Loading…
Company interests and foreign aid policy: Playing donors off against one another
The evidence on conditionality indicates that this instrument sometimes works, and sometimes does not work. We suggest that third parties to the donor–recipient relationship influence the aid disbursement. The halt in aid that should follow non-compliance could trigger the recipient to cancel contra...
Saved in:
Published in: | European economic review 2006-04, Vol.50 (3), p.533-545 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-ef7855e3ce6c07c06b2a612cf6fca84c53a8eec68cbd921cfb31ccb0f5c231783 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-ef7855e3ce6c07c06b2a612cf6fca84c53a8eec68cbd921cfb31ccb0f5c231783 |
container_end_page | 545 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 533 |
container_title | European economic review |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Villanger, Espen |
description | The evidence on conditionality indicates that this instrument sometimes works, and sometimes does not work. We suggest that third parties to the donor–recipient relationship influence the aid disbursement. The halt in aid that should follow non-compliance could trigger the recipient to cancel contracts with companies from donor countries, which creates incentives for the companies to put pressure towards aid disbursement. We use a multi-agent triadic model of the relationships between a recipient and two donors and two companies to illustrate that recipients may act strategically to make third parties (like companies and others) influence the disbursement decision. Failing to take account of third parties’ role yields the opposite result; conditionality becomes successful. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2005.01.005 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37723682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0014292105000164</els_id><sourcerecordid>37723682</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-ef7855e3ce6c07c06b2a612cf6fca84c53a8eec68cbd921cfb31ccb0f5c231783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE2rFDEQDKLg-vQ_BA_eZszHZibPmy5-8sB3UPAWsj2dfVlmkzGZXZh_bw8rCl4MdIqmq4qiGONStFLI7vWxxXPJCLngpVVCmFbIluAR20jb68b06sdjthFCbht1q-RT9qzWo6Cdzht2v8unyaeFxzRjwTpX7tPAA9nFQ-I-DnzKY4TlDb8f_RLTgQ855VJ5DoH7g4-pzjwnJFmeH7A8Z0-CHyu--I037PuH9992n5q7rx8_797eNWCEmRsMvTUGNWAHogfR7ZXvpILQBfB2C0Z7iwidhf1AqSHstQTYi2BAadlbfcNeXX2nkn-eKbg7xQo4jj5hPlen-17pzioivvyHeMznkiibk7dWbI1Skkj2SoKSay0Y3FTiyZfFSeHWnt3R_e3ZrT07IR0BSb9cpQUnhD86XB-s5IvT3gj6FhpSdgSRRtNM601rZ7bGPcwnMnt3NUOq7hKxuAoRE-AQC8Lshhz_n-gXREumHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198045221</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Company interests and foreign aid policy: Playing donors off against one another</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Villanger, Espen</creator><creatorcontrib>Villanger, Espen</creatorcontrib><description>The evidence on conditionality indicates that this instrument sometimes works, and sometimes does not work. We suggest that third parties to the donor–recipient relationship influence the aid disbursement. The halt in aid that should follow non-compliance could trigger the recipient to cancel contracts with companies from donor countries, which creates incentives for the companies to put pressure towards aid disbursement. We use a multi-agent triadic model of the relationships between a recipient and two donors and two companies to illustrate that recipients may act strategically to make third parties (like companies and others) influence the disbursement decision. Failing to take account of third parties’ role yields the opposite result; conditionality becomes successful.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-2921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-572X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2005.01.005</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EERVAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Compliance ; Conditionality ; Development policy ; Economic analysis ; Economic equilibrium ; Economic models ; Foreign aid ; Foreign assistance ; Game theory ; International economic policy ; Lobbying ; Strategic planning ; Studies ; Third party ; Triadic</subject><ispartof>European economic review, 2006-04, Vol.50 (3), p.533-545</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Apr 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-ef7855e3ce6c07c06b2a612cf6fca84c53a8eec68cbd921cfb31ccb0f5c231783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-ef7855e3ce6c07c06b2a612cf6fca84c53a8eec68cbd921cfb31ccb0f5c231783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33224</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeeecrev/v_3a50_3ay_3a2006_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a533-545.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Villanger, Espen</creatorcontrib><title>Company interests and foreign aid policy: Playing donors off against one another</title><title>European economic review</title><description>The evidence on conditionality indicates that this instrument sometimes works, and sometimes does not work. We suggest that third parties to the donor–recipient relationship influence the aid disbursement. The halt in aid that should follow non-compliance could trigger the recipient to cancel contracts with companies from donor countries, which creates incentives for the companies to put pressure towards aid disbursement. We use a multi-agent triadic model of the relationships between a recipient and two donors and two companies to illustrate that recipients may act strategically to make third parties (like companies and others) influence the disbursement decision. Failing to take account of third parties’ role yields the opposite result; conditionality becomes successful.</description><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Conditionality</subject><subject>Development policy</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economic equilibrium</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Foreign aid</subject><subject>Foreign assistance</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>International economic policy</subject><subject>Lobbying</subject><subject>Strategic planning</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Third party</subject><subject>Triadic</subject><issn>0014-2921</issn><issn>1873-572X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUE2rFDEQDKLg-vQ_BA_eZszHZibPmy5-8sB3UPAWsj2dfVlmkzGZXZh_bw8rCl4MdIqmq4qiGONStFLI7vWxxXPJCLngpVVCmFbIluAR20jb68b06sdjthFCbht1q-RT9qzWo6Cdzht2v8unyaeFxzRjwTpX7tPAA9nFQ-I-DnzKY4TlDb8f_RLTgQ855VJ5DoH7g4-pzjwnJFmeH7A8Z0-CHyu--I037PuH9992n5q7rx8_797eNWCEmRsMvTUGNWAHogfR7ZXvpILQBfB2C0Z7iwidhf1AqSHstQTYi2BAadlbfcNeXX2nkn-eKbg7xQo4jj5hPlen-17pzioivvyHeMznkiibk7dWbI1Skkj2SoKSay0Y3FTiyZfFSeHWnt3R_e3ZrT07IR0BSb9cpQUnhD86XB-s5IvT3gj6FhpSdgSRRtNM601rZ7bGPcwnMnt3NUOq7hKxuAoRE-AQC8Lshhz_n-gXREumHg</recordid><startdate>20060401</startdate><enddate>20060401</enddate><creator>Villanger, Espen</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060401</creationdate><title>Company interests and foreign aid policy: Playing donors off against one another</title><author>Villanger, Espen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-ef7855e3ce6c07c06b2a612cf6fca84c53a8eec68cbd921cfb31ccb0f5c231783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Conditionality</topic><topic>Development policy</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economic equilibrium</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Foreign aid</topic><topic>Foreign assistance</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>International economic policy</topic><topic>Lobbying</topic><topic>Strategic planning</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Third party</topic><topic>Triadic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Villanger, Espen</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>European economic review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Villanger, Espen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Company interests and foreign aid policy: Playing donors off against one another</atitle><jtitle>European economic review</jtitle><date>2006-04-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>533</spage><epage>545</epage><pages>533-545</pages><issn>0014-2921</issn><eissn>1873-572X</eissn><coden>EERVAI</coden><abstract>The evidence on conditionality indicates that this instrument sometimes works, and sometimes does not work. We suggest that third parties to the donor–recipient relationship influence the aid disbursement. The halt in aid that should follow non-compliance could trigger the recipient to cancel contracts with companies from donor countries, which creates incentives for the companies to put pressure towards aid disbursement. We use a multi-agent triadic model of the relationships between a recipient and two donors and two companies to illustrate that recipients may act strategically to make third parties (like companies and others) influence the disbursement decision. Failing to take account of third parties’ role yields the opposite result; conditionality becomes successful.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.euroecorev.2005.01.005</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0014-2921 |
ispartof | European economic review, 2006-04, Vol.50 (3), p.533-545 |
issn | 0014-2921 1873-572X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37723682 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list) |
subjects | Compliance Conditionality Development policy Economic analysis Economic equilibrium Economic models Foreign aid Foreign assistance Game theory International economic policy Lobbying Strategic planning Studies Third party Triadic |
title | Company interests and foreign aid policy: Playing donors off against one another |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T11%3A08%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Company%20interests%20and%20foreign%20aid%20policy:%20Playing%20donors%20off%20against%20one%20another&rft.jtitle=European%20economic%20review&rft.au=Villanger,%20Espen&rft.date=2006-04-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=533&rft.epage=545&rft.pages=533-545&rft.issn=0014-2921&rft.eissn=1873-572X&rft.coden=EERVAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2005.01.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E37723682%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-ef7855e3ce6c07c06b2a612cf6fca84c53a8eec68cbd921cfb31ccb0f5c231783%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198045221&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |