An Experimental Investigation of Employer Discretion in Employee Performance Evaluation and Compensation

• Published in: The Accounting review 2005-04, Vol.80 (2), p.563-583
• Main Authors: Fisher, Joseph G., Maines, Laureen A., Peffer, Sean A., Sprinkle, Geoffrey B.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Average revenue; Business accounting; Business studies; Compensation; Control systems; Correlation analysis; Decision making; Economic performance; Employee compensation; Employee motivation; Employees; Employers; Evaluation; Group performance; Human resource management; Human resources; Income; Job performance; Labour relations; Leisure time; Moral hazard; Opportunistic behavior; Performance appraisal; Personnel management; Productivity; Professional relationships; Statistical significance; Studies; Total revenue
• ISSN: 0001-4826; 1558-7967
• DOI: 10.2308/accr.2005.80.2.563

Employment relationships provide fertile ground for both employee and employer opportunism. Employers worry about whether employees will devote sufficient effort to work, and employees are concerned about whether employers will compensate them appropriately. In this paper, we examine whether employer discretion over the size of the total employee compensation pool and the allocation of this pool among employees influences employee and employer opportunism. The results of our experiment indicate that firm output and employees' compensation are greater when the employer does not have discretion over total employee compensation, but does have discretion over the allocation of total compensation. We find that the employer's residual profit increases with discretion over the allocation of compensation among employees; however, we find no effect on residual profit of the employer's discretion over the total amount of employee compensation. Our results suggest that firms benefit from a compensation contract that establishes total employee compensation as a predetermined function of public, aggregate measures such as accounting income, but provides the employer at least some discretion to allocate this compensation using private information. However, our results caution that employees and employers may not have similar preferences for the degree of employer discretion over the determination of total employee compensation.