Religiosity, stress and psychological distress: no evidence for an association among undergraduate students

The relationship between religion and mental and physical health has received substantial scientific interest. It has been suggested that indicators of religiosity are inversely associated with aspects of psychological distress. The aim of the present study was to investigate further the relationshi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Personality and individual differences 2003-01, Vol.34 (2), p.211-217
Main Authors: O’Connor, Daryl B, Cobb, Joanna, O’Connor, Rory C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biological and medical sciences
Coping
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General health
Personality. Affectivity
Psychological distress
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Religiosity
Stress
Undergraduate students
Undergraduates
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The relationship between religion and mental and physical health has received substantial scientific interest. It has been suggested that indicators of religiosity are inversely associated with aspects of psychological distress. The aim of the present study was to investigate further the relationship between religiosity, stress and psychological distress. One hundred and seventy-seven undergraduate students completed the Francis Scale of Attitude Towards Christianity (FSAC), the Stress Arousal Checklist, the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-30) and the Multi-dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. No association was found between scores on the FSAC, the measure of stress, social support or the GHQ-30. Stress and social support were the only variables significantly associated with scores on the GHQ-30. The results of the present study provide evidence, among an undergraduate sample, that religiosity is not associated with psychological distress.
ISSN:0191-8869
1873-3549
DOI:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00035-1