Loading…
The impact of “community” on fisheries management in the US Northeast
The discourse of fisheries science and management displaces community and culture from the essential economic dynamic of fisheries. The goal of this dominant discourse is to enclose fisheries, to constitute them as within the singular and hegemonic economy of capitalism. Alternative economies, such...
Saved in:
Published in: | Geoforum 2006-03, Vol.37 (2), p.169-184 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-3bbd56f9d1af0dcf759768447ac68d60af74d25f4a06bd52c7f2085b4f1cd30b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-3bbd56f9d1af0dcf759768447ac68d60af74d25f4a06bd52c7f2085b4f1cd30b3 |
container_end_page | 184 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 169 |
container_title | Geoforum |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Martin, Kevin St |
description | The discourse of fisheries science and management displaces community and culture from the essential economic dynamic of fisheries. The goal of this dominant discourse is to enclose fisheries, to constitute them as within the singular and hegemonic economy of capitalism. Alternative economies, such as those based on the presence of community, are always seen as either existing before or beyond the dominant economic formation. The category of community is, nevertheless, being incorporated into contemporary fisheries science and management where it has the potential to disrupt the ontological foundations of the current management regime. To avoid disruption, community is situated such that it is the domain of anthropology while the essential economic dynamic of fisheries remains the purview of fisheries bioeconomics. Community can be identified, documented, and analyzed but always only as a site of economic impact and never as a constituent of the economic itself. Curiously, this disciplining of community has a literal geographic dimension: the discursive domain of bioeconomics corresponds to the spatial domain of fisheries resources themselves while that of fisheries social science/anthropology corresponds to the terrestrial locations where fishers reside. Fishing ports become the place of community while the actual common property resource remains the site where the essential economic dynamic reigns uncompromised. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.geoforum.2005.05.004 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38233747</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016718505000576</els_id><sourcerecordid>20412913</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-3bbd56f9d1af0dcf759768447ac68d60af74d25f4a06bd52c7f2085b4f1cd30b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1OwzAUhC0EEqVwBeQVu4Tn2ImTHajip1IFC9q15Th266qJi50gddeDwOV6EhIV1pVGmrf4ZqQ3CN0SiAmQ7H4dL7Uzznd1nACk8SBgZ2hEcp5EBS3yczSCnow4ydNLdBXCGgA4zYsRms5XGtt6K1WLncGH_bdydd01tt0d9j_YNdjYsNLe6oBr2cilrnXTYtvgtg8uPvCb8_0lQ3uNLozcBH3z52O0eH6aT16j2fvLdPI4ixRj0Ea0LKs0M0VFpIFKGZ4WPMsZ41JleZWBNJxVSWqYhKwnE8VNAnlaMkNURaGkY3R37N1699np0IraBqU3G9lo1wVB84RSzvhJMAFGkoLQHsyOoPIuBK-N2HpbS78TBMQwsViL_4nFMLEYBKwPPhyDuv_3y2ovgrK6UbqyXqtWVM6eqvgF6kqKoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20412913</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of “community” on fisheries management in the US Northeast</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Martin, Kevin St</creator><creatorcontrib>Martin, Kevin St</creatorcontrib><description>The discourse of fisheries science and management displaces community and culture from the essential economic dynamic of fisheries. The goal of this dominant discourse is to enclose fisheries, to constitute them as within the singular and hegemonic economy of capitalism. Alternative economies, such as those based on the presence of community, are always seen as either existing before or beyond the dominant economic formation. The category of community is, nevertheless, being incorporated into contemporary fisheries science and management where it has the potential to disrupt the ontological foundations of the current management regime. To avoid disruption, community is situated such that it is the domain of anthropology while the essential economic dynamic of fisheries remains the purview of fisheries bioeconomics. Community can be identified, documented, and analyzed but always only as a site of economic impact and never as a constituent of the economic itself. Curiously, this disciplining of community has a literal geographic dimension: the discursive domain of bioeconomics corresponds to the spatial domain of fisheries resources themselves while that of fisheries social science/anthropology corresponds to the terrestrial locations where fishers reside. Fishing ports become the place of community while the actual common property resource remains the site where the essential economic dynamic reigns uncompromised.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-7185</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9398</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2005.05.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anthropology ; Capitalism ; Commons ; Community ; Community organization ; Economic discourse ; Economic systems ; Fisheries ; Fishery management ; Geographic location ; Political ecology ; Space ; U.S.A</subject><ispartof>Geoforum, 2006-03, Vol.37 (2), p.169-184</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-3bbd56f9d1af0dcf759768447ac68d60af74d25f4a06bd52c7f2085b4f1cd30b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-3bbd56f9d1af0dcf759768447ac68d60af74d25f4a06bd52c7f2085b4f1cd30b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martin, Kevin St</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of “community” on fisheries management in the US Northeast</title><title>Geoforum</title><description>The discourse of fisheries science and management displaces community and culture from the essential economic dynamic of fisheries. The goal of this dominant discourse is to enclose fisheries, to constitute them as within the singular and hegemonic economy of capitalism. Alternative economies, such as those based on the presence of community, are always seen as either existing before or beyond the dominant economic formation. The category of community is, nevertheless, being incorporated into contemporary fisheries science and management where it has the potential to disrupt the ontological foundations of the current management regime. To avoid disruption, community is situated such that it is the domain of anthropology while the essential economic dynamic of fisheries remains the purview of fisheries bioeconomics. Community can be identified, documented, and analyzed but always only as a site of economic impact and never as a constituent of the economic itself. Curiously, this disciplining of community has a literal geographic dimension: the discursive domain of bioeconomics corresponds to the spatial domain of fisheries resources themselves while that of fisheries social science/anthropology corresponds to the terrestrial locations where fishers reside. Fishing ports become the place of community while the actual common property resource remains the site where the essential economic dynamic reigns uncompromised.</description><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Commons</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Community organization</subject><subject>Economic discourse</subject><subject>Economic systems</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Fishery management</subject><subject>Geographic location</subject><subject>Political ecology</subject><subject>Space</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><issn>0016-7185</issn><issn>1872-9398</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1OwzAUhC0EEqVwBeQVu4Tn2ImTHajip1IFC9q15Th266qJi50gddeDwOV6EhIV1pVGmrf4ZqQ3CN0SiAmQ7H4dL7Uzznd1nACk8SBgZ2hEcp5EBS3yczSCnow4ydNLdBXCGgA4zYsRms5XGtt6K1WLncGH_bdydd01tt0d9j_YNdjYsNLe6oBr2cilrnXTYtvgtg8uPvCb8_0lQ3uNLozcBH3z52O0eH6aT16j2fvLdPI4ixRj0Ea0LKs0M0VFpIFKGZ4WPMsZ41JleZWBNJxVSWqYhKwnE8VNAnlaMkNURaGkY3R37N1699np0IraBqU3G9lo1wVB84RSzvhJMAFGkoLQHsyOoPIuBK-N2HpbS78TBMQwsViL_4nFMLEYBKwPPhyDuv_3y2ovgrK6UbqyXqtWVM6eqvgF6kqKoQ</recordid><startdate>20060301</startdate><enddate>20060301</enddate><creator>Martin, Kevin St</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060301</creationdate><title>The impact of “community” on fisheries management in the US Northeast</title><author>Martin, Kevin St</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-3bbd56f9d1af0dcf759768447ac68d60af74d25f4a06bd52c7f2085b4f1cd30b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Commons</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Community organization</topic><topic>Economic discourse</topic><topic>Economic systems</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Fishery management</topic><topic>Geographic location</topic><topic>Political ecology</topic><topic>Space</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martin, Kevin St</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Geoforum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martin, Kevin St</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of “community” on fisheries management in the US Northeast</atitle><jtitle>Geoforum</jtitle><date>2006-03-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>184</epage><pages>169-184</pages><issn>0016-7185</issn><eissn>1872-9398</eissn><abstract>The discourse of fisheries science and management displaces community and culture from the essential economic dynamic of fisheries. The goal of this dominant discourse is to enclose fisheries, to constitute them as within the singular and hegemonic economy of capitalism. Alternative economies, such as those based on the presence of community, are always seen as either existing before or beyond the dominant economic formation. The category of community is, nevertheless, being incorporated into contemporary fisheries science and management where it has the potential to disrupt the ontological foundations of the current management regime. To avoid disruption, community is situated such that it is the domain of anthropology while the essential economic dynamic of fisheries remains the purview of fisheries bioeconomics. Community can be identified, documented, and analyzed but always only as a site of economic impact and never as a constituent of the economic itself. Curiously, this disciplining of community has a literal geographic dimension: the discursive domain of bioeconomics corresponds to the spatial domain of fisheries resources themselves while that of fisheries social science/anthropology corresponds to the terrestrial locations where fishers reside. Fishing ports become the place of community while the actual common property resource remains the site where the essential economic dynamic reigns uncompromised.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.geoforum.2005.05.004</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0016-7185 |
ispartof | Geoforum, 2006-03, Vol.37 (2), p.169-184 |
issn | 0016-7185 1872-9398 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38233747 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Elsevier |
subjects | Anthropology Capitalism Commons Community Community organization Economic discourse Economic systems Fisheries Fishery management Geographic location Political ecology Space U.S.A |
title | The impact of “community” on fisheries management in the US Northeast |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T08%3A19%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20%E2%80%9Ccommunity%E2%80%9D%20on%20fisheries%20management%20in%20the%20US%20Northeast&rft.jtitle=Geoforum&rft.au=Martin,%20Kevin%20St&rft.date=2006-03-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=184&rft.pages=169-184&rft.issn=0016-7185&rft.eissn=1872-9398&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.geoforum.2005.05.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20412913%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-3bbd56f9d1af0dcf759768447ac68d60af74d25f4a06bd52c7f2085b4f1cd30b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20412913&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |