A stakeholder approach to MCDA

Research into quantitative decision‐making has undeniably made considerable progress in recent years, having gone from coping with single decision‐maker, single criterion to multiple decision‐makers, multiple criteria decisions situations. Suitable mathematical methods and instruments have been perf...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Systems research and behavioral science 1998-01, Vol.15 (1), p.15-32
Main Authors: Banville, Claude, Landry, Maurice, Martel, Jean-Marc, Boulaire, Christèle
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Decision making
Decision theory
Group decision making
Information technology
intervention strategies
Interventionism
Mathematical methods
multiple criteria decision aid
problems
socio-political aspects of problems
stakeholder
Systems analysis
systems approach
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 32
container_issue 1
container_start_page 15
container_title Systems research and behavioral science
container_volume 15
creator Banville, Claude
Landry, Maurice
Martel, Jean-Marc
Boulaire, Christèle
description Research into quantitative decision‐making has undeniably made considerable progress in recent years, having gone from coping with single decision‐maker, single criterion to multiple decision‐makers, multiple criteria decisions situations. Suitable mathematical methods and instruments have been perfected and are now quite sophisticated. Moreover, they are often supported by a powerful software. However, most decision situations require that the systemic socio‐political aspects of the decision processes be taken into account and the methods and instruments developed so far may not be satisfactory in this regard. This paper presents a proposition that is aimed at improving this situation. It is based on the concept of stakeholder which, in our view, should be more directly incorporated into any multiple criteria decision aid (MCDA) approach. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(199801/02)15:1<15::AID-SRES179>3.0.CO;2-B
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38660838</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38660838</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-9ec1e05ccbeef85730af25fe6a713400dedd9b329d9ca69f66f9ca2a453e7d443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkG1LwzAQx4so-PgVZCCIvui8S5qmURFqN3X4MHGKCMIR2xQ3q53NhvrtTa36QgXfXI7cP78cP8-LEdoIwLY2Br2kt4mglI8y4BuoVAS4BWwTxTbuurId9zr-4KI7QKn2eBvaSX-H-fsz3sL3q9mPnvkSWDjvLVo7AkBAxAVvNW7ZiX4w92WRmaqlx-Oq1Ol9a1K2TpNOvOzN5bqwZuXzXPKuDrqXyZF_0j_sJfGJn3LOlK9MigZEmt4Zk0dCctA5E7kJtUQeAGQmy9SdS2Yq1aHKwzB3DdOB4EZmQcCXvPWG675_nho7ocehTU1R6CdTTi3xKAwh4pELrv0Ijspp9eR2IxQiAMGErHE3TSqtSmsrk9O4Gj7q6o0QqPZKVHul2hDVhqjxSm6CgrAu5LzSp1fiBJT0idG-Y9827JdhYd5-gf_l_o39unJ4v8EP7cS8fuN19UCh5FLQ9dkhqePrgMnjMzrn7yZgmX8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1554052574</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A stakeholder approach to MCDA</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley</source><creator>Banville, Claude ; Landry, Maurice ; Martel, Jean-Marc ; Boulaire, Christèle</creator><creatorcontrib>Banville, Claude ; Landry, Maurice ; Martel, Jean-Marc ; Boulaire, Christèle</creatorcontrib><description>Research into quantitative decision‐making has undeniably made considerable progress in recent years, having gone from coping with single decision‐maker, single criterion to multiple decision‐makers, multiple criteria decisions situations. Suitable mathematical methods and instruments have been perfected and are now quite sophisticated. Moreover, they are often supported by a powerful software. However, most decision situations require that the systemic socio‐political aspects of the decision processes be taken into account and the methods and instruments developed so far may not be satisfactory in this regard. This paper presents a proposition that is aimed at improving this situation. It is based on the concept of stakeholder which, in our view, should be more directly incorporated into any multiple criteria decision aid (MCDA) approach. © 1998 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-7026</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1743</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(199801/02)15:1&lt;15::AID-SRES179&gt;3.0.CO;2-B</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Decision making ; Decision theory ; Group decision making ; Information technology ; intervention strategies ; Interventionism ; Mathematical methods ; multiple criteria decision aid ; problems ; socio-political aspects of problems ; stakeholder ; Systems analysis ; systems approach</subject><ispartof>Systems research and behavioral science, 1998-01, Vol.15 (1), p.15-32</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1998 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33201</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Banville, Claude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landry, Maurice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martel, Jean-Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boulaire, Christèle</creatorcontrib><title>A stakeholder approach to MCDA</title><title>Systems research and behavioral science</title><addtitle>Syst. Res</addtitle><description>Research into quantitative decision‐making has undeniably made considerable progress in recent years, having gone from coping with single decision‐maker, single criterion to multiple decision‐makers, multiple criteria decisions situations. Suitable mathematical methods and instruments have been perfected and are now quite sophisticated. Moreover, they are often supported by a powerful software. However, most decision situations require that the systemic socio‐political aspects of the decision processes be taken into account and the methods and instruments developed so far may not be satisfactory in this regard. This paper presents a proposition that is aimed at improving this situation. It is based on the concept of stakeholder which, in our view, should be more directly incorporated into any multiple criteria decision aid (MCDA) approach. © 1998 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision theory</subject><subject>Group decision making</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>intervention strategies</subject><subject>Interventionism</subject><subject>Mathematical methods</subject><subject>multiple criteria decision aid</subject><subject>problems</subject><subject>socio-political aspects of problems</subject><subject>stakeholder</subject><subject>Systems analysis</subject><subject>systems approach</subject><issn>1092-7026</issn><issn>1099-1743</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkG1LwzAQx4so-PgVZCCIvui8S5qmURFqN3X4MHGKCMIR2xQ3q53NhvrtTa36QgXfXI7cP78cP8-LEdoIwLY2Br2kt4mglI8y4BuoVAS4BWwTxTbuurId9zr-4KI7QKn2eBvaSX-H-fsz3sL3q9mPnvkSWDjvLVo7AkBAxAVvNW7ZiX4w92WRmaqlx-Oq1Ol9a1K2TpNOvOzN5bqwZuXzXPKuDrqXyZF_0j_sJfGJn3LOlK9MigZEmt4Zk0dCctA5E7kJtUQeAGQmy9SdS2Yq1aHKwzB3DdOB4EZmQcCXvPWG675_nho7ocehTU1R6CdTTi3xKAwh4pELrv0Ijspp9eR2IxQiAMGErHE3TSqtSmsrk9O4Gj7q6o0QqPZKVHul2hDVhqjxSm6CgrAu5LzSp1fiBJT0idG-Y9827JdhYd5-gf_l_o39unJ4v8EP7cS8fuN19UCh5FLQ9dkhqePrgMnjMzrn7yZgmX8</recordid><startdate>199801</startdate><enddate>199801</enddate><creator>Banville, Claude</creator><creator>Landry, Maurice</creator><creator>Martel, Jean-Marc</creator><creator>Boulaire, Christèle</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SMOQP</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199801</creationdate><title>A stakeholder approach to MCDA</title><author>Banville, Claude ; Landry, Maurice ; Martel, Jean-Marc ; Boulaire, Christèle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-9ec1e05ccbeef85730af25fe6a713400dedd9b329d9ca69f66f9ca2a453e7d443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision theory</topic><topic>Group decision making</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>intervention strategies</topic><topic>Interventionism</topic><topic>Mathematical methods</topic><topic>multiple criteria decision aid</topic><topic>problems</topic><topic>socio-political aspects of problems</topic><topic>stakeholder</topic><topic>Systems analysis</topic><topic>systems approach</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Banville, Claude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landry, Maurice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martel, Jean-Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boulaire, Christèle</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 46</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Systems research and behavioral science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Banville, Claude</au><au>Landry, Maurice</au><au>Martel, Jean-Marc</au><au>Boulaire, Christèle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A stakeholder approach to MCDA</atitle><jtitle>Systems research and behavioral science</jtitle><addtitle>Syst. Res</addtitle><date>1998-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>32</epage><pages>15-32</pages><issn>1092-7026</issn><eissn>1099-1743</eissn><abstract>Research into quantitative decision‐making has undeniably made considerable progress in recent years, having gone from coping with single decision‐maker, single criterion to multiple decision‐makers, multiple criteria decisions situations. Suitable mathematical methods and instruments have been perfected and are now quite sophisticated. Moreover, they are often supported by a powerful software. However, most decision situations require that the systemic socio‐political aspects of the decision processes be taken into account and the methods and instruments developed so far may not be satisfactory in this regard. This paper presents a proposition that is aimed at improving this situation. It is based on the concept of stakeholder which, in our view, should be more directly incorporated into any multiple criteria decision aid (MCDA) approach. © 1998 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(199801/02)15:1&lt;15::AID-SRES179&gt;3.0.CO;2-B</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1092-7026
ispartof Systems research and behavioral science, 1998-01, Vol.15 (1), p.15-32
issn 1092-7026
1099-1743
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38660838
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley
subjects Decision making
Decision theory
Group decision making
Information technology
intervention strategies
Interventionism
Mathematical methods
multiple criteria decision aid
problems
socio-political aspects of problems
stakeholder
Systems analysis
systems approach
title A stakeholder approach to MCDA
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T23%3A23%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20stakeholder%20approach%20to%20MCDA&rft.jtitle=Systems%20research%20and%20behavioral%20science&rft.au=Banville,%20Claude&rft.date=1998-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=32&rft.pages=15-32&rft.issn=1092-7026&rft.eissn=1099-1743&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(199801/02)15:1%3C15::AID-SRES179%3E3.0.CO;2-B&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38660838%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-9ec1e05ccbeef85730af25fe6a713400dedd9b329d9ca69f66f9ca2a453e7d443%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1554052574&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true