Loading…
Consumer Response to Tax Rebates
This paper uses survey techniques to study the extent to which households spend a tax rebate. In July through September 2001, many households received tax rebates of $300 or $600. During August, September, and October 2001 a survey of a representative sample of US households to determine how the rec...
Saved in:
| Published in: | The American economic review 2003-03, Vol.93 (1), p.381-396 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-1d9e4a2aa644533ad831cbcfd4a0607eb666dcfbe05932754d225de323c46ee3 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-1d9e4a2aa644533ad831cbcfd4a0607eb666dcfbe05932754d225de323c46ee3 |
| container_end_page | 396 |
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 381 |
| container_title | The American economic review |
| container_volume | 93 |
| creator | Shapiro, Matthew D. Slemrod, Joel |
| description | This paper uses survey techniques to study the extent to which households spend a tax rebate. In July through September 2001, many households received tax rebates of $300 or $600. During August, September, and October 2001 a survey of a representative sample of US households to determine how the receipt of the rebate checks would change behavior, was conducted. It was found that only 21.8% of those receiving. The study is intended to extend the understanding of consumer response to fiscal interventions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1257/000282803321455368 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38452393</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3132182</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3132182</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-1d9e4a2aa644533ad831cbcfd4a0607eb666dcfbe05932754d225de323c46ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkEFLAzEQhYMoWKt_QDwsHrytJjNJNnuUYlUoCLL3kM3OQsu2qcku6L83peJBD8PMg-8Nj8fYteD3AlT1wDkHA4YjgpBKoTYnbCZqKcuqNuKUzQ5AmQk4ZxcpbfhBi2rGikXYpWlLsXintM83FWMoGveZdetGSpfsrHdDoqufPWfN8qlZvJSrt-fXxeOq9BL5WIquJunAOS2lQnSdQeFb33fScc0rarXWne9b4qpGqJTsAFRHCOilJsI5uzu-3cfwMVEa7XadPA2D21GYkkUjFWCNGbz9A27CFHc5mgVEngcgQ3CEfAwpRertPq63Ln5Zwe2hMPu_sGy6OZo2aQzx14EiIwbwG519ZFM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>233023322</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Consumer Response to Tax Rebates</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>American Economic Association</source><source>BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Shapiro, Matthew D. ; Slemrod, Joel</creator><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Matthew D. ; Slemrod, Joel</creatorcontrib><description>This paper uses survey techniques to study the extent to which households spend a tax rebate. In July through September 2001, many households received tax rebates of $300 or $600. During August, September, and October 2001 a survey of a representative sample of US households to determine how the receipt of the rebate checks would change behavior, was conducted. It was found that only 21.8% of those receiving. The study is intended to extend the understanding of consumer response to fiscal interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1257/000282803321455368</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AENRAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Nashville: American Economic Association</publisher><subject>Consumer behavior ; Consumer economics ; Consumer spending ; Consumers ; Consumption ; Couples ; Disposable income ; Economic conditions ; Economic models ; Economic surveys ; Economics ; Fiscal policy ; Government spending ; Household economics ; Households ; Hypotheses ; Impact analysis ; Income taxes ; Liquidity ; Polls & surveys ; Propensity to consume ; Rebates ; Reconciliation ; Sales rebates ; Shorter Papers ; Studies ; Tax cuts ; Tax rates ; Tax refunds ; Taxable income ; Taxation ; Taxes</subject><ispartof>The American economic review, 2003-03, Vol.93 (1), p.381-396</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 American Economic Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Economic Association Mar 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-1d9e4a2aa644533ad831cbcfd4a0607eb666dcfbe05932754d225de323c46ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-1d9e4a2aa644533ad831cbcfd4a0607eb666dcfbe05932754d225de323c46ee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/233023322/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/233023322?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3748,11688,12847,21394,27924,27925,33223,33224,33611,33612,36060,36061,43733,44363,58238,58471,74221,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slemrod, Joel</creatorcontrib><title>Consumer Response to Tax Rebates</title><title>The American economic review</title><description>This paper uses survey techniques to study the extent to which households spend a tax rebate. In July through September 2001, many households received tax rebates of $300 or $600. During August, September, and October 2001 a survey of a representative sample of US households to determine how the receipt of the rebate checks would change behavior, was conducted. It was found that only 21.8% of those receiving. The study is intended to extend the understanding of consumer response to fiscal interventions.</description><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Consumer economics</subject><subject>Consumer spending</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Couples</subject><subject>Disposable income</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economic surveys</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Fiscal policy</subject><subject>Government spending</subject><subject>Household economics</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Income taxes</subject><subject>Liquidity</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Propensity to consume</subject><subject>Rebates</subject><subject>Reconciliation</subject><subject>Sales rebates</subject><subject>Shorter Papers</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tax cuts</subject><subject>Tax rates</subject><subject>Tax refunds</subject><subject>Taxable income</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Taxes</subject><issn>0002-8282</issn><issn>1944-7981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNplkEFLAzEQhYMoWKt_QDwsHrytJjNJNnuUYlUoCLL3kM3OQsu2qcku6L83peJBD8PMg-8Nj8fYteD3AlT1wDkHA4YjgpBKoTYnbCZqKcuqNuKUzQ5AmQk4ZxcpbfhBi2rGikXYpWlLsXintM83FWMoGveZdetGSpfsrHdDoqufPWfN8qlZvJSrt-fXxeOq9BL5WIquJunAOS2lQnSdQeFb33fScc0rarXWne9b4qpGqJTsAFRHCOilJsI5uzu-3cfwMVEa7XadPA2D21GYkkUjFWCNGbz9A27CFHc5mgVEngcgQ3CEfAwpRertPq63Ln5Zwe2hMPu_sGy6OZo2aQzx14EiIwbwG519ZFM</recordid><startdate>20030301</startdate><enddate>20030301</enddate><creator>Shapiro, Matthew D.</creator><creator>Slemrod, Joel</creator><general>American Economic Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030301</creationdate><title>Consumer Response to Tax Rebates</title><author>Shapiro, Matthew D. ; Slemrod, Joel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-1d9e4a2aa644533ad831cbcfd4a0607eb666dcfbe05932754d225de323c46ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Consumer economics</topic><topic>Consumer spending</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Couples</topic><topic>Disposable income</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economic surveys</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Fiscal policy</topic><topic>Government spending</topic><topic>Household economics</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Income taxes</topic><topic>Liquidity</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Propensity to consume</topic><topic>Rebates</topic><topic>Reconciliation</topic><topic>Sales rebates</topic><topic>Shorter Papers</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tax cuts</topic><topic>Tax rates</topic><topic>Tax refunds</topic><topic>Taxable income</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Taxes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slemrod, Joel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The American economic review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shapiro, Matthew D.</au><au>Slemrod, Joel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Consumer Response to Tax Rebates</atitle><jtitle>The American economic review</jtitle><date>2003-03-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>381</spage><epage>396</epage><pages>381-396</pages><issn>0002-8282</issn><eissn>1944-7981</eissn><coden>AENRAA</coden><abstract>This paper uses survey techniques to study the extent to which households spend a tax rebate. In July through September 2001, many households received tax rebates of $300 or $600. During August, September, and October 2001 a survey of a representative sample of US households to determine how the receipt of the rebate checks would change behavior, was conducted. It was found that only 21.8% of those receiving. The study is intended to extend the understanding of consumer response to fiscal interventions.</abstract><cop>Nashville</cop><pub>American Economic Association</pub><doi>10.1257/000282803321455368</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0002-8282 |
| ispartof | The American economic review, 2003-03, Vol.93 (1), p.381-396 |
| issn | 0002-8282 1944-7981 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38452393 |
| source | EconLit s plnými texty; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; American Economic Association; BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate); JSTOR |
| subjects | Consumer behavior Consumer economics Consumer spending Consumers Consumption Couples Disposable income Economic conditions Economic models Economic surveys Economics Fiscal policy Government spending Household economics Households Hypotheses Impact analysis Income taxes Liquidity Polls & surveys Propensity to consume Rebates Reconciliation Sales rebates Shorter Papers Studies Tax cuts Tax rates Tax refunds Taxable income Taxation Taxes |
| title | Consumer Response to Tax Rebates |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A57%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Consumer%20Response%20to%20Tax%20Rebates&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20economic%20review&rft.au=Shapiro,%20Matthew%20D.&rft.date=2003-03-01&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=381&rft.epage=396&rft.pages=381-396&rft.issn=0002-8282&rft.eissn=1944-7981&rft.coden=AENRAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1257/000282803321455368&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3132182%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-1d9e4a2aa644533ad831cbcfd4a0607eb666dcfbe05932754d225de323c46ee3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=233023322&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3132182&rfr_iscdi=true |