Loading…

An Empirical Analysis of Common Stock Delistings

This paper presents an empirical analysis of firms that are delisted from a major stock exchange. The delisting process is described and stock price movements surrounding delisting are analyzed. For firms with prior announcements, equity values decline by approximately 8.5 percent on announcement da...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of financial and quantitative analysis 1990-06, Vol.25 (2), p.261-272
Main Authors: Sanger, Gary C., Peterson, James D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-16db16627c3dfa0f1e29ad6e1ee10c9fa4b7f90bf0a3c8d1f6186f884136b9043
cites
container_end_page 272
container_issue 2
container_start_page 261
container_title Journal of financial and quantitative analysis
container_volume 25
creator Sanger, Gary C.
Peterson, James D.
description This paper presents an empirical analysis of firms that are delisted from a major stock exchange. The delisting process is described and stock price movements surrounding delisting are analyzed. For firms with prior announcements, equity values decline by approximately 8.5 percent on announcement day. For firms without prior announcements, a similar adjustment takes place between the last day of trading in the initial market and the close of the first day of trading in the new market. Four hypotheses concerning the decline in firm value are examined. These are the liquidity hypothesis, the management signalling hypothesis, the exchange certification hypothesis, and the downward sloping demand curve hypothesis. Evidence consistent with the liquidity hypothesis is presented in the paper. Unlike evidence on stock exchange listings, returns in the post-delisting period do not appear to be anomalous.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/2330828
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36985981</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_2307_2330828</cupid><jstor_id>2330828</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2330828</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-16db16627c3dfa0f1e29ad6e1ee10c9fa4b7f90bf0a3c8d1f6186f884136b9043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90NFKwzAUBuAgCs4pvkIRUbyoniRtmlyOOqcw0aFeh7RNRra2mUkH7u3t2FDwwqsDh4-fc36EzjHcEgrZHaEUOOEHaICzlMVMYHaIBgCExBgEHKOTEBYA2wUMEIzaaNysrLelqqNRq-pNsCFyJspd07g2eutcuYzudW1DZ9t5OEVHRtVBn-3nEH08jN_zx3j6MnnKR9O4TBLWxZhVBWaMZCWtjAKDNRGqYhprjaEURiVFZgQUBhQteYUNw5wZzhNMWSEgoUN0tctdefe51qGTjQ2lrmvVarcOkjLBU8FxDy_-wIVb-_6RIAnGPKEp2aLrHSq9C8FrI1feNspvJAa5rU3ua-vl5U4uQuf8Pyzesb4W_fXDlF9KltEslWwyk6-zlD6TnMhJ72_2B6im8Laa698z_2Z_A7XAg74</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211843521</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Empirical Analysis of Common Stock Delistings</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>EconLit with Full Text【Remote access available】</source><source>Cambridge University Press:JISC Collections:Full Collection Digital Archives (STM and HSS) (218 titles)</source><creator>Sanger, Gary C. ; Peterson, James D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sanger, Gary C. ; Peterson, James D.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents an empirical analysis of firms that are delisted from a major stock exchange. The delisting process is described and stock price movements surrounding delisting are analyzed. For firms with prior announcements, equity values decline by approximately 8.5 percent on announcement day. For firms without prior announcements, a similar adjustment takes place between the last day of trading in the initial market and the close of the first day of trading in the new market. Four hypotheses concerning the decline in firm value are examined. These are the liquidity hypothesis, the management signalling hypothesis, the exchange certification hypothesis, and the downward sloping demand curve hypothesis. Evidence consistent with the liquidity hypothesis is presented in the paper. Unlike evidence on stock exchange listings, returns in the post-delisting period do not appear to be anomalous.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1090</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-6916</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/2330828</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JFQAAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Business structures ; Common stock ; Demand curves ; Empirical ; Empirical evidence ; Financial securities ; Hypotheses ; Impacts ; Investment trusts ; Liquidity ; Listing ; Nasdaq Composite Index ; Negative ; Quantitative analysis ; Return on equity ; Securities markets ; Standard and Poors 500 Index ; Stock exchange speculation ; Stock exchanges ; Stock market delistings ; Stock prices ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 1990-06, Vol.25 (2), p.261-272</ispartof><rights>Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1990</rights><rights>Copyright 1990 Graduate School of Business Administration, University of Washington</rights><rights>Copyright %Washington% Jun 1990</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-16db16627c3dfa0f1e29ad6e1ee10c9fa4b7f90bf0a3c8d1f6186f884136b9043</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/211843521/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/211843521?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,12847,27924,27925,33223,33224,36060,36061,44363,55689,58238,58471,74767</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sanger, Gary C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson, James D.</creatorcontrib><title>An Empirical Analysis of Common Stock Delistings</title><title>Journal of financial and quantitative analysis</title><addtitle>J. Financ. Quant. Anal</addtitle><description>This paper presents an empirical analysis of firms that are delisted from a major stock exchange. The delisting process is described and stock price movements surrounding delisting are analyzed. For firms with prior announcements, equity values decline by approximately 8.5 percent on announcement day. For firms without prior announcements, a similar adjustment takes place between the last day of trading in the initial market and the close of the first day of trading in the new market. Four hypotheses concerning the decline in firm value are examined. These are the liquidity hypothesis, the management signalling hypothesis, the exchange certification hypothesis, and the downward sloping demand curve hypothesis. Evidence consistent with the liquidity hypothesis is presented in the paper. Unlike evidence on stock exchange listings, returns in the post-delisting period do not appear to be anomalous.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Business structures</subject><subject>Common stock</subject><subject>Demand curves</subject><subject>Empirical</subject><subject>Empirical evidence</subject><subject>Financial securities</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Impacts</subject><subject>Investment trusts</subject><subject>Liquidity</subject><subject>Listing</subject><subject>Nasdaq Composite Index</subject><subject>Negative</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Return on equity</subject><subject>Securities markets</subject><subject>Standard and Poors 500 Index</subject><subject>Stock exchange speculation</subject><subject>Stock exchanges</subject><subject>Stock market delistings</subject><subject>Stock prices</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0022-1090</issn><issn>1756-6916</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp90NFKwzAUBuAgCs4pvkIRUbyoniRtmlyOOqcw0aFeh7RNRra2mUkH7u3t2FDwwqsDh4-fc36EzjHcEgrZHaEUOOEHaICzlMVMYHaIBgCExBgEHKOTEBYA2wUMEIzaaNysrLelqqNRq-pNsCFyJspd07g2eutcuYzudW1DZ9t5OEVHRtVBn-3nEH08jN_zx3j6MnnKR9O4TBLWxZhVBWaMZCWtjAKDNRGqYhprjaEURiVFZgQUBhQteYUNw5wZzhNMWSEgoUN0tctdefe51qGTjQ2lrmvVarcOkjLBU8FxDy_-wIVb-_6RIAnGPKEp2aLrHSq9C8FrI1feNspvJAa5rU3ua-vl5U4uQuf8Pyzesb4W_fXDlF9KltEslWwyk6-zlD6TnMhJ72_2B6im8Laa698z_2Z_A7XAg74</recordid><startdate>19900601</startdate><enddate>19900601</enddate><creator>Sanger, Gary C.</creator><creator>Peterson, James D.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>University of Washington Graduate School of Business Administration</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900601</creationdate><title>An Empirical Analysis of Common Stock Delistings</title><author>Sanger, Gary C. ; Peterson, James D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-16db16627c3dfa0f1e29ad6e1ee10c9fa4b7f90bf0a3c8d1f6186f884136b9043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Business structures</topic><topic>Common stock</topic><topic>Demand curves</topic><topic>Empirical</topic><topic>Empirical evidence</topic><topic>Financial securities</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Impacts</topic><topic>Investment trusts</topic><topic>Liquidity</topic><topic>Listing</topic><topic>Nasdaq Composite Index</topic><topic>Negative</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Return on equity</topic><topic>Securities markets</topic><topic>Standard and Poors 500 Index</topic><topic>Stock exchange speculation</topic><topic>Stock exchanges</topic><topic>Stock market delistings</topic><topic>Stock prices</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sanger, Gary C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson, James D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of financial and quantitative analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sanger, Gary C.</au><au>Peterson, James D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Empirical Analysis of Common Stock Delistings</atitle><jtitle>Journal of financial and quantitative analysis</jtitle><addtitle>J. Financ. Quant. Anal</addtitle><date>1990-06-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>261</spage><epage>272</epage><pages>261-272</pages><issn>0022-1090</issn><eissn>1756-6916</eissn><coden>JFQAAC</coden><abstract>This paper presents an empirical analysis of firms that are delisted from a major stock exchange. The delisting process is described and stock price movements surrounding delisting are analyzed. For firms with prior announcements, equity values decline by approximately 8.5 percent on announcement day. For firms without prior announcements, a similar adjustment takes place between the last day of trading in the initial market and the close of the first day of trading in the new market. Four hypotheses concerning the decline in firm value are examined. These are the liquidity hypothesis, the management signalling hypothesis, the exchange certification hypothesis, and the downward sloping demand curve hypothesis. Evidence consistent with the liquidity hypothesis is presented in the paper. Unlike evidence on stock exchange listings, returns in the post-delisting period do not appear to be anomalous.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.2307/2330828</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1090
ispartof Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 1990-06, Vol.25 (2), p.261-272
issn 0022-1090
1756-6916
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36985981
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; EconLit with Full Text【Remote access available】; Cambridge University Press:JISC Collections:Full Collection Digital Archives (STM and HSS) (218 titles)
subjects Analysis
Business structures
Common stock
Demand curves
Empirical
Empirical evidence
Financial securities
Hypotheses
Impacts
Investment trusts
Liquidity
Listing
Nasdaq Composite Index
Negative
Quantitative analysis
Return on equity
Securities markets
Standard and Poors 500 Index
Stock exchange speculation
Stock exchanges
Stock market delistings
Stock prices
Studies
title An Empirical Analysis of Common Stock Delistings
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A28%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Empirical%20Analysis%20of%20Common%20Stock%20Delistings&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20financial%20and%20quantitative%20analysis&rft.au=Sanger,%20Gary%20C.&rft.date=1990-06-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=261&rft.epage=272&rft.pages=261-272&rft.issn=0022-1090&rft.eissn=1756-6916&rft.coden=JFQAAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/2330828&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2330828%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-16db16627c3dfa0f1e29ad6e1ee10c9fa4b7f90bf0a3c8d1f6186f884136b9043%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211843521&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_2307_2330828&rft_jstor_id=2330828&rfr_iscdi=true