Loading…
'Classification' and 'Judgement': Social class and the 'cognitive structures' of choice of Higher Education
The issue of social-class-related patterns of access to Higher Education (HE) has become a matter of public debate in the UK recently, but is on the whole portrayed one-sidedly in terms of issues of selection (elitism), and the social dimensions of choice are neglected. Here, drawing on an Economic...
Saved in:
Published in: | British journal of sociology of education 2002-03, Vol.23 (1), p.51-72 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-90c5a8606f4576ede651e41c553fb637da4c65e08d953c8a646104a7e1a794e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-90c5a8606f4576ede651e41c553fb637da4c65e08d953c8a646104a7e1a794e3 |
container_end_page | 72 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 51 |
container_title | British journal of sociology of education |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Ball, Stephen J. Davies, Jackie David, Miriam Reay, Diane |
description | The issue of social-class-related patterns of access to Higher Education (HE) has become a matter of public debate in the UK recently, but is on the whole portrayed one-sidedly in terms of issues of selection (elitism), and the social dimensions of choice are neglected. Here, drawing on an Economic and Social Research Council research study, choice of HE is examined using Bourdieu's concepts of 'classification' and 'judgement'. HE is viewed in terms of its internal status differentiations. Students' positive and negative choices are addressed using qualitative and quantitative data, and the 'accuracy' of status perceptions are also tested. It is argued that choices are infused with class and ethnic meanings and that choice-making plays a crucial role in the reproduction of divisions and hierarchies in HE, but also that the very idea of choice assumes a kind of formal equality that obscures 'the effects of real inequality'. HE choices are embedded in different kinds of biographies and institutional habituses, and different 'opportunity structures'. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/01425690120102854 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57342746</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1393097</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1393097</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-90c5a8606f4576ede651e41c553fb637da4c65e08d953c8a646104a7e1a794e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcGK1TAUhoMoeB19AMFFEbSr6klykrbiRi6jowy4cPYhpqf35trbjEmqztvb2hHFQWaVwPf9f044jD3m8IJDAy-Bo1C6BS6Ag2gU3mEbjlpVUqK-yzYLr2ZB3GcPUjoAgAbFN-xLuR1sSr73zmYfxrKwY1eUH6ZuR0cac_mq-BSct0PhFu8XzXsqShd2o8_-GxUpx8nlKVIqi9AXbh-8o-V25nd7isVpN63dD9m93g6JHl2fJ-zi7enF9qw6__ju_fbNeeWwwVy14JRtNOgeVa2pI604IXdKyf6zlnVn0WlF0HStkq6xGjUHtDVxW7dI8oQ9X2svY_g6Ucrm6JOjYbAjhSkZDagQ2_ZWUdUSRY16Fp_-Ix7CFMf5D0aAFlwgilniq-RiSClSby6jP9p4ZTiYZUfmxo7mzLPrYpucHfpoR-fTn6BE5KDr2XuyeoeUQ_yLtxLaBdcr9mMf4tF-D3HoTLZXQ4i_O288bvKPPCdf35qU_5__J19BvTw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>206212442</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>'Classification' and 'Judgement': Social class and the 'cognitive structures' of choice of Higher Education</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Taylor & Francis</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Ball, Stephen J. ; Davies, Jackie ; David, Miriam ; Reay, Diane</creator><creatorcontrib>Ball, Stephen J. ; Davies, Jackie ; David, Miriam ; Reay, Diane</creatorcontrib><description>The issue of social-class-related patterns of access to Higher Education (HE) has become a matter of public debate in the UK recently, but is on the whole portrayed one-sidedly in terms of issues of selection (elitism), and the social dimensions of choice are neglected. Here, drawing on an Economic and Social Research Council research study, choice of HE is examined using Bourdieu's concepts of 'classification' and 'judgement'. HE is viewed in terms of its internal status differentiations. Students' positive and negative choices are addressed using qualitative and quantitative data, and the 'accuracy' of status perceptions are also tested. It is argued that choices are infused with class and ethnic meanings and that choice-making plays a crucial role in the reproduction of divisions and hierarchies in HE, but also that the very idea of choice assumes a kind of formal equality that obscures 'the effects of real inequality'. HE choices are embedded in different kinds of biographies and institutional habituses, and different 'opportunity structures'.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-5692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-3346</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01425690120102854</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJSEDB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Access ; Access to Education ; Bourdieu, Pierre ; Choices ; Class action lawsuits ; Cognitive Structures ; College students ; Community schools ; Educational Inequality ; Educational sociology ; England ; Formal dances ; Habitus ; Higher Education ; Inequalities ; Opportunity Structures ; Parents ; Private schools ; Social Class ; Social classes ; Social Reproduction ; Social structures ; Sociology ; Sociology of education. Educational systems. Lifelong education ; Universities</subject><ispartof>British journal of sociology of education, 2002-03, Vol.23 (1), p.51-72</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2002</rights><rights>Copyright 2002 Taylor & Francis Limited</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Carfax Publishing Company Mar 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-90c5a8606f4576ede651e41c553fb637da4c65e08d953c8a646104a7e1a794e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-90c5a8606f4576ede651e41c553fb637da4c65e08d953c8a646104a7e1a794e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1393097$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1393097$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976,30977,33200,33751,33752,58213,58446</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13441067$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ball, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Jackie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reay, Diane</creatorcontrib><title>'Classification' and 'Judgement': Social class and the 'cognitive structures' of choice of Higher Education</title><title>British journal of sociology of education</title><description>The issue of social-class-related patterns of access to Higher Education (HE) has become a matter of public debate in the UK recently, but is on the whole portrayed one-sidedly in terms of issues of selection (elitism), and the social dimensions of choice are neglected. Here, drawing on an Economic and Social Research Council research study, choice of HE is examined using Bourdieu's concepts of 'classification' and 'judgement'. HE is viewed in terms of its internal status differentiations. Students' positive and negative choices are addressed using qualitative and quantitative data, and the 'accuracy' of status perceptions are also tested. It is argued that choices are infused with class and ethnic meanings and that choice-making plays a crucial role in the reproduction of divisions and hierarchies in HE, but also that the very idea of choice assumes a kind of formal equality that obscures 'the effects of real inequality'. HE choices are embedded in different kinds of biographies and institutional habituses, and different 'opportunity structures'.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Access to Education</subject><subject>Bourdieu, Pierre</subject><subject>Choices</subject><subject>Class action lawsuits</subject><subject>Cognitive Structures</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Community schools</subject><subject>Educational Inequality</subject><subject>Educational sociology</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Formal dances</subject><subject>Habitus</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Inequalities</subject><subject>Opportunity Structures</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Private schools</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><subject>Social classes</subject><subject>Social Reproduction</subject><subject>Social structures</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sociology of education. Educational systems. Lifelong education</subject><subject>Universities</subject><issn>0142-5692</issn><issn>1465-3346</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcGK1TAUhoMoeB19AMFFEbSr6klykrbiRi6jowy4cPYhpqf35trbjEmqztvb2hHFQWaVwPf9f044jD3m8IJDAy-Bo1C6BS6Ag2gU3mEbjlpVUqK-yzYLr2ZB3GcPUjoAgAbFN-xLuR1sSr73zmYfxrKwY1eUH6ZuR0cac_mq-BSct0PhFu8XzXsqShd2o8_-GxUpx8nlKVIqi9AXbh-8o-V25nd7isVpN63dD9m93g6JHl2fJ-zi7enF9qw6__ju_fbNeeWwwVy14JRtNOgeVa2pI604IXdKyf6zlnVn0WlF0HStkq6xGjUHtDVxW7dI8oQ9X2svY_g6Ucrm6JOjYbAjhSkZDagQ2_ZWUdUSRY16Fp_-Ix7CFMf5D0aAFlwgilniq-RiSClSby6jP9p4ZTiYZUfmxo7mzLPrYpucHfpoR-fTn6BE5KDr2XuyeoeUQ_yLtxLaBdcr9mMf4tF-D3HoTLZXQ4i_O288bvKPPCdf35qU_5__J19BvTw</recordid><startdate>20020301</startdate><enddate>20020301</enddate><creator>Ball, Stephen J.</creator><creator>Davies, Jackie</creator><creator>David, Miriam</creator><creator>Reay, Diane</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Carfax Publishing, Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><general>Taylor and Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020301</creationdate><title>'Classification' and 'Judgement': Social class and the 'cognitive structures' of choice of Higher Education</title><author>Ball, Stephen J. ; Davies, Jackie ; David, Miriam ; Reay, Diane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-90c5a8606f4576ede651e41c553fb637da4c65e08d953c8a646104a7e1a794e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Access to Education</topic><topic>Bourdieu, Pierre</topic><topic>Choices</topic><topic>Class action lawsuits</topic><topic>Cognitive Structures</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Community schools</topic><topic>Educational Inequality</topic><topic>Educational sociology</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Formal dances</topic><topic>Habitus</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Inequalities</topic><topic>Opportunity Structures</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Private schools</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><topic>Social classes</topic><topic>Social Reproduction</topic><topic>Social structures</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sociology of education. Educational systems. Lifelong education</topic><topic>Universities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ball, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Jackie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reay, Diane</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>British journal of sociology of education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ball, Stephen J.</au><au>Davies, Jackie</au><au>David, Miriam</au><au>Reay, Diane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>'Classification' and 'Judgement': Social class and the 'cognitive structures' of choice of Higher Education</atitle><jtitle>British journal of sociology of education</jtitle><date>2002-03-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>51</spage><epage>72</epage><pages>51-72</pages><issn>0142-5692</issn><eissn>1465-3346</eissn><coden>BJSEDB</coden><abstract>The issue of social-class-related patterns of access to Higher Education (HE) has become a matter of public debate in the UK recently, but is on the whole portrayed one-sidedly in terms of issues of selection (elitism), and the social dimensions of choice are neglected. Here, drawing on an Economic and Social Research Council research study, choice of HE is examined using Bourdieu's concepts of 'classification' and 'judgement'. HE is viewed in terms of its internal status differentiations. Students' positive and negative choices are addressed using qualitative and quantitative data, and the 'accuracy' of status perceptions are also tested. It is argued that choices are infused with class and ethnic meanings and that choice-making plays a crucial role in the reproduction of divisions and hierarchies in HE, but also that the very idea of choice assumes a kind of formal equality that obscures 'the effects of real inequality'. HE choices are embedded in different kinds of biographies and institutional habituses, and different 'opportunity structures'.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/01425690120102854</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0142-5692 |
ispartof | British journal of sociology of education, 2002-03, Vol.23 (1), p.51-72 |
issn | 0142-5692 1465-3346 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57342746 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Taylor & Francis; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Access Access to Education Bourdieu, Pierre Choices Class action lawsuits Cognitive Structures College students Community schools Educational Inequality Educational sociology England Formal dances Habitus Higher Education Inequalities Opportunity Structures Parents Private schools Social Class Social classes Social Reproduction Social structures Sociology Sociology of education. Educational systems. Lifelong education Universities |
title | 'Classification' and 'Judgement': Social class and the 'cognitive structures' of choice of Higher Education |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T17%3A05%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle='Classification'%20and%20'Judgement':%20Social%20class%20and%20the%20'cognitive%20structures'%20of%20choice%20of%20Higher%20Education&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20sociology%20of%20education&rft.au=Ball,%20Stephen%20J.&rft.date=2002-03-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=72&rft.pages=51-72&rft.issn=0142-5692&rft.eissn=1465-3346&rft.coden=BJSEDB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01425690120102854&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1393097%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-90c5a8606f4576ede651e41c553fb637da4c65e08d953c8a646104a7e1a794e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=206212442&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1393097&rfr_iscdi=true |