Loading…

Crisis response in the public schools: A survey of school psychologists' experiences and perceptions

In this study, 228 school psychologists completed a survey regarding crisis intervention teams and plans. The majority of respondents indicated their schools had crisis plans (95.1%) and teams (83.6%). The most common team activities endorsed by participants involved providing direct assistance and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychology in the schools 2007-11, Vol.44 (8), p.749-764
Main Authors: Adamson, Austin D., Peacock, Gretchen Gimpel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-220ee474688dfb9d95c041935d26dab13d9350fc727232ff8975f7af21f7fca23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-220ee474688dfb9d95c041935d26dab13d9350fc727232ff8975f7af21f7fca23
container_end_page 764
container_issue 8
container_start_page 749
container_title Psychology in the schools
container_volume 44
creator Adamson, Austin D.
Peacock, Gretchen Gimpel
description In this study, 228 school psychologists completed a survey regarding crisis intervention teams and plans. The majority of respondents indicated their schools had crisis plans (95.1%) and teams (83.6%). The most common team activities endorsed by participants involved providing direct assistance and services to students, staff, and the media. The majority of participants (93%) reported that their schools had experienced and responded to serious crises. Respondents indicated that psychological debriefing was frequently used (generic 49.1% and standardized 17.9%). Less than half of the participants (44.3%) reported that meetings were conducted with parents and community members following a crisis. Nearly all of the participants (98.2%) reported that they had some type of crisis intervention training. However, many participants suggested that additional training and practice with crisis intervention would improve schools' crisis responses. Results are discussed with implications for school psychologists to improve their schools' crisis intervention plans and teams' responses. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Psychol Schs 44: 749–764, 2007.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pits.20263
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57251654</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ776674</ericid><sourcerecordid>57251654</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-220ee474688dfb9d95c041935d26dab13d9350fc727232ff8975f7af21f7fca23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtv1DAQh60KpC6FS889-EKRkFL8iO2kt2rVd9UiUdTeLK8zpoY0CZ4s7f73eMlSbpw89vwe1kfILmcHnDHxaYgjHggmtNwiM64EK3TFzCsyY0zKQrJKbZM3iN8ZY6YW1Yw08xQxIk2AQ98h0NjR8QHosFy00VP0D33f4iE9orhMv2BF-7B5pAOu8tD23yKO-IHC8wApQucBqesamm8ehjHm1LfkdXAtwrvNuUO-nhzfzs-Kq5vT8_nRVeFlnb8nBAMoTamrqgmLuqmVZyWvpWqEbtyCyybPLHgjjJAihKo2KhgXBA8meCfkDtmfcofU_1wCjvYxooe2dR30S7TKCMW1KrPw4yT0qUdMEOyQ4qNLK8uZXYO0a5D2D8gsfr9JdehdG5LrfMR_jpqLqtQ66_YmXcbgX9bHF8ZobdadfFo_xRZW_ym0n89vv_ytLiZPRgzPLx6XflhtpFH27vrUntxf3ovLuwvL5W8nlpyf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57251654</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Crisis response in the public schools: A survey of school psychologists' experiences and perceptions</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Adamson, Austin D. ; Peacock, Gretchen Gimpel</creator><creatorcontrib>Adamson, Austin D. ; Peacock, Gretchen Gimpel</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, 228 school psychologists completed a survey regarding crisis intervention teams and plans. The majority of respondents indicated their schools had crisis plans (95.1%) and teams (83.6%). The most common team activities endorsed by participants involved providing direct assistance and services to students, staff, and the media. The majority of participants (93%) reported that their schools had experienced and responded to serious crises. Respondents indicated that psychological debriefing was frequently used (generic 49.1% and standardized 17.9%). Less than half of the participants (44.3%) reported that meetings were conducted with parents and community members following a crisis. Nearly all of the participants (98.2%) reported that they had some type of crisis intervention training. However, many participants suggested that additional training and practice with crisis intervention would improve schools' crisis responses. Results are discussed with implications for school psychologists to improve their schools' crisis intervention plans and teams' responses. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Psychol Schs 44: 749–764, 2007.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3085</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6807</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pits.20263</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PYSCBO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Attitude Measures ; Biological and medical sciences ; Crisis Intervention ; Crisis Management ; Debriefing ; Educational psychology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Medical sciences ; Mental health ; Miscellaneous ; Organization of mental health. Health systems ; Perceptions ; Planning ; Professional attitudes ; Professional Training ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Public Schools ; School Counseling ; School Personnel ; School Psychologists ; Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry ; Surveys ; Teamwork</subject><ispartof>Psychology in the schools, 2007-11, Vol.44 (8), p.749-764</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-220ee474688dfb9d95c041935d26dab13d9350fc727232ff8975f7af21f7fca23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-220ee474688dfb9d95c041935d26dab13d9350fc727232ff8975f7af21f7fca23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ776674$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19128466$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adamson, Austin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peacock, Gretchen Gimpel</creatorcontrib><title>Crisis response in the public schools: A survey of school psychologists' experiences and perceptions</title><title>Psychology in the schools</title><addtitle>Psychol. Schs</addtitle><description>In this study, 228 school psychologists completed a survey regarding crisis intervention teams and plans. The majority of respondents indicated their schools had crisis plans (95.1%) and teams (83.6%). The most common team activities endorsed by participants involved providing direct assistance and services to students, staff, and the media. The majority of participants (93%) reported that their schools had experienced and responded to serious crises. Respondents indicated that psychological debriefing was frequently used (generic 49.1% and standardized 17.9%). Less than half of the participants (44.3%) reported that meetings were conducted with parents and community members following a crisis. Nearly all of the participants (98.2%) reported that they had some type of crisis intervention training. However, many participants suggested that additional training and practice with crisis intervention would improve schools' crisis responses. Results are discussed with implications for school psychologists to improve their schools' crisis intervention plans and teams' responses. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Psychol Schs 44: 749–764, 2007.</description><subject>Attitude Measures</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Crisis Intervention</subject><subject>Crisis Management</subject><subject>Debriefing</subject><subject>Educational psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Organization of mental health. Health systems</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Professional attitudes</subject><subject>Professional Training</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Public Schools</subject><subject>School Counseling</subject><subject>School Personnel</subject><subject>School Psychologists</subject><subject>Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Teamwork</subject><issn>0033-3085</issn><issn>1520-6807</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtv1DAQh60KpC6FS889-EKRkFL8iO2kt2rVd9UiUdTeLK8zpoY0CZ4s7f73eMlSbpw89vwe1kfILmcHnDHxaYgjHggmtNwiM64EK3TFzCsyY0zKQrJKbZM3iN8ZY6YW1Yw08xQxIk2AQ98h0NjR8QHosFy00VP0D33f4iE9orhMv2BF-7B5pAOu8tD23yKO-IHC8wApQucBqesamm8ehjHm1LfkdXAtwrvNuUO-nhzfzs-Kq5vT8_nRVeFlnb8nBAMoTamrqgmLuqmVZyWvpWqEbtyCyybPLHgjjJAihKo2KhgXBA8meCfkDtmfcofU_1wCjvYxooe2dR30S7TKCMW1KrPw4yT0qUdMEOyQ4qNLK8uZXYO0a5D2D8gsfr9JdehdG5LrfMR_jpqLqtQ66_YmXcbgX9bHF8ZobdadfFo_xRZW_ym0n89vv_ytLiZPRgzPLx6XflhtpFH27vrUntxf3ovLuwvL5W8nlpyf</recordid><startdate>200711</startdate><enddate>200711</enddate><creator>Adamson, Austin D.</creator><creator>Peacock, Gretchen Gimpel</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200711</creationdate><title>Crisis response in the public schools: A survey of school psychologists' experiences and perceptions</title><author>Adamson, Austin D. ; Peacock, Gretchen Gimpel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-220ee474688dfb9d95c041935d26dab13d9350fc727232ff8975f7af21f7fca23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Attitude Measures</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Crisis Intervention</topic><topic>Crisis Management</topic><topic>Debriefing</topic><topic>Educational psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Organization of mental health. Health systems</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Professional attitudes</topic><topic>Professional Training</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Public Schools</topic><topic>School Counseling</topic><topic>School Personnel</topic><topic>School Psychologists</topic><topic>Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Teamwork</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adamson, Austin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peacock, Gretchen Gimpel</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Psychology in the schools</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adamson, Austin D.</au><au>Peacock, Gretchen Gimpel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ776674</ericid><atitle>Crisis response in the public schools: A survey of school psychologists' experiences and perceptions</atitle><jtitle>Psychology in the schools</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol. Schs</addtitle><date>2007-11</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>749</spage><epage>764</epage><pages>749-764</pages><issn>0033-3085</issn><eissn>1520-6807</eissn><coden>PYSCBO</coden><abstract>In this study, 228 school psychologists completed a survey regarding crisis intervention teams and plans. The majority of respondents indicated their schools had crisis plans (95.1%) and teams (83.6%). The most common team activities endorsed by participants involved providing direct assistance and services to students, staff, and the media. The majority of participants (93%) reported that their schools had experienced and responded to serious crises. Respondents indicated that psychological debriefing was frequently used (generic 49.1% and standardized 17.9%). Less than half of the participants (44.3%) reported that meetings were conducted with parents and community members following a crisis. Nearly all of the participants (98.2%) reported that they had some type of crisis intervention training. However, many participants suggested that additional training and practice with crisis intervention would improve schools' crisis responses. Results are discussed with implications for school psychologists to improve their schools' crisis intervention plans and teams' responses. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Psychol Schs 44: 749–764, 2007.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/pits.20263</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-3085
ispartof Psychology in the schools, 2007-11, Vol.44 (8), p.749-764
issn 0033-3085
1520-6807
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57251654
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; ERIC
subjects Attitude Measures
Biological and medical sciences
Crisis Intervention
Crisis Management
Debriefing
Educational psychology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Medical sciences
Mental health
Miscellaneous
Organization of mental health. Health systems
Perceptions
Planning
Professional attitudes
Professional Training
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Public Schools
School Counseling
School Personnel
School Psychologists
Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry
Surveys
Teamwork
title Crisis response in the public schools: A survey of school psychologists' experiences and perceptions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T04%3A01%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Crisis%20response%20in%20the%20public%20schools:%20A%20survey%20of%20school%20psychologists'%20experiences%20and%20perceptions&rft.jtitle=Psychology%20in%20the%20schools&rft.au=Adamson,%20Austin%20D.&rft.date=2007-11&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=749&rft.epage=764&rft.pages=749-764&rft.issn=0033-3085&rft.eissn=1520-6807&rft.coden=PYSCBO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pits.20263&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57251654%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-220ee474688dfb9d95c041935d26dab13d9350fc727232ff8975f7af21f7fca23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57251654&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ776674&rfr_iscdi=true