Loading…
Design of stormwater monitoring programs
Stormwater runoff is now the leading source of water pollution in the United States, and stormwater monitoring programs have only recently been developed. This paper evaluates several stormwater monitoring programs to identify ways of increasing the likelihood of identification of high-risk discharg...
Saved in:
Published in: | Water research (Oxford) 2007-10, Vol.41 (18), p.4186-4196 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-c2ccd8fa1f405acba6ab5c2df432688e91ef287dfba745d067a3bc65e37e98853 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-c2ccd8fa1f405acba6ab5c2df432688e91ef287dfba745d067a3bc65e37e98853 |
container_end_page | 4196 |
container_issue | 18 |
container_start_page | 4186 |
container_title | Water research (Oxford) |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Lee, Haejin Swamikannu, Xavier Radulescu, Dan Kim, Seung-jai Stenstrom, Michael K. |
description | Stormwater runoff is now the leading source of water pollution in the United States, and stormwater monitoring programs have only recently been developed. This paper evaluates several stormwater monitoring programs to identify ways of increasing the likelihood of identification of high-risk dischargers and increasing data reliability for assisting in the development of total maximum daily loads. No relationship was found between various types of industrial activity or landuse and water quality data. Stormwater data collected with grab samples has much greater pollutant concentration variability than in potable water or wastewater monitoring programs. Industrial land use is an important source of metals. For grab samples, sampling time during the storm event will affect results. Data from California, which has distinct dry periods, showed a seasonal first flush, whereas data from areas with more uniform rainfall throughout the year did not show a seasonal first flush. Selecting a subset of sites from each monitored category using a flow-weighted composite sampler is an alternative strategy, and may result in lower overall cost with improved accuracy and variability in mass emissions, but may not be less successful in identifying high-risk dischargers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.016 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_47642352</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0043135407003211</els_id><sourcerecordid>47642352</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-c2ccd8fa1f405acba6ab5c2df432688e91ef287dfba745d067a3bc65e37e98853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0c9LHDEUB_BQKnW1_Q-K7qXiZaYvvzMXodhWBcFD6zlkMi9Llp0Zm8wq_vfNMgve1FPI4_NeHt8Q8pVCTYGq7-v6yU0Jc80AdA2yLsUPZEGNbiomhPlIFgCCV5RLcUiOcl4DAGO8-UQOqVYgQMsFOf-JOa6G5RiWeRpTX2ZiWvbjEMstDqvlQxpXyfX5MzkIbpPxy_48Jve_f_29vK5u765uLn_cVl6CnirPvO9McDQIkM63TrlWetYFwZkyBhuKgRndhdZpITtQ2vHWK4lcY2OM5MfkbJ5bHv63xTzZPmaPm40bcNxmK7QSjEv2JqSNaUC8BwrDlTA7KGbo05hzwmAfUuxderYU7C5zu7Zz5naXuQVpS7G0neznb9seu5emfcgFfNsDl73bhOQGH_OLaygoUKK409kFN1q3SsXc_2FAOYBhRtDdhhezwPIDjxGTzT7i4LGLCf1kuzG-vut_6NSp9w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14836482</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Design of stormwater monitoring programs</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Lee, Haejin ; Swamikannu, Xavier ; Radulescu, Dan ; Kim, Seung-jai ; Stenstrom, Michael K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Haejin ; Swamikannu, Xavier ; Radulescu, Dan ; Kim, Seung-jai ; Stenstrom, Michael K.</creatorcontrib><description>Stormwater runoff is now the leading source of water pollution in the United States, and stormwater monitoring programs have only recently been developed. This paper evaluates several stormwater monitoring programs to identify ways of increasing the likelihood of identification of high-risk dischargers and increasing data reliability for assisting in the development of total maximum daily loads. No relationship was found between various types of industrial activity or landuse and water quality data. Stormwater data collected with grab samples has much greater pollutant concentration variability than in potable water or wastewater monitoring programs. Industrial land use is an important source of metals. For grab samples, sampling time during the storm event will affect results. Data from California, which has distinct dry periods, showed a seasonal first flush, whereas data from areas with more uniform rainfall throughout the year did not show a seasonal first flush. Selecting a subset of sites from each monitored category using a flow-weighted composite sampler is an alternative strategy, and may result in lower overall cost with improved accuracy and variability in mass emissions, but may not be less successful in identifying high-risk dischargers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17604075</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WATRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; California ; Connecticut ; data analysis ; Environmental Monitoring ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; environmental programs ; Exact sciences and technology ; First flush ; Industrial general permit ; land use ; methods ; Monitoring ; Municipal permit ; Other industrial wastes. Sewage sludge ; pollutants ; Pollution ; risk assessment ; sampling ; Seasons ; Stormwater ; total maximum daily load ; United States ; United States Environmental Protection Agency ; Wastes ; Water Pollutants ; water pollution ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 2007-10, Vol.41 (18), p.4186-4196</ispartof><rights>2007 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-c2ccd8fa1f405acba6ab5c2df432688e91ef287dfba745d067a3bc65e37e98853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-c2ccd8fa1f405acba6ab5c2df432688e91ef287dfba745d067a3bc65e37e98853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19106064$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17604075$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Haejin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swamikannu, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radulescu, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Seung-jai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stenstrom, Michael K.</creatorcontrib><title>Design of stormwater monitoring programs</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><description>Stormwater runoff is now the leading source of water pollution in the United States, and stormwater monitoring programs have only recently been developed. This paper evaluates several stormwater monitoring programs to identify ways of increasing the likelihood of identification of high-risk dischargers and increasing data reliability for assisting in the development of total maximum daily loads. No relationship was found between various types of industrial activity or landuse and water quality data. Stormwater data collected with grab samples has much greater pollutant concentration variability than in potable water or wastewater monitoring programs. Industrial land use is an important source of metals. For grab samples, sampling time during the storm event will affect results. Data from California, which has distinct dry periods, showed a seasonal first flush, whereas data from areas with more uniform rainfall throughout the year did not show a seasonal first flush. Selecting a subset of sites from each monitored category using a flow-weighted composite sampler is an alternative strategy, and may result in lower overall cost with improved accuracy and variability in mass emissions, but may not be less successful in identifying high-risk dischargers.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Connecticut</subject><subject>data analysis</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>environmental programs</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>First flush</subject><subject>Industrial general permit</subject><subject>land use</subject><subject>methods</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Municipal permit</subject><subject>Other industrial wastes. Sewage sludge</subject><subject>pollutants</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>risk assessment</subject><subject>sampling</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Stormwater</subject><subject>total maximum daily load</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States Environmental Protection Agency</subject><subject>Wastes</subject><subject>Water Pollutants</subject><subject>water pollution</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0c9LHDEUB_BQKnW1_Q-K7qXiZaYvvzMXodhWBcFD6zlkMi9Llp0Zm8wq_vfNMgve1FPI4_NeHt8Q8pVCTYGq7-v6yU0Jc80AdA2yLsUPZEGNbiomhPlIFgCCV5RLcUiOcl4DAGO8-UQOqVYgQMsFOf-JOa6G5RiWeRpTX2ZiWvbjEMstDqvlQxpXyfX5MzkIbpPxy_48Jve_f_29vK5u765uLn_cVl6CnirPvO9McDQIkM63TrlWetYFwZkyBhuKgRndhdZpITtQ2vHWK4lcY2OM5MfkbJ5bHv63xTzZPmaPm40bcNxmK7QSjEv2JqSNaUC8BwrDlTA7KGbo05hzwmAfUuxderYU7C5zu7Zz5naXuQVpS7G0neznb9seu5emfcgFfNsDl73bhOQGH_OLaygoUKK409kFN1q3SsXc_2FAOYBhRtDdhhezwPIDjxGTzT7i4LGLCf1kuzG-vut_6NSp9w</recordid><startdate>20071001</startdate><enddate>20071001</enddate><creator>Lee, Haejin</creator><creator>Swamikannu, Xavier</creator><creator>Radulescu, Dan</creator><creator>Kim, Seung-jai</creator><creator>Stenstrom, Michael K.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071001</creationdate><title>Design of stormwater monitoring programs</title><author>Lee, Haejin ; Swamikannu, Xavier ; Radulescu, Dan ; Kim, Seung-jai ; Stenstrom, Michael K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-c2ccd8fa1f405acba6ab5c2df432688e91ef287dfba745d067a3bc65e37e98853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Connecticut</topic><topic>data analysis</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>environmental programs</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>First flush</topic><topic>Industrial general permit</topic><topic>land use</topic><topic>methods</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Municipal permit</topic><topic>Other industrial wastes. Sewage sludge</topic><topic>pollutants</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>risk assessment</topic><topic>sampling</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Stormwater</topic><topic>total maximum daily load</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States Environmental Protection Agency</topic><topic>Wastes</topic><topic>Water Pollutants</topic><topic>water pollution</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Haejin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swamikannu, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radulescu, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Seung-jai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stenstrom, Michael K.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Haejin</au><au>Swamikannu, Xavier</au><au>Radulescu, Dan</au><au>Kim, Seung-jai</au><au>Stenstrom, Michael K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Design of stormwater monitoring programs</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><date>2007-10-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>4186</spage><epage>4196</epage><pages>4186-4196</pages><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><coden>WATRAG</coden><abstract>Stormwater runoff is now the leading source of water pollution in the United States, and stormwater monitoring programs have only recently been developed. This paper evaluates several stormwater monitoring programs to identify ways of increasing the likelihood of identification of high-risk dischargers and increasing data reliability for assisting in the development of total maximum daily loads. No relationship was found between various types of industrial activity or landuse and water quality data. Stormwater data collected with grab samples has much greater pollutant concentration variability than in potable water or wastewater monitoring programs. Industrial land use is an important source of metals. For grab samples, sampling time during the storm event will affect results. Data from California, which has distinct dry periods, showed a seasonal first flush, whereas data from areas with more uniform rainfall throughout the year did not show a seasonal first flush. Selecting a subset of sites from each monitored category using a flow-weighted composite sampler is an alternative strategy, and may result in lower overall cost with improved accuracy and variability in mass emissions, but may not be less successful in identifying high-risk dischargers.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>17604075</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.016</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1354 |
ispartof | Water research (Oxford), 2007-10, Vol.41 (18), p.4186-4196 |
issn | 0043-1354 1879-2448 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_47642352 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Applied sciences California Connecticut data analysis Environmental Monitoring Environmental Monitoring - methods environmental programs Exact sciences and technology First flush Industrial general permit land use methods Monitoring Municipal permit Other industrial wastes. Sewage sludge pollutants Pollution risk assessment sampling Seasons Stormwater total maximum daily load United States United States Environmental Protection Agency Wastes Water Pollutants water pollution Water treatment and pollution |
title | Design of stormwater monitoring programs |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A42%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Design%20of%20stormwater%20monitoring%20programs&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Lee,%20Haejin&rft.date=2007-10-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=4186&rft.epage=4196&rft.pages=4186-4196&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft.coden=WATRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E47642352%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-c2ccd8fa1f405acba6ab5c2df432688e91ef287dfba745d067a3bc65e37e98853%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14836482&rft_id=info:pmid/17604075&rfr_iscdi=true |