Ensuring global standards for medical graduates: a pilot study of international standard-setting

• Published in: Medical teacher 2005-05, Vol.27 (3), p.207-213
• Main Authors: Stern, David T., Ben-David, Miriam Friedman, Champlain, Andre De, Hodges, Brian, Wojtczak, Andrzej, Roy Schwarz, M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Academic Achievement; Clinical Competence - standards; Clinical skills; Development; Education, Medical, Graduate - standards; Educational Measurement - methods; Humans; International standards; Internationality; Medical Education; Medical schools; Medical students; Observation; Performance standards; Physicians; Physicians - standards; Pilot Projects; Pilot studies; Professional competence
• ISSN: 0142-159X; 1466-187X
• DOI: 10.1080/01421590500129571

Increasing physician and patient mobility has led to a move toward internationalization of standards for physician competence. The Institute for International Medical Education proposed a set of outcome-based standards for student performance, which were then measured using three assessment tools in eight leading schools in China: a 150-item multiple-choice examination, a 15-station OSCE and a 16-item faculty observation form. The purpose of this study was to empanel a group of experts to determine whether international student-level performance standards could be set. The IIME convened an international panel of experts in student education with specialty and geographic diversity. The group was split into two, with each sub-group establishing standards independently. After a discussion of the borderline student, the sub-groups established minimally acceptable cut-off scores for performance on the multiple-choice examination (Angoff and Hofstee methods), the OSCE station and global rating performance (modified Angoff method and holistic criterion reference), and faculty observation domains (holistic criterion reference). Panelists within each group set very similar standards for performance. In addition, the two independent parallel panels generated nearly identical performance standards. Cut-off scores changed little before and after being shown pilot data but standard deviations diminished. International experts agreed on a minimum set of competences for medical student performance. In addition, they were able to set consistent performance standards with multiple examination types. This provides an initial basis against which to compare physician performance internationally.