Do citations matter?

Citation indexes are based on the principle of authors citing previous articles of relevance. The paper demonstrates the long history of citing for precedent and notes how ISI's citation indexes differ from Shepards Citations. The paper analyses some of the criticisms of citation counting, and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of information science 1994-01, Vol.20 (1), p.2-15
Main Authors: Baird, Laura M., Oppenheim, Charles
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bibliometrics. Scientometrics. Evaluation
Citation analysis
Exact sciences and technology
Indexing
Information and communication sciences
Information science. Documentation
Library and information science. General aspects
Library science
Sciences and techniques of general use
Studies
Writers
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Citation indexes are based on the principle of authors citing previous articles of relevance. The paper demonstrates the long history of citing for precedent and notes how ISI's citation indexes differ from Shepards Citations. The paper analyses some of the criticisms of citation counting, and some of the uses for which citation analysis has been employed. The paper also examines the idea of the development of an Acknowledgements Index, and concludes such an index is unlikely to be commercially viable. The paper describes a citation study of Eugene Garfield, and concludes that he may be the most heavily cited information scientist, that he is a heavy self-citer, and that the reasons why other authors cite Garfield are different from the reasons why he cites himself. The paper concludes that citation studies remain a valid method of analysis of individuals', institutions', or journals' impact, but need to be used with caution and in conjunction with other measures.
ISSN:0165-5515
1741-6485
DOI:10.1177/016555159402000102