Settings, speech genres, and the institutional organization of practices

The authors of this essay are concerned with examining speech genres in the context of institutional settings. Studies of setting have importance for understanding the ways in which students' use of speech genres is intertwined with social practices, tool-use, and institutional objectives. Afte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Folia linguistica 2005-01, Vol.XXXIX (1-2), p.115-142
Main Authors: Berkenkotter, Carol, Thein, Amanda Haertling
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adolescents
Applied research
Boulder
Children
Colorado
Contextual analysis
Discourse analysis
Institutionalization
Learning
Linguistics
Organization theory
Organizational analysis
Secondary schools
Social interaction
Social space
Social structure
U.S.A
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The authors of this essay are concerned with examining speech genres in the context of institutional settings. Studies of setting have importance for understanding the ways in which students' use of speech genres is intertwined with social practices, tool-use, and institutional objectives. After introducing the theoretical assumptions informing the studies described in the article, the authors illustrate institutional social interactions which reveal how children's and adolescents' bodies and linguistic practices are organized through time and space. In the first of these settings, children in a Montessori preschool 'learn how to mean' in the context of tools and artifacts, genres, and contextual cues. In the second setting, a high school in a large Midwestern city, the researcher examines how students constitute themselves as insiders or outsiders in such settings as the English classroom, the school gymnasium (where special events are held), and the cafeteria. It is in such social spaces that students' language and behavior both generates and instantiates the dominant group's social structure. We argue that the organization of bodies/practices in each of these two settings-the preschool and the high school-tacitly accomplishes social and ideological agendas through students' seemingly 'everyday' activities. Reprinted by permission of Mouton de Gruyter
ISSN:0165-4004