The Ups and Downs of Florida Growth Policy, 1971-2008

This article reviews the accomplishments and shortcomings of Florida growth management and smart growth policies in the past four decades. It begins with three history sections on Florida growth management: the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. After a slow beginning due to incomplete legislation in the 1970...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Planning, practice & research practice & research, 2009-08, Vol.24 (3), p.379-387
Main Author: Ben-Zadok, Efraim
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cities
Florida
Governance
Government
Legislation
U.S.A
Urban development
Urban planning
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-e86134ca28d053b89eab5dd6e39e8e3e023a5a518c084c18eaebf4b1aae3f8cb3
container_end_page 387
container_issue 3
container_start_page 379
container_title Planning, practice & research
container_volume 24
creator Ben-Zadok, Efraim
description This article reviews the accomplishments and shortcomings of Florida growth management and smart growth policies in the past four decades. It begins with three history sections on Florida growth management: the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. After a slow beginning due to incomplete legislation in the 1970s, Florida innovative growth management moved quickly forward to the forefront of the planning profession in the 1980s, but then faced its most critical implementation dilemma in the 1990s. The article continues with three sections on Florida smart growth in the 2000s: a general one on politics followed by two specific ones on legislation. The 2000s smart growth legislation was a positive accomplishment, but it was overshadowed by political deadlock and a troubled intergovernmental system, which ultimately contributed to Florida's decline as a national growth leader. The concluding section offers long-range policy implications for Florida and other states that contemplate or implement growth management and smart growth initiatives.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/02697450903020833
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37168942</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>37168942</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-e86134ca28d053b89eab5dd6e39e8e3e023a5a518c084c18eaebf4b1aae3f8cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwA9g8MRE45_JhSywIaEGqBEM7W45zVoPSuNipSv89qcpWCaYb7nne072MXQu4EyDhHtJClVkOChBSkIgnbCSwgARyiadstN8nA6DO2UWMnwBQgMARy-dL4ot15Kar-bPfdpF7xyetD01t-DT4bb_kH75t7O6WC1WKJAWQl-zMmTbS1e8cs8XkZf70mszep29Pj7PEYqr6hGQhMLMmlTXkWElFpsrruiBUJAkJUjS5yYW0IDMrJBmqXFYJYwidtBWO2c0hdx3814Zir1dNtNS2piO_iRpLUUiVpQMoDqANPsZATq9DszJhpwXofUH6qKDBeTg4Ted8WJmtD22te7MbnnfBdLYZDvyll__qR5buv3v8Af4GeuU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>37168942</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Ups and Downs of Florida Growth Policy, 1971-2008</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><source>BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)</source><creator>Ben-Zadok, Efraim</creator><creatorcontrib>Ben-Zadok, Efraim</creatorcontrib><description>This article reviews the accomplishments and shortcomings of Florida growth management and smart growth policies in the past four decades. It begins with three history sections on Florida growth management: the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. After a slow beginning due to incomplete legislation in the 1970s, Florida innovative growth management moved quickly forward to the forefront of the planning profession in the 1980s, but then faced its most critical implementation dilemma in the 1990s. The article continues with three sections on Florida smart growth in the 2000s: a general one on politics followed by two specific ones on legislation. The 2000s smart growth legislation was a positive accomplishment, but it was overshadowed by political deadlock and a troubled intergovernmental system, which ultimately contributed to Florida's decline as a national growth leader. The concluding section offers long-range policy implications for Florida and other states that contemplate or implement growth management and smart growth initiatives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-7459</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1360-0583</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02697450903020833</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><subject>Cities ; Florida ; Governance ; Government ; Legislation ; U.S.A ; Urban development ; Urban planning</subject><ispartof>Planning, practice &amp; research, 2009-08, Vol.24 (3), p.379-387</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-e86134ca28d053b89eab5dd6e39e8e3e023a5a518c084c18eaebf4b1aae3f8cb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33224</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ben-Zadok, Efraim</creatorcontrib><title>The Ups and Downs of Florida Growth Policy, 1971-2008</title><title>Planning, practice &amp; research</title><description>This article reviews the accomplishments and shortcomings of Florida growth management and smart growth policies in the past four decades. It begins with three history sections on Florida growth management: the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. After a slow beginning due to incomplete legislation in the 1970s, Florida innovative growth management moved quickly forward to the forefront of the planning profession in the 1980s, but then faced its most critical implementation dilemma in the 1990s. The article continues with three sections on Florida smart growth in the 2000s: a general one on politics followed by two specific ones on legislation. The 2000s smart growth legislation was a positive accomplishment, but it was overshadowed by political deadlock and a troubled intergovernmental system, which ultimately contributed to Florida's decline as a national growth leader. The concluding section offers long-range policy implications for Florida and other states that contemplate or implement growth management and smart growth initiatives.</description><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Florida</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Urban development</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><issn>0269-7459</issn><issn>1360-0583</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwA9g8MRE45_JhSywIaEGqBEM7W45zVoPSuNipSv89qcpWCaYb7nne072MXQu4EyDhHtJClVkOChBSkIgnbCSwgARyiadstN8nA6DO2UWMnwBQgMARy-dL4ot15Kar-bPfdpF7xyetD01t-DT4bb_kH75t7O6WC1WKJAWQl-zMmTbS1e8cs8XkZf70mszep29Pj7PEYqr6hGQhMLMmlTXkWElFpsrruiBUJAkJUjS5yYW0IDMrJBmqXFYJYwidtBWO2c0hdx3814Zir1dNtNS2piO_iRpLUUiVpQMoDqANPsZATq9DszJhpwXofUH6qKDBeTg4Ted8WJmtD22te7MbnnfBdLYZDvyll__qR5buv3v8Af4GeuU</recordid><startdate>200908</startdate><enddate>200908</enddate><creator>Ben-Zadok, Efraim</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200908</creationdate><title>The Ups and Downs of Florida Growth Policy, 1971-2008</title><author>Ben-Zadok, Efraim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-e86134ca28d053b89eab5dd6e39e8e3e023a5a518c084c18eaebf4b1aae3f8cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Florida</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Urban development</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ben-Zadok, Efraim</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Planning, practice &amp; research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ben-Zadok, Efraim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Ups and Downs of Florida Growth Policy, 1971-2008</atitle><jtitle>Planning, practice &amp; research</jtitle><date>2009-08</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>379</spage><epage>387</epage><pages>379-387</pages><issn>0269-7459</issn><eissn>1360-0583</eissn><abstract>This article reviews the accomplishments and shortcomings of Florida growth management and smart growth policies in the past four decades. It begins with three history sections on Florida growth management: the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. After a slow beginning due to incomplete legislation in the 1970s, Florida innovative growth management moved quickly forward to the forefront of the planning profession in the 1980s, but then faced its most critical implementation dilemma in the 1990s. The article continues with three sections on Florida smart growth in the 2000s: a general one on politics followed by two specific ones on legislation. The 2000s smart growth legislation was a positive accomplishment, but it was overshadowed by political deadlock and a troubled intergovernmental system, which ultimately contributed to Florida's decline as a national growth leader. The concluding section offers long-range policy implications for Florida and other states that contemplate or implement growth management and smart growth initiatives.</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/02697450903020833</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-7459
ispartof Planning, practice & research, 2009-08, Vol.24 (3), p.379-387
issn 0269-7459
1360-0583
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37168942
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Taylor & Francis; BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)
subjects Cities
Florida
Governance
Government
Legislation
U.S.A
Urban development
Urban planning
title The Ups and Downs of Florida Growth Policy, 1971-2008
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A08%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Ups%20and%20Downs%20of%20Florida%20Growth%20Policy,%201971-2008&rft.jtitle=Planning,%20practice%20&%20research&rft.au=Ben-Zadok,%20Efraim&rft.date=2009-08&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=379&rft.epage=387&rft.pages=379-387&rft.issn=0269-7459&rft.eissn=1360-0583&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02697450903020833&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E37168942%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-e86134ca28d053b89eab5dd6e39e8e3e023a5a518c084c18eaebf4b1aae3f8cb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=37168942&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true