Loading…

Foreground:background salience: Explaining the effects of graphical displays on risk avoidance

The purpose of this research was to determine the mechanisms underlying the graphical effect identified by Stone, Yates, and Parker (1997), in which graphical formats for conveying risk information are more effective than numerical formats for increasing risk-avoidant behavior. Two experiments teste...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Organizational behavior and human decision processes 2003, Vol.90 (1), p.19-36
Main Authors: Stone, Eric R., Sieck, Winston R., Bull, Benita E., Frank Yates, J., Parks, Stephanie C., Rush, Carolyn J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-8f6f6419889c41933ba56414b81535a2fb7ff6f4d2d353d9dccec7c9803367ab3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-8f6f6419889c41933ba56414b81535a2fb7ff6f4d2d353d9dccec7c9803367ab3
container_end_page 36
container_issue 1
container_start_page 19
container_title Organizational behavior and human decision processes
container_volume 90
creator Stone, Eric R.
Sieck, Winston R.
Bull, Benita E.
Frank Yates, J.
Parks, Stephanie C.
Rush, Carolyn J.
description The purpose of this research was to determine the mechanisms underlying the graphical effect identified by Stone, Yates, and Parker (1997), in which graphical formats for conveying risk information are more effective than numerical formats for increasing risk-avoidant behavior. Two experiments tested whether this graphical effect occurred because the graphical formats used by Stone et al. highlighted the number of people harmed by the focal hazard, causing the decisions to be based mainly on the number of people harmed (which we label the “foreground”) at the expense of the total number of people at risk of harm (which we call the “background”). Specifically, two graphical formats were developed that displayed pictorially both the number of people harmed and the total number at risk, and use of these display formats eliminated the graphical effect. We thus propose that the previously discussed graphical effect was in fact a manifestation of a more general foreground:background salience effect, whereby displays that highlight the number of people harmed at the expense of the total number of people at risk of harm lead to greater risk avoidance. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00003-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38480576</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0749597803000037</els_id><sourcerecordid>331588441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-8f6f6419889c41933ba56414b81535a2fb7ff6f4d2d353d9dccec7c9803367ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV9rFDEUxYMouNZ-BGEQlPowmkwmk0lfREr_QcEH7ashk9zsZjs7GZPZpfvtvbtTKvhi4OYm4XcuhxNC3jH6mVHWfPlBZa1KoWR7RvkniouX8gVZMKpEqVRFX5LFM_KavMl5TSljDaUL8usqJlimuB3ceWfsw3wssukDDBbOi8vHsTdhCMOymFZQgPdgp1xEXyyTGVfBmr5wISO0x9ehSCE_FGYXgzOof0teedNnOH3qJ-T-6vLnxU159_369uLbXWkFq6ay9Y1vaqbaVllsnHdG4L3uWia4MJXvpEekdpXjgjvlrAUrrWop5400HT8hH-e5Y4q_t5AnvQnZQt-bAeI2a97WLRWyQfD9P-A6btOA3nRVcabqitUIiRmyKeacwOsxhY1Je82oPkSuj5HrQ56acn2MXEvU3cy6BCPYZxEArGO3cqPeaW4UxW2PVR1E3AQshjUeutK80atpg6M-PPk0GSP2CdMM-a-PWgqqpELu68wBprsLkHS2x59zIeFHaRfDf0z_AcUTrko</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223194214</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Foreground:background salience: Explaining the effects of graphical displays on risk avoidance</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Stone, Eric R. ; Sieck, Winston R. ; Bull, Benita E. ; Frank Yates, J. ; Parks, Stephanie C. ; Rush, Carolyn J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stone, Eric R. ; Sieck, Winston R. ; Bull, Benita E. ; Frank Yates, J. ; Parks, Stephanie C. ; Rush, Carolyn J.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this research was to determine the mechanisms underlying the graphical effect identified by Stone, Yates, and Parker (1997), in which graphical formats for conveying risk information are more effective than numerical formats for increasing risk-avoidant behavior. Two experiments tested whether this graphical effect occurred because the graphical formats used by Stone et al. highlighted the number of people harmed by the focal hazard, causing the decisions to be based mainly on the number of people harmed (which we label the “foreground”) at the expense of the total number of people at risk of harm (which we call the “background”). Specifically, two graphical formats were developed that displayed pictorially both the number of people harmed and the total number at risk, and use of these display formats eliminated the graphical effect. We thus propose that the previously discussed graphical effect was in fact a manifestation of a more general foreground:background salience effect, whereby displays that highlight the number of people harmed at the expense of the total number of people at risk of harm lead to greater risk avoidance. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-5978</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9920</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00003-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Applied psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition ; Communication ; Decision theory ; Ergonomics. Human factors ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Graphs ; Human behaviour ; Information ; Occupational psychology ; Organization theory ; Organizational behavior ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Risk ; Risk management ; Studies ; Visual aids</subject><ispartof>Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2003, Vol.90 (1), p.19-36</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Science (USA)</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc. Jan 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-8f6f6419889c41933ba56414b81535a2fb7ff6f4d2d353d9dccec7c9803367ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-8f6f6419889c41933ba56414b81535a2fb7ff6f4d2d353d9dccec7c9803367ab3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,30999,33223,33224</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14750979$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeejobhdp/v_3a90_3ay_3a2003_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a19-36.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stone, Eric R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sieck, Winston R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bull, Benita E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frank Yates, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parks, Stephanie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rush, Carolyn J.</creatorcontrib><title>Foreground:background salience: Explaining the effects of graphical displays on risk avoidance</title><title>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</title><description>The purpose of this research was to determine the mechanisms underlying the graphical effect identified by Stone, Yates, and Parker (1997), in which graphical formats for conveying risk information are more effective than numerical formats for increasing risk-avoidant behavior. Two experiments tested whether this graphical effect occurred because the graphical formats used by Stone et al. highlighted the number of people harmed by the focal hazard, causing the decisions to be based mainly on the number of people harmed (which we label the “foreground”) at the expense of the total number of people at risk of harm (which we call the “background”). Specifically, two graphical formats were developed that displayed pictorially both the number of people harmed and the total number at risk, and use of these display formats eliminated the graphical effect. We thus propose that the previously discussed graphical effect was in fact a manifestation of a more general foreground:background salience effect, whereby displays that highlight the number of people harmed at the expense of the total number of people at risk of harm lead to greater risk avoidance. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.</description><subject>Applied psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Decision theory</subject><subject>Ergonomics. Human factors</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Graphs</subject><subject>Human behaviour</subject><subject>Information</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Organization theory</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Visual aids</subject><issn>0749-5978</issn><issn>1095-9920</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV9rFDEUxYMouNZ-BGEQlPowmkwmk0lfREr_QcEH7ashk9zsZjs7GZPZpfvtvbtTKvhi4OYm4XcuhxNC3jH6mVHWfPlBZa1KoWR7RvkniouX8gVZMKpEqVRFX5LFM_KavMl5TSljDaUL8usqJlimuB3ceWfsw3wssukDDBbOi8vHsTdhCMOymFZQgPdgp1xEXyyTGVfBmr5wISO0x9ehSCE_FGYXgzOof0teedNnOH3qJ-T-6vLnxU159_369uLbXWkFq6ay9Y1vaqbaVllsnHdG4L3uWia4MJXvpEekdpXjgjvlrAUrrWop5400HT8hH-e5Y4q_t5AnvQnZQt-bAeI2a97WLRWyQfD9P-A6btOA3nRVcabqitUIiRmyKeacwOsxhY1Je82oPkSuj5HrQ56acn2MXEvU3cy6BCPYZxEArGO3cqPeaW4UxW2PVR1E3AQshjUeutK80atpg6M-PPk0GSP2CdMM-a-PWgqqpELu68wBprsLkHS2x59zIeFHaRfDf0z_AcUTrko</recordid><startdate>2003</startdate><enddate>2003</enddate><creator>Stone, Eric R.</creator><creator>Sieck, Winston R.</creator><creator>Bull, Benita E.</creator><creator>Frank Yates, J.</creator><creator>Parks, Stephanie C.</creator><creator>Rush, Carolyn J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2003</creationdate><title>Foreground:background salience: Explaining the effects of graphical displays on risk avoidance</title><author>Stone, Eric R. ; Sieck, Winston R. ; Bull, Benita E. ; Frank Yates, J. ; Parks, Stephanie C. ; Rush, Carolyn J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-8f6f6419889c41933ba56414b81535a2fb7ff6f4d2d353d9dccec7c9803367ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Applied psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Decision theory</topic><topic>Ergonomics. Human factors</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Graphs</topic><topic>Human behaviour</topic><topic>Information</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Organization theory</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Visual aids</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stone, Eric R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sieck, Winston R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bull, Benita E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frank Yates, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parks, Stephanie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rush, Carolyn J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stone, Eric R.</au><au>Sieck, Winston R.</au><au>Bull, Benita E.</au><au>Frank Yates, J.</au><au>Parks, Stephanie C.</au><au>Rush, Carolyn J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Foreground:background salience: Explaining the effects of graphical displays on risk avoidance</atitle><jtitle>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</jtitle><date>2003</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>19-36</pages><issn>0749-5978</issn><eissn>1095-9920</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this research was to determine the mechanisms underlying the graphical effect identified by Stone, Yates, and Parker (1997), in which graphical formats for conveying risk information are more effective than numerical formats for increasing risk-avoidant behavior. Two experiments tested whether this graphical effect occurred because the graphical formats used by Stone et al. highlighted the number of people harmed by the focal hazard, causing the decisions to be based mainly on the number of people harmed (which we label the “foreground”) at the expense of the total number of people at risk of harm (which we call the “background”). Specifically, two graphical formats were developed that displayed pictorially both the number of people harmed and the total number at risk, and use of these display formats eliminated the graphical effect. We thus propose that the previously discussed graphical effect was in fact a manifestation of a more general foreground:background salience effect, whereby displays that highlight the number of people harmed at the expense of the total number of people at risk of harm lead to greater risk avoidance. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00003-7</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-5978
ispartof Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2003, Vol.90 (1), p.19-36
issn 0749-5978
1095-9920
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38480576
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Applied psychology
Biological and medical sciences
Cognition
Communication
Decision theory
Ergonomics. Human factors
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Graphs
Human behaviour
Information
Occupational psychology
Organization theory
Organizational behavior
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Risk
Risk management
Studies
Visual aids
title Foreground:background salience: Explaining the effects of graphical displays on risk avoidance
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T17%3A19%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Foreground:background%20salience:%20Explaining%20the%20effects%20of%20graphical%20displays%20on%20risk%20avoidance&rft.jtitle=Organizational%20behavior%20and%20human%20decision%20processes&rft.au=Stone,%20Eric%20R.&rft.date=2003&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=19-36&rft.issn=0749-5978&rft.eissn=1095-9920&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00003-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E331588441%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-8f6f6419889c41933ba56414b81535a2fb7ff6f4d2d353d9dccec7c9803367ab3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223194214&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true