Loading…

Equilibrium Exchange Rate Hedging

We assume a world like the one that gives the capital asset pricing model, but with many goods and many countries. We assume that investors in a given country have homothetic utility functions with the same weights, and a currency that has a sure end-of-period value using a price index with those we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of finance (New York) 1990-07, Vol.45 (3), p.899-907
Main Author: BLACK, FISCHER
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4981-1b5eec1fc5a74a9e1e15bf401de87b86b95f6b0e3677a15729cc0f534f3cf1e63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4981-1b5eec1fc5a74a9e1e15bf401de87b86b95f6b0e3677a15729cc0f534f3cf1e63
container_end_page 907
container_issue 3
container_start_page 899
container_title The Journal of finance (New York)
container_volume 45
creator BLACK, FISCHER
description We assume a world like the one that gives the capital asset pricing model, but with many goods and many countries. We assume that investors in a given country have homothetic utility functions with the same weights, and a currency that has a sure end-of-period value using a price index with those weights. Siegel's paradox (derived from Jensen's inequality) makes investors want a positive amount of exchange risk. When average risk tolerance is the same across countries, every investor will hold the same mix of market risk (through the world market portfolio of all assets) and exchange risk (in a diversified basket of foreign currencies). In fact, the ratio of exchange risk to market risk is equal to the average investor's risk tolerance. We can write the ratio of exchange risk to market risk (and the fraction of the market's exchange risk that investors hedge) as depending on an average of world market risk premia, an average of world market volatilities, and an average of exchange rate volatilities. The weights in these averages are the same as the weights of the different countries in the currency basket. Given these averages, the ratio (and the fraction hedged) will not depend directly on exchange rate means or covariances. In equilibrium, we can use the ratio of exchange risk to market risk to measure average risk tolerance: in this model, risk tolerance is observable.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb05111.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37014438</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2328798</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2328798</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4981-1b5eec1fc5a74a9e1e15bf401de87b86b95f6b0e3677a15729cc0f534f3cf1e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkVtr3DAQhUVoodu0_2GblLzZ0ehq9akhbG6EpHRbAn0ZZEXe2PWuE8mmm39fGYdQCqVkHiTBfOcgziFkD2gOaQ6bHKSgmWIKcjCG5n1JZVrk2x0ye169IjNKGcuAFuwNeRtjQ8eRckY-LB6Guq3LUA_r-WLr7uxm5edfbe_nZ_52VW9W78jryrbRv3-6d8n3k8W347Ps8vr0_PjoMnPCFJBBKb13UDlptbDGgwdZVoLCrS90WajSyEqV1HOltQWpmXGOVpKLirsKvOK75GDyvQ_dw-Bjj-s6Ot-2duO7ISLXFITgRQL3_gKbbgib9DcEIzQtBPD_QooWMkH7_4SY0QCKUZaoTxPlQhdj8BXeh3ptwyMCxbEFbHCMGseocWwBn1rAbRJ_nsS_6tY_vkCJF9cn5-MzWXycLJrYd-FPC8apTgcrtBljySasjr3fPmM2_ESluZZ4c3WK3PxYLr_oJUr-Gy11phM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1297116202</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Equilibrium Exchange Rate Hedging</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>BLACK, FISCHER</creator><creatorcontrib>BLACK, FISCHER</creatorcontrib><description>We assume a world like the one that gives the capital asset pricing model, but with many goods and many countries. We assume that investors in a given country have homothetic utility functions with the same weights, and a currency that has a sure end-of-period value using a price index with those weights. Siegel's paradox (derived from Jensen's inequality) makes investors want a positive amount of exchange risk. When average risk tolerance is the same across countries, every investor will hold the same mix of market risk (through the world market portfolio of all assets) and exchange risk (in a diversified basket of foreign currencies). In fact, the ratio of exchange risk to market risk is equal to the average investor's risk tolerance. We can write the ratio of exchange risk to market risk (and the fraction of the market's exchange risk that investors hedge) as depending on an average of world market risk premia, an average of world market volatilities, and an average of exchange rate volatilities. The weights in these averages are the same as the weights of the different countries in the currency basket. Given these averages, the ratio (and the fraction hedged) will not depend directly on exchange rate means or covariances. In equilibrium, we can use the ratio of exchange risk to market risk to measure average risk tolerance: in this model, risk tolerance is observable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1082</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6261</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb05111.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLFIAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Currency ; Equilibrium ; Exchange rates ; Financial portfolios ; Fractions ; Hedging ; Investment risk ; Investors ; Market portfolios ; Paradoxes ; Return on investment</subject><ispartof>The Journal of finance (New York), 1990-07, Vol.45 (3), p.899-907</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1990 American Finance Association</rights><rights>1990 the American Finance Association</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Inc. Jul 1990</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4981-1b5eec1fc5a74a9e1e15bf401de87b86b95f6b0e3677a15729cc0f534f3cf1e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4981-1b5eec1fc5a74a9e1e15bf401de87b86b95f6b0e3677a15729cc0f534f3cf1e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2328798$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2328798$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33200,33201,58213,58446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>BLACK, FISCHER</creatorcontrib><title>Equilibrium Exchange Rate Hedging</title><title>The Journal of finance (New York)</title><description>We assume a world like the one that gives the capital asset pricing model, but with many goods and many countries. We assume that investors in a given country have homothetic utility functions with the same weights, and a currency that has a sure end-of-period value using a price index with those weights. Siegel's paradox (derived from Jensen's inequality) makes investors want a positive amount of exchange risk. When average risk tolerance is the same across countries, every investor will hold the same mix of market risk (through the world market portfolio of all assets) and exchange risk (in a diversified basket of foreign currencies). In fact, the ratio of exchange risk to market risk is equal to the average investor's risk tolerance. We can write the ratio of exchange risk to market risk (and the fraction of the market's exchange risk that investors hedge) as depending on an average of world market risk premia, an average of world market volatilities, and an average of exchange rate volatilities. The weights in these averages are the same as the weights of the different countries in the currency basket. Given these averages, the ratio (and the fraction hedged) will not depend directly on exchange rate means or covariances. In equilibrium, we can use the ratio of exchange risk to market risk to measure average risk tolerance: in this model, risk tolerance is observable.</description><subject>Currency</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Exchange rates</subject><subject>Financial portfolios</subject><subject>Fractions</subject><subject>Hedging</subject><subject>Investment risk</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Market portfolios</subject><subject>Paradoxes</subject><subject>Return on investment</subject><issn>0022-1082</issn><issn>1540-6261</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkVtr3DAQhUVoodu0_2GblLzZ0ehq9akhbG6EpHRbAn0ZZEXe2PWuE8mmm39fGYdQCqVkHiTBfOcgziFkD2gOaQ6bHKSgmWIKcjCG5n1JZVrk2x0ye169IjNKGcuAFuwNeRtjQ8eRckY-LB6Guq3LUA_r-WLr7uxm5edfbe_nZ_52VW9W78jryrbRv3-6d8n3k8W347Ps8vr0_PjoMnPCFJBBKb13UDlptbDGgwdZVoLCrS90WajSyEqV1HOltQWpmXGOVpKLirsKvOK75GDyvQ_dw-Bjj-s6Ot-2duO7ISLXFITgRQL3_gKbbgib9DcEIzQtBPD_QooWMkH7_4SY0QCKUZaoTxPlQhdj8BXeh3ptwyMCxbEFbHCMGseocWwBn1rAbRJ_nsS_6tY_vkCJF9cn5-MzWXycLJrYd-FPC8apTgcrtBljySasjr3fPmM2_ESluZZ4c3WK3PxYLr_oJUr-Gy11phM</recordid><startdate>199007</startdate><enddate>199007</enddate><creator>BLACK, FISCHER</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Finance Association</general><general>Blackwell Publishers Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FUVTR</scope><scope>JILTI</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199007</creationdate><title>Equilibrium Exchange Rate Hedging</title><author>BLACK, FISCHER</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4981-1b5eec1fc5a74a9e1e15bf401de87b86b95f6b0e3677a15729cc0f534f3cf1e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Currency</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Exchange rates</topic><topic>Financial portfolios</topic><topic>Fractions</topic><topic>Hedging</topic><topic>Investment risk</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Market portfolios</topic><topic>Paradoxes</topic><topic>Return on investment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BLACK, FISCHER</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 06</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 32</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Journal of finance (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BLACK, FISCHER</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Equilibrium Exchange Rate Hedging</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of finance (New York)</jtitle><date>1990-07</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>899</spage><epage>907</epage><pages>899-907</pages><issn>0022-1082</issn><eissn>1540-6261</eissn><coden>JLFIAN</coden><abstract>We assume a world like the one that gives the capital asset pricing model, but with many goods and many countries. We assume that investors in a given country have homothetic utility functions with the same weights, and a currency that has a sure end-of-period value using a price index with those weights. Siegel's paradox (derived from Jensen's inequality) makes investors want a positive amount of exchange risk. When average risk tolerance is the same across countries, every investor will hold the same mix of market risk (through the world market portfolio of all assets) and exchange risk (in a diversified basket of foreign currencies). In fact, the ratio of exchange risk to market risk is equal to the average investor's risk tolerance. We can write the ratio of exchange risk to market risk (and the fraction of the market's exchange risk that investors hedge) as depending on an average of world market risk premia, an average of world market volatilities, and an average of exchange rate volatilities. The weights in these averages are the same as the weights of the different countries in the currency basket. Given these averages, the ratio (and the fraction hedged) will not depend directly on exchange rate means or covariances. In equilibrium, we can use the ratio of exchange risk to market risk to measure average risk tolerance: in this model, risk tolerance is observable.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb05111.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1082
ispartof The Journal of finance (New York), 1990-07, Vol.45 (3), p.899-907
issn 0022-1082
1540-6261
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37014438
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Currency
Equilibrium
Exchange rates
Financial portfolios
Fractions
Hedging
Investment risk
Investors
Market portfolios
Paradoxes
Return on investment
title Equilibrium Exchange Rate Hedging
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-22T18%3A01%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Equilibrium%20Exchange%20Rate%20Hedging&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20finance%20(New%20York)&rft.au=BLACK,%20FISCHER&rft.date=1990-07&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=899&rft.epage=907&rft.pages=899-907&rft.issn=0022-1082&rft.eissn=1540-6261&rft.coden=JLFIAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb05111.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2328798%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4981-1b5eec1fc5a74a9e1e15bf401de87b86b95f6b0e3677a15729cc0f534f3cf1e63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1297116202&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2328798&rfr_iscdi=true