Loading…

Terms of engagement: alternatives to punitive policies

The frequent failure of punitive policies - such as military force or sanctions - to achieve foreign-policy goals at reasonable costs has catalysed a search for alternative ways of dealing with problem regimes. In this quest, engagement strategies, or the primary use of incentives to persuade govern...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Survival (London) 2000-07, Vol.42 (2), p.113-135
Main Authors: Haass, R., O'Sullivan, M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-67cf81c278ab1b1f035e48681940f1d9a2964d08fc563fe1e87ce6f7b8db03403
cites
container_end_page 135
container_issue 2
container_start_page 113
container_title Survival (London)
container_volume 42
creator Haass, R.
O'Sullivan, M.
description The frequent failure of punitive policies - such as military force or sanctions - to achieve foreign-policy goals at reasonable costs has catalysed a search for alternative ways of dealing with problem regimes. In this quest, engagement strategies, or the primary use of incentives to persuade governments to change their behaviour, hold great promise. At the same time, unconditional forms of engagement which extend inducements to civil society or the private sector can also effect positive changes in the long run. Although an often neglected policy option, engagement has the ability to transform many of the problematic relationships with which the United States has struggled, such as its relations with Cuba, Iran, Libya and others.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/survival/42.2.113
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38899520</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>55601376</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-67cf81c278ab1b1f035e48681940f1d9a2964d08fc563fe1e87ce6f7b8db03403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wNui4G3bTJJmE_EixS8oeKnnkKZJScluarJb6b93S_UiFE_DwPO8zPAidA14BFjSce7S1m91GDMyIiMAeoIGwLgoCZfyFA0wprLklIpzdJHzGmMMvTdAfG5TnYvoCtus9MrWtmnvCx1amxrd-q3NRRuLTdf4_VJsYvDG23yJzpwO2V79zCH6eH6aT1_L2fvL2_RxVhoGtC15ZZwAQyqhF7AAh-nEMsEFSIYdLKUmkrMlFs5MOHUWrKiM5a5aiOUCU4bpEN0dcjcpfnY2t6r22dgQdGNjl9VECiorzv4FqRBSTsg-8eYPuI5d_2vIikDFMSZyD90eg6CSUGHS5_UUHCiTYs7JOrVJvtZppwCrfSvqtxXFiCKqb6V3Hg6Ob1xMtf6KKSxVq3chJpd0Y3x_63H9G8UdleQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1791702388</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Terms of engagement: alternatives to punitive policies</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Haass, R. ; O'Sullivan, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Haass, R. ; O'Sullivan, M.</creatorcontrib><description>The frequent failure of punitive policies - such as military force or sanctions - to achieve foreign-policy goals at reasonable costs has catalysed a search for alternative ways of dealing with problem regimes. In this quest, engagement strategies, or the primary use of incentives to persuade governments to change their behaviour, hold great promise. At the same time, unconditional forms of engagement which extend inducements to civil society or the private sector can also effect positive changes in the long run. Although an often neglected policy option, engagement has the ability to transform many of the problematic relationships with which the United States has struggled, such as its relations with Cuba, Iran, Libya and others.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-6338</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2699</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/survival/42.2.113</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Armed forces ; Domestic affairs ; Foreign policy ; Foreign policy making ; Foreign relations ; International relations ; Material incentives ; Military engagements ; Military policy ; Policy studies ; Punishment ; Sanctions ; Sanctions (international law) ; Third-party intervention ; U.S.A ; United States</subject><ispartof>Survival (London), 2000-07, Vol.42 (2), p.113-135</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2000</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Summer 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-67cf81c278ab1b1f035e48681940f1d9a2964d08fc563fe1e87ce6f7b8db03403</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27848,27907,27908,33206,33207</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haass, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Terms of engagement: alternatives to punitive policies</title><title>Survival (London)</title><description>The frequent failure of punitive policies - such as military force or sanctions - to achieve foreign-policy goals at reasonable costs has catalysed a search for alternative ways of dealing with problem regimes. In this quest, engagement strategies, or the primary use of incentives to persuade governments to change their behaviour, hold great promise. At the same time, unconditional forms of engagement which extend inducements to civil society or the private sector can also effect positive changes in the long run. Although an often neglected policy option, engagement has the ability to transform many of the problematic relationships with which the United States has struggled, such as its relations with Cuba, Iran, Libya and others.</description><subject>Armed forces</subject><subject>Domestic affairs</subject><subject>Foreign policy</subject><subject>Foreign policy making</subject><subject>Foreign relations</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Material incentives</subject><subject>Military engagements</subject><subject>Military policy</subject><subject>Policy studies</subject><subject>Punishment</subject><subject>Sanctions</subject><subject>Sanctions (international law)</subject><subject>Third-party intervention</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0039-6338</issn><issn>1468-2699</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wNui4G3bTJJmE_EixS8oeKnnkKZJScluarJb6b93S_UiFE_DwPO8zPAidA14BFjSce7S1m91GDMyIiMAeoIGwLgoCZfyFA0wprLklIpzdJHzGmMMvTdAfG5TnYvoCtus9MrWtmnvCx1amxrd-q3NRRuLTdf4_VJsYvDG23yJzpwO2V79zCH6eH6aT1_L2fvL2_RxVhoGtC15ZZwAQyqhF7AAh-nEMsEFSIYdLKUmkrMlFs5MOHUWrKiM5a5aiOUCU4bpEN0dcjcpfnY2t6r22dgQdGNjl9VECiorzv4FqRBSTsg-8eYPuI5d_2vIikDFMSZyD90eg6CSUGHS5_UUHCiTYs7JOrVJvtZppwCrfSvqtxXFiCKqb6V3Hg6Ob1xMtf6KKSxVq3chJpd0Y3x_63H9G8UdleQ</recordid><startdate>20000701</startdate><enddate>20000701</enddate><creator>Haass, R.</creator><creator>O'Sullivan, M.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>International Institute for Strategic Studies</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FMSEA</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>HWXIY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000701</creationdate><title>Terms of engagement: alternatives to punitive policies</title><author>Haass, R. ; O'Sullivan, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-67cf81c278ab1b1f035e48681940f1d9a2964d08fc563fe1e87ce6f7b8db03403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Armed forces</topic><topic>Domestic affairs</topic><topic>Foreign policy</topic><topic>Foreign policy making</topic><topic>Foreign relations</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Material incentives</topic><topic>Military engagements</topic><topic>Military policy</topic><topic>Policy studies</topic><topic>Punishment</topic><topic>Sanctions</topic><topic>Sanctions (international law)</topic><topic>Third-party intervention</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haass, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 05</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 25</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Survival (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haass, R.</au><au>O'Sullivan, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Terms of engagement: alternatives to punitive policies</atitle><jtitle>Survival (London)</jtitle><date>2000-07-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>113</spage><epage>135</epage><pages>113-135</pages><issn>0039-6338</issn><eissn>1468-2699</eissn><abstract>The frequent failure of punitive policies - such as military force or sanctions - to achieve foreign-policy goals at reasonable costs has catalysed a search for alternative ways of dealing with problem regimes. In this quest, engagement strategies, or the primary use of incentives to persuade governments to change their behaviour, hold great promise. At the same time, unconditional forms of engagement which extend inducements to civil society or the private sector can also effect positive changes in the long run. Although an often neglected policy option, engagement has the ability to transform many of the problematic relationships with which the United States has struggled, such as its relations with Cuba, Iran, Libya and others.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1093/survival/42.2.113</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-6338
ispartof Survival (London), 2000-07, Vol.42 (2), p.113-135
issn 0039-6338
1468-2699
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38899520
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Taylor & Francis; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects Armed forces
Domestic affairs
Foreign policy
Foreign policy making
Foreign relations
International relations
Material incentives
Military engagements
Military policy
Policy studies
Punishment
Sanctions
Sanctions (international law)
Third-party intervention
U.S.A
United States
title Terms of engagement: alternatives to punitive policies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T18%3A49%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Terms%20of%20engagement:%20alternatives%20to%20punitive%20policies&rft.jtitle=Survival%20(London)&rft.au=Haass,%20R.&rft.date=2000-07-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=113&rft.epage=135&rft.pages=113-135&rft.issn=0039-6338&rft.eissn=1468-2699&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/survival/42.2.113&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E55601376%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-67cf81c278ab1b1f035e48681940f1d9a2964d08fc563fe1e87ce6f7b8db03403%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1791702388&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true