Loading…
Strategic considerations for clean coal R&D
While present interest in coal-fired power generation is centred on the developing countries, with new natural-gas-fired power stations predominating in the developed world, in the long term coal will return to being the fuel of choice for power generation for much of the world. To minimise the glob...
Saved in:
Published in: | Energy policy 2001-05, Vol.29 (6), p.441-452 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-34da068e405cb2e5dd1b4aa3446b236ea7a93dd3338ed234545a781e22861ec13 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-34da068e405cb2e5dd1b4aa3446b236ea7a93dd3338ed234545a781e22861ec13 |
container_end_page | 452 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 441 |
container_title | Energy policy |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | McMullan, J.T. Williams, B.C. McCahey, S |
description | While present interest in coal-fired power generation is centred on the developing countries, with new natural-gas-fired power stations predominating in the developed world, in the long term coal will return to being the fuel of choice for power generation for much of the world. To minimise the global impact of coal use it is essential, therefore, that coal technologies are developed that are efficient, clean and economically attractive. Techno-economic analyses of the options for coal are presented together with a strategic overview of potential lines of development. The broad conclusions are that new coal plant will not be truly competitive with natural gas until the price of gas increases to about 3.3
EURO/GJ, compared with a coal price of 1.3
EURO/GJ. Present state-of-the-art pulverised coal-fired plant is close to its optimum techno-economic performance and further improvements depend on the development of cost-effective super-alloys. However, there are good opportunities to increase the efficiency of coal use to greater than 50% (LHV basis) using gasification-based power generation cycles. Unless credit is given for the much lower emissions provided by these cycles, the pulverised coal and pressurised fluidised bed combustion will remain the most economic options. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00140-3 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_39007188</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421500001403</els_id><sourcerecordid>17866486</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-34da068e405cb2e5dd1b4aa3446b236ea7a93dd3338ed234545a781e22861ec13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1rVDEQhoMouFZ_grAIFkWOzuR7r0TqNwXB6nXIJrOacvacY3K20H_vbLdU8GYDk5mQ5x0meYV4ivAaAe2bC1CAnZZoXgC8BEANnbonFuid6qxz7r5Y3CEPxaPWLgFA-5VeiFcXc40z_SppmcahlUx8LFwtN2Ndpp7iwBexX34_ff9YPNjEvtGT23wifn788OPsc3f-7dOXs3fnXTLOzp3SOYL1pMGktSSTM651jEpru5bKUnRxpXJWSnnKUmmjTXQeSUpvkRKqE3F66DvV8c-O2hy2pSXq-zjQuGtBrQAcen8UROet1d4eB7WxXqFm8Nl_4OW4qwO_NkgwCsHifj5zgFIdW6u0CVMt21ivA0LYOxJuHAn77w4A4caRoFj39aCrNFG6ExGvgaaxD1dBRbni7XpfsIxT4bAcE4fW3NTI8HvecrPnt5PGlmK_qXFIpf2bRPObAA1zbw8csWNXhWpoqdCQKJdKaQ55LEfG_gsMlrS6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205310611</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strategic considerations for clean coal R&D</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>McMullan, J.T. ; Williams, B.C. ; McCahey, S</creator><creatorcontrib>McMullan, J.T. ; Williams, B.C. ; McCahey, S</creatorcontrib><description>While present interest in coal-fired power generation is centred on the developing countries, with new natural-gas-fired power stations predominating in the developed world, in the long term coal will return to being the fuel of choice for power generation for much of the world. To minimise the global impact of coal use it is essential, therefore, that coal technologies are developed that are efficient, clean and economically attractive. Techno-economic analyses of the options for coal are presented together with a strategic overview of potential lines of development. The broad conclusions are that new coal plant will not be truly competitive with natural gas until the price of gas increases to about 3.3
EURO/GJ, compared with a coal price of 1.3
EURO/GJ. Present state-of-the-art pulverised coal-fired plant is close to its optimum techno-economic performance and further improvements depend on the development of cost-effective super-alloys. However, there are good opportunities to increase the efficiency of coal use to greater than 50% (LHV basis) using gasification-based power generation cycles. Unless credit is given for the much lower emissions provided by these cycles, the pulverised coal and pressurised fluidised bed combustion will remain the most economic options.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00140-3</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENPYAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Clean coal ; Coal ; Coal industry ; Coal R&D strategy ; Developing countries ; Economic data ; Electric energy ; Energy ; Energy economics ; Energy policy ; Environmental protection ; Exact sciences and technology ; Gasoline prices ; General, economic and professional studies ; Natural gas ; Power generation ; Power plants ; R&D ; Research & development ; Research and development ; Statistics ; Studies ; Techno-economic analysis</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2001-05, Vol.29 (6), p.441-452</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. May 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-34da068e405cb2e5dd1b4aa3446b236ea7a93dd3338ed234545a781e22861ec13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-34da068e405cb2e5dd1b4aa3446b236ea7a93dd3338ed234545a781e22861ec13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,33223,33224</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14145015$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeenepol/v_3a29_3ay_3a2001_3ai_3a6_3ap_3a441-452.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McMullan, J.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, B.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCahey, S</creatorcontrib><title>Strategic considerations for clean coal R&D</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>While present interest in coal-fired power generation is centred on the developing countries, with new natural-gas-fired power stations predominating in the developed world, in the long term coal will return to being the fuel of choice for power generation for much of the world. To minimise the global impact of coal use it is essential, therefore, that coal technologies are developed that are efficient, clean and economically attractive. Techno-economic analyses of the options for coal are presented together with a strategic overview of potential lines of development. The broad conclusions are that new coal plant will not be truly competitive with natural gas until the price of gas increases to about 3.3
EURO/GJ, compared with a coal price of 1.3
EURO/GJ. Present state-of-the-art pulverised coal-fired plant is close to its optimum techno-economic performance and further improvements depend on the development of cost-effective super-alloys. However, there are good opportunities to increase the efficiency of coal use to greater than 50% (LHV basis) using gasification-based power generation cycles. Unless credit is given for the much lower emissions provided by these cycles, the pulverised coal and pressurised fluidised bed combustion will remain the most economic options.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Clean coal</subject><subject>Coal</subject><subject>Coal industry</subject><subject>Coal R&D strategy</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Economic data</subject><subject>Electric energy</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Gasoline prices</subject><subject>General, economic and professional studies</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Power generation</subject><subject>Power plants</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Research and development</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Techno-economic analysis</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1rVDEQhoMouFZ_grAIFkWOzuR7r0TqNwXB6nXIJrOacvacY3K20H_vbLdU8GYDk5mQ5x0meYV4ivAaAe2bC1CAnZZoXgC8BEANnbonFuid6qxz7r5Y3CEPxaPWLgFA-5VeiFcXc40z_SppmcahlUx8LFwtN2Ndpp7iwBexX34_ff9YPNjEvtGT23wifn788OPsc3f-7dOXs3fnXTLOzp3SOYL1pMGktSSTM651jEpru5bKUnRxpXJWSnnKUmmjTXQeSUpvkRKqE3F66DvV8c-O2hy2pSXq-zjQuGtBrQAcen8UROet1d4eB7WxXqFm8Nl_4OW4qwO_NkgwCsHifj5zgFIdW6u0CVMt21ivA0LYOxJuHAn77w4A4caRoFj39aCrNFG6ExGvgaaxD1dBRbni7XpfsIxT4bAcE4fW3NTI8HvecrPnt5PGlmK_qXFIpf2bRPObAA1zbw8csWNXhWpoqdCQKJdKaQ55LEfG_gsMlrS6</recordid><startdate>20010501</startdate><enddate>20010501</enddate><creator>McMullan, J.T.</creator><creator>Williams, B.C.</creator><creator>McCahey, S</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010501</creationdate><title>Strategic considerations for clean coal R&D</title><author>McMullan, J.T. ; Williams, B.C. ; McCahey, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-34da068e405cb2e5dd1b4aa3446b236ea7a93dd3338ed234545a781e22861ec13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Clean coal</topic><topic>Coal</topic><topic>Coal industry</topic><topic>Coal R&D strategy</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Economic data</topic><topic>Electric energy</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Gasoline prices</topic><topic>General, economic and professional studies</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Power generation</topic><topic>Power plants</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Research and development</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Techno-economic analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McMullan, J.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, B.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCahey, S</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McMullan, J.T.</au><au>Williams, B.C.</au><au>McCahey, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strategic considerations for clean coal R&D</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2001-05-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>441</spage><epage>452</epage><pages>441-452</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><coden>ENPYAC</coden><abstract>While present interest in coal-fired power generation is centred on the developing countries, with new natural-gas-fired power stations predominating in the developed world, in the long term coal will return to being the fuel of choice for power generation for much of the world. To minimise the global impact of coal use it is essential, therefore, that coal technologies are developed that are efficient, clean and economically attractive. Techno-economic analyses of the options for coal are presented together with a strategic overview of potential lines of development. The broad conclusions are that new coal plant will not be truly competitive with natural gas until the price of gas increases to about 3.3
EURO/GJ, compared with a coal price of 1.3
EURO/GJ. Present state-of-the-art pulverised coal-fired plant is close to its optimum techno-economic performance and further improvements depend on the development of cost-effective super-alloys. However, there are good opportunities to increase the efficiency of coal use to greater than 50% (LHV basis) using gasification-based power generation cycles. Unless credit is given for the much lower emissions provided by these cycles, the pulverised coal and pressurised fluidised bed combustion will remain the most economic options.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00140-3</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4215 |
ispartof | Energy policy, 2001-05, Vol.29 (6), p.441-452 |
issn | 0301-4215 1873-6777 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_39007188 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024; PAIS Index |
subjects | Applied sciences Clean coal Coal Coal industry Coal R&D strategy Developing countries Economic data Electric energy Energy Energy economics Energy policy Environmental protection Exact sciences and technology Gasoline prices General, economic and professional studies Natural gas Power generation Power plants R&D Research & development Research and development Statistics Studies Techno-economic analysis |
title | Strategic considerations for clean coal R&D |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T02%3A29%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strategic%20considerations%20for%20clean%20coal%20R&D&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=McMullan,%20J.T.&rft.date=2001-05-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=441&rft.epage=452&rft.pages=441-452&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft.coden=ENPYAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00140-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17866486%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-34da068e405cb2e5dd1b4aa3446b236ea7a93dd3338ed234545a781e22861ec13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205310611&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |