Loading…

Aftercare attendance and post-treatment functioning of severely substance dependent residential treatment clients

The present study evaluated the impact of a structured aftercare programme following residential treatment for severe alcohol and/or heroin dependent clients. Over 17 months, 77 participants were recruited to the study and allocated randomly to either a structured aftercare (SA) programme or to unst...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Drug and alcohol review 2003-06, Vol.22 (2), p.181-190
Main Authors: SANNIBALE, C, HURKETT, P, BOSSCHE, E VAN DEN, O'CONNOR, D, ZADOR, D, CAPUS, C, GREGORY, K, MCKENZIE, M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4644-4d69e090072c686f01e28e744e2fd0f9d90737f6529c3ff4d0e9b4a71ff34b2a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4644-4d69e090072c686f01e28e744e2fd0f9d90737f6529c3ff4d0e9b4a71ff34b2a3
container_end_page 190
container_issue 2
container_start_page 181
container_title Drug and alcohol review
container_volume 22
creator SANNIBALE, C
HURKETT, P
BOSSCHE, E VAN DEN
O'CONNOR, D
ZADOR, D
CAPUS, C
GREGORY, K
MCKENZIE, M
description The present study evaluated the impact of a structured aftercare programme following residential treatment for severe alcohol and/or heroin dependent clients. Over 17 months, 77 participants were recruited to the study and allocated randomly to either a structured aftercare (SA) programme or to unstructured aftercare (UA) of crisis counselling on request. Independent clinicians interviewed participants and collaterals, at 4-month (median) intervals, for 12 months following residential treatment. SA compared to UA was associated with a fourfold increase in aftercare attendance and one-third the rate of uncontrolled principal substance use at follow-up. Participants who attended either type of aftercare relapsed a median of 134 days later than those who attended no aftercare. Overall, 23% of monitored participants remained abstinent throughout, 21% maintained controlled substance use and 56% relapsed, within a median of 36 days following residential treatment. The only significant predictor of days to relapse, controlling for age, was pretreatment use of additional substances. Participants with pretreatment additional substance use relapsed a median of 192 days earlier than those who had used no other substances. The degree of agreement between participant self-reports and collateral reports was fair-to-moderate and moderate among collaterals. Intention-to-treat analyses revealed significant and clinically meaningful reductions in substance use in this sample of severely dependent residential treatment clients. The generalizability of these results is limited because of significant differences in age and presenting substance between the study sample and other clients admitted to the service during the study. This latter group of younger, male, heroin-dependent clients with polydrug use who refuse opioid pharmacotherapy, are more likely to drop out of treatment or relapse early following treatment and continue to present a challenge to treatment services. [Sannibale C, Van den Bossche E, O'Connor D, Zador D, Capus C, Gregory K, McKenzie M. Aftercare attendance and post-treatment functioning of severely substance dependent residential treatment clients. Drug Alcohol Rev 2003;22:181 - 190]
doi_str_mv 10.1080/09595230100100624
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57211155</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57211155</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4644-4d69e090072c686f01e28e744e2fd0f9d90737f6529c3ff4d0e9b4a71ff34b2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EotvCB-CCcuKWMnZsJxanVWELUgXinzhaXmdMXRJnazvAfnscdkUPSCCNNCP59548bwh5QuGcQgfPQQklWAMUlpKM3yMryqWom0ay-2S1vNcFkCfkNKUbAGBCsIfkhLJOgAKxIrdrlzFaE7EyOWPoTbBlDH21m1Kuc0STRwy5cnOw2U_Bh6_V5KqE3zHisK_SvE35t6jHXdEvbMTkl8GbobpzsIMvLT0iD5wZEj4-9jPyefPq08Xr-urd5ZuL9VVtueS85r1UWP4ILbOykw4osg5bzpG5HpzqFbRN66RgyjbO8R5QbblpqXMN3zLTnJFnB99dnG5nTFmPPlkcBhNwmpMWLaOUClFAegBtnFKK6PQu-tHEvaagl5z1XzkXzdOj-bwdsb9THIMtgDgAP_yA-_876pfrD6pbjOuDzqeMP__oTPymZdlX6C9vL_XHtttI8X6jWeFfHPngpjiaazRDvl7uqW-mOYaS8D_W-AXjO6q6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57211155</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Aftercare attendance and post-treatment functioning of severely substance dependent residential treatment clients</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><creator>SANNIBALE, C ; HURKETT, P ; BOSSCHE, E VAN DEN ; O'CONNOR, D ; ZADOR, D ; CAPUS, C ; GREGORY, K ; MCKENZIE, M</creator><creatorcontrib>SANNIBALE, C ; HURKETT, P ; BOSSCHE, E VAN DEN ; O'CONNOR, D ; ZADOR, D ; CAPUS, C ; GREGORY, K ; MCKENZIE, M</creatorcontrib><description>The present study evaluated the impact of a structured aftercare programme following residential treatment for severe alcohol and/or heroin dependent clients. Over 17 months, 77 participants were recruited to the study and allocated randomly to either a structured aftercare (SA) programme or to unstructured aftercare (UA) of crisis counselling on request. Independent clinicians interviewed participants and collaterals, at 4-month (median) intervals, for 12 months following residential treatment. SA compared to UA was associated with a fourfold increase in aftercare attendance and one-third the rate of uncontrolled principal substance use at follow-up. Participants who attended either type of aftercare relapsed a median of 134 days later than those who attended no aftercare. Overall, 23% of monitored participants remained abstinent throughout, 21% maintained controlled substance use and 56% relapsed, within a median of 36 days following residential treatment. The only significant predictor of days to relapse, controlling for age, was pretreatment use of additional substances. Participants with pretreatment additional substance use relapsed a median of 192 days earlier than those who had used no other substances. The degree of agreement between participant self-reports and collateral reports was fair-to-moderate and moderate among collaterals. Intention-to-treat analyses revealed significant and clinically meaningful reductions in substance use in this sample of severely dependent residential treatment clients. The generalizability of these results is limited because of significant differences in age and presenting substance between the study sample and other clients admitted to the service during the study. This latter group of younger, male, heroin-dependent clients with polydrug use who refuse opioid pharmacotherapy, are more likely to drop out of treatment or relapse early following treatment and continue to present a challenge to treatment services. [Sannibale C, Van den Bossche E, O'Connor D, Zador D, Capus C, Gregory K, McKenzie M. Aftercare attendance and post-treatment functioning of severely substance dependent residential treatment clients. Drug Alcohol Rev 2003;22:181 - 190]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-5236</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-3362</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09595230100100624</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12850905</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; After care ; aftercare ; Aftercare - organization &amp; administration ; Aftercare - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Alcohol dependence ; Alcoholism - diagnosis ; Alcoholism - epidemiology ; Alcoholism - rehabilitation ; Attendance ; Counseling ; Drug dependency ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Heroin Dependence - diagnosis ; Heroin Dependence - epidemiology ; Heroin Dependence - rehabilitation ; Humans ; intensive treatment ; Male ; Patient Compliance - statistics &amp; numerical data ; polydrug use ; post-treatment functioning ; Program Evaluation ; Recurrence ; Relapse ; Residential Treatment ; Severity of Illness Index ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Drug and alcohol review, 2003-06, Vol.22 (2), p.181-190</ispartof><rights>2003 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2003</rights><rights>2003 Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and other Drugs</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4644-4d69e090072c686f01e28e744e2fd0f9d90737f6529c3ff4d0e9b4a71ff34b2a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4644-4d69e090072c686f01e28e744e2fd0f9d90737f6529c3ff4d0e9b4a71ff34b2a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12850905$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SANNIBALE, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HURKETT, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOSSCHE, E VAN DEN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'CONNOR, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZADOR, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAPUS, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GREGORY, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCKENZIE, M</creatorcontrib><title>Aftercare attendance and post-treatment functioning of severely substance dependent residential treatment clients</title><title>Drug and alcohol review</title><addtitle>Drug Alcohol Rev</addtitle><description>The present study evaluated the impact of a structured aftercare programme following residential treatment for severe alcohol and/or heroin dependent clients. Over 17 months, 77 participants were recruited to the study and allocated randomly to either a structured aftercare (SA) programme or to unstructured aftercare (UA) of crisis counselling on request. Independent clinicians interviewed participants and collaterals, at 4-month (median) intervals, for 12 months following residential treatment. SA compared to UA was associated with a fourfold increase in aftercare attendance and one-third the rate of uncontrolled principal substance use at follow-up. Participants who attended either type of aftercare relapsed a median of 134 days later than those who attended no aftercare. Overall, 23% of monitored participants remained abstinent throughout, 21% maintained controlled substance use and 56% relapsed, within a median of 36 days following residential treatment. The only significant predictor of days to relapse, controlling for age, was pretreatment use of additional substances. Participants with pretreatment additional substance use relapsed a median of 192 days earlier than those who had used no other substances. The degree of agreement between participant self-reports and collateral reports was fair-to-moderate and moderate among collaterals. Intention-to-treat analyses revealed significant and clinically meaningful reductions in substance use in this sample of severely dependent residential treatment clients. The generalizability of these results is limited because of significant differences in age and presenting substance between the study sample and other clients admitted to the service during the study. This latter group of younger, male, heroin-dependent clients with polydrug use who refuse opioid pharmacotherapy, are more likely to drop out of treatment or relapse early following treatment and continue to present a challenge to treatment services. [Sannibale C, Van den Bossche E, O'Connor D, Zador D, Capus C, Gregory K, McKenzie M. Aftercare attendance and post-treatment functioning of severely substance dependent residential treatment clients. Drug Alcohol Rev 2003;22:181 - 190]</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>After care</subject><subject>aftercare</subject><subject>Aftercare - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Aftercare - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Alcohol dependence</subject><subject>Alcoholism - diagnosis</subject><subject>Alcoholism - epidemiology</subject><subject>Alcoholism - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Attendance</subject><subject>Counseling</subject><subject>Drug dependency</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Heroin Dependence - diagnosis</subject><subject>Heroin Dependence - epidemiology</subject><subject>Heroin Dependence - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intensive treatment</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Patient Compliance - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>polydrug use</subject><subject>post-treatment functioning</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Relapse</subject><subject>Residential Treatment</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0959-5236</issn><issn>1465-3362</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EotvCB-CCcuKWMnZsJxanVWELUgXinzhaXmdMXRJnazvAfnscdkUPSCCNNCP59548bwh5QuGcQgfPQQklWAMUlpKM3yMryqWom0ay-2S1vNcFkCfkNKUbAGBCsIfkhLJOgAKxIrdrlzFaE7EyOWPoTbBlDH21m1Kuc0STRwy5cnOw2U_Bh6_V5KqE3zHisK_SvE35t6jHXdEvbMTkl8GbobpzsIMvLT0iD5wZEj4-9jPyefPq08Xr-urd5ZuL9VVtueS85r1UWP4ILbOykw4osg5bzpG5HpzqFbRN66RgyjbO8R5QbblpqXMN3zLTnJFnB99dnG5nTFmPPlkcBhNwmpMWLaOUClFAegBtnFKK6PQu-tHEvaagl5z1XzkXzdOj-bwdsb9THIMtgDgAP_yA-_876pfrD6pbjOuDzqeMP__oTPymZdlX6C9vL_XHtttI8X6jWeFfHPngpjiaazRDvl7uqW-mOYaS8D_W-AXjO6q6</recordid><startdate>200306</startdate><enddate>200306</enddate><creator>SANNIBALE, C</creator><creator>HURKETT, P</creator><creator>BOSSCHE, E VAN DEN</creator><creator>O'CONNOR, D</creator><creator>ZADOR, D</creator><creator>CAPUS, C</creator><creator>GREGORY, K</creator><creator>MCKENZIE, M</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200306</creationdate><title>Aftercare attendance and post-treatment functioning of severely substance dependent residential treatment clients</title><author>SANNIBALE, C ; HURKETT, P ; BOSSCHE, E VAN DEN ; O'CONNOR, D ; ZADOR, D ; CAPUS, C ; GREGORY, K ; MCKENZIE, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4644-4d69e090072c686f01e28e744e2fd0f9d90737f6529c3ff4d0e9b4a71ff34b2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>After care</topic><topic>aftercare</topic><topic>Aftercare - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Aftercare - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Alcohol dependence</topic><topic>Alcoholism - diagnosis</topic><topic>Alcoholism - epidemiology</topic><topic>Alcoholism - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Attendance</topic><topic>Counseling</topic><topic>Drug dependency</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Heroin Dependence - diagnosis</topic><topic>Heroin Dependence - epidemiology</topic><topic>Heroin Dependence - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intensive treatment</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Patient Compliance - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>polydrug use</topic><topic>post-treatment functioning</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Relapse</topic><topic>Residential Treatment</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SANNIBALE, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HURKETT, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOSSCHE, E VAN DEN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'CONNOR, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZADOR, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAPUS, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GREGORY, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCKENZIE, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Drug and alcohol review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SANNIBALE, C</au><au>HURKETT, P</au><au>BOSSCHE, E VAN DEN</au><au>O'CONNOR, D</au><au>ZADOR, D</au><au>CAPUS, C</au><au>GREGORY, K</au><au>MCKENZIE, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Aftercare attendance and post-treatment functioning of severely substance dependent residential treatment clients</atitle><jtitle>Drug and alcohol review</jtitle><addtitle>Drug Alcohol Rev</addtitle><date>2003-06</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>181</spage><epage>190</epage><pages>181-190</pages><issn>0959-5236</issn><eissn>1465-3362</eissn><abstract>The present study evaluated the impact of a structured aftercare programme following residential treatment for severe alcohol and/or heroin dependent clients. Over 17 months, 77 participants were recruited to the study and allocated randomly to either a structured aftercare (SA) programme or to unstructured aftercare (UA) of crisis counselling on request. Independent clinicians interviewed participants and collaterals, at 4-month (median) intervals, for 12 months following residential treatment. SA compared to UA was associated with a fourfold increase in aftercare attendance and one-third the rate of uncontrolled principal substance use at follow-up. Participants who attended either type of aftercare relapsed a median of 134 days later than those who attended no aftercare. Overall, 23% of monitored participants remained abstinent throughout, 21% maintained controlled substance use and 56% relapsed, within a median of 36 days following residential treatment. The only significant predictor of days to relapse, controlling for age, was pretreatment use of additional substances. Participants with pretreatment additional substance use relapsed a median of 192 days earlier than those who had used no other substances. The degree of agreement between participant self-reports and collateral reports was fair-to-moderate and moderate among collaterals. Intention-to-treat analyses revealed significant and clinically meaningful reductions in substance use in this sample of severely dependent residential treatment clients. The generalizability of these results is limited because of significant differences in age and presenting substance between the study sample and other clients admitted to the service during the study. This latter group of younger, male, heroin-dependent clients with polydrug use who refuse opioid pharmacotherapy, are more likely to drop out of treatment or relapse early following treatment and continue to present a challenge to treatment services. [Sannibale C, Van den Bossche E, O'Connor D, Zador D, Capus C, Gregory K, McKenzie M. Aftercare attendance and post-treatment functioning of severely substance dependent residential treatment clients. Drug Alcohol Rev 2003;22:181 - 190]</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>12850905</pmid><doi>10.1080/09595230100100624</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-5236
ispartof Drug and alcohol review, 2003-06, Vol.22 (2), p.181-190
issn 0959-5236
1465-3362
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57211155
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; SPORTDiscus with Full Text
subjects Adult
After care
aftercare
Aftercare - organization & administration
Aftercare - statistics & numerical data
Alcohol dependence
Alcoholism - diagnosis
Alcoholism - epidemiology
Alcoholism - rehabilitation
Attendance
Counseling
Drug dependency
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Heroin Dependence - diagnosis
Heroin Dependence - epidemiology
Heroin Dependence - rehabilitation
Humans
intensive treatment
Male
Patient Compliance - statistics & numerical data
polydrug use
post-treatment functioning
Program Evaluation
Recurrence
Relapse
Residential Treatment
Severity of Illness Index
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Aftercare attendance and post-treatment functioning of severely substance dependent residential treatment clients
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T12%3A12%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Aftercare%20attendance%20and%20post-treatment%20functioning%20of%20severely%20substance%20dependent%20residential%20treatment%20clients&rft.jtitle=Drug%20and%20alcohol%20review&rft.au=SANNIBALE,%20C&rft.date=2003-06&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=181&rft.epage=190&rft.pages=181-190&rft.issn=0959-5236&rft.eissn=1465-3362&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09595230100100624&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57211155%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4644-4d69e090072c686f01e28e744e2fd0f9d90737f6529c3ff4d0e9b4a71ff34b2a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57211155&rft_id=info:pmid/12850905&rfr_iscdi=true