Loading…
The European Commission's Opinions under Article 6(4) of the Habitats Directive
The contribution examines the Opinions which the European Commission has issued so far under Article 6(4) of Directive 92/43 (Habitats Directive). It examines Member States' reasoning for justifying the application of Article 6(4) of the Habitats Directive in the light of the European Court of...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of environmental law 2009, Vol.21 (1), p.59-85 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-ab0688a08d85ecfab70a6bea3933e5f9d4d40a25a38d27232331b6d803beb05f3 |
|---|---|
| cites | |
| container_end_page | 85 |
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 59 |
| container_title | Journal of environmental law |
| container_volume | 21 |
| creator | Kramer, L. |
| description | The contribution examines the Opinions which the European Commission has issued so far under Article 6(4) of Directive 92/43 (Habitats Directive). It examines Member States' reasoning for justifying the application of Article 6(4) of the Habitats Directive in the light of the European Court of Justice rulings, and comes to the conclusion that probably not one of the cases submitted would have been accepted by the Court. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jel/eqn028 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37233251</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44248678</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/jel/eqn028</oup_id><sourcerecordid>44248678</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-ab0688a08d85ecfab70a6bea3933e5f9d4d40a25a38d27232331b6d803beb05f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhS1EJYYpm-6RLCSgRUrrd5xlNbQd0MBsiqjYWE5yIzxk4tR2Kvj3uErVBQu6ulc6330ehI4oOaWk4mc76M_gdiBMP0MLKpQoeClunqMFqSQrtC75C_Qyxh0hhDHKFmh7_RPwxRT8CHbAK7_fuxidH95HvB3dkLOIp6GFgM9Dck0PWB2LE-w7nHLh2tYu2RTxRxegSe4ODtFBZ_sIrx7iEn27vLherYvN9urT6nxTNJzJVNiaKK0t0a2W0HS2LolVNVhecQ6yq1rRCmKZtFy3rGSccU5r1WrCa6iJ7PgSvZv7jsHfThCTyYs30Pd2AD9Fw3NRnkSfBKkgtFJSZfDNP-DOT2HIRxhGdX6jzLst0YcZaoKPMUBnxuD2NvwxlJh7B0x2wMwOZPjtDPtp_D_3euZ2MfnwSArBhFblvV7MuosJfj_qNvwyquSlNOubH-bLldTfv6435jP_C0OKndw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218374593</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The European Commission's Opinions under Article 6(4) of the Habitats Directive</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Kramer, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kramer, L.</creatorcontrib><description>The contribution examines the Opinions which the European Commission has issued so far under Article 6(4) of Directive 92/43 (Habitats Directive). It examines Member States' reasoning for justifying the application of Article 6(4) of the Habitats Directive in the light of the European Court of Justice rulings, and comes to the conclusion that probably not one of the cases submitted would have been accepted by the Court.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-8873</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-374X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jel/eqn028</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Airports ; Article 6 ; Beavers ; Coal ; Coal mining ; Commission Opinions ; Compensation ; compensation measures ; Cross-national analysis ; Environmental impact assessment ; Environmental impact studies ; Environmental law ; European law ; European Union ; Habitat conservation ; Habitats ; Habitats Directive 92/43 ; Highways ; impact assessment ; Nature conservation ; Political action committees ; Provisions ; Public interest ; Public opinion ; Rail lines</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental law, 2009, Vol.21 (1), p.59-85</ispartof><rights>The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org 2009</rights><rights>The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-ab0688a08d85ecfab70a6bea3933e5f9d4d40a25a38d27232331b6d803beb05f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44248678$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44248678$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,33223,33224,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kramer, L.</creatorcontrib><title>The European Commission's Opinions under Article 6(4) of the Habitats Directive</title><title>Journal of environmental law</title><description>The contribution examines the Opinions which the European Commission has issued so far under Article 6(4) of Directive 92/43 (Habitats Directive). It examines Member States' reasoning for justifying the application of Article 6(4) of the Habitats Directive in the light of the European Court of Justice rulings, and comes to the conclusion that probably not one of the cases submitted would have been accepted by the Court.</description><subject>Airports</subject><subject>Article 6</subject><subject>Beavers</subject><subject>Coal</subject><subject>Coal mining</subject><subject>Commission Opinions</subject><subject>Compensation</subject><subject>compensation measures</subject><subject>Cross-national analysis</subject><subject>Environmental impact assessment</subject><subject>Environmental impact studies</subject><subject>Environmental law</subject><subject>European law</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Habitats Directive 92/43</subject><subject>Highways</subject><subject>impact assessment</subject><subject>Nature conservation</subject><subject>Political action committees</subject><subject>Provisions</subject><subject>Public interest</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Rail lines</subject><issn>0952-8873</issn><issn>1464-374X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhS1EJYYpm-6RLCSgRUrrd5xlNbQd0MBsiqjYWE5yIzxk4tR2Kvj3uErVBQu6ulc6330ehI4oOaWk4mc76M_gdiBMP0MLKpQoeClunqMFqSQrtC75C_Qyxh0hhDHKFmh7_RPwxRT8CHbAK7_fuxidH95HvB3dkLOIp6GFgM9Dck0PWB2LE-w7nHLh2tYu2RTxRxegSe4ODtFBZ_sIrx7iEn27vLherYvN9urT6nxTNJzJVNiaKK0t0a2W0HS2LolVNVhecQ6yq1rRCmKZtFy3rGSccU5r1WrCa6iJ7PgSvZv7jsHfThCTyYs30Pd2AD9Fw3NRnkSfBKkgtFJSZfDNP-DOT2HIRxhGdX6jzLst0YcZaoKPMUBnxuD2NvwxlJh7B0x2wMwOZPjtDPtp_D_3euZ2MfnwSArBhFblvV7MuosJfj_qNvwyquSlNOubH-bLldTfv6435jP_C0OKndw</recordid><startdate>2009</startdate><enddate>2009</enddate><creator>Kramer, L.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2009</creationdate><title>The European Commission's Opinions under Article 6(4) of the Habitats Directive</title><author>Kramer, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-ab0688a08d85ecfab70a6bea3933e5f9d4d40a25a38d27232331b6d803beb05f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Airports</topic><topic>Article 6</topic><topic>Beavers</topic><topic>Coal</topic><topic>Coal mining</topic><topic>Commission Opinions</topic><topic>Compensation</topic><topic>compensation measures</topic><topic>Cross-national analysis</topic><topic>Environmental impact assessment</topic><topic>Environmental impact studies</topic><topic>Environmental law</topic><topic>European law</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Habitats Directive 92/43</topic><topic>Highways</topic><topic>impact assessment</topic><topic>Nature conservation</topic><topic>Political action committees</topic><topic>Provisions</topic><topic>Public interest</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Rail lines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kramer, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kramer, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The European Commission's Opinions under Article 6(4) of the Habitats Directive</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental law</jtitle><date>2009</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>85</epage><pages>59-85</pages><issn>0952-8873</issn><eissn>1464-374X</eissn><abstract>The contribution examines the Opinions which the European Commission has issued so far under Article 6(4) of Directive 92/43 (Habitats Directive). It examines Member States' reasoning for justifying the application of Article 6(4) of the Habitats Directive in the light of the European Court of Justice rulings, and comes to the conclusion that probably not one of the cases submitted would have been accepted by the Court.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jel/eqn028</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0952-8873 |
| ispartof | Journal of environmental law, 2009, Vol.21 (1), p.59-85 |
| issn | 0952-8873 1464-374X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37233251 |
| source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Oxford Journals Online |
| subjects | Airports Article 6 Beavers Coal Coal mining Commission Opinions Compensation compensation measures Cross-national analysis Environmental impact assessment Environmental impact studies Environmental law European law European Union Habitat conservation Habitats Habitats Directive 92/43 Highways impact assessment Nature conservation Political action committees Provisions Public interest Public opinion Rail lines |
| title | The European Commission's Opinions under Article 6(4) of the Habitats Directive |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A35%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20European%20Commission's%20Opinions%20under%20Article%206(4)%20of%20the%20Habitats%20Directive&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20law&rft.au=Kramer,%20L.&rft.date=2009&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=85&rft.pages=59-85&rft.issn=0952-8873&rft.eissn=1464-374X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jel/eqn028&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44248678%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-ab0688a08d85ecfab70a6bea3933e5f9d4d40a25a38d27232331b6d803beb05f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218374593&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44248678&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jel/eqn028&rfr_iscdi=true |