Traces of the artist: Sensitivity to the role of the artist in children's pictorial reasoning

• Published in: British journal of developmental psychology 2003-09, Vol.21 (3), p.415-445
• Main Authors: Callaghan, Tara C., Rochat, Philippe
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adults; Age differences; Artists; Beliefs; Biological and medical sciences; Child; Child Development; Cognition; Developmental psychology; Emotional states; Emotions; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Identification; Inferences; Psychology; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychology. Psychophysiology; Puppetry; Reasoning; Sensitivity; Social Cognition; Stimuli; Theory of Mind; Young Children
• ISSN: 0261-510X; 2044-835X
• DOI: 10.1348/026151003322277784

In three studies we investigated the question of whether children consider the attributes of the artist (sentience, age level, affective style, emotion) when making judgments about the traces (drawings) made by that artist. In Study 1, 2–5‐year‐old children were asked to find pictures drawn by a machine, an adult, an older and a younger child. Results indicated that children younger than 4 years do not consider the artists' attributes when making judgments, but 4‐ and 5‐year‐olds do. Furthermore, whereas the oldest children were adept at both machine‐person (sentience) and person‐person (age) contrasts, 4‐year‐olds succeeded only with person‐person contrasts. In Study 2, videotaped artists displayed differences in degree of agitation (affective style) while drawing, and this attribute was manipulated in the drawing by varying line density, asymmetry, line overlap and line gap, or all four features, across stimuli. Three‐ and five‐year‐old children judged whether a calm or agitated person drew the stimuli. Findings showed that five‐year‐old, but not 3‐year‐old, children easily completed the task. In Study 3, 3‐, 5‐ and 7‐year‐old children judged whether happy or sad artists made paintings of matching emotional tone. Performance on this picture judgment task was contrasted with performance on three theory of mind tasks (false belief, emotion and interpretative). The results indicated that 5‐ and 7‐year‐olds successfully judged the impact of artists' emotions on paintings, but 3‐year‐olds did not. Performance on the picture task was related to that on the false belief task, but not to the emotion or interpretive tasks. Taken together, the results suggest that children's view of visual symbols includes a consideration of the qualities of the artist beginning around 5 years, and there appears to be a common link between judgments of the mind behind the visual symbol in the picture task and judgments of mental state reasoning in the false belief task.