Loading…
Crisis response in the public schools: A survey of school psychologists' experiences and perceptions
In this study, 228 school psychologists completed a survey regarding crisis intervention teams and plans. The majority of respondents indicated their schools had crisis plans (95.1%) and teams (83.6%). The most common team activities endorsed by participants involved providing direct assistance and...
Saved in:
Published in: | Psychology in the schools 2007-11, Vol.44 (8), p.749-764 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-220ee474688dfb9d95c041935d26dab13d9350fc727232ff8975f7af21f7fca23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-220ee474688dfb9d95c041935d26dab13d9350fc727232ff8975f7af21f7fca23 |
container_end_page | 764 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 749 |
container_title | Psychology in the schools |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Adamson, Austin D. Peacock, Gretchen Gimpel |
description | In this study, 228 school psychologists completed a survey regarding crisis intervention teams and plans. The majority of respondents indicated their schools had crisis plans (95.1%) and teams (83.6%). The most common team activities endorsed by participants involved providing direct assistance and services to students, staff, and the media. The majority of participants (93%) reported that their schools had experienced and responded to serious crises. Respondents indicated that psychological debriefing was frequently used (generic 49.1% and standardized 17.9%). Less than half of the participants (44.3%) reported that meetings were conducted with parents and community members following a crisis. Nearly all of the participants (98.2%) reported that they had some type of crisis intervention training. However, many participants suggested that additional training and practice with crisis intervention would improve schools' crisis responses. Results are discussed with implications for school psychologists to improve their schools' crisis intervention plans and teams' responses. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Psychol Schs 44: 749–764, 2007. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pits.20263 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57251654</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ776674</ericid><sourcerecordid>57251654</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-220ee474688dfb9d95c041935d26dab13d9350fc727232ff8975f7af21f7fca23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtv1DAQh60KpC6FS889-EKRkFL8iO2kt2rVd9UiUdTeLK8zpoY0CZ4s7f73eMlSbpw89vwe1kfILmcHnDHxaYgjHggmtNwiM64EK3TFzCsyY0zKQrJKbZM3iN8ZY6YW1Yw08xQxIk2AQ98h0NjR8QHosFy00VP0D33f4iE9orhMv2BF-7B5pAOu8tD23yKO-IHC8wApQucBqesamm8ehjHm1LfkdXAtwrvNuUO-nhzfzs-Kq5vT8_nRVeFlnb8nBAMoTamrqgmLuqmVZyWvpWqEbtyCyybPLHgjjJAihKo2KhgXBA8meCfkDtmfcofU_1wCjvYxooe2dR30S7TKCMW1KrPw4yT0qUdMEOyQ4qNLK8uZXYO0a5D2D8gsfr9JdehdG5LrfMR_jpqLqtQ66_YmXcbgX9bHF8ZobdadfFo_xRZW_ym0n89vv_ytLiZPRgzPLx6XflhtpFH27vrUntxf3ovLuwvL5W8nlpyf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57251654</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Crisis response in the public schools: A survey of school psychologists' experiences and perceptions</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Adamson, Austin D. ; Peacock, Gretchen Gimpel</creator><creatorcontrib>Adamson, Austin D. ; Peacock, Gretchen Gimpel</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, 228 school psychologists completed a survey regarding crisis intervention teams and plans. The majority of respondents indicated their schools had crisis plans (95.1%) and teams (83.6%). The most common team activities endorsed by participants involved providing direct assistance and services to students, staff, and the media. The majority of participants (93%) reported that their schools had experienced and responded to serious crises. Respondents indicated that psychological debriefing was frequently used (generic 49.1% and standardized 17.9%). Less than half of the participants (44.3%) reported that meetings were conducted with parents and community members following a crisis. Nearly all of the participants (98.2%) reported that they had some type of crisis intervention training. However, many participants suggested that additional training and practice with crisis intervention would improve schools' crisis responses. Results are discussed with implications for school psychologists to improve their schools' crisis intervention plans and teams' responses. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Psychol Schs 44: 749–764, 2007.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3085</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6807</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pits.20263</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PYSCBO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Attitude Measures ; Biological and medical sciences ; Crisis Intervention ; Crisis Management ; Debriefing ; Educational psychology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Medical sciences ; Mental health ; Miscellaneous ; Organization of mental health. Health systems ; Perceptions ; Planning ; Professional attitudes ; Professional Training ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Public Schools ; School Counseling ; School Personnel ; School Psychologists ; Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry ; Surveys ; Teamwork</subject><ispartof>Psychology in the schools, 2007-11, Vol.44 (8), p.749-764</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-220ee474688dfb9d95c041935d26dab13d9350fc727232ff8975f7af21f7fca23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-220ee474688dfb9d95c041935d26dab13d9350fc727232ff8975f7af21f7fca23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ776674$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19128466$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adamson, Austin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peacock, Gretchen Gimpel</creatorcontrib><title>Crisis response in the public schools: A survey of school psychologists' experiences and perceptions</title><title>Psychology in the schools</title><addtitle>Psychol. Schs</addtitle><description>In this study, 228 school psychologists completed a survey regarding crisis intervention teams and plans. The majority of respondents indicated their schools had crisis plans (95.1%) and teams (83.6%). The most common team activities endorsed by participants involved providing direct assistance and services to students, staff, and the media. The majority of participants (93%) reported that their schools had experienced and responded to serious crises. Respondents indicated that psychological debriefing was frequently used (generic 49.1% and standardized 17.9%). Less than half of the participants (44.3%) reported that meetings were conducted with parents and community members following a crisis. Nearly all of the participants (98.2%) reported that they had some type of crisis intervention training. However, many participants suggested that additional training and practice with crisis intervention would improve schools' crisis responses. Results are discussed with implications for school psychologists to improve their schools' crisis intervention plans and teams' responses. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Psychol Schs 44: 749–764, 2007.</description><subject>Attitude Measures</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Crisis Intervention</subject><subject>Crisis Management</subject><subject>Debriefing</subject><subject>Educational psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Organization of mental health. Health systems</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Professional attitudes</subject><subject>Professional Training</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Public Schools</subject><subject>School Counseling</subject><subject>School Personnel</subject><subject>School Psychologists</subject><subject>Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Teamwork</subject><issn>0033-3085</issn><issn>1520-6807</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtv1DAQh60KpC6FS889-EKRkFL8iO2kt2rVd9UiUdTeLK8zpoY0CZ4s7f73eMlSbpw89vwe1kfILmcHnDHxaYgjHggmtNwiM64EK3TFzCsyY0zKQrJKbZM3iN8ZY6YW1Yw08xQxIk2AQ98h0NjR8QHosFy00VP0D33f4iE9orhMv2BF-7B5pAOu8tD23yKO-IHC8wApQucBqesamm8ehjHm1LfkdXAtwrvNuUO-nhzfzs-Kq5vT8_nRVeFlnb8nBAMoTamrqgmLuqmVZyWvpWqEbtyCyybPLHgjjJAihKo2KhgXBA8meCfkDtmfcofU_1wCjvYxooe2dR30S7TKCMW1KrPw4yT0qUdMEOyQ4qNLK8uZXYO0a5D2D8gsfr9JdehdG5LrfMR_jpqLqtQ66_YmXcbgX9bHF8ZobdadfFo_xRZW_ym0n89vv_ytLiZPRgzPLx6XflhtpFH27vrUntxf3ovLuwvL5W8nlpyf</recordid><startdate>200711</startdate><enddate>200711</enddate><creator>Adamson, Austin D.</creator><creator>Peacock, Gretchen Gimpel</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200711</creationdate><title>Crisis response in the public schools: A survey of school psychologists' experiences and perceptions</title><author>Adamson, Austin D. ; Peacock, Gretchen Gimpel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-220ee474688dfb9d95c041935d26dab13d9350fc727232ff8975f7af21f7fca23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Attitude Measures</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Crisis Intervention</topic><topic>Crisis Management</topic><topic>Debriefing</topic><topic>Educational psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Organization of mental health. Health systems</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Professional attitudes</topic><topic>Professional Training</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Public Schools</topic><topic>School Counseling</topic><topic>School Personnel</topic><topic>School Psychologists</topic><topic>Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Teamwork</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adamson, Austin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peacock, Gretchen Gimpel</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Psychology in the schools</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adamson, Austin D.</au><au>Peacock, Gretchen Gimpel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ776674</ericid><atitle>Crisis response in the public schools: A survey of school psychologists' experiences and perceptions</atitle><jtitle>Psychology in the schools</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol. Schs</addtitle><date>2007-11</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>749</spage><epage>764</epage><pages>749-764</pages><issn>0033-3085</issn><eissn>1520-6807</eissn><coden>PYSCBO</coden><abstract>In this study, 228 school psychologists completed a survey regarding crisis intervention teams and plans. The majority of respondents indicated their schools had crisis plans (95.1%) and teams (83.6%). The most common team activities endorsed by participants involved providing direct assistance and services to students, staff, and the media. The majority of participants (93%) reported that their schools had experienced and responded to serious crises. Respondents indicated that psychological debriefing was frequently used (generic 49.1% and standardized 17.9%). Less than half of the participants (44.3%) reported that meetings were conducted with parents and community members following a crisis. Nearly all of the participants (98.2%) reported that they had some type of crisis intervention training. However, many participants suggested that additional training and practice with crisis intervention would improve schools' crisis responses. Results are discussed with implications for school psychologists to improve their schools' crisis intervention plans and teams' responses. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Psychol Schs 44: 749–764, 2007.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/pits.20263</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-3085 |
ispartof | Psychology in the schools, 2007-11, Vol.44 (8), p.749-764 |
issn | 0033-3085 1520-6807 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57251654 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; ERIC |
subjects | Attitude Measures Biological and medical sciences Crisis Intervention Crisis Management Debriefing Educational psychology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Medical sciences Mental health Miscellaneous Organization of mental health. Health systems Perceptions Planning Professional attitudes Professional Training Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychopathology. Psychiatry Public Schools School Counseling School Personnel School Psychologists Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry Surveys Teamwork |
title | Crisis response in the public schools: A survey of school psychologists' experiences and perceptions |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T04%3A01%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Crisis%20response%20in%20the%20public%20schools:%20A%20survey%20of%20school%20psychologists'%20experiences%20and%20perceptions&rft.jtitle=Psychology%20in%20the%20schools&rft.au=Adamson,%20Austin%20D.&rft.date=2007-11&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=749&rft.epage=764&rft.pages=749-764&rft.issn=0033-3085&rft.eissn=1520-6807&rft.coden=PYSCBO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pits.20263&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57251654%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-220ee474688dfb9d95c041935d26dab13d9350fc727232ff8975f7af21f7fca23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57251654&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ776674&rfr_iscdi=true |