Loading…
Are There Income Effects on Global Willingness to Pay for Biodiversity Conservation?
This paper is concerned with the empirical relationship between biodiversity conservation values and income. We use random effects panel models to examine the effects of income, and then GDP per capita, on willingness to pay for habitat and biodiversity conservation. In a meta-analysis, 145 Willingn...
Saved in:
Published in: | Environmental & resource economics 2009-06, Vol.43 (2), p.137-160 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-8d2e0888c700e332c3a7938ee90dd5ae17c02b930d50c28b03bac8cd2b8b0d963 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-8d2e0888c700e332c3a7938ee90dd5ae17c02b930d50c28b03bac8cd2b8b0d963 |
container_end_page | 160 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 137 |
container_title | Environmental & resource economics |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl Hanley, Nick |
description | This paper is concerned with the empirical relationship between biodiversity conservation values and income. We use random effects panel models to examine the effects of income, and then GDP per capita, on willingness to pay for habitat and biodiversity conservation. In a meta-analysis, 145 Willingness To Pay estimates for biodiversity conservation where existence value plays a major role were collected from 46 contingent valuation studies across six continents. Other effects included in the meta-analysis were the study year; habitat type; continent; scope as presented to respondents; whether WTP bids were for preventing a deterioration or gaining an improvement in conservation, whether a specific species or specific habitat was protected; whether the questionnaire used a dichotomous choice or an open-ended format; distribution format; and the choice of payment vehicle. GDP per capita seemed to perform as well as an explanatory variable as respondent's mean stated income, indicating that it is wealth in society as a whole which determines variations in WTP. Even if large variation, our main conclusion is, that the demand for biodiversity conservation rises with a nation's wealth, but the income elasticity of willingness to pay is less than one. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10640-008-9226-8 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37188441</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1706191391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-8d2e0888c700e332c3a7938ee90dd5ae17c02b930d50c28b03bac8cd2b8b0d963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUcGKFDEQDaLguPoBngwevLVbSbo7yUnWYXfdZUHBWTyGdLp6NmtP0iY9A_P3ZmhR8KCHV1UU7z2qeIS8ZvCeAcjzzKCtoQJQlea8rdQTsmKNFBVrgD8lK9C8rtq6hefkRc6PAKBl3a7I5iIh3TxgqTfBxR3Sy2FAN2caA70eY2dH-s2Pow_bgDnTOdIv9kiHmOhHH3t_wJT9fKTrGDKmg519DB9ekmeDHTO--tXPyP3V5Wb9qbr7fH2zvrirXCNgrlTPEZRSTgKgENwJK7VQiBr6vrHIpAPeaQF9A46rDkRnnXI978rc61ackXeL75Tijz3m2ex8djiONmDcZyMkU6qu2X-JHJrCgxPx7V_Ex7hPoTxhOAclm6bVhcQWkksx54SDmZLf2XQ0DMwpDbOkYUoa5pSGUUVzu2gSTuh-C77bCUPCsjkYYWtRyrGAl3hK86exYCpgQhrWgnmYd8WML2a5-IQtpj9X_uuCN4tosNHYbfLZ3H_l5WdgrWBSK_ETaNmt1A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220875569</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are There Income Effects on Global Willingness to Pay for Biodiversity Conservation?</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl ; Hanley, Nick</creator><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl ; Hanley, Nick</creatorcontrib><description>This paper is concerned with the empirical relationship between biodiversity conservation values and income. We use random effects panel models to examine the effects of income, and then GDP per capita, on willingness to pay for habitat and biodiversity conservation. In a meta-analysis, 145 Willingness To Pay estimates for biodiversity conservation where existence value plays a major role were collected from 46 contingent valuation studies across six continents. Other effects included in the meta-analysis were the study year; habitat type; continent; scope as presented to respondents; whether WTP bids were for preventing a deterioration or gaining an improvement in conservation, whether a specific species or specific habitat was protected; whether the questionnaire used a dichotomous choice or an open-ended format; distribution format; and the choice of payment vehicle. GDP per capita seemed to perform as well as an explanatory variable as respondent's mean stated income, indicating that it is wealth in society as a whole which determines variations in WTP. Even if large variation, our main conclusion is, that the demand for biodiversity conservation rises with a nation's wealth, but the income elasticity of willingness to pay is less than one.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0924-6460</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1502</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10640-008-9226-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Conservation ; Contingent valuation ; Economic growth ; Economic Policy ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Elasticity of demand ; Environmental Economics ; Environmental Kuznets Curve ; Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice ; Environmental Management ; Environmental quality ; Existence values ; GDP ; Gross Domestic Product ; Habitats ; Households ; Income ; Income effects ; Meta-analysis ; Per capita ; Pollutants ; Studies ; Valuation ; Willingness to pay</subject><ispartof>Environmental & resource economics, 2009-06, Vol.43 (2), p.137-160</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-8d2e0888c700e332c3a7938ee90dd5ae17c02b930d50c28b03bac8cd2b8b0d963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-8d2e0888c700e332c3a7938ee90dd5ae17c02b930d50c28b03bac8cd2b8b0d963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/220875569/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/220875569?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,12847,27924,27925,33223,33224,36060,36061,44363,74895</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/kapenreec/v_3a43_3ay_3a2009_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a137-160.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanley, Nick</creatorcontrib><title>Are There Income Effects on Global Willingness to Pay for Biodiversity Conservation?</title><title>Environmental & resource economics</title><addtitle>Environ Resource Econ</addtitle><description>This paper is concerned with the empirical relationship between biodiversity conservation values and income. We use random effects panel models to examine the effects of income, and then GDP per capita, on willingness to pay for habitat and biodiversity conservation. In a meta-analysis, 145 Willingness To Pay estimates for biodiversity conservation where existence value plays a major role were collected from 46 contingent valuation studies across six continents. Other effects included in the meta-analysis were the study year; habitat type; continent; scope as presented to respondents; whether WTP bids were for preventing a deterioration or gaining an improvement in conservation, whether a specific species or specific habitat was protected; whether the questionnaire used a dichotomous choice or an open-ended format; distribution format; and the choice of payment vehicle. GDP per capita seemed to perform as well as an explanatory variable as respondent's mean stated income, indicating that it is wealth in society as a whole which determines variations in WTP. Even if large variation, our main conclusion is, that the demand for biodiversity conservation rises with a nation's wealth, but the income elasticity of willingness to pay is less than one.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Contingent valuation</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economic Policy</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Elasticity of demand</subject><subject>Environmental Economics</subject><subject>Environmental Kuznets Curve</subject><subject>Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental quality</subject><subject>Existence values</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Income effects</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Per capita</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><subject>Willingness to pay</subject><issn>0924-6460</issn><issn>1573-1502</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUcGKFDEQDaLguPoBngwevLVbSbo7yUnWYXfdZUHBWTyGdLp6NmtP0iY9A_P3ZmhR8KCHV1UU7z2qeIS8ZvCeAcjzzKCtoQJQlea8rdQTsmKNFBVrgD8lK9C8rtq6hefkRc6PAKBl3a7I5iIh3TxgqTfBxR3Sy2FAN2caA70eY2dH-s2Pow_bgDnTOdIv9kiHmOhHH3t_wJT9fKTrGDKmg519DB9ekmeDHTO--tXPyP3V5Wb9qbr7fH2zvrirXCNgrlTPEZRSTgKgENwJK7VQiBr6vrHIpAPeaQF9A46rDkRnnXI978rc61ackXeL75Tijz3m2ex8djiONmDcZyMkU6qu2X-JHJrCgxPx7V_Ex7hPoTxhOAclm6bVhcQWkksx54SDmZLf2XQ0DMwpDbOkYUoa5pSGUUVzu2gSTuh-C77bCUPCsjkYYWtRyrGAl3hK86exYCpgQhrWgnmYd8WML2a5-IQtpj9X_uuCN4tosNHYbfLZ3H_l5WdgrWBSK_ETaNmt1A</recordid><startdate>20090601</startdate><enddate>20090601</enddate><creator>Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl</creator><creator>Hanley, Nick</creator><general>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090601</creationdate><title>Are There Income Effects on Global Willingness to Pay for Biodiversity Conservation?</title><author>Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl ; Hanley, Nick</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-8d2e0888c700e332c3a7938ee90dd5ae17c02b930d50c28b03bac8cd2b8b0d963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Contingent valuation</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economic Policy</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Elasticity of demand</topic><topic>Environmental Economics</topic><topic>Environmental Kuznets Curve</topic><topic>Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental quality</topic><topic>Existence values</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Income effects</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Per capita</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><topic>Willingness to pay</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanley, Nick</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental & resource economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl</au><au>Hanley, Nick</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are There Income Effects on Global Willingness to Pay for Biodiversity Conservation?</atitle><jtitle>Environmental & resource economics</jtitle><stitle>Environ Resource Econ</stitle><date>2009-06-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>137</spage><epage>160</epage><pages>137-160</pages><issn>0924-6460</issn><eissn>1573-1502</eissn><abstract>This paper is concerned with the empirical relationship between biodiversity conservation values and income. We use random effects panel models to examine the effects of income, and then GDP per capita, on willingness to pay for habitat and biodiversity conservation. In a meta-analysis, 145 Willingness To Pay estimates for biodiversity conservation where existence value plays a major role were collected from 46 contingent valuation studies across six continents. Other effects included in the meta-analysis were the study year; habitat type; continent; scope as presented to respondents; whether WTP bids were for preventing a deterioration or gaining an improvement in conservation, whether a specific species or specific habitat was protected; whether the questionnaire used a dichotomous choice or an open-ended format; distribution format; and the choice of payment vehicle. GDP per capita seemed to perform as well as an explanatory variable as respondent's mean stated income, indicating that it is wealth in society as a whole which determines variations in WTP. Even if large variation, our main conclusion is, that the demand for biodiversity conservation rises with a nation's wealth, but the income elasticity of willingness to pay is less than one.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10640-008-9226-8</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0924-6460 |
ispartof | Environmental & resource economics, 2009-06, Vol.43 (2), p.137-160 |
issn | 0924-6460 1573-1502 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37188441 |
source | EconLit s plnými texty; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); Springer Link |
subjects | Biodiversity Conservation Contingent valuation Economic growth Economic Policy Economics Economics and Finance Elasticity of demand Environmental Economics Environmental Kuznets Curve Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice Environmental Management Environmental quality Existence values GDP Gross Domestic Product Habitats Households Income Income effects Meta-analysis Per capita Pollutants Studies Valuation Willingness to pay |
title | Are There Income Effects on Global Willingness to Pay for Biodiversity Conservation? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T21%3A46%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20There%20Income%20Effects%20on%20Global%20Willingness%20to%20Pay%20for%20Biodiversity%20Conservation?&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20&%20resource%20economics&rft.au=Jacobsen,%20Jette%20Bredahl&rft.date=2009-06-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=137&rft.epage=160&rft.pages=137-160&rft.issn=0924-6460&rft.eissn=1573-1502&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10640-008-9226-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1706191391%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-8d2e0888c700e332c3a7938ee90dd5ae17c02b930d50c28b03bac8cd2b8b0d963%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220875569&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |