Loading…
Aftercare attendance and post-treatment functioning of severely substance dependent residential treatment clients
The present study evaluated the impact of a structured aftercare programme following residential treatment for severe alcohol and/or heroin dependent clients. Over 17 months, 77 participants were recruited to the study and allocated randomly to either a structured aftercare (SA) programme or to unst...
Saved in:
Published in: | Drug and alcohol review 2003-06, Vol.22 (2), p.181-190 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4644-4d69e090072c686f01e28e744e2fd0f9d90737f6529c3ff4d0e9b4a71ff34b2a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4644-4d69e090072c686f01e28e744e2fd0f9d90737f6529c3ff4d0e9b4a71ff34b2a3 |
container_end_page | 190 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 181 |
container_title | Drug and alcohol review |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | SANNIBALE, C HURKETT, P BOSSCHE, E VAN DEN O'CONNOR, D ZADOR, D CAPUS, C GREGORY, K MCKENZIE, M |
description | The present study evaluated the impact of a structured aftercare programme following residential treatment for severe alcohol and/or heroin dependent clients. Over 17 months, 77 participants were recruited to the study and allocated randomly to either a structured aftercare (SA) programme or to unstructured aftercare (UA) of crisis counselling on request. Independent clinicians interviewed participants and collaterals, at 4-month (median) intervals, for 12 months following residential treatment. SA compared to UA was associated with a fourfold increase in aftercare attendance and one-third the rate of uncontrolled principal substance use at follow-up. Participants who attended either type of aftercare relapsed a median of 134 days later than those who attended no aftercare. Overall, 23% of monitored participants remained abstinent throughout, 21% maintained controlled substance use and 56% relapsed, within a median of 36 days following residential treatment. The only significant predictor of days to relapse, controlling for age, was pretreatment use of additional substances. Participants with pretreatment additional substance use relapsed a median of 192 days earlier than those who had used no other substances. The degree of agreement between participant self-reports and collateral reports was fair-to-moderate and moderate among collaterals. Intention-to-treat analyses revealed significant and clinically meaningful reductions in substance use in this sample of severely dependent residential treatment clients. The generalizability of these results is limited because of significant differences in age and presenting substance between the study sample and other clients admitted to the service during the study. This latter group of younger, male, heroin-dependent clients with polydrug use who refuse opioid pharmacotherapy, are more likely to drop out of treatment or relapse early following treatment and continue to present a challenge to treatment services. [Sannibale C, Van den Bossche E, O'Connor D, Zador D, Capus C, Gregory K, McKenzie M. Aftercare attendance and post-treatment functioning of severely substance dependent residential treatment clients. Drug Alcohol Rev 2003;22:181 - 190] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/09595230100100624 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57211155</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57211155</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4644-4d69e090072c686f01e28e744e2fd0f9d90737f6529c3ff4d0e9b4a71ff34b2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EotvCB-CCcuKWMnZsJxanVWELUgXinzhaXmdMXRJnazvAfnscdkUPSCCNNCP59548bwh5QuGcQgfPQQklWAMUlpKM3yMryqWom0ay-2S1vNcFkCfkNKUbAGBCsIfkhLJOgAKxIrdrlzFaE7EyOWPoTbBlDH21m1Kuc0STRwy5cnOw2U_Bh6_V5KqE3zHisK_SvE35t6jHXdEvbMTkl8GbobpzsIMvLT0iD5wZEj4-9jPyefPq08Xr-urd5ZuL9VVtueS85r1UWP4ILbOykw4osg5bzpG5HpzqFbRN66RgyjbO8R5QbblpqXMN3zLTnJFnB99dnG5nTFmPPlkcBhNwmpMWLaOUClFAegBtnFKK6PQu-tHEvaagl5z1XzkXzdOj-bwdsb9THIMtgDgAP_yA-_876pfrD6pbjOuDzqeMP__oTPymZdlX6C9vL_XHtttI8X6jWeFfHPngpjiaazRDvl7uqW-mOYaS8D_W-AXjO6q6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57211155</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Aftercare attendance and post-treatment functioning of severely substance dependent residential treatment clients</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><creator>SANNIBALE, C ; HURKETT, P ; BOSSCHE, E VAN DEN ; O'CONNOR, D ; ZADOR, D ; CAPUS, C ; GREGORY, K ; MCKENZIE, M</creator><creatorcontrib>SANNIBALE, C ; HURKETT, P ; BOSSCHE, E VAN DEN ; O'CONNOR, D ; ZADOR, D ; CAPUS, C ; GREGORY, K ; MCKENZIE, M</creatorcontrib><description>The present study evaluated the impact of a structured aftercare programme following residential treatment for severe alcohol and/or heroin dependent clients. Over 17 months, 77 participants were recruited to the study and allocated randomly to either a structured aftercare (SA) programme or to unstructured aftercare (UA) of crisis counselling on request. Independent clinicians interviewed participants and collaterals, at 4-month (median) intervals, for 12 months following residential treatment. SA compared to UA was associated with a fourfold increase in aftercare attendance and one-third the rate of uncontrolled principal substance use at follow-up. Participants who attended either type of aftercare relapsed a median of 134 days later than those who attended no aftercare. Overall, 23% of monitored participants remained abstinent throughout, 21% maintained controlled substance use and 56% relapsed, within a median of 36 days following residential treatment. The only significant predictor of days to relapse, controlling for age, was pretreatment use of additional substances. Participants with pretreatment additional substance use relapsed a median of 192 days earlier than those who had used no other substances. The degree of agreement between participant self-reports and collateral reports was fair-to-moderate and moderate among collaterals. Intention-to-treat analyses revealed significant and clinically meaningful reductions in substance use in this sample of severely dependent residential treatment clients. The generalizability of these results is limited because of significant differences in age and presenting substance between the study sample and other clients admitted to the service during the study. This latter group of younger, male, heroin-dependent clients with polydrug use who refuse opioid pharmacotherapy, are more likely to drop out of treatment or relapse early following treatment and continue to present a challenge to treatment services. [Sannibale C, Van den Bossche E, O'Connor D, Zador D, Capus C, Gregory K, McKenzie M. Aftercare attendance and post-treatment functioning of severely substance dependent residential treatment clients. Drug Alcohol Rev 2003;22:181 - 190]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-5236</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-3362</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09595230100100624</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12850905</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; After care ; aftercare ; Aftercare - organization & administration ; Aftercare - statistics & numerical data ; Alcohol dependence ; Alcoholism - diagnosis ; Alcoholism - epidemiology ; Alcoholism - rehabilitation ; Attendance ; Counseling ; Drug dependency ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Heroin Dependence - diagnosis ; Heroin Dependence - epidemiology ; Heroin Dependence - rehabilitation ; Humans ; intensive treatment ; Male ; Patient Compliance - statistics & numerical data ; polydrug use ; post-treatment functioning ; Program Evaluation ; Recurrence ; Relapse ; Residential Treatment ; Severity of Illness Index ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Drug and alcohol review, 2003-06, Vol.22 (2), p.181-190</ispartof><rights>2003 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2003</rights><rights>2003 Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and other Drugs</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4644-4d69e090072c686f01e28e744e2fd0f9d90737f6529c3ff4d0e9b4a71ff34b2a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4644-4d69e090072c686f01e28e744e2fd0f9d90737f6529c3ff4d0e9b4a71ff34b2a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12850905$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SANNIBALE, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HURKETT, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOSSCHE, E VAN DEN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'CONNOR, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZADOR, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAPUS, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GREGORY, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCKENZIE, M</creatorcontrib><title>Aftercare attendance and post-treatment functioning of severely substance dependent residential treatment clients</title><title>Drug and alcohol review</title><addtitle>Drug Alcohol Rev</addtitle><description>The present study evaluated the impact of a structured aftercare programme following residential treatment for severe alcohol and/or heroin dependent clients. Over 17 months, 77 participants were recruited to the study and allocated randomly to either a structured aftercare (SA) programme or to unstructured aftercare (UA) of crisis counselling on request. Independent clinicians interviewed participants and collaterals, at 4-month (median) intervals, for 12 months following residential treatment. SA compared to UA was associated with a fourfold increase in aftercare attendance and one-third the rate of uncontrolled principal substance use at follow-up. Participants who attended either type of aftercare relapsed a median of 134 days later than those who attended no aftercare. Overall, 23% of monitored participants remained abstinent throughout, 21% maintained controlled substance use and 56% relapsed, within a median of 36 days following residential treatment. The only significant predictor of days to relapse, controlling for age, was pretreatment use of additional substances. Participants with pretreatment additional substance use relapsed a median of 192 days earlier than those who had used no other substances. The degree of agreement between participant self-reports and collateral reports was fair-to-moderate and moderate among collaterals. Intention-to-treat analyses revealed significant and clinically meaningful reductions in substance use in this sample of severely dependent residential treatment clients. The generalizability of these results is limited because of significant differences in age and presenting substance between the study sample and other clients admitted to the service during the study. This latter group of younger, male, heroin-dependent clients with polydrug use who refuse opioid pharmacotherapy, are more likely to drop out of treatment or relapse early following treatment and continue to present a challenge to treatment services. [Sannibale C, Van den Bossche E, O'Connor D, Zador D, Capus C, Gregory K, McKenzie M. Aftercare attendance and post-treatment functioning of severely substance dependent residential treatment clients. Drug Alcohol Rev 2003;22:181 - 190]</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>After care</subject><subject>aftercare</subject><subject>Aftercare - organization & administration</subject><subject>Aftercare - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Alcohol dependence</subject><subject>Alcoholism - diagnosis</subject><subject>Alcoholism - epidemiology</subject><subject>Alcoholism - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Attendance</subject><subject>Counseling</subject><subject>Drug dependency</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Heroin Dependence - diagnosis</subject><subject>Heroin Dependence - epidemiology</subject><subject>Heroin Dependence - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intensive treatment</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Patient Compliance - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>polydrug use</subject><subject>post-treatment functioning</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Relapse</subject><subject>Residential Treatment</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0959-5236</issn><issn>1465-3362</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EotvCB-CCcuKWMnZsJxanVWELUgXinzhaXmdMXRJnazvAfnscdkUPSCCNNCP59548bwh5QuGcQgfPQQklWAMUlpKM3yMryqWom0ay-2S1vNcFkCfkNKUbAGBCsIfkhLJOgAKxIrdrlzFaE7EyOWPoTbBlDH21m1Kuc0STRwy5cnOw2U_Bh6_V5KqE3zHisK_SvE35t6jHXdEvbMTkl8GbobpzsIMvLT0iD5wZEj4-9jPyefPq08Xr-urd5ZuL9VVtueS85r1UWP4ILbOykw4osg5bzpG5HpzqFbRN66RgyjbO8R5QbblpqXMN3zLTnJFnB99dnG5nTFmPPlkcBhNwmpMWLaOUClFAegBtnFKK6PQu-tHEvaagl5z1XzkXzdOj-bwdsb9THIMtgDgAP_yA-_876pfrD6pbjOuDzqeMP__oTPymZdlX6C9vL_XHtttI8X6jWeFfHPngpjiaazRDvl7uqW-mOYaS8D_W-AXjO6q6</recordid><startdate>200306</startdate><enddate>200306</enddate><creator>SANNIBALE, C</creator><creator>HURKETT, P</creator><creator>BOSSCHE, E VAN DEN</creator><creator>O'CONNOR, D</creator><creator>ZADOR, D</creator><creator>CAPUS, C</creator><creator>GREGORY, K</creator><creator>MCKENZIE, M</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200306</creationdate><title>Aftercare attendance and post-treatment functioning of severely substance dependent residential treatment clients</title><author>SANNIBALE, C ; HURKETT, P ; BOSSCHE, E VAN DEN ; O'CONNOR, D ; ZADOR, D ; CAPUS, C ; GREGORY, K ; MCKENZIE, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4644-4d69e090072c686f01e28e744e2fd0f9d90737f6529c3ff4d0e9b4a71ff34b2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>After care</topic><topic>aftercare</topic><topic>Aftercare - organization & administration</topic><topic>Aftercare - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Alcohol dependence</topic><topic>Alcoholism - diagnosis</topic><topic>Alcoholism - epidemiology</topic><topic>Alcoholism - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Attendance</topic><topic>Counseling</topic><topic>Drug dependency</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Heroin Dependence - diagnosis</topic><topic>Heroin Dependence - epidemiology</topic><topic>Heroin Dependence - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intensive treatment</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Patient Compliance - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>polydrug use</topic><topic>post-treatment functioning</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Relapse</topic><topic>Residential Treatment</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SANNIBALE, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HURKETT, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOSSCHE, E VAN DEN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'CONNOR, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZADOR, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAPUS, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GREGORY, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCKENZIE, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Drug and alcohol review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SANNIBALE, C</au><au>HURKETT, P</au><au>BOSSCHE, E VAN DEN</au><au>O'CONNOR, D</au><au>ZADOR, D</au><au>CAPUS, C</au><au>GREGORY, K</au><au>MCKENZIE, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Aftercare attendance and post-treatment functioning of severely substance dependent residential treatment clients</atitle><jtitle>Drug and alcohol review</jtitle><addtitle>Drug Alcohol Rev</addtitle><date>2003-06</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>181</spage><epage>190</epage><pages>181-190</pages><issn>0959-5236</issn><eissn>1465-3362</eissn><abstract>The present study evaluated the impact of a structured aftercare programme following residential treatment for severe alcohol and/or heroin dependent clients. Over 17 months, 77 participants were recruited to the study and allocated randomly to either a structured aftercare (SA) programme or to unstructured aftercare (UA) of crisis counselling on request. Independent clinicians interviewed participants and collaterals, at 4-month (median) intervals, for 12 months following residential treatment. SA compared to UA was associated with a fourfold increase in aftercare attendance and one-third the rate of uncontrolled principal substance use at follow-up. Participants who attended either type of aftercare relapsed a median of 134 days later than those who attended no aftercare. Overall, 23% of monitored participants remained abstinent throughout, 21% maintained controlled substance use and 56% relapsed, within a median of 36 days following residential treatment. The only significant predictor of days to relapse, controlling for age, was pretreatment use of additional substances. Participants with pretreatment additional substance use relapsed a median of 192 days earlier than those who had used no other substances. The degree of agreement between participant self-reports and collateral reports was fair-to-moderate and moderate among collaterals. Intention-to-treat analyses revealed significant and clinically meaningful reductions in substance use in this sample of severely dependent residential treatment clients. The generalizability of these results is limited because of significant differences in age and presenting substance between the study sample and other clients admitted to the service during the study. This latter group of younger, male, heroin-dependent clients with polydrug use who refuse opioid pharmacotherapy, are more likely to drop out of treatment or relapse early following treatment and continue to present a challenge to treatment services. [Sannibale C, Van den Bossche E, O'Connor D, Zador D, Capus C, Gregory K, McKenzie M. Aftercare attendance and post-treatment functioning of severely substance dependent residential treatment clients. Drug Alcohol Rev 2003;22:181 - 190]</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>12850905</pmid><doi>10.1080/09595230100100624</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-5236 |
ispartof | Drug and alcohol review, 2003-06, Vol.22 (2), p.181-190 |
issn | 0959-5236 1465-3362 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57211155 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; SPORTDiscus with Full Text |
subjects | Adult After care aftercare Aftercare - organization & administration Aftercare - statistics & numerical data Alcohol dependence Alcoholism - diagnosis Alcoholism - epidemiology Alcoholism - rehabilitation Attendance Counseling Drug dependency Female Follow-Up Studies Heroin Dependence - diagnosis Heroin Dependence - epidemiology Heroin Dependence - rehabilitation Humans intensive treatment Male Patient Compliance - statistics & numerical data polydrug use post-treatment functioning Program Evaluation Recurrence Relapse Residential Treatment Severity of Illness Index Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Aftercare attendance and post-treatment functioning of severely substance dependent residential treatment clients |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T12%3A12%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Aftercare%20attendance%20and%20post-treatment%20functioning%20of%20severely%20substance%20dependent%20residential%20treatment%20clients&rft.jtitle=Drug%20and%20alcohol%20review&rft.au=SANNIBALE,%20C&rft.date=2003-06&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=181&rft.epage=190&rft.pages=181-190&rft.issn=0959-5236&rft.eissn=1465-3362&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09595230100100624&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57211155%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4644-4d69e090072c686f01e28e744e2fd0f9d90737f6529c3ff4d0e9b4a71ff34b2a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57211155&rft_id=info:pmid/12850905&rfr_iscdi=true |