Loading…
Factors influencing self-report of mobile phone use: the role of response prompt, time reference and mobile phone use in recall
The current study (n = 180) assesses factors affecting the recall of past mobile phone behaviour. It manipulates two factors hypothesised as influencing recall of duration and number of calls made: time reference (24 hours vs. 3 days) and context prompt (temporal, person called, reason for call) and...
Saved in:
Published in: | Applied cognitive psychology 2009-07, Vol.23 (5), p.664-683 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4226-d408faf365290e9714038354a1c203922f9af101e0877e27ae77bf7be34e9d33 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4226-d408faf365290e9714038354a1c203922f9af101e0877e27ae77bf7be34e9d33 |
container_end_page | 683 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 664 |
container_title | Applied cognitive psychology |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Timotijevic, Lada Barnett, Julie Shepherd, Richard Senior, Victoria |
description | The current study (n = 180) assesses factors affecting the recall of past mobile phone behaviour. It manipulates two factors hypothesised as influencing recall of duration and number of calls made: time reference (24 hours vs. 3 days) and context prompt (temporal, person called, reason for call) and also considers their impact in relation to levels of mobile phone use. A measure of recall error was constructed by matching self‐reported calls to actual calls and weighting for actual usage. The results indicate that most people tend to overestimate duration and underestimate number of phone calls, although these discrepancies are related to actual amount of mobile phone use. The manipulations of time reference and context prompt have some effect on the patterns of recall in relation to number, rather than duration, of calls. The implications of these results for the development of reliable and valid self‐report measures of mobile phone use are discussed. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/acp.1496 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57304009</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57304009</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4226-d408faf365290e9714038354a1c203922f9af101e0877e27ae77bf7be34e9d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkdFqFDEUhoNYcK2CjxAExQunniQzk8S7stiqratIoZchO3tip85MpskM2qu-umfZpRdK8SqQ8_El5_8ZeyHgSADId74Zj0Rp60dsIcDaArSEx2wBxpiiBANP2NOcrwHA1kIu2N2Jb6aYMm-H0M04NO3wg2fsQpFwjGniMfA-rtsO-XgVB-Rzxvd8ukKeIt3RNGEe45BpnmI_Tm_51PY0xYCJdMj9sPnHQK8R0fiue8YOgu8yPt-fh-zi5MPF8mNx_vX00_L4vGhKKetiQ18PPqi6khbQalGCMqoqvWgkKCtlsD4IEAhGa5Tao9broNeoSrQbpQ7Z652WPnkzY55c3-YGu84PGOfsKq2gpEz-C0owktI1BL78C7yOcxpoByeFkLau6q3tzQ5qUsyZMnFjanufbp0At63LUV1uWxehr_Y-nymYkDx1ke95KSrQArabFDvuFyV6-6DPHS-_7b17vs0T_r7nffrpaq105S5Xp25VmdWXy-9n7rP6AwxJsdY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211296569</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors influencing self-report of mobile phone use: the role of response prompt, time reference and mobile phone use in recall</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Timotijevic, Lada ; Barnett, Julie ; Shepherd, Richard ; Senior, Victoria</creator><creatorcontrib>Timotijevic, Lada ; Barnett, Julie ; Shepherd, Richard ; Senior, Victoria</creatorcontrib><description>The current study (n = 180) assesses factors affecting the recall of past mobile phone behaviour. It manipulates two factors hypothesised as influencing recall of duration and number of calls made: time reference (24 hours vs. 3 days) and context prompt (temporal, person called, reason for call) and also considers their impact in relation to levels of mobile phone use. A measure of recall error was constructed by matching self‐reported calls to actual calls and weighting for actual usage. The results indicate that most people tend to overestimate duration and underestimate number of phone calls, although these discrepancies are related to actual amount of mobile phone use. The manipulations of time reference and context prompt have some effect on the patterns of recall in relation to number, rather than duration, of calls. The implications of these results for the development of reliable and valid self‐report measures of mobile phone use are discussed. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-4080</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0720</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acp.1496</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ACPSED</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cellular telephones ; Cognitive psychology ; Discrepancies ; Discriminant analysis ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Learning. Memory ; Manipulation ; Matching ; Memory ; Miscellaneous ; Mobile phones ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Recall ; Selfreport ; Studies ; Weighting</subject><ispartof>Applied cognitive psychology, 2009-07, Vol.23 (5), p.664-683</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright John Wiley and Sons, Limited Jul 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4226-d408faf365290e9714038354a1c203922f9af101e0877e27ae77bf7be34e9d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4226-d408faf365290e9714038354a1c203922f9af101e0877e27ae77bf7be34e9d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21507103$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Timotijevic, Lada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnett, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepherd, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senior, Victoria</creatorcontrib><title>Factors influencing self-report of mobile phone use: the role of response prompt, time reference and mobile phone use in recall</title><title>Applied cognitive psychology</title><addtitle>Appl. Cognit. Psychol</addtitle><description>The current study (n = 180) assesses factors affecting the recall of past mobile phone behaviour. It manipulates two factors hypothesised as influencing recall of duration and number of calls made: time reference (24 hours vs. 3 days) and context prompt (temporal, person called, reason for call) and also considers their impact in relation to levels of mobile phone use. A measure of recall error was constructed by matching self‐reported calls to actual calls and weighting for actual usage. The results indicate that most people tend to overestimate duration and underestimate number of phone calls, although these discrepancies are related to actual amount of mobile phone use. The manipulations of time reference and context prompt have some effect on the patterns of recall in relation to number, rather than duration, of calls. The implications of these results for the development of reliable and valid self‐report measures of mobile phone use are discussed. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Applied psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cellular telephones</subject><subject>Cognitive psychology</subject><subject>Discrepancies</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Manipulation</subject><subject>Matching</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Mobile phones</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Recall</subject><subject>Selfreport</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Weighting</subject><issn>0888-4080</issn><issn>1099-0720</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkdFqFDEUhoNYcK2CjxAExQunniQzk8S7stiqratIoZchO3tip85MpskM2qu-umfZpRdK8SqQ8_El5_8ZeyHgSADId74Zj0Rp60dsIcDaArSEx2wBxpiiBANP2NOcrwHA1kIu2N2Jb6aYMm-H0M04NO3wg2fsQpFwjGniMfA-rtsO-XgVB-Rzxvd8ukKeIt3RNGEe45BpnmI_Tm_51PY0xYCJdMj9sPnHQK8R0fiue8YOgu8yPt-fh-zi5MPF8mNx_vX00_L4vGhKKetiQ18PPqi6khbQalGCMqoqvWgkKCtlsD4IEAhGa5Tao9broNeoSrQbpQ7Z652WPnkzY55c3-YGu84PGOfsKq2gpEz-C0owktI1BL78C7yOcxpoByeFkLau6q3tzQ5qUsyZMnFjanufbp0At63LUV1uWxehr_Y-nymYkDx1ke95KSrQArabFDvuFyV6-6DPHS-_7b17vs0T_r7nffrpaq105S5Xp25VmdWXy-9n7rP6AwxJsdY</recordid><startdate>200907</startdate><enddate>200907</enddate><creator>Timotijevic, Lada</creator><creator>Barnett, Julie</creator><creator>Shepherd, Richard</creator><creator>Senior, Victoria</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200907</creationdate><title>Factors influencing self-report of mobile phone use: the role of response prompt, time reference and mobile phone use in recall</title><author>Timotijevic, Lada ; Barnett, Julie ; Shepherd, Richard ; Senior, Victoria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4226-d408faf365290e9714038354a1c203922f9af101e0877e27ae77bf7be34e9d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Applied psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cellular telephones</topic><topic>Cognitive psychology</topic><topic>Discrepancies</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Manipulation</topic><topic>Matching</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Mobile phones</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Recall</topic><topic>Selfreport</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Weighting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Timotijevic, Lada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnett, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepherd, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senior, Victoria</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Applied cognitive psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Timotijevic, Lada</au><au>Barnett, Julie</au><au>Shepherd, Richard</au><au>Senior, Victoria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors influencing self-report of mobile phone use: the role of response prompt, time reference and mobile phone use in recall</atitle><jtitle>Applied cognitive psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Appl. Cognit. Psychol</addtitle><date>2009-07</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>664</spage><epage>683</epage><pages>664-683</pages><issn>0888-4080</issn><eissn>1099-0720</eissn><coden>ACPSED</coden><abstract>The current study (n = 180) assesses factors affecting the recall of past mobile phone behaviour. It manipulates two factors hypothesised as influencing recall of duration and number of calls made: time reference (24 hours vs. 3 days) and context prompt (temporal, person called, reason for call) and also considers their impact in relation to levels of mobile phone use. A measure of recall error was constructed by matching self‐reported calls to actual calls and weighting for actual usage. The results indicate that most people tend to overestimate duration and underestimate number of phone calls, although these discrepancies are related to actual amount of mobile phone use. The manipulations of time reference and context prompt have some effect on the patterns of recall in relation to number, rather than duration, of calls. The implications of these results for the development of reliable and valid self‐report measures of mobile phone use are discussed. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/acp.1496</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0888-4080 |
ispartof | Applied cognitive psychology, 2009-07, Vol.23 (5), p.664-683 |
issn | 0888-4080 1099-0720 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57304009 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Applied psychology Biological and medical sciences Cellular telephones Cognitive psychology Discrepancies Discriminant analysis Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Learning. Memory Manipulation Matching Memory Miscellaneous Mobile phones Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Recall Selfreport Studies Weighting |
title | Factors influencing self-report of mobile phone use: the role of response prompt, time reference and mobile phone use in recall |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T19%3A56%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20influencing%20self-report%20of%20mobile%20phone%20use:%20the%20role%20of%20response%20prompt,%20time%20reference%20and%20mobile%20phone%20use%20in%20recall&rft.jtitle=Applied%20cognitive%20psychology&rft.au=Timotijevic,%20Lada&rft.date=2009-07&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=664&rft.epage=683&rft.pages=664-683&rft.issn=0888-4080&rft.eissn=1099-0720&rft.coden=ACPSED&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acp.1496&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57304009%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4226-d408faf365290e9714038354a1c203922f9af101e0877e27ae77bf7be34e9d33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211296569&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |