Loading…
Self-discrepancy and elaboration of self-conceptions as factors influencing reactions to feedback
Previous research examined the predictions of the self‐enhancement theory and the self‐consistency theory regarding reactions to self‐relevant feedback. In the present study two circumstances that are supposed to moderate self‐enhancement and self‐consistency motives have been examined: the elaborat...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of social psychology 1999-08, Vol.29 (5-6), p.725-739 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5370-773f6db8eea342400df6561edc63fcccf34c41687aee614c6e6e25e408017e9a3 |
container_end_page | 739 |
container_issue | 5-6 |
container_start_page | 725 |
container_title | European journal of social psychology |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Dauenheimer, Dirk Stahlberg, Dagmar Petersen, Lars-Eric |
description | Previous research examined the predictions of the self‐enhancement theory and the self‐consistency theory regarding reactions to self‐relevant feedback. In the present study two circumstances that are supposed to moderate self‐enhancement and self‐consistency motives have been examined: the elaboration of a self‐conception and the discrepancy between the actual self and a personal standard. One hundred and fourteen participants received either positive, consistent, or negative feedback regarding their results on a personality test. Affective and cognitive reactions to fictitious feedback were measured as dependent variables. In accordance with prior empirical evidence, affective reactions followed the self‐enhancement theory and cognitive reactions were in line with the self‐consistency theory. Moreover, affective and cognitive reactions were influenced by the elaboration of a self‐conception and the discrepancy between the actual self and a personal standard as predicted. Regarding affective reactions, the predictions of the self‐enhancement theory were more clearly supported when self‐conceptions were less elaborated or when people perceived a high self‐discrepancy. Regarding cognitive reactions, the predictions of the self‐consistency theory were more clearly supported when self‐conceptions were highly elaborated or when people perceived a low self‐discrepancy. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199908/09)29:5/6<725::AID-EJSP970>3.0.CO;2-G |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57464595</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38767852</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5370-773f6db8eea342400df6561edc63fcccf34c41687aee614c6e6e25e408017e9a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV2LEzEUhgdRsK7-hwFFdi-mzcckmVQR1ulaK8tWqB83wiHNnMjszs7UpGW3_96MU1dQQS9CwuHJOe_hSZIZJWNKCJscrxbl4oQSrbN42DHVWpNiQvQJ01MxkS8VE9Pp6WKWnb1bvdeKvOJjMi6XL1g2v5eM7j7eT0aE5DJjSrGHyaMQLgkhWko-SswKG5dVdbAeN6a1-9S0VYqNWXfebOuuTTuXhp6xXWtx05dCakLqjN12PqR165odtrZuv6YeY_EHsO1Sh1itjb16nDxwpgn45HAfJR_fnH0o32bny_miPD3PrOCKZEpxJ6t1gWh4znJCKieFpFhZyZ211vHc5lQWyiBKmluJEpnAnBSEKtSGHyXPh74b333bYdjCddwKm8a02O0CCJXLXGjxT5AXSqpCsAg-_Q287Ha-jUsALZQiQnBNI_VloKzvQvDoYOPra-P3QAn0GgF6jdDbgN4GDBrjG5gGARKiRoCoEQ4agQOBcgkM5rH9s0MIE6xpnI-S6vBrRiGF0jxiMGA3dYP7PyL8T4K_B_hZihOyYUIdtnh7N8H4K5CKKwGfL-ZwIV-vZp_yAmb8O688z90</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877055391</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Self-discrepancy and elaboration of self-conceptions as factors influencing reactions to feedback</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Dauenheimer, Dirk ; Stahlberg, Dagmar ; Petersen, Lars-Eric</creator><creatorcontrib>Dauenheimer, Dirk ; Stahlberg, Dagmar ; Petersen, Lars-Eric</creatorcontrib><description>Previous research examined the predictions of the self‐enhancement theory and the self‐consistency theory regarding reactions to self‐relevant feedback. In the present study two circumstances that are supposed to moderate self‐enhancement and self‐consistency motives have been examined: the elaboration of a self‐conception and the discrepancy between the actual self and a personal standard. One hundred and fourteen participants received either positive, consistent, or negative feedback regarding their results on a personality test. Affective and cognitive reactions to fictitious feedback were measured as dependent variables. In accordance with prior empirical evidence, affective reactions followed the self‐enhancement theory and cognitive reactions were in line with the self‐consistency theory. Moreover, affective and cognitive reactions were influenced by the elaboration of a self‐conception and the discrepancy between the actual self and a personal standard as predicted. Regarding affective reactions, the predictions of the self‐enhancement theory were more clearly supported when self‐conceptions were less elaborated or when people perceived a high self‐discrepancy. Regarding cognitive reactions, the predictions of the self‐consistency theory were more clearly supported when self‐conceptions were highly elaborated or when people perceived a low self‐discrepancy. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-2772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199908/09)29:5/6<725::AID-EJSP970>3.0.CO;2-G</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EJSPA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition ; Criticism ; Factors ; Feedback ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human behaviour ; Personality. Affectivity ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Responses ; Self ; Self representation ; Self-concept ; Selfconcept ; Selfconsistency ; Selfenhancement ; Social interaction ; Social psychology ; Work standards</subject><ispartof>European journal of social psychology, 1999-08, Vol.29 (5-6), p.725-739</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5370-773f6db8eea342400df6561edc63fcccf34c41687aee614c6e6e25e408017e9a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,30979,33203</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1865793$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dauenheimer, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stahlberg, Dagmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Lars-Eric</creatorcontrib><title>Self-discrepancy and elaboration of self-conceptions as factors influencing reactions to feedback</title><title>European journal of social psychology</title><addtitle>Eur. J. Soc. Psychol</addtitle><description>Previous research examined the predictions of the self‐enhancement theory and the self‐consistency theory regarding reactions to self‐relevant feedback. In the present study two circumstances that are supposed to moderate self‐enhancement and self‐consistency motives have been examined: the elaboration of a self‐conception and the discrepancy between the actual self and a personal standard. One hundred and fourteen participants received either positive, consistent, or negative feedback regarding their results on a personality test. Affective and cognitive reactions to fictitious feedback were measured as dependent variables. In accordance with prior empirical evidence, affective reactions followed the self‐enhancement theory and cognitive reactions were in line with the self‐consistency theory. Moreover, affective and cognitive reactions were influenced by the elaboration of a self‐conception and the discrepancy between the actual self and a personal standard as predicted. Regarding affective reactions, the predictions of the self‐enhancement theory were more clearly supported when self‐conceptions were less elaborated or when people perceived a high self‐discrepancy. Regarding cognitive reactions, the predictions of the self‐consistency theory were more clearly supported when self‐conceptions were highly elaborated or when people perceived a low self‐discrepancy. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Factors</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human behaviour</subject><subject>Personality. Affectivity</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Responses</subject><subject>Self</subject><subject>Self representation</subject><subject>Self-concept</subject><subject>Selfconcept</subject><subject>Selfconsistency</subject><subject>Selfenhancement</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Work standards</subject><issn>0046-2772</issn><issn>1099-0992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV2LEzEUhgdRsK7-hwFFdi-mzcckmVQR1ulaK8tWqB83wiHNnMjszs7UpGW3_96MU1dQQS9CwuHJOe_hSZIZJWNKCJscrxbl4oQSrbN42DHVWpNiQvQJ01MxkS8VE9Pp6WKWnb1bvdeKvOJjMi6XL1g2v5eM7j7eT0aE5DJjSrGHyaMQLgkhWko-SswKG5dVdbAeN6a1-9S0VYqNWXfebOuuTTuXhp6xXWtx05dCakLqjN12PqR165odtrZuv6YeY_EHsO1Sh1itjb16nDxwpgn45HAfJR_fnH0o32bny_miPD3PrOCKZEpxJ6t1gWh4znJCKieFpFhZyZ211vHc5lQWyiBKmluJEpnAnBSEKtSGHyXPh74b333bYdjCddwKm8a02O0CCJXLXGjxT5AXSqpCsAg-_Q287Ha-jUsALZQiQnBNI_VloKzvQvDoYOPra-P3QAn0GgF6jdDbgN4GDBrjG5gGARKiRoCoEQ4agQOBcgkM5rH9s0MIE6xpnI-S6vBrRiGF0jxiMGA3dYP7PyL8T4K_B_hZihOyYUIdtnh7N8H4K5CKKwGfL-ZwIV-vZp_yAmb8O688z90</recordid><startdate>199908</startdate><enddate>199908</enddate><creator>Dauenheimer, Dirk</creator><creator>Stahlberg, Dagmar</creator><creator>Petersen, Lars-Eric</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQCIK</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199908</creationdate><title>Self-discrepancy and elaboration of self-conceptions as factors influencing reactions to feedback</title><author>Dauenheimer, Dirk ; Stahlberg, Dagmar ; Petersen, Lars-Eric</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5370-773f6db8eea342400df6561edc63fcccf34c41687aee614c6e6e25e408017e9a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Factors</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human behaviour</topic><topic>Personality. Affectivity</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Responses</topic><topic>Self</topic><topic>Self representation</topic><topic>Self-concept</topic><topic>Selfconcept</topic><topic>Selfconsistency</topic><topic>Selfenhancement</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Work standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dauenheimer, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stahlberg, Dagmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Lars-Eric</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 33</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>European journal of social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dauenheimer, Dirk</au><au>Stahlberg, Dagmar</au><au>Petersen, Lars-Eric</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Self-discrepancy and elaboration of self-conceptions as factors influencing reactions to feedback</atitle><jtitle>European journal of social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur. J. Soc. Psychol</addtitle><date>1999-08</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>5-6</issue><spage>725</spage><epage>739</epage><pages>725-739</pages><issn>0046-2772</issn><eissn>1099-0992</eissn><coden>EJSPA6</coden><abstract>Previous research examined the predictions of the self‐enhancement theory and the self‐consistency theory regarding reactions to self‐relevant feedback. In the present study two circumstances that are supposed to moderate self‐enhancement and self‐consistency motives have been examined: the elaboration of a self‐conception and the discrepancy between the actual self and a personal standard. One hundred and fourteen participants received either positive, consistent, or negative feedback regarding their results on a personality test. Affective and cognitive reactions to fictitious feedback were measured as dependent variables. In accordance with prior empirical evidence, affective reactions followed the self‐enhancement theory and cognitive reactions were in line with the self‐consistency theory. Moreover, affective and cognitive reactions were influenced by the elaboration of a self‐conception and the discrepancy between the actual self and a personal standard as predicted. Regarding affective reactions, the predictions of the self‐enhancement theory were more clearly supported when self‐conceptions were less elaborated or when people perceived a high self‐discrepancy. Regarding cognitive reactions, the predictions of the self‐consistency theory were more clearly supported when self‐conceptions were highly elaborated or when people perceived a low self‐discrepancy. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199908/09)29:5/6<725::AID-EJSP970>3.0.CO;2-G</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0046-2772 |
ispartof | European journal of social psychology, 1999-08, Vol.29 (5-6), p.725-739 |
issn | 0046-2772 1099-0992 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57464595 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Cognition Criticism Factors Feedback Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human behaviour Personality. Affectivity Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Responses Self Self representation Self-concept Selfconcept Selfconsistency Selfenhancement Social interaction Social psychology Work standards |
title | Self-discrepancy and elaboration of self-conceptions as factors influencing reactions to feedback |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T17%3A33%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Self-discrepancy%20and%20elaboration%20of%20self-conceptions%20as%20factors%20influencing%20reactions%20to%20feedback&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Dauenheimer,%20Dirk&rft.date=1999-08&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=5-6&rft.spage=725&rft.epage=739&rft.pages=725-739&rft.issn=0046-2772&rft.eissn=1099-0992&rft.coden=EJSPA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199908/09)29:5/6%3C725::AID-EJSP970%3E3.0.CO;2-G&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38767852%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5370-773f6db8eea342400df6561edc63fcccf34c41687aee614c6e6e25e408017e9a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877055391&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |