Learning styles: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study in higher education

• Published in: British journal of educational psychology 1998-09, Vol.68 (3), p.427-441
• Main Authors: Busato, Vittorio V., Prins, Frans J., Elshout, Jan J., Hamaker, Christiaan
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Achievement; Biological and medical sciences; Cognitive Style; College Students; Educational psychology; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Learning Processes; Learning styles; Longitudinal Studies; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychology. Psychophysiology; Pupil and student. Academic achievement and failure; Relationship; Students; Universities
• ISSN: 0007-0998; 2044-8279
• DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1998.tb01302.x

Background. In his dissertation, Jan Vermunt (1992) proposed four different learning styles: a meaning directed, a reproduction directed, an application directed and an undirected style. Aims. In a cross‐sectional and longitudinal design the development of these learning styles during students' stay at the university is studied, as well as the relation of these styles with academic success. A systematic relation between year of study and learning style is expected, namely that the application and meaning directed learning style scores would be higher in the later years and the undirected and reproduction learning style scores would be the highest in the early years. Results. In the cross‐sectional study it was not found that the application and meaning directed learning style scores were higher in the later years, nor that the undirected and reproduction learning style scores were the highest in the early years. In the longitudinal study the means of the meaning directed and application directed learning style scores indeed increased over the years, while the means of the reproduction and undirected learning style scores decreased. For the score on the meaning directed learning style, this change was significant, though a marginal effect size was found. Conclusion. It might not be concluded there is a systematic relation between year of study and learning style. No evidence is found for the implicit hierarchy that the meaning directed and application directed learning are better than the reproduction learning style. The undirected learning style, however, correlates negatively with academic success.