasingly restrictive practice in the Norwegian evaluations, raising the question of how this can be explained in the face of increasing global acceptance of GMOs. A related question is to what extent and how this result is affected by the trends in the EU. An increasingly restrictive practice may be explained by changes in the access structure to the evaluating body, or it may be due to learning and a growing acceptance of the precautionary principle in this sector. Third, a higher number of rejections may largely be associated with the interest structure pertaining to GMOs in Norway. Final decisions are pending and there are uncertainties concerning how Norwegian authorities will apply the specific criteria of the Gene Technology Act. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0961-0405</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1756-932X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0976</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-9338</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/eet.483</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>assessments ; biotechnology regulation ; comparative public policy ; Crops ; Data analysis ; Environment ; environmental policy ; European Union ; Genetically altered foods ; Genetically modified organisms ; Legislation ; Norway ; Precautionary principle ; Social utility ; Studies ; Sustainable development</subject><ispartof>European environment, 2008-07, Vol.18 (4), p.243-256</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd. and ERP Environment</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Periodicals Inc. Jul/Aug 2008</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3613-f2ba69f86d4bc679d90f193e521a6581a1add0b23f1fc2f02c5d903ffd49d2a63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3613-f2ba69f86d4bc679d90f193e521a6581a1add0b23f1fc2f02c5d903ffd49d2a63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,33223,33224</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rosendal, G. Kristin</creatorcontrib><title>Interpreting sustainable development and societal utility in Norwegian GMO assessments</title><title>European environment</title><addtitle>Eur. Env</addtitle><description>This article examines the process of assessing applications for genetically modified (GM) crops or plants for import or commercial planting in Norway. GMO legislation in Norway is closely linked to the EU through the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA), to which Norway is a party. A central difference with the EU processes emanates from specific clauses in the Norwegian Gene Technology Act on ‘sustainable development’ and ‘societal utility’, which provide a potentially wider leverage for Norwegian authorities to turn down the applications. Research material indicates evidence of an increasingly restrictive practice in the Norwegian evaluations, raising the question of how this can be explained in the face of increasing global acceptance of GMOs. A related question is to what extent and how this result is affected by the trends in the EU. An increasingly restrictive practice may be explained by changes in the access structure to the evaluating body, or it may be due to learning and a growing acceptance of the precautionary principle in this sector. Third, a higher number of rejections may largely be associated with the interest structure pertaining to GMOs in Norway. Final decisions are pending and there are uncertainties concerning how Norwegian authorities will apply the specific criteria of the Gene Technology Act. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.</description><subject>assessments</subject><subject>biotechnology regulation</subject><subject>comparative public policy</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>environmental policy</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Genetically altered foods</subject><subject>Genetically modified organisms</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Norway</subject><subject>Precautionary principle</subject><subject>Social utility</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><issn>0961-0405</issn><issn>1756-932X</issn><issn>1099-0976</issn><issn>1756-9338</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c1O3DAUBWALtRJTingFiwVdVKH-ixMvKzQdEBSQGNql5UmukWnGGXyd0nn7ZpSqCyTE6m6-e6SjQ8gRZ6ecMfEFIJ-qWu6RGWfGFMxU-h2ZMaN5wRQr98kHxEfGmCy5mpEfFzFD2iTIIT5QHDC7EN2qA9rCb-j6zRpipi62FPsmQHYdHXLoQt7SEOl1n57hIbhIF99vqEMExN0DfiTvvesQDv_dA3L_bb48Oy-ubhYXZ1-vikZqLgsvVk4bX-tWrRpdmdYwz42EUnCny5o77tqWrYT03DfCM9GUI5Het8q0wml5QE6m3E3qnwbAbNcBG-g6F6Ef0Eptqlqq8m2oZMWV2SUev4CP_ZDiWMIKzoUulalH9GlCTeoRE3i7SWHt0tZyZncr2HEFO64wys-TfA4dbF9jdj5fTrqYdMAMf_5rl35ZXcmqtD-vF3bJL8_vLk1tb-VfcU6X6Q</recordid><startdate>200807</startdate><enddate>200807</enddate><creator>Rosendal, G. Kristin</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200807</creationdate><title>Interpreting sustainable development and societal utility in Norwegian GMO assessments</title><author>Rosendal, G. Kristin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3613-f2ba69f86d4bc679d90f193e521a6581a1add0b23f1fc2f02c5d903ffd49d2a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>assessments</topic><topic>biotechnology regulation</topic><topic>comparative public policy</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>environmental policy</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Genetically altered foods</topic><topic>Genetically modified organisms</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Norway</topic><topic>Precautionary principle</topic><topic>Social utility</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosendal, G. Kristin</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>European environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosendal, G. Kristin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interpreting sustainable development and societal utility in Norwegian GMO assessments</atitle><jtitle>European environment</jtitle><addtitle>Eur. Env</addtitle><date>2008-07</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>243</spage><epage>256</epage><pages>243-256</pages><issn>0961-0405</issn><issn>1756-932X</issn><eissn>1099-0976</eissn><eissn>1756-9338</eissn><abstract>This article examines the process of assessing applications for genetically modified (GM) crops or plants for import or commercial planting in Norway. GMO legislation in Norway is closely linked to the EU through the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA), to which Norway is a party. A central difference with the EU processes emanates from specific clauses in the Norwegian Gene Technology Act on ‘sustainable development’ and ‘societal utility’, which provide a potentially wider leverage for Norwegian authorities to turn down the applications. Research material indicates evidence of an increasingly restrictive practice in the Norwegian evaluations, raising the question of how this can be explained in the face of increasing global acceptance of GMOs. A related question is to what extent and how this result is affected by the trends in the EU. An increasingly restrictive practice may be explained by changes in the access structure to the evaluating body, or it may be due to learning and a growing acceptance of the precautionary principle in this sector. Third, a higher number of rejections may largely be associated with the interest structure pertaining to GMOs in Norway. Final decisions are pending and there are uncertainties concerning how Norwegian authorities will apply the specific criteria of the Gene Technology Act. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/eet.483</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0961-0405
ispartof European environment, 2008-07, Vol.18 (4), p.243-256
issn 0961-0405
1756-932X
1099-0976
1756-9338
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36978345
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; PAIS Index
subjects assessments
biotechnology regulation
comparative public policy
Crops
Data analysis
Environment
environmental policy
European Union
Genetically altered foods
Genetically modified organisms
Legislation
Norway
Precautionary principle
Social utility
Studies
Sustainable development
title Interpreting sustainable development and societal utility in Norwegian GMO assessments
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T02%3A48%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interpreting%20sustainable%20development%20and%20societal%20utility%20in%20Norwegian%20GMO%20assessments&rft.jtitle=European%20environment&rft.au=Rosendal,%20G.%20Kristin&rft.date=2008-07&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=243&rft.epage=256&rft.pages=243-256&rft.issn=0961-0405&rft.eissn=1099-0976&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/eet.483&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E36978345%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3613-f2ba69f86d4bc679d90f193e521a6581a1add0b23f1fc2f02c5d903ffd49d2a63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211265498&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true