The Accounting Review and the Production of Accounting Knowledge

The Aaccounting Review (TAR) is a significant medium through which validated accounting knowledge is disseminated. This paper reports the results of an analysis of selected characteristics of TAR editorial board members which provides a partial description of the validating process at TAR . Results...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Critical perspectives on accounting 1995-06, Vol.6 (3), p.263-287
Main Authors: Williams, Paul F., Rodgers, Jacci L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Accounting
Accounting methods
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c232t-3ae74e6fe894c283fb311e22188b58dea716b8436ded2ce101b4a3e6672333443
cites
container_end_page 287
container_issue 3
container_start_page 263
container_title Critical perspectives on accounting
container_volume 6
creator Williams, Paul F.
Rodgers, Jacci L.
description The Aaccounting Review (TAR) is a significant medium through which validated accounting knowledge is disseminated. This paper reports the results of an analysis of selected characteristics of TAR editorial board members which provides a partial description of the validating process at TAR . Results indicate that more power to validate knowledge claims is bestowed on individuals who received PhD degrees at a particular set of 15 schools and that the bases for selection to the board cannot be construed as universal. It also appears to be the case that little difference exists in the nature of the texts appearing in TAR and the other prestigious US accounting journals.
doi_str_mv 10.1006/cpac.1995.1025
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38854974</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1045235485710258</els_id><sourcerecordid>38854974</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c232t-3ae74e6fe894c283fb311e22188b58dea716b8436ded2ce101b4a3e6672333443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1PwzAQxS0EEqWwMmdiS_F3nI2q4ktUAqEyW459KUZpXOyEiv-eRGFgYbp7uvdOdz-ELgleEIzltd0buyBlKQZJxRGaEVyKfNDieOy5yCkT_BSdpfSBMSG8lDN0s3mHbGlt6NvOt9vsFb48HDLTuqwbJi8xuN52PrRZqP_6ntpwaMBt4Ryd1KZJcPFb5-jt7nazesjXz_ePq-U6t5TRLmcGCg6yBlVySxWrK0YIUEqUqoRyYAoiK8WZdOCoBYJJxQ0DKQvKGOOczdHVtHcfw2cPqdM7nyw0jWkh9EkzpQQvi9G4mIw2hpQi1Hof_c7Eb02wHkHpEZQeQekR1BBQUwCG84fvo07WQ2vB-Qi20y74_6I_NztuUQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>38854974</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Accounting Review and the Production of Accounting Knowledge</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Williams, Paul F. ; Rodgers, Jacci L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Williams, Paul F. ; Rodgers, Jacci L.</creatorcontrib><description>The Aaccounting Review (TAR) is a significant medium through which validated accounting knowledge is disseminated. This paper reports the results of an analysis of selected characteristics of TAR editorial board members which provides a partial description of the validating process at TAR . Results indicate that more power to validate knowledge claims is bestowed on individuals who received PhD degrees at a particular set of 15 schools and that the bases for selection to the board cannot be construed as universal. It also appears to be the case that little difference exists in the nature of the texts appearing in TAR and the other prestigious US accounting journals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-2354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9955</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/cpac.1995.1025</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Accounting methods</subject><ispartof>Critical perspectives on accounting, 1995-06, Vol.6 (3), p.263-287</ispartof><rights>1995 Academic Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c232t-3ae74e6fe894c283fb311e22188b58dea716b8436ded2ce101b4a3e6672333443</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27900,27901,33200</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Williams, Paul F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodgers, Jacci L.</creatorcontrib><title>The Accounting Review and the Production of Accounting Knowledge</title><title>Critical perspectives on accounting</title><description>The Aaccounting Review (TAR) is a significant medium through which validated accounting knowledge is disseminated. This paper reports the results of an analysis of selected characteristics of TAR editorial board members which provides a partial description of the validating process at TAR . Results indicate that more power to validate knowledge claims is bestowed on individuals who received PhD degrees at a particular set of 15 schools and that the bases for selection to the board cannot be construed as universal. It also appears to be the case that little difference exists in the nature of the texts appearing in TAR and the other prestigious US accounting journals.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Accounting methods</subject><issn>1045-2354</issn><issn>1095-9955</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kL1PwzAQxS0EEqWwMmdiS_F3nI2q4ktUAqEyW459KUZpXOyEiv-eRGFgYbp7uvdOdz-ELgleEIzltd0buyBlKQZJxRGaEVyKfNDieOy5yCkT_BSdpfSBMSG8lDN0s3mHbGlt6NvOt9vsFb48HDLTuqwbJi8xuN52PrRZqP_6ntpwaMBt4Ryd1KZJcPFb5-jt7nazesjXz_ePq-U6t5TRLmcGCg6yBlVySxWrK0YIUEqUqoRyYAoiK8WZdOCoBYJJxQ0DKQvKGOOczdHVtHcfw2cPqdM7nyw0jWkh9EkzpQQvi9G4mIw2hpQi1Hof_c7Eb02wHkHpEZQeQekR1BBQUwCG84fvo07WQ2vB-Qi20y74_6I_NztuUQ</recordid><startdate>19950601</startdate><enddate>19950601</enddate><creator>Williams, Paul F.</creator><creator>Rodgers, Jacci L.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950601</creationdate><title>The Accounting Review and the Production of Accounting Knowledge</title><author>Williams, Paul F. ; Rodgers, Jacci L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c232t-3ae74e6fe894c283fb311e22188b58dea716b8436ded2ce101b4a3e6672333443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Accounting methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Williams, Paul F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodgers, Jacci L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Critical perspectives on accounting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Williams, Paul F.</au><au>Rodgers, Jacci L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Accounting Review and the Production of Accounting Knowledge</atitle><jtitle>Critical perspectives on accounting</jtitle><date>1995-06-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>263</spage><epage>287</epage><pages>263-287</pages><issn>1045-2354</issn><eissn>1095-9955</eissn><abstract>The Aaccounting Review (TAR) is a significant medium through which validated accounting knowledge is disseminated. This paper reports the results of an analysis of selected characteristics of TAR editorial board members which provides a partial description of the validating process at TAR . Results indicate that more power to validate knowledge claims is bestowed on individuals who received PhD degrees at a particular set of 15 schools and that the bases for selection to the board cannot be construed as universal. It also appears to be the case that little difference exists in the nature of the texts appearing in TAR and the other prestigious US accounting journals.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1006/cpac.1995.1025</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1045-2354
ispartof Critical perspectives on accounting, 1995-06, Vol.6 (3), p.263-287
issn 1045-2354
1095-9955
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38854974
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Accounting
Accounting methods
title The Accounting Review and the Production of Accounting Knowledge
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-25T12%3A20%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Accounting%20Review%20and%20the%20Production%20of%20Accounting%20Knowledge&rft.jtitle=Critical%20perspectives%20on%20accounting&rft.au=Williams,%20Paul%20F.&rft.date=1995-06-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=263&rft.epage=287&rft.pages=263-287&rft.issn=1045-2354&rft.eissn=1095-9955&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/cpac.1995.1025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38854974%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c232t-3ae74e6fe894c283fb311e22188b58dea716b8436ded2ce101b4a3e6672333443%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=38854974&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true