Exploring alternative theories of economic regionalism: from trade to finance in Asian co-operation?

• Published in: Review of international political economy : RIPE 2003-08, Vol.10 (3), p.430-454
• Main Authors: Dieter, Heribert, Higgott, Richard
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bank liquidity; Bilateral Trade; Central banks; Cooperation; Currency; East Asia; Economic crises; Economic theory; Finance; Funding liquidity; International financial institutions; International liquidity; International political economy; Monetary policy; Monetary Regionalism; Political economy; Political integration; Political science; Regional Integration; Regionalism; Trade; World economy
• ISSN: 0969-2290; 1466-4526
• DOI: 10.1080/09692290308422

The financial crises of the late 1990s marked an intellectual watershed for the global economy, and also for regionalism as the Janus face of globalization. At the beginning of the twenty-first century, the theory and practice of regional cooperation and integration may evolve along different lines to how it was understood for most of the second half of the twentieth century. In East Asia, in particular, this will mean that the relationship between multilateralism and regionalism will change. The 'East Asian' region will become an increasingly important domain within which to explore enhanced protection against financial crises. What we might call 'monetary regionalism', sceptical western voices notwithstanding, is now firmly on the regional agenda in East Asia. Within conventional political economy, the theory and practice of monetary regionalism is not as easy to understand as traditional, trade-driven, regional integration. Thus one aim of this paper is to outline a theory of monetary regionalism and demonstrate the degree to which it represents a break with understandings of the regional project in East Asia prior to the late 1990s. From its start in 1989, APEC claimed to be a new type of regionalism. The promise was that APEC would promote open regionalism. APEC did not achieve this goal. Nor did it provide support to its Asian members during the financial crises of the late 1990s. At the same time, more traditional (what we might call Balassian) understandings of trade-driven regional integration are showing signs of decreasing importance. There is a growing appeal to trade co-operation, but this is notably an increasing interest in bilateral preferential trading arrangements. This leads to a complex picture of competing regional initiatives across the economic policy spectrum. The paper locates these initiatives in the wider context of the growing politico-economic dialogue between Southeast and Northeast Asia that has developed via the ASEAN+3 process since 1997.