Loading…

The impact of “community” on fisheries management in the US Northeast

The discourse of fisheries science and management displaces community and culture from the essential economic dynamic of fisheries. The goal of this dominant discourse is to enclose fisheries, to constitute them as within the singular and hegemonic economy of capitalism. Alternative economies, such...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geoforum 2006-03, Vol.37 (2), p.169-184
Main Author: Martin, Kevin St
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-3bbd56f9d1af0dcf759768447ac68d60af74d25f4a06bd52c7f2085b4f1cd30b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-3bbd56f9d1af0dcf759768447ac68d60af74d25f4a06bd52c7f2085b4f1cd30b3
container_end_page 184
container_issue 2
container_start_page 169
container_title Geoforum
container_volume 37
creator Martin, Kevin St
description The discourse of fisheries science and management displaces community and culture from the essential economic dynamic of fisheries. The goal of this dominant discourse is to enclose fisheries, to constitute them as within the singular and hegemonic economy of capitalism. Alternative economies, such as those based on the presence of community, are always seen as either existing before or beyond the dominant economic formation. The category of community is, nevertheless, being incorporated into contemporary fisheries science and management where it has the potential to disrupt the ontological foundations of the current management regime. To avoid disruption, community is situated such that it is the domain of anthropology while the essential economic dynamic of fisheries remains the purview of fisheries bioeconomics. Community can be identified, documented, and analyzed but always only as a site of economic impact and never as a constituent of the economic itself. Curiously, this disciplining of community has a literal geographic dimension: the discursive domain of bioeconomics corresponds to the spatial domain of fisheries resources themselves while that of fisheries social science/anthropology corresponds to the terrestrial locations where fishers reside. Fishing ports become the place of community while the actual common property resource remains the site where the essential economic dynamic reigns uncompromised.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.geoforum.2005.05.004
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38233747</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016718505000576</els_id><sourcerecordid>20412913</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-3bbd56f9d1af0dcf759768447ac68d60af74d25f4a06bd52c7f2085b4f1cd30b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1OwzAUhC0EEqVwBeQVu4Tn2ImTHajip1IFC9q15Th266qJi50gddeDwOV6EhIV1pVGmrf4ZqQ3CN0SiAmQ7H4dL7Uzznd1nACk8SBgZ2hEcp5EBS3yczSCnow4ydNLdBXCGgA4zYsRms5XGtt6K1WLncGH_bdydd01tt0d9j_YNdjYsNLe6oBr2cilrnXTYtvgtg8uPvCb8_0lQ3uNLozcBH3z52O0eH6aT16j2fvLdPI4ixRj0Ea0LKs0M0VFpIFKGZ4WPMsZ41JleZWBNJxVSWqYhKwnE8VNAnlaMkNURaGkY3R37N1699np0IraBqU3G9lo1wVB84RSzvhJMAFGkoLQHsyOoPIuBK-N2HpbS78TBMQwsViL_4nFMLEYBKwPPhyDuv_3y2ovgrK6UbqyXqtWVM6eqvgF6kqKoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20412913</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of “community” on fisheries management in the US Northeast</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Martin, Kevin St</creator><creatorcontrib>Martin, Kevin St</creatorcontrib><description>The discourse of fisheries science and management displaces community and culture from the essential economic dynamic of fisheries. The goal of this dominant discourse is to enclose fisheries, to constitute them as within the singular and hegemonic economy of capitalism. Alternative economies, such as those based on the presence of community, are always seen as either existing before or beyond the dominant economic formation. The category of community is, nevertheless, being incorporated into contemporary fisheries science and management where it has the potential to disrupt the ontological foundations of the current management regime. To avoid disruption, community is situated such that it is the domain of anthropology while the essential economic dynamic of fisheries remains the purview of fisheries bioeconomics. Community can be identified, documented, and analyzed but always only as a site of economic impact and never as a constituent of the economic itself. Curiously, this disciplining of community has a literal geographic dimension: the discursive domain of bioeconomics corresponds to the spatial domain of fisheries resources themselves while that of fisheries social science/anthropology corresponds to the terrestrial locations where fishers reside. Fishing ports become the place of community while the actual common property resource remains the site where the essential economic dynamic reigns uncompromised.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-7185</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9398</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2005.05.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anthropology ; Capitalism ; Commons ; Community ; Community organization ; Economic discourse ; Economic systems ; Fisheries ; Fishery management ; Geographic location ; Political ecology ; Space ; U.S.A</subject><ispartof>Geoforum, 2006-03, Vol.37 (2), p.169-184</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-3bbd56f9d1af0dcf759768447ac68d60af74d25f4a06bd52c7f2085b4f1cd30b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-3bbd56f9d1af0dcf759768447ac68d60af74d25f4a06bd52c7f2085b4f1cd30b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martin, Kevin St</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of “community” on fisheries management in the US Northeast</title><title>Geoforum</title><description>The discourse of fisheries science and management displaces community and culture from the essential economic dynamic of fisheries. The goal of this dominant discourse is to enclose fisheries, to constitute them as within the singular and hegemonic economy of capitalism. Alternative economies, such as those based on the presence of community, are always seen as either existing before or beyond the dominant economic formation. The category of community is, nevertheless, being incorporated into contemporary fisheries science and management where it has the potential to disrupt the ontological foundations of the current management regime. To avoid disruption, community is situated such that it is the domain of anthropology while the essential economic dynamic of fisheries remains the purview of fisheries bioeconomics. Community can be identified, documented, and analyzed but always only as a site of economic impact and never as a constituent of the economic itself. Curiously, this disciplining of community has a literal geographic dimension: the discursive domain of bioeconomics corresponds to the spatial domain of fisheries resources themselves while that of fisheries social science/anthropology corresponds to the terrestrial locations where fishers reside. Fishing ports become the place of community while the actual common property resource remains the site where the essential economic dynamic reigns uncompromised.</description><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Commons</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Community organization</subject><subject>Economic discourse</subject><subject>Economic systems</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Fishery management</subject><subject>Geographic location</subject><subject>Political ecology</subject><subject>Space</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><issn>0016-7185</issn><issn>1872-9398</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1OwzAUhC0EEqVwBeQVu4Tn2ImTHajip1IFC9q15Th266qJi50gddeDwOV6EhIV1pVGmrf4ZqQ3CN0SiAmQ7H4dL7Uzznd1nACk8SBgZ2hEcp5EBS3yczSCnow4ydNLdBXCGgA4zYsRms5XGtt6K1WLncGH_bdydd01tt0d9j_YNdjYsNLe6oBr2cilrnXTYtvgtg8uPvCb8_0lQ3uNLozcBH3z52O0eH6aT16j2fvLdPI4ixRj0Ea0LKs0M0VFpIFKGZ4WPMsZ41JleZWBNJxVSWqYhKwnE8VNAnlaMkNURaGkY3R37N1699np0IraBqU3G9lo1wVB84RSzvhJMAFGkoLQHsyOoPIuBK-N2HpbS78TBMQwsViL_4nFMLEYBKwPPhyDuv_3y2ovgrK6UbqyXqtWVM6eqvgF6kqKoQ</recordid><startdate>20060301</startdate><enddate>20060301</enddate><creator>Martin, Kevin St</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060301</creationdate><title>The impact of “community” on fisheries management in the US Northeast</title><author>Martin, Kevin St</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-3bbd56f9d1af0dcf759768447ac68d60af74d25f4a06bd52c7f2085b4f1cd30b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Commons</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Community organization</topic><topic>Economic discourse</topic><topic>Economic systems</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Fishery management</topic><topic>Geographic location</topic><topic>Political ecology</topic><topic>Space</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martin, Kevin St</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Geoforum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martin, Kevin St</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of “community” on fisheries management in the US Northeast</atitle><jtitle>Geoforum</jtitle><date>2006-03-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>184</epage><pages>169-184</pages><issn>0016-7185</issn><eissn>1872-9398</eissn><abstract>The discourse of fisheries science and management displaces community and culture from the essential economic dynamic of fisheries. The goal of this dominant discourse is to enclose fisheries, to constitute them as within the singular and hegemonic economy of capitalism. Alternative economies, such as those based on the presence of community, are always seen as either existing before or beyond the dominant economic formation. The category of community is, nevertheless, being incorporated into contemporary fisheries science and management where it has the potential to disrupt the ontological foundations of the current management regime. To avoid disruption, community is situated such that it is the domain of anthropology while the essential economic dynamic of fisheries remains the purview of fisheries bioeconomics. Community can be identified, documented, and analyzed but always only as a site of economic impact and never as a constituent of the economic itself. Curiously, this disciplining of community has a literal geographic dimension: the discursive domain of bioeconomics corresponds to the spatial domain of fisheries resources themselves while that of fisheries social science/anthropology corresponds to the terrestrial locations where fishers reside. Fishing ports become the place of community while the actual common property resource remains the site where the essential economic dynamic reigns uncompromised.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.geoforum.2005.05.004</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-7185
ispartof Geoforum, 2006-03, Vol.37 (2), p.169-184
issn 0016-7185
1872-9398
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38233747
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Elsevier
subjects Anthropology
Capitalism
Commons
Community
Community organization
Economic discourse
Economic systems
Fisheries
Fishery management
Geographic location
Political ecology
Space
U.S.A
title The impact of “community” on fisheries management in the US Northeast
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T08%3A19%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20%E2%80%9Ccommunity%E2%80%9D%20on%20fisheries%20management%20in%20the%20US%20Northeast&rft.jtitle=Geoforum&rft.au=Martin,%20Kevin%20St&rft.date=2006-03-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=184&rft.pages=169-184&rft.issn=0016-7185&rft.eissn=1872-9398&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.geoforum.2005.05.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20412913%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-3bbd56f9d1af0dcf759768447ac68d60af74d25f4a06bd52c7f2085b4f1cd30b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20412913&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true