Loading…
Foreground:background salience: Explaining the effects of graphical displays on risk avoidance
The purpose of this research was to determine the mechanisms underlying the graphical effect identified by Stone, Yates, and Parker (1997), in which graphical formats for conveying risk information are more effective than numerical formats for increasing risk-avoidant behavior. Two experiments teste...
Saved in:
Published in: | Organizational behavior and human decision processes 2003, Vol.90 (1), p.19-36 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-8f6f6419889c41933ba56414b81535a2fb7ff6f4d2d353d9dccec7c9803367ab3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-8f6f6419889c41933ba56414b81535a2fb7ff6f4d2d353d9dccec7c9803367ab3 |
container_end_page | 36 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 19 |
container_title | Organizational behavior and human decision processes |
container_volume | 90 |
creator | Stone, Eric R. Sieck, Winston R. Bull, Benita E. Frank Yates, J. Parks, Stephanie C. Rush, Carolyn J. |
description | The purpose of this research was to determine the mechanisms underlying the graphical effect identified by
Stone, Yates, and Parker (1997), in which graphical formats for conveying risk information are more effective than numerical formats for increasing risk-avoidant behavior. Two experiments tested whether this graphical effect occurred because the graphical formats used by Stone et al. highlighted the number of people harmed by the focal hazard, causing the decisions to be based mainly on the number of people harmed (which we label the “foreground”) at the expense of the total number of people at risk of harm (which we call the “background”). Specifically, two graphical formats were developed that displayed pictorially both the number of people harmed and the total number at risk, and use of these display formats eliminated the graphical effect. We thus propose that the previously discussed graphical effect was in fact a manifestation of a more general foreground:background salience effect, whereby displays that highlight the number of people harmed at the expense of the total number of people at risk of harm lead to greater risk avoidance. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00003-7 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38480576</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0749597803000037</els_id><sourcerecordid>331588441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-8f6f6419889c41933ba56414b81535a2fb7ff6f4d2d353d9dccec7c9803367ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV9rFDEUxYMouNZ-BGEQlPowmkwmk0lfREr_QcEH7ashk9zsZjs7GZPZpfvtvbtTKvhi4OYm4XcuhxNC3jH6mVHWfPlBZa1KoWR7RvkniouX8gVZMKpEqVRFX5LFM_KavMl5TSljDaUL8usqJlimuB3ceWfsw3wssukDDBbOi8vHsTdhCMOymFZQgPdgp1xEXyyTGVfBmr5wISO0x9ehSCE_FGYXgzOof0teedNnOH3qJ-T-6vLnxU159_369uLbXWkFq6ay9Y1vaqbaVllsnHdG4L3uWia4MJXvpEekdpXjgjvlrAUrrWop5400HT8hH-e5Y4q_t5AnvQnZQt-bAeI2a97WLRWyQfD9P-A6btOA3nRVcabqitUIiRmyKeacwOsxhY1Je82oPkSuj5HrQ56acn2MXEvU3cy6BCPYZxEArGO3cqPeaW4UxW2PVR1E3AQshjUeutK80atpg6M-PPk0GSP2CdMM-a-PWgqqpELu68wBprsLkHS2x59zIeFHaRfDf0z_AcUTrko</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223194214</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Foreground:background salience: Explaining the effects of graphical displays on risk avoidance</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Stone, Eric R. ; Sieck, Winston R. ; Bull, Benita E. ; Frank Yates, J. ; Parks, Stephanie C. ; Rush, Carolyn J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stone, Eric R. ; Sieck, Winston R. ; Bull, Benita E. ; Frank Yates, J. ; Parks, Stephanie C. ; Rush, Carolyn J.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this research was to determine the mechanisms underlying the graphical effect identified by
Stone, Yates, and Parker (1997), in which graphical formats for conveying risk information are more effective than numerical formats for increasing risk-avoidant behavior. Two experiments tested whether this graphical effect occurred because the graphical formats used by Stone et al. highlighted the number of people harmed by the focal hazard, causing the decisions to be based mainly on the number of people harmed (which we label the “foreground”) at the expense of the total number of people at risk of harm (which we call the “background”). Specifically, two graphical formats were developed that displayed pictorially both the number of people harmed and the total number at risk, and use of these display formats eliminated the graphical effect. We thus propose that the previously discussed graphical effect was in fact a manifestation of a more general foreground:background salience effect, whereby displays that highlight the number of people harmed at the expense of the total number of people at risk of harm lead to greater risk avoidance. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-5978</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9920</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00003-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Applied psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition ; Communication ; Decision theory ; Ergonomics. Human factors ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Graphs ; Human behaviour ; Information ; Occupational psychology ; Organization theory ; Organizational behavior ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Risk ; Risk management ; Studies ; Visual aids</subject><ispartof>Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2003, Vol.90 (1), p.19-36</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Science (USA)</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc. Jan 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-8f6f6419889c41933ba56414b81535a2fb7ff6f4d2d353d9dccec7c9803367ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-8f6f6419889c41933ba56414b81535a2fb7ff6f4d2d353d9dccec7c9803367ab3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,30999,33223,33224</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14750979$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeejobhdp/v_3a90_3ay_3a2003_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a19-36.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stone, Eric R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sieck, Winston R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bull, Benita E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frank Yates, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parks, Stephanie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rush, Carolyn J.</creatorcontrib><title>Foreground:background salience: Explaining the effects of graphical displays on risk avoidance</title><title>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</title><description>The purpose of this research was to determine the mechanisms underlying the graphical effect identified by
Stone, Yates, and Parker (1997), in which graphical formats for conveying risk information are more effective than numerical formats for increasing risk-avoidant behavior. Two experiments tested whether this graphical effect occurred because the graphical formats used by Stone et al. highlighted the number of people harmed by the focal hazard, causing the decisions to be based mainly on the number of people harmed (which we label the “foreground”) at the expense of the total number of people at risk of harm (which we call the “background”). Specifically, two graphical formats were developed that displayed pictorially both the number of people harmed and the total number at risk, and use of these display formats eliminated the graphical effect. We thus propose that the previously discussed graphical effect was in fact a manifestation of a more general foreground:background salience effect, whereby displays that highlight the number of people harmed at the expense of the total number of people at risk of harm lead to greater risk avoidance. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.</description><subject>Applied psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Decision theory</subject><subject>Ergonomics. Human factors</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Graphs</subject><subject>Human behaviour</subject><subject>Information</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Organization theory</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Visual aids</subject><issn>0749-5978</issn><issn>1095-9920</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV9rFDEUxYMouNZ-BGEQlPowmkwmk0lfREr_QcEH7ashk9zsZjs7GZPZpfvtvbtTKvhi4OYm4XcuhxNC3jH6mVHWfPlBZa1KoWR7RvkniouX8gVZMKpEqVRFX5LFM_KavMl5TSljDaUL8usqJlimuB3ceWfsw3wssukDDBbOi8vHsTdhCMOymFZQgPdgp1xEXyyTGVfBmr5wISO0x9ehSCE_FGYXgzOof0teedNnOH3qJ-T-6vLnxU159_369uLbXWkFq6ay9Y1vaqbaVllsnHdG4L3uWia4MJXvpEekdpXjgjvlrAUrrWop5400HT8hH-e5Y4q_t5AnvQnZQt-bAeI2a97WLRWyQfD9P-A6btOA3nRVcabqitUIiRmyKeacwOsxhY1Je82oPkSuj5HrQ56acn2MXEvU3cy6BCPYZxEArGO3cqPeaW4UxW2PVR1E3AQshjUeutK80atpg6M-PPk0GSP2CdMM-a-PWgqqpELu68wBprsLkHS2x59zIeFHaRfDf0z_AcUTrko</recordid><startdate>2003</startdate><enddate>2003</enddate><creator>Stone, Eric R.</creator><creator>Sieck, Winston R.</creator><creator>Bull, Benita E.</creator><creator>Frank Yates, J.</creator><creator>Parks, Stephanie C.</creator><creator>Rush, Carolyn J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2003</creationdate><title>Foreground:background salience: Explaining the effects of graphical displays on risk avoidance</title><author>Stone, Eric R. ; Sieck, Winston R. ; Bull, Benita E. ; Frank Yates, J. ; Parks, Stephanie C. ; Rush, Carolyn J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-8f6f6419889c41933ba56414b81535a2fb7ff6f4d2d353d9dccec7c9803367ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Applied psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Decision theory</topic><topic>Ergonomics. Human factors</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Graphs</topic><topic>Human behaviour</topic><topic>Information</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Organization theory</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Visual aids</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stone, Eric R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sieck, Winston R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bull, Benita E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frank Yates, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parks, Stephanie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rush, Carolyn J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stone, Eric R.</au><au>Sieck, Winston R.</au><au>Bull, Benita E.</au><au>Frank Yates, J.</au><au>Parks, Stephanie C.</au><au>Rush, Carolyn J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Foreground:background salience: Explaining the effects of graphical displays on risk avoidance</atitle><jtitle>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</jtitle><date>2003</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>19-36</pages><issn>0749-5978</issn><eissn>1095-9920</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this research was to determine the mechanisms underlying the graphical effect identified by
Stone, Yates, and Parker (1997), in which graphical formats for conveying risk information are more effective than numerical formats for increasing risk-avoidant behavior. Two experiments tested whether this graphical effect occurred because the graphical formats used by Stone et al. highlighted the number of people harmed by the focal hazard, causing the decisions to be based mainly on the number of people harmed (which we label the “foreground”) at the expense of the total number of people at risk of harm (which we call the “background”). Specifically, two graphical formats were developed that displayed pictorially both the number of people harmed and the total number at risk, and use of these display formats eliminated the graphical effect. We thus propose that the previously discussed graphical effect was in fact a manifestation of a more general foreground:background salience effect, whereby displays that highlight the number of people harmed at the expense of the total number of people at risk of harm lead to greater risk avoidance. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00003-7</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0749-5978 |
ispartof | Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2003, Vol.90 (1), p.19-36 |
issn | 0749-5978 1095-9920 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38480576 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Applied psychology Biological and medical sciences Cognition Communication Decision theory Ergonomics. Human factors Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Graphs Human behaviour Information Occupational psychology Organization theory Organizational behavior Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Risk Risk management Studies Visual aids |
title | Foreground:background salience: Explaining the effects of graphical displays on risk avoidance |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T17%3A19%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Foreground:background%20salience:%20Explaining%20the%20effects%20of%20graphical%20displays%20on%20risk%20avoidance&rft.jtitle=Organizational%20behavior%20and%20human%20decision%20processes&rft.au=Stone,%20Eric%20R.&rft.date=2003&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=19-36&rft.issn=0749-5978&rft.eissn=1095-9920&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00003-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E331588441%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-8f6f6419889c41933ba56414b81535a2fb7ff6f4d2d353d9dccec7c9803367ab3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223194214&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |