A Spatial Theory of Positive and Negative Campaigning

In order to explore the content of electoral campaigns, this paper makes two modifications to Hotelling's model of spatial competition. First, we assume that agents inherit initial locations and engage in costly relocation. Second, an agent's relocation is affected by her rival's acti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Games and economic behavior 1996-12, Vol.17 (2), p.209-229
Main Authors: Harrington, Jr, Joseph E., Hess, Gregory D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Competition
Economic behaviour
Elections
Game theory
Presidential elections
Voting behaviour
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In order to explore the content of electoral campaigns, this paper makes two modifications to Hotelling's model of spatial competition. First, we assume that agents inherit initial locations and engage in costly relocation. Second, an agent's relocation is affected by her rival's actions. We investigate how a candidate allocates resources between positive campaigning—which influences voters' perceptions of her own ideology—and negative campaigning—which influences her opponent's perceived ideology. Our theory predicts that the candidate who is perceived as having less attractive personal attributes runs a relatively more negative campaign. The theory's implications are illustrated for the 1988 presidential election.Journal of Economic LiteratureClassification Numbers: C7, H0.
ISSN:0899-8256
1090-2473
DOI:10.1006/game.1996.0103