Challenge seeking: The relationship of achievement goals to choice of task difficulty level in ego-involving and neutral conditions

• Published in: Motivation and emotion 2008-12, Vol.32 (4), p.310-322
• Main Authors: Jagacinski, Carolyn M., Kumar, Shamala, Kokkinou, Irini
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anxiety; Behavior; Behavioral Science and Psychology; Clinical Psychology; Difficulty; Ego; Gender differences; Goals; Original Paper; Perceptions; Personality and Social Psychology; Preferences; Psychology; Risk taking
• ISSN: 0146-7239; 1573-6644
• DOI: 10.1007/s11031-008-9103-3

We investigated Nicholls’ (Psychol Rev 91:328–346, 1984) predictions concerning the impact of achievement goals (manipulated and measured) on risk-taking behavior. Participants were given ego-involving or neutral instructions and chose the difficulty levels for 10 nonverbal cognitive problems they performed. Consistent with Nicholls’ prediction, a moderate level of difficulty was initially preferred following neutral instructions. In contrast, following ego-involving instructions, women tended to select a lower level of difficulty and men a higher level of difficulty, reflecting the fact that men reported higher levels of perceived ability than women. Endorsements of mastery- and performance-approach goals were generally positively related to the levels of difficulty selected across trials. Endorsement of performance-avoidance goals was negatively related to the levels of difficulty selected, but the relationship diminished in later trials. During the later trials, participants given ego-involving instructions selected higher levels of difficulty than those given neutral instructions and men selected higher levels of difficulty than women.