Loading…

International Comparisons of Poverty Intensity: Index Decomposition and Bootstrap Inference

This paper proposes an alternative formulation for the Sen-Shorrocks-Thon (SST) index of poverty intensity that is appropriate for survey data with sampling weights. It also decomposes the SST index into the poverty rate, the average poverty gap ratio among the poor, and the overall Gini index of po...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of human resources 2000, Vol.35 (1), p.51-81
Main Authors: Osberg, Lars, Xu, Kuan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-ada69f2cd53d22ef2c3c7e87f8def8336fbcee4180d2fc589ccf857e286d7a923
cites
container_end_page 81
container_issue 1
container_start_page 51
container_title The Journal of human resources
container_volume 35
creator Osberg, Lars
Xu, Kuan
description This paper proposes an alternative formulation for the Sen-Shorrocks-Thon (SST) index of poverty intensity that is appropriate for survey data with sampling weights. It also decomposes the SST index into the poverty rate, the average poverty gap ratio among the poor, and the overall Gini index of poverty gap ratios. To account for sampling variation in estimates of poverty intensity, this paper uses the bootstrap method to compute confidence intervals and presents international comparisons using Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) data from the 1970s to the 1990s. Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses indicate that the percentage change in poverty intensity can be approximated by the sum of percentage changes in the poverty rate and average poverty gap ratio, since changes in the overall Gini index of poverty gap ratios are negligible. In the early 1970s poverty intensity in Canada and the United States was almost indistinguishable, but in the 1970s Canadian poverty intensity decreased. Large increases in poverty intensity occurred in the 1980s in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Sweden.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/146356
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38898948</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>146356</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>146356</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-ada69f2cd53d22ef2c3c7e87f8def8336fbcee4180d2fc589ccf857e286d7a923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kVtLAzEQhYMoWKv-hkXBt9XcNsn6pvVWKOiDguDDErMT2LJN1iQV--9NqaAIfZozwzdnGA5CxwSfU4blBeGCVWIHjUjFVakw5rtohDGlJRHidR8dxDjHuSeMj9Db1CUITqfOO90XE78YdOiid7HwtnjynxDSqlhDLnZpdZllC1_FDZhM-jzKe4V2bXHtfYop6CETFgI4A4doz-o-wtFPHaOXu9vnyUM5e7yfTq5mpeG0TqVutagtNW3FWkohK2YkKGlVC1YxJuy7AeBE4ZZaU6naGKsqCVSJVuqasjE62_gOwX8sIaZm0UUDfa8d-GVsmFK1qrnK4Mk_cO6X-fk-NhRTSZmQMkOn2yAia6JoTfmfmyb4GAPYZgjdQodVQ3CzjqHZxPBrN4_Jh23UN_YRhUs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1791829242</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>International Comparisons of Poverty Intensity: Index Decomposition and Bootstrap Inference</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】</source><creator>Osberg, Lars ; Xu, Kuan</creator><creatorcontrib>Osberg, Lars ; Xu, Kuan</creatorcontrib><description>This paper proposes an alternative formulation for the Sen-Shorrocks-Thon (SST) index of poverty intensity that is appropriate for survey data with sampling weights. It also decomposes the SST index into the poverty rate, the average poverty gap ratio among the poor, and the overall Gini index of poverty gap ratios. To account for sampling variation in estimates of poverty intensity, this paper uses the bootstrap method to compute confidence intervals and presents international comparisons using Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) data from the 1970s to the 1990s. Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses indicate that the percentage change in poverty intensity can be approximated by the sum of percentage changes in the poverty rate and average poverty gap ratio, since changes in the overall Gini index of poverty gap ratios are negligible. In the early 1970s poverty intensity in Canada and the United States was almost indistinguishable, but in the 1970s Canadian poverty intensity decreased. Large increases in poverty intensity occurred in the 1980s in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Sweden.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-166X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-8004</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/146356</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHREA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: University of Wisconsin Press</publisher><subject>Comparative analysis ; Data sampling ; Decomposition ; Gini index ; Human resources ; Income distribution ; Income inequality ; Poverty ; Poverty gap ; Poverty line ; Poverty rates ; Ratios ; Sampling ; Standard of living ; Statistical analysis ; Studies ; Survey data ; Survey sampling</subject><ispartof>The Journal of human resources, 2000, Vol.35 (1), p.51-81</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2000 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System</rights><rights>Copyright University of Wisconsin Press Winter 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-ada69f2cd53d22ef2c3c7e87f8def8336fbcee4180d2fc589ccf857e286d7a923</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/146356$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/146356$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,33223,33224,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Osberg, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Kuan</creatorcontrib><title>International Comparisons of Poverty Intensity: Index Decomposition and Bootstrap Inference</title><title>The Journal of human resources</title><description>This paper proposes an alternative formulation for the Sen-Shorrocks-Thon (SST) index of poverty intensity that is appropriate for survey data with sampling weights. It also decomposes the SST index into the poverty rate, the average poverty gap ratio among the poor, and the overall Gini index of poverty gap ratios. To account for sampling variation in estimates of poverty intensity, this paper uses the bootstrap method to compute confidence intervals and presents international comparisons using Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) data from the 1970s to the 1990s. Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses indicate that the percentage change in poverty intensity can be approximated by the sum of percentage changes in the poverty rate and average poverty gap ratio, since changes in the overall Gini index of poverty gap ratios are negligible. In the early 1970s poverty intensity in Canada and the United States was almost indistinguishable, but in the 1970s Canadian poverty intensity decreased. Large increases in poverty intensity occurred in the 1980s in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Sweden.</description><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Data sampling</subject><subject>Decomposition</subject><subject>Gini index</subject><subject>Human resources</subject><subject>Income distribution</subject><subject>Income inequality</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Poverty gap</subject><subject>Poverty line</subject><subject>Poverty rates</subject><subject>Ratios</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Standard of living</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Survey data</subject><subject>Survey sampling</subject><issn>0022-166X</issn><issn>1548-8004</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kVtLAzEQhYMoWKv-hkXBt9XcNsn6pvVWKOiDguDDErMT2LJN1iQV--9NqaAIfZozwzdnGA5CxwSfU4blBeGCVWIHjUjFVakw5rtohDGlJRHidR8dxDjHuSeMj9Db1CUITqfOO90XE78YdOiid7HwtnjynxDSqlhDLnZpdZllC1_FDZhM-jzKe4V2bXHtfYop6CETFgI4A4doz-o-wtFPHaOXu9vnyUM5e7yfTq5mpeG0TqVutagtNW3FWkohK2YkKGlVC1YxJuy7AeBE4ZZaU6naGKsqCVSJVuqasjE62_gOwX8sIaZm0UUDfa8d-GVsmFK1qrnK4Mk_cO6X-fk-NhRTSZmQMkOn2yAia6JoTfmfmyb4GAPYZgjdQodVQ3CzjqHZxPBrN4_Jh23UN_YRhUs</recordid><startdate>2000</startdate><enddate>2000</enddate><creator>Osberg, Lars</creator><creator>Xu, Kuan</creator><general>University of Wisconsin Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2000</creationdate><title>International Comparisons of Poverty Intensity: Index Decomposition and Bootstrap Inference</title><author>Osberg, Lars ; Xu, Kuan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-ada69f2cd53d22ef2c3c7e87f8def8336fbcee4180d2fc589ccf857e286d7a923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Data sampling</topic><topic>Decomposition</topic><topic>Gini index</topic><topic>Human resources</topic><topic>Income distribution</topic><topic>Income inequality</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Poverty gap</topic><topic>Poverty line</topic><topic>Poverty rates</topic><topic>Ratios</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Standard of living</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Survey data</topic><topic>Survey sampling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Osberg, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Kuan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of human resources</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Osberg, Lars</au><au>Xu, Kuan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>International Comparisons of Poverty Intensity: Index Decomposition and Bootstrap Inference</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of human resources</jtitle><date>2000</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>51</spage><epage>81</epage><pages>51-81</pages><issn>0022-166X</issn><eissn>1548-8004</eissn><coden>JHREA9</coden><abstract>This paper proposes an alternative formulation for the Sen-Shorrocks-Thon (SST) index of poverty intensity that is appropriate for survey data with sampling weights. It also decomposes the SST index into the poverty rate, the average poverty gap ratio among the poor, and the overall Gini index of poverty gap ratios. To account for sampling variation in estimates of poverty intensity, this paper uses the bootstrap method to compute confidence intervals and presents international comparisons using Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) data from the 1970s to the 1990s. Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses indicate that the percentage change in poverty intensity can be approximated by the sum of percentage changes in the poverty rate and average poverty gap ratio, since changes in the overall Gini index of poverty gap ratios are negligible. In the early 1970s poverty intensity in Canada and the United States was almost indistinguishable, but in the 1970s Canadian poverty intensity decreased. Large increases in poverty intensity occurred in the 1980s in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Sweden.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>University of Wisconsin Press</pub><doi>10.2307/146356</doi><tpages>31</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-166X
ispartof The Journal of human resources, 2000, Vol.35 (1), p.51-81
issn 0022-166X
1548-8004
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38898948
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】
subjects Comparative analysis
Data sampling
Decomposition
Gini index
Human resources
Income distribution
Income inequality
Poverty
Poverty gap
Poverty line
Poverty rates
Ratios
Sampling
Standard of living
Statistical analysis
Studies
Survey data
Survey sampling
title International Comparisons of Poverty Intensity: Index Decomposition and Bootstrap Inference
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T01%3A55%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=International%20Comparisons%20of%20Poverty%20Intensity:%20Index%20Decomposition%20and%20Bootstrap%20Inference&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20human%20resources&rft.au=Osberg,%20Lars&rft.date=2000&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=81&rft.pages=51-81&rft.issn=0022-166X&rft.eissn=1548-8004&rft.coden=JHREA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/146356&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E146356%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-ada69f2cd53d22ef2c3c7e87f8def8336fbcee4180d2fc589ccf857e286d7a923%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1791829242&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=146356&rfr_iscdi=true