Loading…
Community-based production of open-source software: What do we know about the developers who participate?
This paper seeks to close an empirical gap regarding the motivations, personal attributes and behavioral patterns among free/libre and open-source (FLOSS) developers, especially those involved in community-based production, and considers the bearing of its findings on the existing literature and the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Information economics and policy 2008-12, Vol.20 (4), p.364-398 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-53a2d2948c3da4335eba270eeafe346633a28d6239942483b605cf2b28e500893 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-53a2d2948c3da4335eba270eeafe346633a28d6239942483b605cf2b28e500893 |
container_end_page | 398 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 364 |
container_title | Information economics and policy |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | David, Paul A. Shapiro, Joseph S. |
description | This paper seeks to close an empirical gap regarding the motivations, personal attributes and behavioral patterns among free/libre and open-source (FLOSS) developers, especially those involved in community-based production, and considers the bearing of its findings on the existing literature and the future directions for research. Respondents to an extensive web-survey’s (FLOSS-US 2003) questions about their reasons for beginning to work FLOSS are classified according to their distinct “motivational profiles” by hierarchical cluster analysis. Over half of them also are matched to projects of known membership sizes, revealing that although some members from each of the clusters are present in the small, medium and large ranges of the distribution of project sizes, the mixing fractions for the large and the very small project ranges are statistically different. Among developers who changed projects, there is a discernable flow from the bottom toward the very small towards to large projects, some of which is motivated by individuals seeking to improve their programming skills. It is found that the profile of early motivation, along with other individual attributes, significantly affects individual developers’ selections of projects from different regions of the size range. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.10.001 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37127270</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167624508000553</els_id><sourcerecordid>1612403461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-53a2d2948c3da4335eba270eeafe346633a28d6239942483b605cf2b28e500893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU2v0zAQjBBIlAf_weLALcUfcWJzQVA9eA89iQuIo-XYG9UliYPttOq_Z0sRSFw4rL3yzox2PFVFGN0yytrXh22YhwguLnHcckoVPm8pZY-qDVOdqKXu5ONqg9Cubnkjn1bPcj5QSrGnmyrs4jStcyjnurcZPFlS9KsrIc4kDiQuMNc5rskByXEoJ5vgDfm2t4X4SE5Avs_xRGwf10LKHoiHI4xISpmc9pEsNpXgwmILvH1ePRnsmOHF7_um-vrh9svurn74_PF-9-6hdrJjpZbCcs91o5zwthFCQm95RwHsAKJpW4Fz5VsutG54o0TfUukG3nMFEt1rcVO9uuqikx8r5GKmkB2Mo50hrtmIjvEOFRH48h_gAY3OuJthWnMtWyURpK4gl2LOCQazpDDZdDaMmksA5mD-BmAuAVwmGABSP12pCRZwf3gAEACxwRwNeqF4nH81yBQ2YDVYC5ZosdPK7MuEYu-vYoBfdwyQTHYBZgc-JHDF-Bj-v9FPWIytvg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199295685</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Community-based production of open-source software: What do we know about the developers who participate?</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>David, Paul A. ; Shapiro, Joseph S.</creator><creatorcontrib>David, Paul A. ; Shapiro, Joseph S.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper seeks to close an empirical gap regarding the motivations, personal attributes and behavioral patterns among free/libre and open-source (FLOSS) developers, especially those involved in community-based production, and considers the bearing of its findings on the existing literature and the future directions for research. Respondents to an extensive web-survey’s (FLOSS-US 2003) questions about their reasons for beginning to work FLOSS are classified according to their distinct “motivational profiles” by hierarchical cluster analysis. Over half of them also are matched to projects of known membership sizes, revealing that although some members from each of the clusters are present in the small, medium and large ranges of the distribution of project sizes, the mixing fractions for the large and the very small project ranges are statistically different. Among developers who changed projects, there is a discernable flow from the bottom toward the very small towards to large projects, some of which is motivated by individuals seeking to improve their programming skills. It is found that the profile of early motivation, along with other individual attributes, significantly affects individual developers’ selections of projects from different regions of the size range.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6245</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5975</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.10.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Cluster analysis ; Community ; Community-based peer production ; FLOSS projects ; Hierarchical cluster analysis ; Industrial organization ; Micro-motives ; Motivation ; Motivational profiles ; Open source software ; Open-source software FLOSS projects Community-based peer production Population heterogeneity Micro-motives Motivational profiles Web-cast surveys Hierarchical cluster analysis ; Population heterogeneity ; Production ; Programmers ; Software ; Studies ; Systems development ; Web-cast surveys</subject><ispartof>Information economics and policy, 2008-12, Vol.20 (4), p.364-398</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Dec 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-53a2d2948c3da4335eba270eeafe346633a28d6239942483b605cf2b28e500893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-53a2d2948c3da4335eba270eeafe346633a28d6239942483b605cf2b28e500893</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27845,27903,27904,33202,33203,34114</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeiepoli/v_3a20_3ay_3a2008_3ai_3a4_3ap_3a364-398.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>David, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Joseph S.</creatorcontrib><title>Community-based production of open-source software: What do we know about the developers who participate?</title><title>Information economics and policy</title><description>This paper seeks to close an empirical gap regarding the motivations, personal attributes and behavioral patterns among free/libre and open-source (FLOSS) developers, especially those involved in community-based production, and considers the bearing of its findings on the existing literature and the future directions for research. Respondents to an extensive web-survey’s (FLOSS-US 2003) questions about their reasons for beginning to work FLOSS are classified according to their distinct “motivational profiles” by hierarchical cluster analysis. Over half of them also are matched to projects of known membership sizes, revealing that although some members from each of the clusters are present in the small, medium and large ranges of the distribution of project sizes, the mixing fractions for the large and the very small project ranges are statistically different. Among developers who changed projects, there is a discernable flow from the bottom toward the very small towards to large projects, some of which is motivated by individuals seeking to improve their programming skills. It is found that the profile of early motivation, along with other individual attributes, significantly affects individual developers’ selections of projects from different regions of the size range.</description><subject>Cluster analysis</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Community-based peer production</subject><subject>FLOSS projects</subject><subject>Hierarchical cluster analysis</subject><subject>Industrial organization</subject><subject>Micro-motives</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Motivational profiles</subject><subject>Open source software</subject><subject>Open-source software FLOSS projects Community-based peer production Population heterogeneity Micro-motives Motivational profiles Web-cast surveys Hierarchical cluster analysis</subject><subject>Population heterogeneity</subject><subject>Production</subject><subject>Programmers</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Systems development</subject><subject>Web-cast surveys</subject><issn>0167-6245</issn><issn>1873-5975</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUU2v0zAQjBBIlAf_weLALcUfcWJzQVA9eA89iQuIo-XYG9UliYPttOq_Z0sRSFw4rL3yzox2PFVFGN0yytrXh22YhwguLnHcckoVPm8pZY-qDVOdqKXu5ONqg9Cubnkjn1bPcj5QSrGnmyrs4jStcyjnurcZPFlS9KsrIc4kDiQuMNc5rskByXEoJ5vgDfm2t4X4SE5Avs_xRGwf10LKHoiHI4xISpmc9pEsNpXgwmILvH1ePRnsmOHF7_um-vrh9svurn74_PF-9-6hdrJjpZbCcs91o5zwthFCQm95RwHsAKJpW4Fz5VsutG54o0TfUukG3nMFEt1rcVO9uuqikx8r5GKmkB2Mo50hrtmIjvEOFRH48h_gAY3OuJthWnMtWyURpK4gl2LOCQazpDDZdDaMmksA5mD-BmAuAVwmGABSP12pCRZwf3gAEACxwRwNeqF4nH81yBQ2YDVYC5ZosdPK7MuEYu-vYoBfdwyQTHYBZgc-JHDF-Bj-v9FPWIytvg</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>David, Paul A.</creator><creator>Shapiro, Joseph S.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>Community-based production of open-source software: What do we know about the developers who participate?</title><author>David, Paul A. ; Shapiro, Joseph S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-53a2d2948c3da4335eba270eeafe346633a28d6239942483b605cf2b28e500893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Cluster analysis</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Community-based peer production</topic><topic>FLOSS projects</topic><topic>Hierarchical cluster analysis</topic><topic>Industrial organization</topic><topic>Micro-motives</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Motivational profiles</topic><topic>Open source software</topic><topic>Open-source software FLOSS projects Community-based peer production Population heterogeneity Micro-motives Motivational profiles Web-cast surveys Hierarchical cluster analysis</topic><topic>Population heterogeneity</topic><topic>Production</topic><topic>Programmers</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Systems development</topic><topic>Web-cast surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>David, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Joseph S.</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Information economics and policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>David, Paul A.</au><au>Shapiro, Joseph S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Community-based production of open-source software: What do we know about the developers who participate?</atitle><jtitle>Information economics and policy</jtitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>364</spage><epage>398</epage><pages>364-398</pages><issn>0167-6245</issn><eissn>1873-5975</eissn><abstract>This paper seeks to close an empirical gap regarding the motivations, personal attributes and behavioral patterns among free/libre and open-source (FLOSS) developers, especially those involved in community-based production, and considers the bearing of its findings on the existing literature and the future directions for research. Respondents to an extensive web-survey’s (FLOSS-US 2003) questions about their reasons for beginning to work FLOSS are classified according to their distinct “motivational profiles” by hierarchical cluster analysis. Over half of them also are matched to projects of known membership sizes, revealing that although some members from each of the clusters are present in the small, medium and large ranges of the distribution of project sizes, the mixing fractions for the large and the very small project ranges are statistically different. Among developers who changed projects, there is a discernable flow from the bottom toward the very small towards to large projects, some of which is motivated by individuals seeking to improve their programming skills. It is found that the profile of early motivation, along with other individual attributes, significantly affects individual developers’ selections of projects from different regions of the size range.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.10.001</doi><tpages>35</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-6245 |
ispartof | Information economics and policy, 2008-12, Vol.20 (4), p.364-398 |
issn | 0167-6245 1873-5975 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37127270 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection; PAIS Index |
subjects | Cluster analysis Community Community-based peer production FLOSS projects Hierarchical cluster analysis Industrial organization Micro-motives Motivation Motivational profiles Open source software Open-source software FLOSS projects Community-based peer production Population heterogeneity Micro-motives Motivational profiles Web-cast surveys Hierarchical cluster analysis Population heterogeneity Production Programmers Software Studies Systems development Web-cast surveys |
title | Community-based production of open-source software: What do we know about the developers who participate? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T17%3A54%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Community-based%20production%20of%20open-source%20software:%20What%20do%20we%20know%20about%20the%20developers%20who%20participate?&rft.jtitle=Information%20economics%20and%20policy&rft.au=David,%20Paul%20A.&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=364&rft.epage=398&rft.pages=364-398&rft.issn=0167-6245&rft.eissn=1873-5975&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.10.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1612403461%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-53a2d2948c3da4335eba270eeafe346633a28d6239942483b605cf2b28e500893%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199295685&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |