Loading…

Technology and Map-Learning: Users, Methods, and Symbols

This article investigates the cognitive processes used by learners (adults and young adolescents) for tasks that require the integration of geographical information across spaces, hierarchies, and geographic scales. An experiment simulated basic GIS functions and contained four experimental conditio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2003-12, Vol.93 (4), p.828-850
Main Authors: Lloyd, Robert, Bunch, Rick L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4994-89f6d2982caed000fcfadbefa8fd1b7b55ce96dc5b185e88ad7ca95c24e5280c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4994-89f6d2982caed000fcfadbefa8fd1b7b55ce96dc5b185e88ad7ca95c24e5280c3
container_end_page 850
container_issue 4
container_start_page 828
container_title Annals of the Association of American Geographers
container_volume 93
creator Lloyd, Robert
Bunch, Rick L.
description This article investigates the cognitive processes used by learners (adults and young adolescents) for tasks that require the integration of geographical information across spaces, hierarchies, and geographic scales. An experiment simulated basic GIS functions and contained four experimental conditions (Chunk, Layer, Scale, and Whole). Reaction time, accuracy, and confidence were recorded as dependent variables related to the success of the integration process. The data were used as input for a back-propagation neural-network model. The neural network model was successful in learning patterns and could be used to predict the confidence, reaction time, and accuracy for combinations of learners, experimental conditions, and map-feature categories. A multivariate analysis of variance was used to determine significant relationships among the behavioral variables and characteristics of the learners, experimental conditions related to GIS functions, and map features (points, lines, and areas). The results of the analysis generally indicated that young adolescent learners were slower, less accurate, and more confident than adult learners for all experimental conditions. Overall, subjects were more accurate and confident in tasks that required less integration of geographical information. Learners had the most success recalling information related to area symbols and the least success recalling information related to point symbols.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2003.09304004.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37809603</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1515353</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1515353</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4994-89f6d2982caed000fcfadbefa8fd1b7b55ce96dc5b185e88ad7ca95c24e5280c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE1v2zAMhoWhBZpm-wc9BBu2U-3RlmTL6ykI0nZA2h3WngVZH40NxcqkBK3__WS4WYCeVl0kig9fki9CXzJIs3i-t2lGijJhGIo0B8ApVBgIAElfPqDJv9wJmkD8TGgB7Aydh9DGMMMFmSD2oOW6c9Y99TPRqdmd2CYrLXzXdE8_Zo9B-3A5u9O7tVPxMRC_-03tbPiITo2wQX96vafo8Xr5sLhNVr9ufi7mq0SSqiIJq0yh8orlUmgVuxpphKq1EcyorC5rSqWuCiVpnTGqGROqlKKiMiea5gwknqJvo-7Wuz97HXZ80wSprRWddvvAccmgKgBH8PMbsHV738XZeA4MypIQFqGrEZLeheC14VvfbITveQZ8sJS3fLCND7bxwVJ-sJS_xOqvry1EkMIaLzrZhKNEAZREiyO3HLnnxur-PS34_P5-fgijzsWo04ad80cdmlFMh42vx3TTGec34tl5q_hO9Nb5w2z4f_b6C7MsqdM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>208077448</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Technology and Map-Learning: Users, Methods, and Symbols</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Lloyd, Robert ; Bunch, Rick L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, Robert ; Bunch, Rick L.</creatorcontrib><description>This article investigates the cognitive processes used by learners (adults and young adolescents) for tasks that require the integration of geographical information across spaces, hierarchies, and geographic scales. An experiment simulated basic GIS functions and contained four experimental conditions (Chunk, Layer, Scale, and Whole). Reaction time, accuracy, and confidence were recorded as dependent variables related to the success of the integration process. The data were used as input for a back-propagation neural-network model. The neural network model was successful in learning patterns and could be used to predict the confidence, reaction time, and accuracy for combinations of learners, experimental conditions, and map-feature categories. A multivariate analysis of variance was used to determine significant relationships among the behavioral variables and characteristics of the learners, experimental conditions related to GIS functions, and map features (points, lines, and areas). The results of the analysis generally indicated that young adolescent learners were slower, less accurate, and more confident than adult learners for all experimental conditions. Overall, subjects were more accurate and confident in tasks that required less integration of geographical information. Learners had the most success recalling information related to area symbols and the least success recalling information related to point symbols.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-5608</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2469-4452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8306</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2469-4460</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2003.09304004.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AAAGAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Adolescence ; Adolescents ; Adult education ; Bgi / Prodig ; Cartography ; Cognition ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognitive development ; Cognitive models ; General methodology ; Geographic information systems ; Geography ; GIS ; Learning ; Map skills ; Methods, Models, and GIS ; Modeling ; neural network ; Neurons ; Space ; spatial abilities ; Spatial analysis ; spatial cognition ; Technology ; young adolescents</subject><ispartof>Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2003-12, Vol.93 (4), p.828-850</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2003</rights><rights>Copyright 2003 Association of American Geographers</rights><rights>Tous droits réservés © Prodig - Bibliographie Géographique Internationale (BGI), 2004</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Inc. Dec 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4994-89f6d2982caed000fcfadbefa8fd1b7b55ce96dc5b185e88ad7ca95c24e5280c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4994-89f6d2982caed000fcfadbefa8fd1b7b55ce96dc5b185e88ad7ca95c24e5280c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1515353$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1515353$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33224,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16054608$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bunch, Rick L.</creatorcontrib><title>Technology and Map-Learning: Users, Methods, and Symbols</title><title>Annals of the Association of American Geographers</title><description>This article investigates the cognitive processes used by learners (adults and young adolescents) for tasks that require the integration of geographical information across spaces, hierarchies, and geographic scales. An experiment simulated basic GIS functions and contained four experimental conditions (Chunk, Layer, Scale, and Whole). Reaction time, accuracy, and confidence were recorded as dependent variables related to the success of the integration process. The data were used as input for a back-propagation neural-network model. The neural network model was successful in learning patterns and could be used to predict the confidence, reaction time, and accuracy for combinations of learners, experimental conditions, and map-feature categories. A multivariate analysis of variance was used to determine significant relationships among the behavioral variables and characteristics of the learners, experimental conditions related to GIS functions, and map features (points, lines, and areas). The results of the analysis generally indicated that young adolescent learners were slower, less accurate, and more confident than adult learners for all experimental conditions. Overall, subjects were more accurate and confident in tasks that required less integration of geographical information. Learners had the most success recalling information related to area symbols and the least success recalling information related to point symbols.</description><subject>Adolescence</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Adult education</subject><subject>Bgi / Prodig</subject><subject>Cartography</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive development</subject><subject>Cognitive models</subject><subject>General methodology</subject><subject>Geographic information systems</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>GIS</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Map skills</subject><subject>Methods, Models, and GIS</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>neural network</subject><subject>Neurons</subject><subject>Space</subject><subject>spatial abilities</subject><subject>Spatial analysis</subject><subject>spatial cognition</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>young adolescents</subject><issn>0004-5608</issn><issn>2469-4452</issn><issn>1467-8306</issn><issn>2469-4460</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkE1v2zAMhoWhBZpm-wc9BBu2U-3RlmTL6ykI0nZA2h3WngVZH40NxcqkBK3__WS4WYCeVl0kig9fki9CXzJIs3i-t2lGijJhGIo0B8ApVBgIAElfPqDJv9wJmkD8TGgB7Aydh9DGMMMFmSD2oOW6c9Y99TPRqdmd2CYrLXzXdE8_Zo9B-3A5u9O7tVPxMRC_-03tbPiITo2wQX96vafo8Xr5sLhNVr9ufi7mq0SSqiIJq0yh8orlUmgVuxpphKq1EcyorC5rSqWuCiVpnTGqGROqlKKiMiea5gwknqJvo-7Wuz97HXZ80wSprRWddvvAccmgKgBH8PMbsHV738XZeA4MypIQFqGrEZLeheC14VvfbITveQZ8sJS3fLCND7bxwVJ-sJS_xOqvry1EkMIaLzrZhKNEAZREiyO3HLnnxur-PS34_P5-fgijzsWo04ad80cdmlFMh42vx3TTGec34tl5q_hO9Nb5w2z4f_b6C7MsqdM</recordid><startdate>200312</startdate><enddate>200312</enddate><creator>Lloyd, Robert</creator><creator>Bunch, Rick L.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Blackwell Publishers</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Association of American Geographers</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200312</creationdate><title>Technology and Map-Learning: Users, Methods, and Symbols</title><author>Lloyd, Robert ; Bunch, Rick L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4994-89f6d2982caed000fcfadbefa8fd1b7b55ce96dc5b185e88ad7ca95c24e5280c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adolescence</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Adult education</topic><topic>Bgi / Prodig</topic><topic>Cartography</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive development</topic><topic>Cognitive models</topic><topic>General methodology</topic><topic>Geographic information systems</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>GIS</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Map skills</topic><topic>Methods, Models, and GIS</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>neural network</topic><topic>Neurons</topic><topic>Space</topic><topic>spatial abilities</topic><topic>Spatial analysis</topic><topic>spatial cognition</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>young adolescents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bunch, Rick L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Annals of the Association of American Geographers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lloyd, Robert</au><au>Bunch, Rick L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Technology and Map-Learning: Users, Methods, and Symbols</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the Association of American Geographers</jtitle><date>2003-12</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>828</spage><epage>850</epage><pages>828-850</pages><issn>0004-5608</issn><issn>2469-4452</issn><eissn>1467-8306</eissn><eissn>2469-4460</eissn><coden>AAAGAK</coden><abstract>This article investigates the cognitive processes used by learners (adults and young adolescents) for tasks that require the integration of geographical information across spaces, hierarchies, and geographic scales. An experiment simulated basic GIS functions and contained four experimental conditions (Chunk, Layer, Scale, and Whole). Reaction time, accuracy, and confidence were recorded as dependent variables related to the success of the integration process. The data were used as input for a back-propagation neural-network model. The neural network model was successful in learning patterns and could be used to predict the confidence, reaction time, and accuracy for combinations of learners, experimental conditions, and map-feature categories. A multivariate analysis of variance was used to determine significant relationships among the behavioral variables and characteristics of the learners, experimental conditions related to GIS functions, and map features (points, lines, and areas). The results of the analysis generally indicated that young adolescent learners were slower, less accurate, and more confident than adult learners for all experimental conditions. Overall, subjects were more accurate and confident in tasks that required less integration of geographical information. Learners had the most success recalling information related to area symbols and the least success recalling information related to point symbols.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1467-8306.2003.09304004.x</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-5608
ispartof Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2003-12, Vol.93 (4), p.828-850
issn 0004-5608
2469-4452
1467-8306
2469-4460
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37809603
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects Adolescence
Adolescents
Adult education
Bgi / Prodig
Cartography
Cognition
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive development
Cognitive models
General methodology
Geographic information systems
Geography
GIS
Learning
Map skills
Methods, Models, and GIS
Modeling
neural network
Neurons
Space
spatial abilities
Spatial analysis
spatial cognition
Technology
young adolescents
title Technology and Map-Learning: Users, Methods, and Symbols
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T15%3A58%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Technology%20and%20Map-Learning:%20Users,%20Methods,%20and%20Symbols&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20Association%20of%20American%20Geographers&rft.au=Lloyd,%20Robert&rft.date=2003-12&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=828&rft.epage=850&rft.pages=828-850&rft.issn=0004-5608&rft.eissn=1467-8306&rft.coden=AAAGAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2003.09304004.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1515353%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4994-89f6d2982caed000fcfadbefa8fd1b7b55ce96dc5b185e88ad7ca95c24e5280c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=208077448&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1515353&rfr_iscdi=true