Loading…
'Right to counsel' in WTO dispute settlement proceedings. A 1998 resolution of the American Bar Association
A relative newcomer to 'tradespeak' has been the term describing an alleged US desire for world trade under a 'rules-based system'. The US, the proponent of the new 'rulebased system', has been the principal opponent of the right of other governments to be represented b...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of international economic law 1999-03, Vol.2 (1), p.159-162 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 162 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 159 |
container_title | Journal of international economic law |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Ehrenhaft, Peter D |
description | A relative newcomer to 'tradespeak' has been the term describing an alleged US desire for world trade under a 'rules-based system'. The US, the proponent of the new 'rulebased system', has been the principal opponent of the right of other governments to be represented by lawyers of their choosing in panel proceedings. The American Bar Association adopted in February 1998 a Resolution urging the US government to reconsider its stance on this issue. It proposed ways of meeting some of the US Trade Representative's concerns, including the adoption of a 'Code of Conduct' for all lawyers (or other representatives not employees of a government involved) appearing in WTO proceedings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jiel/2.1.159 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38851087</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38851087</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2528-3da264384e7da28414b26eb72573153e3e9a784707ed74d8d088341bdb8afe813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkM9LwzAYhosoOKc3_4DgwV1sly9Jl_RYh79gMJCJx5C237bMrplJevC_t2OePH0vfA8vL0-S3ALNgBZ8urPYTlkGGeTFWTICMRMpl7k6HzKfFSmnXFwmVyHsKAUpAEbJ1-TdbraRREdq13cB2wmxHflcLUljw6GPSALG2OIeu0gO3tWIje02ISMlgaJQxGNwbR-t64hbk7hFUu7R29p05NF4UobgamuO_-vkYm3agDd_d5x8PD-t5q_pYvnyNi8Xac1yplLeGDYTXAmUQ1ICRMVmWEmWSw45R46FkUpIKrGRolENVYoLqJpKmTUq4OPk_tQ7zP3uMUS9t6HGtjUduj5orlQOVMkBvPsH7lzvu2GbZqCA5gVnA_RwgmrvQvC41gdv98b_aKD6qF0ftWumQQ_a-S9AWHRj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218105932</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>'Right to counsel' in WTO dispute settlement proceedings. A 1998 resolution of the American Bar Association</title><source>Lexis+ UK</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Ehrenhaft, Peter D</creator><creatorcontrib>Ehrenhaft, Peter D</creatorcontrib><description>A relative newcomer to 'tradespeak' has been the term describing an alleged US desire for world trade under a 'rules-based system'. The US, the proponent of the new 'rulebased system', has been the principal opponent of the right of other governments to be represented by lawyers of their choosing in panel proceedings. The American Bar Association adopted in February 1998 a Resolution urging the US government to reconsider its stance on this issue. It proposed ways of meeting some of the US Trade Representative's concerns, including the adoption of a 'Code of Conduct' for all lawyers (or other representatives not employees of a government involved) appearing in WTO proceedings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1369-3034</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jiel/2.1.159</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</publisher><subject>Attorneys ; Bar associations ; Committees ; Disputes ; Economic law ; Government ; International law ; International trade ; Litigation ; Meetings ; Organizations ; Public officials ; Trade policy ; Trade preferences ; Trade relations ; World Trade Organization</subject><ispartof>Journal of international economic law, 1999-03, Vol.2 (1), p.159-162</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Jan 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33200,33201</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ehrenhaft, Peter D</creatorcontrib><title>'Right to counsel' in WTO dispute settlement proceedings. A 1998 resolution of the American Bar Association</title><title>Journal of international economic law</title><description>A relative newcomer to 'tradespeak' has been the term describing an alleged US desire for world trade under a 'rules-based system'. The US, the proponent of the new 'rulebased system', has been the principal opponent of the right of other governments to be represented by lawyers of their choosing in panel proceedings. The American Bar Association adopted in February 1998 a Resolution urging the US government to reconsider its stance on this issue. It proposed ways of meeting some of the US Trade Representative's concerns, including the adoption of a 'Code of Conduct' for all lawyers (or other representatives not employees of a government involved) appearing in WTO proceedings.</description><subject>Attorneys</subject><subject>Bar associations</subject><subject>Committees</subject><subject>Disputes</subject><subject>Economic law</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>International trade</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Meetings</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Public officials</subject><subject>Trade policy</subject><subject>Trade preferences</subject><subject>Trade relations</subject><subject>World Trade Organization</subject><issn>1369-3034</issn><issn>1464-3758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkM9LwzAYhosoOKc3_4DgwV1sly9Jl_RYh79gMJCJx5C237bMrplJevC_t2OePH0vfA8vL0-S3ALNgBZ8urPYTlkGGeTFWTICMRMpl7k6HzKfFSmnXFwmVyHsKAUpAEbJ1-TdbraRREdq13cB2wmxHflcLUljw6GPSALG2OIeu0gO3tWIje02ISMlgaJQxGNwbR-t64hbk7hFUu7R29p05NF4UobgamuO_-vkYm3agDd_d5x8PD-t5q_pYvnyNi8Xac1yplLeGDYTXAmUQ1ICRMVmWEmWSw45R46FkUpIKrGRolENVYoLqJpKmTUq4OPk_tQ7zP3uMUS9t6HGtjUduj5orlQOVMkBvPsH7lzvu2GbZqCA5gVnA_RwgmrvQvC41gdv98b_aKD6qF0ftWumQQ_a-S9AWHRj</recordid><startdate>19990301</startdate><enddate>19990301</enddate><creator>Ehrenhaft, Peter D</creator><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990301</creationdate><title>'Right to counsel' in WTO dispute settlement proceedings. A 1998 resolution of the American Bar Association</title><author>Ehrenhaft, Peter D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2528-3da264384e7da28414b26eb72573153e3e9a784707ed74d8d088341bdb8afe813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Attorneys</topic><topic>Bar associations</topic><topic>Committees</topic><topic>Disputes</topic><topic>Economic law</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>International trade</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Meetings</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Public officials</topic><topic>Trade policy</topic><topic>Trade preferences</topic><topic>Trade relations</topic><topic>World Trade Organization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ehrenhaft, Peter D</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of international economic law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ehrenhaft, Peter D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>'Right to counsel' in WTO dispute settlement proceedings. A 1998 resolution of the American Bar Association</atitle><jtitle>Journal of international economic law</jtitle><date>1999-03-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>159</spage><epage>162</epage><pages>159-162</pages><issn>1369-3034</issn><eissn>1464-3758</eissn><abstract>A relative newcomer to 'tradespeak' has been the term describing an alleged US desire for world trade under a 'rules-based system'. The US, the proponent of the new 'rulebased system', has been the principal opponent of the right of other governments to be represented by lawyers of their choosing in panel proceedings. The American Bar Association adopted in February 1998 a Resolution urging the US government to reconsider its stance on this issue. It proposed ways of meeting some of the US Trade Representative's concerns, including the adoption of a 'Code of Conduct' for all lawyers (or other representatives not employees of a government involved) appearing in WTO proceedings.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</pub><doi>10.1093/jiel/2.1.159</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1369-3034 |
ispartof | Journal of international economic law, 1999-03, Vol.2 (1), p.159-162 |
issn | 1369-3034 1464-3758 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38851087 |
source | Lexis+ UK; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text; Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Attorneys Bar associations Committees Disputes Economic law Government International law International trade Litigation Meetings Organizations Public officials Trade policy Trade preferences Trade relations World Trade Organization |
title | 'Right to counsel' in WTO dispute settlement proceedings. A 1998 resolution of the American Bar Association |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T17%3A31%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle='Right%20to%20counsel'%20in%20WTO%20dispute%20settlement%20proceedings.%20A%201998%20resolution%20of%20the%20American%20Bar%20Association&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20international%20economic%20law&rft.au=Ehrenhaft,%20Peter%20D&rft.date=1999-03-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=159&rft.epage=162&rft.pages=159-162&rft.issn=1369-3034&rft.eissn=1464-3758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jiel/2.1.159&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38851087%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2528-3da264384e7da28414b26eb72573153e3e9a784707ed74d8d088341bdb8afe813%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218105932&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |