Sons, Daughters, and Parental Behaviour

• Published in: Oxford review of economic policy 2005-10, Vol.21 (3), p.340-356
• Main Author: LUNDBERG, SHELLY
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Abortion; Bias; Childbirth; Children; Children & youth; Cultural values; Daughters; Developing countries; Discrimination; Divorce; Economic policy; Families & family life; Family relations; Family structure; Family studies; Fathers; Females; Fertility; Gender; Gender differences; Gender relations; Girls; Impact analysis; LDCs; Marital stability; Marital status; Men; Mortality; Mothers; Parent-child relations; Parenting; Parents; Parents & parenting; Preferences; Production functions; Psychologists; Roles; Sex discrimination; Social economics; Sons; Studies; Women; Work hours
• ISSN: 0266-903X; 1460-2121
• DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/gri020

The prevalence of son preference and its implications for family behaviour in developing countries have received a great deal of scholarly attention, but child-gender bias is believed to be empirically unimportant in wealthy, non-traditional societies. Studies by sociologists and psychologists during the past 30 years, however, have documented consistent discrepancies between the behaviour of parents of sons and parents of daughters—boys tend to increase marital stability and marital satisfaction relative to girls, and fathers spend more time with, and are more involved with, sons than daughters. In recent years, economists have begun to contribute to the child-gender literature, re-examining the effects of sons and daughters on family structure and parental involvement with larger samples and greater concern for possible sources of selection bias. Other economic outcomes, such as market work and earnings, have also been studied, and some investigators have exploited the randomness of child gender as a source of exogenous variation in parental behaviour. In general, recent results suggest that child gender does affect family stability and the time allocation of parents, but it is not clear whether these responses reflect parental preferences for boys rather than girls or differences in the constraints parents face.