Loading…

Factors influencing self-report of mobile phone use: the role of response prompt, time reference and mobile phone use in recall

The current study (n = 180) assesses factors affecting the recall of past mobile phone behaviour. It manipulates two factors hypothesised as influencing recall of duration and number of calls made: time reference (24 hours vs. 3 days) and context prompt (temporal, person called, reason for call) and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied cognitive psychology 2009-07, Vol.23 (5), p.664-683
Main Authors: Timotijevic, Lada, Barnett, Julie, Shepherd, Richard, Senior, Victoria
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4226-d408faf365290e9714038354a1c203922f9af101e0877e27ae77bf7be34e9d33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4226-d408faf365290e9714038354a1c203922f9af101e0877e27ae77bf7be34e9d33
container_end_page 683
container_issue 5
container_start_page 664
container_title Applied cognitive psychology
container_volume 23
creator Timotijevic, Lada
Barnett, Julie
Shepherd, Richard
Senior, Victoria
description The current study (n = 180) assesses factors affecting the recall of past mobile phone behaviour. It manipulates two factors hypothesised as influencing recall of duration and number of calls made: time reference (24 hours vs. 3 days) and context prompt (temporal, person called, reason for call) and also considers their impact in relation to levels of mobile phone use. A measure of recall error was constructed by matching self‐reported calls to actual calls and weighting for actual usage. The results indicate that most people tend to overestimate duration and underestimate number of phone calls, although these discrepancies are related to actual amount of mobile phone use. The manipulations of time reference and context prompt have some effect on the patterns of recall in relation to number, rather than duration, of calls. The implications of these results for the development of reliable and valid self‐report measures of mobile phone use are discussed. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/acp.1496
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57304009</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57304009</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4226-d408faf365290e9714038354a1c203922f9af101e0877e27ae77bf7be34e9d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkdFqFDEUhoNYcK2CjxAExQunniQzk8S7stiqratIoZchO3tip85MpskM2qu-umfZpRdK8SqQ8_El5_8ZeyHgSADId74Zj0Rp60dsIcDaArSEx2wBxpiiBANP2NOcrwHA1kIu2N2Jb6aYMm-H0M04NO3wg2fsQpFwjGniMfA-rtsO-XgVB-Rzxvd8ukKeIt3RNGEe45BpnmI_Tm_51PY0xYCJdMj9sPnHQK8R0fiue8YOgu8yPt-fh-zi5MPF8mNx_vX00_L4vGhKKetiQ18PPqi6khbQalGCMqoqvWgkKCtlsD4IEAhGa5Tao9broNeoSrQbpQ7Z652WPnkzY55c3-YGu84PGOfsKq2gpEz-C0owktI1BL78C7yOcxpoByeFkLau6q3tzQ5qUsyZMnFjanufbp0At63LUV1uWxehr_Y-nymYkDx1ke95KSrQArabFDvuFyV6-6DPHS-_7b17vs0T_r7nffrpaq105S5Xp25VmdWXy-9n7rP6AwxJsdY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211296569</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors influencing self-report of mobile phone use: the role of response prompt, time reference and mobile phone use in recall</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Timotijevic, Lada ; Barnett, Julie ; Shepherd, Richard ; Senior, Victoria</creator><creatorcontrib>Timotijevic, Lada ; Barnett, Julie ; Shepherd, Richard ; Senior, Victoria</creatorcontrib><description>The current study (n = 180) assesses factors affecting the recall of past mobile phone behaviour. It manipulates two factors hypothesised as influencing recall of duration and number of calls made: time reference (24 hours vs. 3 days) and context prompt (temporal, person called, reason for call) and also considers their impact in relation to levels of mobile phone use. A measure of recall error was constructed by matching self‐reported calls to actual calls and weighting for actual usage. The results indicate that most people tend to overestimate duration and underestimate number of phone calls, although these discrepancies are related to actual amount of mobile phone use. The manipulations of time reference and context prompt have some effect on the patterns of recall in relation to number, rather than duration, of calls. The implications of these results for the development of reliable and valid self‐report measures of mobile phone use are discussed. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-4080</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0720</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acp.1496</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ACPSED</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cellular telephones ; Cognitive psychology ; Discrepancies ; Discriminant analysis ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Learning. Memory ; Manipulation ; Matching ; Memory ; Miscellaneous ; Mobile phones ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Recall ; Selfreport ; Studies ; Weighting</subject><ispartof>Applied cognitive psychology, 2009-07, Vol.23 (5), p.664-683</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright John Wiley and Sons, Limited Jul 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4226-d408faf365290e9714038354a1c203922f9af101e0877e27ae77bf7be34e9d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4226-d408faf365290e9714038354a1c203922f9af101e0877e27ae77bf7be34e9d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21507103$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Timotijevic, Lada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnett, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepherd, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senior, Victoria</creatorcontrib><title>Factors influencing self-report of mobile phone use: the role of response prompt, time reference and mobile phone use in recall</title><title>Applied cognitive psychology</title><addtitle>Appl. Cognit. Psychol</addtitle><description>The current study (n = 180) assesses factors affecting the recall of past mobile phone behaviour. It manipulates two factors hypothesised as influencing recall of duration and number of calls made: time reference (24 hours vs. 3 days) and context prompt (temporal, person called, reason for call) and also considers their impact in relation to levels of mobile phone use. A measure of recall error was constructed by matching self‐reported calls to actual calls and weighting for actual usage. The results indicate that most people tend to overestimate duration and underestimate number of phone calls, although these discrepancies are related to actual amount of mobile phone use. The manipulations of time reference and context prompt have some effect on the patterns of recall in relation to number, rather than duration, of calls. The implications of these results for the development of reliable and valid self‐report measures of mobile phone use are discussed. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Applied psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cellular telephones</subject><subject>Cognitive psychology</subject><subject>Discrepancies</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Manipulation</subject><subject>Matching</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Mobile phones</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Recall</subject><subject>Selfreport</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Weighting</subject><issn>0888-4080</issn><issn>1099-0720</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkdFqFDEUhoNYcK2CjxAExQunniQzk8S7stiqratIoZchO3tip85MpskM2qu-umfZpRdK8SqQ8_El5_8ZeyHgSADId74Zj0Rp60dsIcDaArSEx2wBxpiiBANP2NOcrwHA1kIu2N2Jb6aYMm-H0M04NO3wg2fsQpFwjGniMfA-rtsO-XgVB-Rzxvd8ukKeIt3RNGEe45BpnmI_Tm_51PY0xYCJdMj9sPnHQK8R0fiue8YOgu8yPt-fh-zi5MPF8mNx_vX00_L4vGhKKetiQ18PPqi6khbQalGCMqoqvWgkKCtlsD4IEAhGa5Tao9broNeoSrQbpQ7Z652WPnkzY55c3-YGu84PGOfsKq2gpEz-C0owktI1BL78C7yOcxpoByeFkLau6q3tzQ5qUsyZMnFjanufbp0At63LUV1uWxehr_Y-nymYkDx1ke95KSrQArabFDvuFyV6-6DPHS-_7b17vs0T_r7nffrpaq105S5Xp25VmdWXy-9n7rP6AwxJsdY</recordid><startdate>200907</startdate><enddate>200907</enddate><creator>Timotijevic, Lada</creator><creator>Barnett, Julie</creator><creator>Shepherd, Richard</creator><creator>Senior, Victoria</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200907</creationdate><title>Factors influencing self-report of mobile phone use: the role of response prompt, time reference and mobile phone use in recall</title><author>Timotijevic, Lada ; Barnett, Julie ; Shepherd, Richard ; Senior, Victoria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4226-d408faf365290e9714038354a1c203922f9af101e0877e27ae77bf7be34e9d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Applied psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cellular telephones</topic><topic>Cognitive psychology</topic><topic>Discrepancies</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Manipulation</topic><topic>Matching</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Mobile phones</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Recall</topic><topic>Selfreport</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Weighting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Timotijevic, Lada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnett, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepherd, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senior, Victoria</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Applied cognitive psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Timotijevic, Lada</au><au>Barnett, Julie</au><au>Shepherd, Richard</au><au>Senior, Victoria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors influencing self-report of mobile phone use: the role of response prompt, time reference and mobile phone use in recall</atitle><jtitle>Applied cognitive psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Appl. Cognit. Psychol</addtitle><date>2009-07</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>664</spage><epage>683</epage><pages>664-683</pages><issn>0888-4080</issn><eissn>1099-0720</eissn><coden>ACPSED</coden><abstract>The current study (n = 180) assesses factors affecting the recall of past mobile phone behaviour. It manipulates two factors hypothesised as influencing recall of duration and number of calls made: time reference (24 hours vs. 3 days) and context prompt (temporal, person called, reason for call) and also considers their impact in relation to levels of mobile phone use. A measure of recall error was constructed by matching self‐reported calls to actual calls and weighting for actual usage. The results indicate that most people tend to overestimate duration and underestimate number of phone calls, although these discrepancies are related to actual amount of mobile phone use. The manipulations of time reference and context prompt have some effect on the patterns of recall in relation to number, rather than duration, of calls. The implications of these results for the development of reliable and valid self‐report measures of mobile phone use are discussed. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/acp.1496</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0888-4080
ispartof Applied cognitive psychology, 2009-07, Vol.23 (5), p.664-683
issn 0888-4080
1099-0720
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57304009
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Applied psychology
Biological and medical sciences
Cellular telephones
Cognitive psychology
Discrepancies
Discriminant analysis
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Learning. Memory
Manipulation
Matching
Memory
Miscellaneous
Mobile phones
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Recall
Selfreport
Studies
Weighting
title Factors influencing self-report of mobile phone use: the role of response prompt, time reference and mobile phone use in recall
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T19%3A56%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20influencing%20self-report%20of%20mobile%20phone%20use:%20the%20role%20of%20response%20prompt,%20time%20reference%20and%20mobile%20phone%20use%20in%20recall&rft.jtitle=Applied%20cognitive%20psychology&rft.au=Timotijevic,%20Lada&rft.date=2009-07&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=664&rft.epage=683&rft.pages=664-683&rft.issn=0888-4080&rft.eissn=1099-0720&rft.coden=ACPSED&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acp.1496&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57304009%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4226-d408faf365290e9714038354a1c203922f9af101e0877e27ae77bf7be34e9d33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211296569&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true