Loading…
Taxes, farm programs, and competitive advantage for U.S. and Canadian farmers: a case study
The objective of this study was to understand the impact of tax and social program policies on competitiveness in trade. A case study approach was used, comparing returns to representative wheat farms located in Montana and Alberta. The principal analytical tool was a financial simulation model. The...
Saved in:
| Published in: | American journal of agricultural economics 1992-05, Vol.74 (2), p.299-309 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-2393cfbd9eba3cd604b8d7553a5af2252bd430fe9ef5580ff362b4194255d2d33 |
|---|---|
| cites | |
| container_end_page | 309 |
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 299 |
| container_title | American journal of agricultural economics |
| container_volume | 74 |
| creator | Perry, G.M. (Oregon State University) Nixon, C.J Bunnage, K.J |
| description | The objective of this study was to understand the impact of tax and social program policies on competitiveness in trade. A case study approach was used, comparing returns to representative wheat farms located in Montana and Alberta. The principal analytical tool was a financial simulation model. The results suggest farmers in Alberta have significant tax and social program advantages and that, for the base scenario, these advantages outweighed government farm program and production cost advantages enjoyed by the Montana farmer. Taxes and social program advantages became relatively less important with an increase in farm size. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2307/1242484 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38303372</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1242484</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1242484</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-2393cfbd9eba3cd604b8d7553a5af2252bd430fe9ef5580ff362b4194255d2d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MFrFDEUBvAgCq5VvIuHgNBeOmuSl8xMvC1L161UFNoF0UN4M0mWWXdm1mS2dv_7pp3SguApPN7vC4-PkLecTQWw4iMXUshSPiMTLvMiK0WRPycTxpjINNPiJXkV4yaNjOtyQn5d4Y2Lp9RjaOku9OuAbRqxs7Tu250bmqG5dhTtNXYDrh31faCr6eX0nsyxQ9tgdx93IX6iSGuMjsZhbw-vyQuP2-jePLxHZLU4u5ovs4tvn8_ns4ushqKUmQANta-sdhVCbXMmq9IWSgEq9EIoUVkJzDvtvFIl8x5yUUmupVDKCgtwRI7Hf9P9f_YuDqZtYu22W-xcv48GSmAAhUjwwz9w0-9Dl24zXOhc5YzLMqmTUdWhjzE4b3ahaTEcDGfmrmLzUHGSbJR_m607_I-Z2ZfZ2VPk_RjZxKEPT5HHdTaumzi4m8c1ht8mL6BQZvnjp1l85QsGi6X5nvy70XvsDa5DE83qUqdutBZwC7STmfs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1296560148</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Taxes, farm programs, and competitive advantage for U.S. and Canadian farmers: a case study</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Oxford University Press Archive</source><creator>Perry, G.M. (Oregon State University) ; Nixon, C.J ; Bunnage, K.J</creator><creatorcontrib>Perry, G.M. (Oregon State University) ; Nixon, C.J ; Bunnage, K.J</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to understand the impact of tax and social program policies on competitiveness in trade. A case study approach was used, comparing returns to representative wheat farms located in Montana and Alberta. The principal analytical tool was a financial simulation model. The results suggest farmers in Alberta have significant tax and social program advantages and that, for the base scenario, these advantages outweighed government farm program and production cost advantages enjoyed by the Montana farmer. Taxes and social program advantages became relatively less important with an increase in farm size.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9092</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8276</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1242484</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Menasha, Wis: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>ACCORD COMMERCIAL ; ACUERDOS COMERCIALES ; Agricultural economics ; Agriculture ; ALBERTA ; BLE ; Canada ; Competitive advantage ; COMPORTAMIENTO ECONOMICO ; COMPORTEMENT ECONOMIQUE ; COSTOS DE PRODUCCION ; COUT DE PRODUCTION ; Crop economics ; Crop production ; Crops ; CULTIVOS ; EXPLOITATION AGRICOLE ; EXPLOTACIONES AGRARIAS ; Farmers ; Fiscal policy ; GATT ; Government programs ; Income taxes ; MODELE DE SIMULATION ; MODELOS DE SIMULACION ; MONTANA ; PLANTE DE CULTURE ; POLITICA FISCAL ; POLITICA SOCIAL ; POLITIQUE FISCALE ; POLITIQUE SOCIALE ; Property taxes ; Q170 ; Q180 ; RELACIONES DE INTERCAMBIO ; RENTABILIDAD ; RENTABILITE ; RESULTADOS DE LA EXPLOTACION ; RESULTAT DE L'EXPLOITATION AGRICOLE ; Simulation ; simulation model ; Social policy ; social programs ; Social security tax ; State income tax ; Tax payments ; taxes ; TERME DE L'ECHANGE ; Total taxes ; trade ; TRIGO ; U.S.A ; United States</subject><ispartof>American journal of agricultural economics, 1992-05, Vol.74 (2), p.299-309</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1992 American Agricultural Economics Association</rights><rights>1992 Agricultural and Applied Economics Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-2393cfbd9eba3cd604b8d7553a5af2252bd430fe9ef5580ff362b4194255d2d33</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1242484$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1242484$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33224,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Perry, G.M. (Oregon State University)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nixon, C.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bunnage, K.J</creatorcontrib><title>Taxes, farm programs, and competitive advantage for U.S. and Canadian farmers: a case study</title><title>American journal of agricultural economics</title><addtitle>American Journal of Agricultural Economics</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to understand the impact of tax and social program policies on competitiveness in trade. A case study approach was used, comparing returns to representative wheat farms located in Montana and Alberta. The principal analytical tool was a financial simulation model. The results suggest farmers in Alberta have significant tax and social program advantages and that, for the base scenario, these advantages outweighed government farm program and production cost advantages enjoyed by the Montana farmer. Taxes and social program advantages became relatively less important with an increase in farm size.</description><subject>ACCORD COMMERCIAL</subject><subject>ACUERDOS COMERCIALES</subject><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>ALBERTA</subject><subject>BLE</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Competitive advantage</subject><subject>COMPORTAMIENTO ECONOMICO</subject><subject>COMPORTEMENT ECONOMIQUE</subject><subject>COSTOS DE PRODUCCION</subject><subject>COUT DE PRODUCTION</subject><subject>Crop economics</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>CULTIVOS</subject><subject>EXPLOITATION AGRICOLE</subject><subject>EXPLOTACIONES AGRARIAS</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Fiscal policy</subject><subject>GATT</subject><subject>Government programs</subject><subject>Income taxes</subject><subject>MODELE DE SIMULATION</subject><subject>MODELOS DE SIMULACION</subject><subject>MONTANA</subject><subject>PLANTE DE CULTURE</subject><subject>POLITICA FISCAL</subject><subject>POLITICA SOCIAL</subject><subject>POLITIQUE FISCALE</subject><subject>POLITIQUE SOCIALE</subject><subject>Property taxes</subject><subject>Q170</subject><subject>Q180</subject><subject>RELACIONES DE INTERCAMBIO</subject><subject>RENTABILIDAD</subject><subject>RENTABILITE</subject><subject>RESULTADOS DE LA EXPLOTACION</subject><subject>RESULTAT DE L'EXPLOITATION AGRICOLE</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>simulation model</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><subject>social programs</subject><subject>Social security tax</subject><subject>State income tax</subject><subject>Tax payments</subject><subject>taxes</subject><subject>TERME DE L'ECHANGE</subject><subject>Total taxes</subject><subject>trade</subject><subject>TRIGO</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0002-9092</issn><issn>1467-8276</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MFrFDEUBvAgCq5VvIuHgNBeOmuSl8xMvC1L161UFNoF0UN4M0mWWXdm1mS2dv_7pp3SguApPN7vC4-PkLecTQWw4iMXUshSPiMTLvMiK0WRPycTxpjINNPiJXkV4yaNjOtyQn5d4Y2Lp9RjaOku9OuAbRqxs7Tu250bmqG5dhTtNXYDrh31faCr6eX0nsyxQ9tgdx93IX6iSGuMjsZhbw-vyQuP2-jePLxHZLU4u5ovs4tvn8_ns4ushqKUmQANta-sdhVCbXMmq9IWSgEq9EIoUVkJzDvtvFIl8x5yUUmupVDKCgtwRI7Hf9P9f_YuDqZtYu22W-xcv48GSmAAhUjwwz9w0-9Dl24zXOhc5YzLMqmTUdWhjzE4b3ahaTEcDGfmrmLzUHGSbJR_m607_I-Z2ZfZ2VPk_RjZxKEPT5HHdTaumzi4m8c1ht8mL6BQZvnjp1l85QsGi6X5nvy70XvsDa5DE83qUqdutBZwC7STmfs</recordid><startdate>199205</startdate><enddate>199205</enddate><creator>Perry, G.M. (Oregon State University)</creator><creator>Nixon, C.J</creator><creator>Bunnage, K.J</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>American Agricultural Economics Association</general><general>American Farm Economic Association</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199205</creationdate><title>Taxes, farm programs, and competitive advantage for U.S. and Canadian farmers: a case study</title><author>Perry, G.M. (Oregon State University) ; Nixon, C.J ; Bunnage, K.J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-2393cfbd9eba3cd604b8d7553a5af2252bd430fe9ef5580ff362b4194255d2d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>ACCORD COMMERCIAL</topic><topic>ACUERDOS COMERCIALES</topic><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>ALBERTA</topic><topic>BLE</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Competitive advantage</topic><topic>COMPORTAMIENTO ECONOMICO</topic><topic>COMPORTEMENT ECONOMIQUE</topic><topic>COSTOS DE PRODUCCION</topic><topic>COUT DE PRODUCTION</topic><topic>Crop economics</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>CULTIVOS</topic><topic>EXPLOITATION AGRICOLE</topic><topic>EXPLOTACIONES AGRARIAS</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Fiscal policy</topic><topic>GATT</topic><topic>Government programs</topic><topic>Income taxes</topic><topic>MODELE DE SIMULATION</topic><topic>MODELOS DE SIMULACION</topic><topic>MONTANA</topic><topic>PLANTE DE CULTURE</topic><topic>POLITICA FISCAL</topic><topic>POLITICA SOCIAL</topic><topic>POLITIQUE FISCALE</topic><topic>POLITIQUE SOCIALE</topic><topic>Property taxes</topic><topic>Q170</topic><topic>Q180</topic><topic>RELACIONES DE INTERCAMBIO</topic><topic>RENTABILIDAD</topic><topic>RENTABILITE</topic><topic>RESULTADOS DE LA EXPLOTACION</topic><topic>RESULTAT DE L'EXPLOITATION AGRICOLE</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>simulation model</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><topic>social programs</topic><topic>Social security tax</topic><topic>State income tax</topic><topic>Tax payments</topic><topic>taxes</topic><topic>TERME DE L'ECHANGE</topic><topic>Total taxes</topic><topic>trade</topic><topic>TRIGO</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perry, G.M. (Oregon State University)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nixon, C.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bunnage, K.J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>American journal of agricultural economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perry, G.M. (Oregon State University)</au><au>Nixon, C.J</au><au>Bunnage, K.J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Taxes, farm programs, and competitive advantage for U.S. and Canadian farmers: a case study</atitle><jtitle>American journal of agricultural economics</jtitle><addtitle>American Journal of Agricultural Economics</addtitle><date>1992-05</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>299</spage><epage>309</epage><pages>299-309</pages><issn>0002-9092</issn><eissn>1467-8276</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study was to understand the impact of tax and social program policies on competitiveness in trade. A case study approach was used, comparing returns to representative wheat farms located in Montana and Alberta. The principal analytical tool was a financial simulation model. The results suggest farmers in Alberta have significant tax and social program advantages and that, for the base scenario, these advantages outweighed government farm program and production cost advantages enjoyed by the Montana farmer. Taxes and social program advantages became relatively less important with an increase in farm size.</abstract><cop>Menasha, Wis</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.2307/1242484</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0002-9092 |
| ispartof | American journal of agricultural economics, 1992-05, Vol.74 (2), p.299-309 |
| issn | 0002-9092 1467-8276 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38303372 |
| source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Oxford University Press Archive |
| subjects | ACCORD COMMERCIAL ACUERDOS COMERCIALES Agricultural economics Agriculture ALBERTA BLE Canada Competitive advantage COMPORTAMIENTO ECONOMICO COMPORTEMENT ECONOMIQUE COSTOS DE PRODUCCION COUT DE PRODUCTION Crop economics Crop production Crops CULTIVOS EXPLOITATION AGRICOLE EXPLOTACIONES AGRARIAS Farmers Fiscal policy GATT Government programs Income taxes MODELE DE SIMULATION MODELOS DE SIMULACION MONTANA PLANTE DE CULTURE POLITICA FISCAL POLITICA SOCIAL POLITIQUE FISCALE POLITIQUE SOCIALE Property taxes Q170 Q180 RELACIONES DE INTERCAMBIO RENTABILIDAD RENTABILITE RESULTADOS DE LA EXPLOTACION RESULTAT DE L'EXPLOITATION AGRICOLE Simulation simulation model Social policy social programs Social security tax State income tax Tax payments taxes TERME DE L'ECHANGE Total taxes trade TRIGO U.S.A United States |
| title | Taxes, farm programs, and competitive advantage for U.S. and Canadian farmers: a case study |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T06%3A47%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Taxes,%20farm%20programs,%20and%20competitive%20advantage%20for%20U.S.%20and%20Canadian%20farmers:%20a%20case%20study&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20agricultural%20economics&rft.au=Perry,%20G.M.%20(Oregon%20State%20University)&rft.date=1992-05&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=299&rft.epage=309&rft.pages=299-309&rft.issn=0002-9092&rft.eissn=1467-8276&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1242484&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1242484%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-2393cfbd9eba3cd604b8d7553a5af2252bd430fe9ef5580ff362b4194255d2d33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1296560148&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1242484&rfr_iscdi=true |