Loading…

Company interests and foreign aid policy: Playing donors off against one another

The evidence on conditionality indicates that this instrument sometimes works, and sometimes does not work. We suggest that third parties to the donor–recipient relationship influence the aid disbursement. The halt in aid that should follow non-compliance could trigger the recipient to cancel contra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European economic review 2006-04, Vol.50 (3), p.533-545
Main Author: Villanger, Espen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-ef7855e3ce6c07c06b2a612cf6fca84c53a8eec68cbd921cfb31ccb0f5c231783
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-ef7855e3ce6c07c06b2a612cf6fca84c53a8eec68cbd921cfb31ccb0f5c231783
container_end_page 545
container_issue 3
container_start_page 533
container_title European economic review
container_volume 50
creator Villanger, Espen
description The evidence on conditionality indicates that this instrument sometimes works, and sometimes does not work. We suggest that third parties to the donor–recipient relationship influence the aid disbursement. The halt in aid that should follow non-compliance could trigger the recipient to cancel contracts with companies from donor countries, which creates incentives for the companies to put pressure towards aid disbursement. We use a multi-agent triadic model of the relationships between a recipient and two donors and two companies to illustrate that recipients may act strategically to make third parties (like companies and others) influence the disbursement decision. Failing to take account of third parties’ role yields the opposite result; conditionality becomes successful.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2005.01.005
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37723682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0014292105000164</els_id><sourcerecordid>37723682</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-ef7855e3ce6c07c06b2a612cf6fca84c53a8eec68cbd921cfb31ccb0f5c231783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE2rFDEQDKLg-vQ_BA_eZszHZibPmy5-8sB3UPAWsj2dfVlmkzGZXZh_bw8rCl4MdIqmq4qiGONStFLI7vWxxXPJCLngpVVCmFbIluAR20jb68b06sdjthFCbht1q-RT9qzWo6Cdzht2v8unyaeFxzRjwTpX7tPAA9nFQ-I-DnzKY4TlDb8f_RLTgQ855VJ5DoH7g4-pzjwnJFmeH7A8Z0-CHyu--I037PuH9992n5q7rx8_797eNWCEmRsMvTUGNWAHogfR7ZXvpILQBfB2C0Z7iwidhf1AqSHstQTYi2BAadlbfcNeXX2nkn-eKbg7xQo4jj5hPlen-17pzioivvyHeMznkiibk7dWbI1Skkj2SoKSay0Y3FTiyZfFSeHWnt3R_e3ZrT07IR0BSb9cpQUnhD86XB-s5IvT3gj6FhpSdgSRRtNM601rZ7bGPcwnMnt3NUOq7hKxuAoRE-AQC8Lshhz_n-gXREumHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198045221</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Company interests and foreign aid policy: Playing donors off against one another</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Villanger, Espen</creator><creatorcontrib>Villanger, Espen</creatorcontrib><description>The evidence on conditionality indicates that this instrument sometimes works, and sometimes does not work. We suggest that third parties to the donor–recipient relationship influence the aid disbursement. The halt in aid that should follow non-compliance could trigger the recipient to cancel contracts with companies from donor countries, which creates incentives for the companies to put pressure towards aid disbursement. We use a multi-agent triadic model of the relationships between a recipient and two donors and two companies to illustrate that recipients may act strategically to make third parties (like companies and others) influence the disbursement decision. Failing to take account of third parties’ role yields the opposite result; conditionality becomes successful.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-2921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-572X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2005.01.005</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EERVAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Compliance ; Conditionality ; Development policy ; Economic analysis ; Economic equilibrium ; Economic models ; Foreign aid ; Foreign assistance ; Game theory ; International economic policy ; Lobbying ; Strategic planning ; Studies ; Third party ; Triadic</subject><ispartof>European economic review, 2006-04, Vol.50 (3), p.533-545</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Apr 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-ef7855e3ce6c07c06b2a612cf6fca84c53a8eec68cbd921cfb31ccb0f5c231783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-ef7855e3ce6c07c06b2a612cf6fca84c53a8eec68cbd921cfb31ccb0f5c231783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33224</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeeecrev/v_3a50_3ay_3a2006_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a533-545.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Villanger, Espen</creatorcontrib><title>Company interests and foreign aid policy: Playing donors off against one another</title><title>European economic review</title><description>The evidence on conditionality indicates that this instrument sometimes works, and sometimes does not work. We suggest that third parties to the donor–recipient relationship influence the aid disbursement. The halt in aid that should follow non-compliance could trigger the recipient to cancel contracts with companies from donor countries, which creates incentives for the companies to put pressure towards aid disbursement. We use a multi-agent triadic model of the relationships between a recipient and two donors and two companies to illustrate that recipients may act strategically to make third parties (like companies and others) influence the disbursement decision. Failing to take account of third parties’ role yields the opposite result; conditionality becomes successful.</description><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Conditionality</subject><subject>Development policy</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economic equilibrium</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Foreign aid</subject><subject>Foreign assistance</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>International economic policy</subject><subject>Lobbying</subject><subject>Strategic planning</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Third party</subject><subject>Triadic</subject><issn>0014-2921</issn><issn>1873-572X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUE2rFDEQDKLg-vQ_BA_eZszHZibPmy5-8sB3UPAWsj2dfVlmkzGZXZh_bw8rCl4MdIqmq4qiGONStFLI7vWxxXPJCLngpVVCmFbIluAR20jb68b06sdjthFCbht1q-RT9qzWo6Cdzht2v8unyaeFxzRjwTpX7tPAA9nFQ-I-DnzKY4TlDb8f_RLTgQ855VJ5DoH7g4-pzjwnJFmeH7A8Z0-CHyu--I037PuH9992n5q7rx8_797eNWCEmRsMvTUGNWAHogfR7ZXvpILQBfB2C0Z7iwidhf1AqSHstQTYi2BAadlbfcNeXX2nkn-eKbg7xQo4jj5hPlen-17pzioivvyHeMznkiibk7dWbI1Skkj2SoKSay0Y3FTiyZfFSeHWnt3R_e3ZrT07IR0BSb9cpQUnhD86XB-s5IvT3gj6FhpSdgSRRtNM601rZ7bGPcwnMnt3NUOq7hKxuAoRE-AQC8Lshhz_n-gXREumHg</recordid><startdate>20060401</startdate><enddate>20060401</enddate><creator>Villanger, Espen</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060401</creationdate><title>Company interests and foreign aid policy: Playing donors off against one another</title><author>Villanger, Espen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-ef7855e3ce6c07c06b2a612cf6fca84c53a8eec68cbd921cfb31ccb0f5c231783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Conditionality</topic><topic>Development policy</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economic equilibrium</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Foreign aid</topic><topic>Foreign assistance</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>International economic policy</topic><topic>Lobbying</topic><topic>Strategic planning</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Third party</topic><topic>Triadic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Villanger, Espen</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>European economic review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Villanger, Espen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Company interests and foreign aid policy: Playing donors off against one another</atitle><jtitle>European economic review</jtitle><date>2006-04-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>533</spage><epage>545</epage><pages>533-545</pages><issn>0014-2921</issn><eissn>1873-572X</eissn><coden>EERVAI</coden><abstract>The evidence on conditionality indicates that this instrument sometimes works, and sometimes does not work. We suggest that third parties to the donor–recipient relationship influence the aid disbursement. The halt in aid that should follow non-compliance could trigger the recipient to cancel contracts with companies from donor countries, which creates incentives for the companies to put pressure towards aid disbursement. We use a multi-agent triadic model of the relationships between a recipient and two donors and two companies to illustrate that recipients may act strategically to make third parties (like companies and others) influence the disbursement decision. Failing to take account of third parties’ role yields the opposite result; conditionality becomes successful.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.euroecorev.2005.01.005</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-2921
ispartof European economic review, 2006-04, Vol.50 (3), p.533-545
issn 0014-2921
1873-572X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37723682
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)
subjects Compliance
Conditionality
Development policy
Economic analysis
Economic equilibrium
Economic models
Foreign aid
Foreign assistance
Game theory
International economic policy
Lobbying
Strategic planning
Studies
Third party
Triadic
title Company interests and foreign aid policy: Playing donors off against one another
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T11%3A08%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Company%20interests%20and%20foreign%20aid%20policy:%20Playing%20donors%20off%20against%20one%20another&rft.jtitle=European%20economic%20review&rft.au=Villanger,%20Espen&rft.date=2006-04-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=533&rft.epage=545&rft.pages=533-545&rft.issn=0014-2921&rft.eissn=1873-572X&rft.coden=EERVAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2005.01.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E37723682%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-ef7855e3ce6c07c06b2a612cf6fca84c53a8eec68cbd921cfb31ccb0f5c231783%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198045221&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true