Loading…

Are There Income Effects on Global Willingness to Pay for Biodiversity Conservation?

This paper is concerned with the empirical relationship between biodiversity conservation values and income. We use random effects panel models to examine the effects of income, and then GDP per capita, on willingness to pay for habitat and biodiversity conservation. In a meta-analysis, 145 Willingn...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental & resource economics 2009-06, Vol.43 (2), p.137-160
Main Authors: Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl, Hanley, Nick
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-8d2e0888c700e332c3a7938ee90dd5ae17c02b930d50c28b03bac8cd2b8b0d963
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-8d2e0888c700e332c3a7938ee90dd5ae17c02b930d50c28b03bac8cd2b8b0d963
container_end_page 160
container_issue 2
container_start_page 137
container_title Environmental & resource economics
container_volume 43
creator Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl
Hanley, Nick
description This paper is concerned with the empirical relationship between biodiversity conservation values and income. We use random effects panel models to examine the effects of income, and then GDP per capita, on willingness to pay for habitat and biodiversity conservation. In a meta-analysis, 145 Willingness To Pay estimates for biodiversity conservation where existence value plays a major role were collected from 46 contingent valuation studies across six continents. Other effects included in the meta-analysis were the study year; habitat type; continent; scope as presented to respondents; whether WTP bids were for preventing a deterioration or gaining an improvement in conservation, whether a specific species or specific habitat was protected; whether the questionnaire used a dichotomous choice or an open-ended format; distribution format; and the choice of payment vehicle. GDP per capita seemed to perform as well as an explanatory variable as respondent's mean stated income, indicating that it is wealth in society as a whole which determines variations in WTP. Even if large variation, our main conclusion is, that the demand for biodiversity conservation rises with a nation's wealth, but the income elasticity of willingness to pay is less than one.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10640-008-9226-8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37188441</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1706191391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-8d2e0888c700e332c3a7938ee90dd5ae17c02b930d50c28b03bac8cd2b8b0d963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUcGKFDEQDaLguPoBngwevLVbSbo7yUnWYXfdZUHBWTyGdLp6NmtP0iY9A_P3ZmhR8KCHV1UU7z2qeIS8ZvCeAcjzzKCtoQJQlea8rdQTsmKNFBVrgD8lK9C8rtq6hefkRc6PAKBl3a7I5iIh3TxgqTfBxR3Sy2FAN2caA70eY2dH-s2Pow_bgDnTOdIv9kiHmOhHH3t_wJT9fKTrGDKmg519DB9ekmeDHTO--tXPyP3V5Wb9qbr7fH2zvrirXCNgrlTPEZRSTgKgENwJK7VQiBr6vrHIpAPeaQF9A46rDkRnnXI978rc61ackXeL75Tijz3m2ex8djiONmDcZyMkU6qu2X-JHJrCgxPx7V_Ex7hPoTxhOAclm6bVhcQWkksx54SDmZLf2XQ0DMwpDbOkYUoa5pSGUUVzu2gSTuh-C77bCUPCsjkYYWtRyrGAl3hK86exYCpgQhrWgnmYd8WML2a5-IQtpj9X_uuCN4tosNHYbfLZ3H_l5WdgrWBSK_ETaNmt1A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220875569</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are There Income Effects on Global Willingness to Pay for Biodiversity Conservation?</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl ; Hanley, Nick</creator><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl ; Hanley, Nick</creatorcontrib><description>This paper is concerned with the empirical relationship between biodiversity conservation values and income. We use random effects panel models to examine the effects of income, and then GDP per capita, on willingness to pay for habitat and biodiversity conservation. In a meta-analysis, 145 Willingness To Pay estimates for biodiversity conservation where existence value plays a major role were collected from 46 contingent valuation studies across six continents. Other effects included in the meta-analysis were the study year; habitat type; continent; scope as presented to respondents; whether WTP bids were for preventing a deterioration or gaining an improvement in conservation, whether a specific species or specific habitat was protected; whether the questionnaire used a dichotomous choice or an open-ended format; distribution format; and the choice of payment vehicle. GDP per capita seemed to perform as well as an explanatory variable as respondent's mean stated income, indicating that it is wealth in society as a whole which determines variations in WTP. Even if large variation, our main conclusion is, that the demand for biodiversity conservation rises with a nation's wealth, but the income elasticity of willingness to pay is less than one.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0924-6460</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1502</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10640-008-9226-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Conservation ; Contingent valuation ; Economic growth ; Economic Policy ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Elasticity of demand ; Environmental Economics ; Environmental Kuznets Curve ; Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice ; Environmental Management ; Environmental quality ; Existence values ; GDP ; Gross Domestic Product ; Habitats ; Households ; Income ; Income effects ; Meta-analysis ; Per capita ; Pollutants ; Studies ; Valuation ; Willingness to pay</subject><ispartof>Environmental &amp; resource economics, 2009-06, Vol.43 (2), p.137-160</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-8d2e0888c700e332c3a7938ee90dd5ae17c02b930d50c28b03bac8cd2b8b0d963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-8d2e0888c700e332c3a7938ee90dd5ae17c02b930d50c28b03bac8cd2b8b0d963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/220875569/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/220875569?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,12847,27924,27925,33223,33224,36060,36061,44363,74895</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/kapenreec/v_3a43_3ay_3a2009_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a137-160.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanley, Nick</creatorcontrib><title>Are There Income Effects on Global Willingness to Pay for Biodiversity Conservation?</title><title>Environmental &amp; resource economics</title><addtitle>Environ Resource Econ</addtitle><description>This paper is concerned with the empirical relationship between biodiversity conservation values and income. We use random effects panel models to examine the effects of income, and then GDP per capita, on willingness to pay for habitat and biodiversity conservation. In a meta-analysis, 145 Willingness To Pay estimates for biodiversity conservation where existence value plays a major role were collected from 46 contingent valuation studies across six continents. Other effects included in the meta-analysis were the study year; habitat type; continent; scope as presented to respondents; whether WTP bids were for preventing a deterioration or gaining an improvement in conservation, whether a specific species or specific habitat was protected; whether the questionnaire used a dichotomous choice or an open-ended format; distribution format; and the choice of payment vehicle. GDP per capita seemed to perform as well as an explanatory variable as respondent's mean stated income, indicating that it is wealth in society as a whole which determines variations in WTP. Even if large variation, our main conclusion is, that the demand for biodiversity conservation rises with a nation's wealth, but the income elasticity of willingness to pay is less than one.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Contingent valuation</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economic Policy</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Elasticity of demand</subject><subject>Environmental Economics</subject><subject>Environmental Kuznets Curve</subject><subject>Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental quality</subject><subject>Existence values</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Income effects</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Per capita</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><subject>Willingness to pay</subject><issn>0924-6460</issn><issn>1573-1502</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUcGKFDEQDaLguPoBngwevLVbSbo7yUnWYXfdZUHBWTyGdLp6NmtP0iY9A_P3ZmhR8KCHV1UU7z2qeIS8ZvCeAcjzzKCtoQJQlea8rdQTsmKNFBVrgD8lK9C8rtq6hefkRc6PAKBl3a7I5iIh3TxgqTfBxR3Sy2FAN2caA70eY2dH-s2Pow_bgDnTOdIv9kiHmOhHH3t_wJT9fKTrGDKmg519DB9ekmeDHTO--tXPyP3V5Wb9qbr7fH2zvrirXCNgrlTPEZRSTgKgENwJK7VQiBr6vrHIpAPeaQF9A46rDkRnnXI978rc61ackXeL75Tijz3m2ex8djiONmDcZyMkU6qu2X-JHJrCgxPx7V_Ex7hPoTxhOAclm6bVhcQWkksx54SDmZLf2XQ0DMwpDbOkYUoa5pSGUUVzu2gSTuh-C77bCUPCsjkYYWtRyrGAl3hK86exYCpgQhrWgnmYd8WML2a5-IQtpj9X_uuCN4tosNHYbfLZ3H_l5WdgrWBSK_ETaNmt1A</recordid><startdate>20090601</startdate><enddate>20090601</enddate><creator>Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl</creator><creator>Hanley, Nick</creator><general>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090601</creationdate><title>Are There Income Effects on Global Willingness to Pay for Biodiversity Conservation?</title><author>Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl ; Hanley, Nick</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-8d2e0888c700e332c3a7938ee90dd5ae17c02b930d50c28b03bac8cd2b8b0d963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Contingent valuation</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economic Policy</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Elasticity of demand</topic><topic>Environmental Economics</topic><topic>Environmental Kuznets Curve</topic><topic>Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental quality</topic><topic>Existence values</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Income effects</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Per capita</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><topic>Willingness to pay</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanley, Nick</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental &amp; resource economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl</au><au>Hanley, Nick</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are There Income Effects on Global Willingness to Pay for Biodiversity Conservation?</atitle><jtitle>Environmental &amp; resource economics</jtitle><stitle>Environ Resource Econ</stitle><date>2009-06-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>137</spage><epage>160</epage><pages>137-160</pages><issn>0924-6460</issn><eissn>1573-1502</eissn><abstract>This paper is concerned with the empirical relationship between biodiversity conservation values and income. We use random effects panel models to examine the effects of income, and then GDP per capita, on willingness to pay for habitat and biodiversity conservation. In a meta-analysis, 145 Willingness To Pay estimates for biodiversity conservation where existence value plays a major role were collected from 46 contingent valuation studies across six continents. Other effects included in the meta-analysis were the study year; habitat type; continent; scope as presented to respondents; whether WTP bids were for preventing a deterioration or gaining an improvement in conservation, whether a specific species or specific habitat was protected; whether the questionnaire used a dichotomous choice or an open-ended format; distribution format; and the choice of payment vehicle. GDP per capita seemed to perform as well as an explanatory variable as respondent's mean stated income, indicating that it is wealth in society as a whole which determines variations in WTP. Even if large variation, our main conclusion is, that the demand for biodiversity conservation rises with a nation's wealth, but the income elasticity of willingness to pay is less than one.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10640-008-9226-8</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0924-6460
ispartof Environmental & resource economics, 2009-06, Vol.43 (2), p.137-160
issn 0924-6460
1573-1502
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37188441
source EconLit s plnými texty; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); Springer Link
subjects Biodiversity
Conservation
Contingent valuation
Economic growth
Economic Policy
Economics
Economics and Finance
Elasticity of demand
Environmental Economics
Environmental Kuznets Curve
Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice
Environmental Management
Environmental quality
Existence values
GDP
Gross Domestic Product
Habitats
Households
Income
Income effects
Meta-analysis
Per capita
Pollutants
Studies
Valuation
Willingness to pay
title Are There Income Effects on Global Willingness to Pay for Biodiversity Conservation?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T21%3A46%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20There%20Income%20Effects%20on%20Global%20Willingness%20to%20Pay%20for%20Biodiversity%20Conservation?&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20&%20resource%20economics&rft.au=Jacobsen,%20Jette%20Bredahl&rft.date=2009-06-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=137&rft.epage=160&rft.pages=137-160&rft.issn=0924-6460&rft.eissn=1573-1502&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10640-008-9226-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1706191391%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-8d2e0888c700e332c3a7938ee90dd5ae17c02b930d50c28b03bac8cd2b8b0d963%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220875569&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true