Loading…

Grasping Weber's illusion: The effect of receptor density differences on grasping and matching

Weber found that distances between tactile stimuli on a high-receptor-density area are perceived as being larger than identical distances on a low-receptor-density area (Weber's illusion). Previous studies of visual illusions suggest that illusion effects vary with the type of response given. H...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cognitive neuropsychology 2008-10, Vol.25 (7-8), p.951-967
Main Authors: Anema, Helen A., Wolswijk, Vincent W. J., Ruis, Carla, Dijkerman, H. Chris
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-4ad37c474b7bab0e07a16c7ed04858fec74d4b5a4a69b1cf236d5bc6510733363
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-4ad37c474b7bab0e07a16c7ed04858fec74d4b5a4a69b1cf236d5bc6510733363
container_end_page 967
container_issue 7-8
container_start_page 951
container_title Cognitive neuropsychology
container_volume 25
creator Anema, Helen A.
Wolswijk, Vincent W. J.
Ruis, Carla
Dijkerman, H. Chris
description Weber found that distances between tactile stimuli on a high-receptor-density area are perceived as being larger than identical distances on a low-receptor-density area (Weber's illusion). Previous studies of visual illusions suggest that illusion effects vary with the type of response given. Here we tested a modified version of Weber's illusion in which a solid object was placed on the forearm or hand. Blindfolded participants were required either to give a size estimation or to grasp the object. The results showed that size estimation of solid objects was consistent with Weber's illusion, whereas grasping responses showed an opposite pattern (e.g., larger hand opening for objects on the forearm). A second experiment showed that this pattern is not due to biomechanical differences induced by the difference in spatial position of the target objects on the hand and arm. We suggest that the larger grip aperture when grasping objects on the arm were due to an increase in safety margin as a response to greater uncertainty about the object dimensions due to reduced receptor density.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/02643290802041323
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57260835</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57260835</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-4ad37c474b7bab0e07a16c7ed04858fec74d4b5a4a69b1cf236d5bc6510733363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxS0EokvhA3BBPkEvgfH_BPWCqlKQKnEp4kbk2JM2KLEX2yvYb49Xu4hDBctpZjS_9zSaR8hzBq8ZtPAGuJaCd7XlIJng4gFZMallA5qbh2S12zcVkCfkSc7fAEBxgMfkhLUaWsH5iny9Sjavp3BLv-CA6VWm0zxv8hTDW3pzhxTHEV2hcaQJHa5LTNRjyFPZUj_VXcLgMNMY6O1vIxs8XWxxd3V4Sh6Nds747FBPyef3lzcXH5rrT1cfL95dN051vDTSemGcNHIwgx0AwVimnUEPslVtvcBILwdlpdXdwNzIhfZqcFoxMEIILU7Jy73vOsXvG8ylX6bscJ5twLjJvdaGgWLqKKgM373mOMhBK85a-V8gtB2v4Nk_QdaqTglmNFSU7VGXYs4Jx36dpsWmbc-g30Xf34u-al4c7DfDgv6P4pB1BcwemMIY02J_xDT7vtjtHNOYbHBTvm_bl5-lKs-PKsXfL_sF85XM5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1859531760</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Grasping Weber's illusion: The effect of receptor density differences on grasping and matching</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Anema, Helen A. ; Wolswijk, Vincent W. J. ; Ruis, Carla ; Dijkerman, H. Chris</creator><creatorcontrib>Anema, Helen A. ; Wolswijk, Vincent W. J. ; Ruis, Carla ; Dijkerman, H. Chris</creatorcontrib><description>Weber found that distances between tactile stimuli on a high-receptor-density area are perceived as being larger than identical distances on a low-receptor-density area (Weber's illusion). Previous studies of visual illusions suggest that illusion effects vary with the type of response given. Here we tested a modified version of Weber's illusion in which a solid object was placed on the forearm or hand. Blindfolded participants were required either to give a size estimation or to grasp the object. The results showed that size estimation of solid objects was consistent with Weber's illusion, whereas grasping responses showed an opposite pattern (e.g., larger hand opening for objects on the forearm). A second experiment showed that this pattern is not due to biomechanical differences induced by the difference in spatial position of the target objects on the hand and arm. We suggest that the larger grip aperture when grasping objects on the arm were due to an increase in safety margin as a response to greater uncertainty about the object dimensions due to reduced receptor density.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-3294</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-0627</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02643290802041323</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18608322</identifier><identifier>CODEN: COGNEP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Psychology Press</publisher><subject>Action ; Grasping ; Illusions ; Perception ; Somatosensory ; Vision ; Visual perception ; Weber's illusion</subject><ispartof>Cognitive neuropsychology, 2008-10, Vol.25 (7-8), p.951-967</ispartof><rights>Copyright Psychology Press 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-4ad37c474b7bab0e07a16c7ed04858fec74d4b5a4a69b1cf236d5bc6510733363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-4ad37c474b7bab0e07a16c7ed04858fec74d4b5a4a69b1cf236d5bc6510733363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18608322$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anema, Helen A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolswijk, Vincent W. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruis, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dijkerman, H. Chris</creatorcontrib><title>Grasping Weber's illusion: The effect of receptor density differences on grasping and matching</title><title>Cognitive neuropsychology</title><addtitle>Cogn Neuropsychol</addtitle><description>Weber found that distances between tactile stimuli on a high-receptor-density area are perceived as being larger than identical distances on a low-receptor-density area (Weber's illusion). Previous studies of visual illusions suggest that illusion effects vary with the type of response given. Here we tested a modified version of Weber's illusion in which a solid object was placed on the forearm or hand. Blindfolded participants were required either to give a size estimation or to grasp the object. The results showed that size estimation of solid objects was consistent with Weber's illusion, whereas grasping responses showed an opposite pattern (e.g., larger hand opening for objects on the forearm). A second experiment showed that this pattern is not due to biomechanical differences induced by the difference in spatial position of the target objects on the hand and arm. We suggest that the larger grip aperture when grasping objects on the arm were due to an increase in safety margin as a response to greater uncertainty about the object dimensions due to reduced receptor density.</description><subject>Action</subject><subject>Grasping</subject><subject>Illusions</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Somatosensory</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>Visual perception</subject><subject>Weber's illusion</subject><issn>0264-3294</issn><issn>1464-0627</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxS0EokvhA3BBPkEvgfH_BPWCqlKQKnEp4kbk2JM2KLEX2yvYb49Xu4hDBctpZjS_9zSaR8hzBq8ZtPAGuJaCd7XlIJng4gFZMallA5qbh2S12zcVkCfkSc7fAEBxgMfkhLUaWsH5iny9Sjavp3BLv-CA6VWm0zxv8hTDW3pzhxTHEV2hcaQJHa5LTNRjyFPZUj_VXcLgMNMY6O1vIxs8XWxxd3V4Sh6Nds747FBPyef3lzcXH5rrT1cfL95dN051vDTSemGcNHIwgx0AwVimnUEPslVtvcBILwdlpdXdwNzIhfZqcFoxMEIILU7Jy73vOsXvG8ylX6bscJ5twLjJvdaGgWLqKKgM373mOMhBK85a-V8gtB2v4Nk_QdaqTglmNFSU7VGXYs4Jx36dpsWmbc-g30Xf34u-al4c7DfDgv6P4pB1BcwemMIY02J_xDT7vtjtHNOYbHBTvm_bl5-lKs-PKsXfL_sF85XM5g</recordid><startdate>200810</startdate><enddate>200810</enddate><creator>Anema, Helen A.</creator><creator>Wolswijk, Vincent W. J.</creator><creator>Ruis, Carla</creator><creator>Dijkerman, H. Chris</creator><general>Psychology Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200810</creationdate><title>Grasping Weber's illusion: The effect of receptor density differences on grasping and matching</title><author>Anema, Helen A. ; Wolswijk, Vincent W. J. ; Ruis, Carla ; Dijkerman, H. Chris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-4ad37c474b7bab0e07a16c7ed04858fec74d4b5a4a69b1cf236d5bc6510733363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Action</topic><topic>Grasping</topic><topic>Illusions</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Somatosensory</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>Visual perception</topic><topic>Weber's illusion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anema, Helen A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolswijk, Vincent W. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruis, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dijkerman, H. Chris</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Cognitive neuropsychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anema, Helen A.</au><au>Wolswijk, Vincent W. J.</au><au>Ruis, Carla</au><au>Dijkerman, H. Chris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Grasping Weber's illusion: The effect of receptor density differences on grasping and matching</atitle><jtitle>Cognitive neuropsychology</jtitle><addtitle>Cogn Neuropsychol</addtitle><date>2008-10</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>7-8</issue><spage>951</spage><epage>967</epage><pages>951-967</pages><issn>0264-3294</issn><eissn>1464-0627</eissn><coden>COGNEP</coden><abstract>Weber found that distances between tactile stimuli on a high-receptor-density area are perceived as being larger than identical distances on a low-receptor-density area (Weber's illusion). Previous studies of visual illusions suggest that illusion effects vary with the type of response given. Here we tested a modified version of Weber's illusion in which a solid object was placed on the forearm or hand. Blindfolded participants were required either to give a size estimation or to grasp the object. The results showed that size estimation of solid objects was consistent with Weber's illusion, whereas grasping responses showed an opposite pattern (e.g., larger hand opening for objects on the forearm). A second experiment showed that this pattern is not due to biomechanical differences induced by the difference in spatial position of the target objects on the hand and arm. We suggest that the larger grip aperture when grasping objects on the arm were due to an increase in safety margin as a response to greater uncertainty about the object dimensions due to reduced receptor density.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Psychology Press</pub><pmid>18608322</pmid><doi>10.1080/02643290802041323</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-3294
ispartof Cognitive neuropsychology, 2008-10, Vol.25 (7-8), p.951-967
issn 0264-3294
1464-0627
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57260835
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects Action
Grasping
Illusions
Perception
Somatosensory
Vision
Visual perception
Weber's illusion
title Grasping Weber's illusion: The effect of receptor density differences on grasping and matching
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T07%3A44%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Grasping%20Weber's%20illusion:%20The%20effect%20of%20receptor%20density%20differences%20on%20grasping%20and%20matching&rft.jtitle=Cognitive%20neuropsychology&rft.au=Anema,%20Helen%20A.&rft.date=2008-10&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=7-8&rft.spage=951&rft.epage=967&rft.pages=951-967&rft.issn=0264-3294&rft.eissn=1464-0627&rft.coden=COGNEP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02643290802041323&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E57260835%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-4ad37c474b7bab0e07a16c7ed04858fec74d4b5a4a69b1cf236d5bc6510733363%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1859531760&rft_id=info:pmid/18608322&rfr_iscdi=true