Loading…

'Classification' and 'Judgement': Social class and the 'cognitive structures' of choice of Higher Education

The issue of social-class-related patterns of access to Higher Education (HE) has become a matter of public debate in the UK recently, but is on the whole portrayed one-sidedly in terms of issues of selection (elitism), and the social dimensions of choice are neglected. Here, drawing on an Economic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of sociology of education 2002-03, Vol.23 (1), p.51-72
Main Authors: Ball, Stephen J., Davies, Jackie, David, Miriam, Reay, Diane
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-90c5a8606f4576ede651e41c553fb637da4c65e08d953c8a646104a7e1a794e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-90c5a8606f4576ede651e41c553fb637da4c65e08d953c8a646104a7e1a794e3
container_end_page 72
container_issue 1
container_start_page 51
container_title British journal of sociology of education
container_volume 23
creator Ball, Stephen J.
Davies, Jackie
David, Miriam
Reay, Diane
description The issue of social-class-related patterns of access to Higher Education (HE) has become a matter of public debate in the UK recently, but is on the whole portrayed one-sidedly in terms of issues of selection (elitism), and the social dimensions of choice are neglected. Here, drawing on an Economic and Social Research Council research study, choice of HE is examined using Bourdieu's concepts of 'classification' and 'judgement'. HE is viewed in terms of its internal status differentiations. Students' positive and negative choices are addressed using qualitative and quantitative data, and the 'accuracy' of status perceptions are also tested. It is argued that choices are infused with class and ethnic meanings and that choice-making plays a crucial role in the reproduction of divisions and hierarchies in HE, but also that the very idea of choice assumes a kind of formal equality that obscures 'the effects of real inequality'. HE choices are embedded in different kinds of biographies and institutional habituses, and different 'opportunity structures'.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/01425690120102854
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57342746</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1393097</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1393097</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-90c5a8606f4576ede651e41c553fb637da4c65e08d953c8a646104a7e1a794e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcGK1TAUhoMoeB19AMFFEbSr6klykrbiRi6jowy4cPYhpqf35trbjEmqztvb2hHFQWaVwPf9f044jD3m8IJDAy-Bo1C6BS6Ag2gU3mEbjlpVUqK-yzYLr2ZB3GcPUjoAgAbFN-xLuR1sSr73zmYfxrKwY1eUH6ZuR0cac_mq-BSct0PhFu8XzXsqShd2o8_-GxUpx8nlKVIqi9AXbh-8o-V25nd7isVpN63dD9m93g6JHl2fJ-zi7enF9qw6__ju_fbNeeWwwVy14JRtNOgeVa2pI604IXdKyf6zlnVn0WlF0HStkq6xGjUHtDVxW7dI8oQ9X2svY_g6Ucrm6JOjYbAjhSkZDagQ2_ZWUdUSRY16Fp_-Ix7CFMf5D0aAFlwgilniq-RiSClSby6jP9p4ZTiYZUfmxo7mzLPrYpucHfpoR-fTn6BE5KDr2XuyeoeUQ_yLtxLaBdcr9mMf4tF-D3HoTLZXQ4i_O288bvKPPCdf35qU_5__J19BvTw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>206212442</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>'Classification' and 'Judgement': Social class and the 'cognitive structures' of choice of Higher Education</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Ball, Stephen J. ; Davies, Jackie ; David, Miriam ; Reay, Diane</creator><creatorcontrib>Ball, Stephen J. ; Davies, Jackie ; David, Miriam ; Reay, Diane</creatorcontrib><description>The issue of social-class-related patterns of access to Higher Education (HE) has become a matter of public debate in the UK recently, but is on the whole portrayed one-sidedly in terms of issues of selection (elitism), and the social dimensions of choice are neglected. Here, drawing on an Economic and Social Research Council research study, choice of HE is examined using Bourdieu's concepts of 'classification' and 'judgement'. HE is viewed in terms of its internal status differentiations. Students' positive and negative choices are addressed using qualitative and quantitative data, and the 'accuracy' of status perceptions are also tested. It is argued that choices are infused with class and ethnic meanings and that choice-making plays a crucial role in the reproduction of divisions and hierarchies in HE, but also that the very idea of choice assumes a kind of formal equality that obscures 'the effects of real inequality'. HE choices are embedded in different kinds of biographies and institutional habituses, and different 'opportunity structures'.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-5692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-3346</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01425690120102854</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJSEDB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Access ; Access to Education ; Bourdieu, Pierre ; Choices ; Class action lawsuits ; Cognitive Structures ; College students ; Community schools ; Educational Inequality ; Educational sociology ; England ; Formal dances ; Habitus ; Higher Education ; Inequalities ; Opportunity Structures ; Parents ; Private schools ; Social Class ; Social classes ; Social Reproduction ; Social structures ; Sociology ; Sociology of education. Educational systems. Lifelong education ; Universities</subject><ispartof>British journal of sociology of education, 2002-03, Vol.23 (1), p.51-72</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2002</rights><rights>Copyright 2002 Taylor &amp; Francis Limited</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Carfax Publishing Company Mar 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-90c5a8606f4576ede651e41c553fb637da4c65e08d953c8a646104a7e1a794e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-90c5a8606f4576ede651e41c553fb637da4c65e08d953c8a646104a7e1a794e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1393097$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1393097$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976,30977,33200,33751,33752,58213,58446</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13441067$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ball, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Jackie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reay, Diane</creatorcontrib><title>'Classification' and 'Judgement': Social class and the 'cognitive structures' of choice of Higher Education</title><title>British journal of sociology of education</title><description>The issue of social-class-related patterns of access to Higher Education (HE) has become a matter of public debate in the UK recently, but is on the whole portrayed one-sidedly in terms of issues of selection (elitism), and the social dimensions of choice are neglected. Here, drawing on an Economic and Social Research Council research study, choice of HE is examined using Bourdieu's concepts of 'classification' and 'judgement'. HE is viewed in terms of its internal status differentiations. Students' positive and negative choices are addressed using qualitative and quantitative data, and the 'accuracy' of status perceptions are also tested. It is argued that choices are infused with class and ethnic meanings and that choice-making plays a crucial role in the reproduction of divisions and hierarchies in HE, but also that the very idea of choice assumes a kind of formal equality that obscures 'the effects of real inequality'. HE choices are embedded in different kinds of biographies and institutional habituses, and different 'opportunity structures'.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Access to Education</subject><subject>Bourdieu, Pierre</subject><subject>Choices</subject><subject>Class action lawsuits</subject><subject>Cognitive Structures</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Community schools</subject><subject>Educational Inequality</subject><subject>Educational sociology</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Formal dances</subject><subject>Habitus</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Inequalities</subject><subject>Opportunity Structures</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Private schools</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><subject>Social classes</subject><subject>Social Reproduction</subject><subject>Social structures</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sociology of education. Educational systems. Lifelong education</subject><subject>Universities</subject><issn>0142-5692</issn><issn>1465-3346</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcGK1TAUhoMoeB19AMFFEbSr6klykrbiRi6jowy4cPYhpqf35trbjEmqztvb2hHFQWaVwPf9f044jD3m8IJDAy-Bo1C6BS6Ag2gU3mEbjlpVUqK-yzYLr2ZB3GcPUjoAgAbFN-xLuR1sSr73zmYfxrKwY1eUH6ZuR0cac_mq-BSct0PhFu8XzXsqShd2o8_-GxUpx8nlKVIqi9AXbh-8o-V25nd7isVpN63dD9m93g6JHl2fJ-zi7enF9qw6__ju_fbNeeWwwVy14JRtNOgeVa2pI604IXdKyf6zlnVn0WlF0HStkq6xGjUHtDVxW7dI8oQ9X2svY_g6Ucrm6JOjYbAjhSkZDagQ2_ZWUdUSRY16Fp_-Ix7CFMf5D0aAFlwgilniq-RiSClSby6jP9p4ZTiYZUfmxo7mzLPrYpucHfpoR-fTn6BE5KDr2XuyeoeUQ_yLtxLaBdcr9mMf4tF-D3HoTLZXQ4i_O288bvKPPCdf35qU_5__J19BvTw</recordid><startdate>20020301</startdate><enddate>20020301</enddate><creator>Ball, Stephen J.</creator><creator>Davies, Jackie</creator><creator>David, Miriam</creator><creator>Reay, Diane</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Carfax Publishing, Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><general>Taylor and Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020301</creationdate><title>'Classification' and 'Judgement': Social class and the 'cognitive structures' of choice of Higher Education</title><author>Ball, Stephen J. ; Davies, Jackie ; David, Miriam ; Reay, Diane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-90c5a8606f4576ede651e41c553fb637da4c65e08d953c8a646104a7e1a794e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Access to Education</topic><topic>Bourdieu, Pierre</topic><topic>Choices</topic><topic>Class action lawsuits</topic><topic>Cognitive Structures</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Community schools</topic><topic>Educational Inequality</topic><topic>Educational sociology</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Formal dances</topic><topic>Habitus</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Inequalities</topic><topic>Opportunity Structures</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Private schools</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><topic>Social classes</topic><topic>Social Reproduction</topic><topic>Social structures</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sociology of education. Educational systems. Lifelong education</topic><topic>Universities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ball, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Jackie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reay, Diane</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>British journal of sociology of education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ball, Stephen J.</au><au>Davies, Jackie</au><au>David, Miriam</au><au>Reay, Diane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>'Classification' and 'Judgement': Social class and the 'cognitive structures' of choice of Higher Education</atitle><jtitle>British journal of sociology of education</jtitle><date>2002-03-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>51</spage><epage>72</epage><pages>51-72</pages><issn>0142-5692</issn><eissn>1465-3346</eissn><coden>BJSEDB</coden><abstract>The issue of social-class-related patterns of access to Higher Education (HE) has become a matter of public debate in the UK recently, but is on the whole portrayed one-sidedly in terms of issues of selection (elitism), and the social dimensions of choice are neglected. Here, drawing on an Economic and Social Research Council research study, choice of HE is examined using Bourdieu's concepts of 'classification' and 'judgement'. HE is viewed in terms of its internal status differentiations. Students' positive and negative choices are addressed using qualitative and quantitative data, and the 'accuracy' of status perceptions are also tested. It is argued that choices are infused with class and ethnic meanings and that choice-making plays a crucial role in the reproduction of divisions and hierarchies in HE, but also that the very idea of choice assumes a kind of formal equality that obscures 'the effects of real inequality'. HE choices are embedded in different kinds of biographies and institutional habituses, and different 'opportunity structures'.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/01425690120102854</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0142-5692
ispartof British journal of sociology of education, 2002-03, Vol.23 (1), p.51-72
issn 0142-5692
1465-3346
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57342746
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Taylor & Francis; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Access
Access to Education
Bourdieu, Pierre
Choices
Class action lawsuits
Cognitive Structures
College students
Community schools
Educational Inequality
Educational sociology
England
Formal dances
Habitus
Higher Education
Inequalities
Opportunity Structures
Parents
Private schools
Social Class
Social classes
Social Reproduction
Social structures
Sociology
Sociology of education. Educational systems. Lifelong education
Universities
title 'Classification' and 'Judgement': Social class and the 'cognitive structures' of choice of Higher Education
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T17%3A05%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle='Classification'%20and%20'Judgement':%20Social%20class%20and%20the%20'cognitive%20structures'%20of%20choice%20of%20Higher%20Education&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20sociology%20of%20education&rft.au=Ball,%20Stephen%20J.&rft.date=2002-03-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=72&rft.pages=51-72&rft.issn=0142-5692&rft.eissn=1465-3346&rft.coden=BJSEDB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01425690120102854&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1393097%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-90c5a8606f4576ede651e41c553fb637da4c65e08d953c8a646104a7e1a794e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=206212442&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1393097&rfr_iscdi=true