Loading…
Terms of engagement: alternatives to punitive policies
The frequent failure of punitive policies - such as military force or sanctions - to achieve foreign-policy goals at reasonable costs has catalysed a search for alternative ways of dealing with problem regimes. In this quest, engagement strategies, or the primary use of incentives to persuade govern...
Saved in:
Published in: | Survival (London) 2000-07, Vol.42 (2), p.113-135 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-67cf81c278ab1b1f035e48681940f1d9a2964d08fc563fe1e87ce6f7b8db03403 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 135 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 113 |
container_title | Survival (London) |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Haass, R. O'Sullivan, M. |
description | The frequent failure of punitive policies - such as military force or sanctions - to achieve foreign-policy goals at reasonable costs has catalysed a search for alternative ways of dealing with problem regimes. In this quest, engagement strategies, or the primary use of incentives to persuade governments to change their behaviour, hold great promise. At the same time, unconditional forms of engagement which extend inducements to civil society or the private sector can also effect positive changes in the long run. Although an often neglected policy option, engagement has the ability to transform many of the problematic relationships with which the United States has struggled, such as its relations with Cuba, Iran, Libya and others. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/survival/42.2.113 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38899520</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>55601376</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-67cf81c278ab1b1f035e48681940f1d9a2964d08fc563fe1e87ce6f7b8db03403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wNui4G3bTJJmE_EixS8oeKnnkKZJScluarJb6b93S_UiFE_DwPO8zPAidA14BFjSce7S1m91GDMyIiMAeoIGwLgoCZfyFA0wprLklIpzdJHzGmMMvTdAfG5TnYvoCtus9MrWtmnvCx1amxrd-q3NRRuLTdf4_VJsYvDG23yJzpwO2V79zCH6eH6aT1_L2fvL2_RxVhoGtC15ZZwAQyqhF7AAh-nEMsEFSIYdLKUmkrMlFs5MOHUWrKiM5a5aiOUCU4bpEN0dcjcpfnY2t6r22dgQdGNjl9VECiorzv4FqRBSTsg-8eYPuI5d_2vIikDFMSZyD90eg6CSUGHS5_UUHCiTYs7JOrVJvtZppwCrfSvqtxXFiCKqb6V3Hg6Ob1xMtf6KKSxVq3chJpd0Y3x_63H9G8UdleQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1791702388</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Terms of engagement: alternatives to punitive policies</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Taylor & Francis</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Haass, R. ; O'Sullivan, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Haass, R. ; O'Sullivan, M.</creatorcontrib><description>The frequent failure of punitive policies - such as military force or sanctions - to achieve foreign-policy goals at reasonable costs has catalysed a search for alternative ways of dealing with problem regimes. In this quest, engagement strategies, or the primary use of incentives to persuade governments to change their behaviour, hold great promise. At the same time, unconditional forms of engagement which extend inducements to civil society or the private sector can also effect positive changes in the long run. Although an often neglected policy option, engagement has the ability to transform many of the problematic relationships with which the United States has struggled, such as its relations with Cuba, Iran, Libya and others.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-6338</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2699</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/survival/42.2.113</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Armed forces ; Domestic affairs ; Foreign policy ; Foreign policy making ; Foreign relations ; International relations ; Material incentives ; Military engagements ; Military policy ; Policy studies ; Punishment ; Sanctions ; Sanctions (international law) ; Third-party intervention ; U.S.A ; United States</subject><ispartof>Survival (London), 2000-07, Vol.42 (2), p.113-135</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2000</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Summer 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-67cf81c278ab1b1f035e48681940f1d9a2964d08fc563fe1e87ce6f7b8db03403</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27848,27907,27908,33206,33207</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haass, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Terms of engagement: alternatives to punitive policies</title><title>Survival (London)</title><description>The frequent failure of punitive policies - such as military force or sanctions - to achieve foreign-policy goals at reasonable costs has catalysed a search for alternative ways of dealing with problem regimes. In this quest, engagement strategies, or the primary use of incentives to persuade governments to change their behaviour, hold great promise. At the same time, unconditional forms of engagement which extend inducements to civil society or the private sector can also effect positive changes in the long run. Although an often neglected policy option, engagement has the ability to transform many of the problematic relationships with which the United States has struggled, such as its relations with Cuba, Iran, Libya and others.</description><subject>Armed forces</subject><subject>Domestic affairs</subject><subject>Foreign policy</subject><subject>Foreign policy making</subject><subject>Foreign relations</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Material incentives</subject><subject>Military engagements</subject><subject>Military policy</subject><subject>Policy studies</subject><subject>Punishment</subject><subject>Sanctions</subject><subject>Sanctions (international law)</subject><subject>Third-party intervention</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0039-6338</issn><issn>1468-2699</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wNui4G3bTJJmE_EixS8oeKnnkKZJScluarJb6b93S_UiFE_DwPO8zPAidA14BFjSce7S1m91GDMyIiMAeoIGwLgoCZfyFA0wprLklIpzdJHzGmMMvTdAfG5TnYvoCtus9MrWtmnvCx1amxrd-q3NRRuLTdf4_VJsYvDG23yJzpwO2V79zCH6eH6aT1_L2fvL2_RxVhoGtC15ZZwAQyqhF7AAh-nEMsEFSIYdLKUmkrMlFs5MOHUWrKiM5a5aiOUCU4bpEN0dcjcpfnY2t6r22dgQdGNjl9VECiorzv4FqRBSTsg-8eYPuI5d_2vIikDFMSZyD90eg6CSUGHS5_UUHCiTYs7JOrVJvtZppwCrfSvqtxXFiCKqb6V3Hg6Ob1xMtf6KKSxVq3chJpd0Y3x_63H9G8UdleQ</recordid><startdate>20000701</startdate><enddate>20000701</enddate><creator>Haass, R.</creator><creator>O'Sullivan, M.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>International Institute for Strategic Studies</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FMSEA</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>HWXIY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000701</creationdate><title>Terms of engagement: alternatives to punitive policies</title><author>Haass, R. ; O'Sullivan, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-67cf81c278ab1b1f035e48681940f1d9a2964d08fc563fe1e87ce6f7b8db03403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Armed forces</topic><topic>Domestic affairs</topic><topic>Foreign policy</topic><topic>Foreign policy making</topic><topic>Foreign relations</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Material incentives</topic><topic>Military engagements</topic><topic>Military policy</topic><topic>Policy studies</topic><topic>Punishment</topic><topic>Sanctions</topic><topic>Sanctions (international law)</topic><topic>Third-party intervention</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haass, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 05</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 25</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Survival (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haass, R.</au><au>O'Sullivan, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Terms of engagement: alternatives to punitive policies</atitle><jtitle>Survival (London)</jtitle><date>2000-07-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>113</spage><epage>135</epage><pages>113-135</pages><issn>0039-6338</issn><eissn>1468-2699</eissn><abstract>The frequent failure of punitive policies - such as military force or sanctions - to achieve foreign-policy goals at reasonable costs has catalysed a search for alternative ways of dealing with problem regimes. In this quest, engagement strategies, or the primary use of incentives to persuade governments to change their behaviour, hold great promise. At the same time, unconditional forms of engagement which extend inducements to civil society or the private sector can also effect positive changes in the long run. Although an often neglected policy option, engagement has the ability to transform many of the problematic relationships with which the United States has struggled, such as its relations with Cuba, Iran, Libya and others.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1093/survival/42.2.113</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0039-6338 |
ispartof | Survival (London), 2000-07, Vol.42 (2), p.113-135 |
issn | 0039-6338 1468-2699 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38899520 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Taylor & Francis; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Armed forces Domestic affairs Foreign policy Foreign policy making Foreign relations International relations Material incentives Military engagements Military policy Policy studies Punishment Sanctions Sanctions (international law) Third-party intervention U.S.A United States |
title | Terms of engagement: alternatives to punitive policies |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T18%3A49%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Terms%20of%20engagement:%20alternatives%20to%20punitive%20policies&rft.jtitle=Survival%20(London)&rft.au=Haass,%20R.&rft.date=2000-07-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=113&rft.epage=135&rft.pages=113-135&rft.issn=0039-6338&rft.eissn=1468-2699&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/survival/42.2.113&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E55601376%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-67cf81c278ab1b1f035e48681940f1d9a2964d08fc563fe1e87ce6f7b8db03403%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1791702388&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |