Loading…

Self-discrepancy and elaboration of self-conceptions as factors influencing reactions to feedback

Previous research examined the predictions of the self‐enhancement theory and the self‐consistency theory regarding reactions to self‐relevant feedback. In the present study two circumstances that are supposed to moderate self‐enhancement and self‐consistency motives have been examined: the elaborat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of social psychology 1999-08, Vol.29 (5-6), p.725-739
Main Authors: Dauenheimer, Dirk, Stahlberg, Dagmar, Petersen, Lars-Eric
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5370-773f6db8eea342400df6561edc63fcccf34c41687aee614c6e6e25e408017e9a3
container_end_page 739
container_issue 5-6
container_start_page 725
container_title European journal of social psychology
container_volume 29
creator Dauenheimer, Dirk
Stahlberg, Dagmar
Petersen, Lars-Eric
description Previous research examined the predictions of the self‐enhancement theory and the self‐consistency theory regarding reactions to self‐relevant feedback. In the present study two circumstances that are supposed to moderate self‐enhancement and self‐consistency motives have been examined: the elaboration of a self‐conception and the discrepancy between the actual self and a personal standard. One hundred and fourteen participants received either positive, consistent, or negative feedback regarding their results on a personality test. Affective and cognitive reactions to fictitious feedback were measured as dependent variables. In accordance with prior empirical evidence, affective reactions followed the self‐enhancement theory and cognitive reactions were in line with the self‐consistency theory. Moreover, affective and cognitive reactions were influenced by the elaboration of a self‐conception and the discrepancy between the actual self and a personal standard as predicted. Regarding affective reactions, the predictions of the self‐enhancement theory were more clearly supported when self‐conceptions were less elaborated or when people perceived a high self‐discrepancy. Regarding cognitive reactions, the predictions of the self‐consistency theory were more clearly supported when self‐conceptions were highly elaborated or when people perceived a low self‐discrepancy. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199908/09)29:5/6<725::AID-EJSP970>3.0.CO;2-G
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57464595</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38767852</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5370-773f6db8eea342400df6561edc63fcccf34c41687aee614c6e6e25e408017e9a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV2LEzEUhgdRsK7-hwFFdi-mzcckmVQR1ulaK8tWqB83wiHNnMjszs7UpGW3_96MU1dQQS9CwuHJOe_hSZIZJWNKCJscrxbl4oQSrbN42DHVWpNiQvQJ01MxkS8VE9Pp6WKWnb1bvdeKvOJjMi6XL1g2v5eM7j7eT0aE5DJjSrGHyaMQLgkhWko-SswKG5dVdbAeN6a1-9S0VYqNWXfebOuuTTuXhp6xXWtx05dCakLqjN12PqR165odtrZuv6YeY_EHsO1Sh1itjb16nDxwpgn45HAfJR_fnH0o32bny_miPD3PrOCKZEpxJ6t1gWh4znJCKieFpFhZyZ211vHc5lQWyiBKmluJEpnAnBSEKtSGHyXPh74b333bYdjCddwKm8a02O0CCJXLXGjxT5AXSqpCsAg-_Q287Ha-jUsALZQiQnBNI_VloKzvQvDoYOPra-P3QAn0GgF6jdDbgN4GDBrjG5gGARKiRoCoEQ4agQOBcgkM5rH9s0MIE6xpnI-S6vBrRiGF0jxiMGA3dYP7PyL8T4K_B_hZihOyYUIdtnh7N8H4K5CKKwGfL-ZwIV-vZp_yAmb8O688z90</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877055391</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Self-discrepancy and elaboration of self-conceptions as factors influencing reactions to feedback</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Dauenheimer, Dirk ; Stahlberg, Dagmar ; Petersen, Lars-Eric</creator><creatorcontrib>Dauenheimer, Dirk ; Stahlberg, Dagmar ; Petersen, Lars-Eric</creatorcontrib><description>Previous research examined the predictions of the self‐enhancement theory and the self‐consistency theory regarding reactions to self‐relevant feedback. In the present study two circumstances that are supposed to moderate self‐enhancement and self‐consistency motives have been examined: the elaboration of a self‐conception and the discrepancy between the actual self and a personal standard. One hundred and fourteen participants received either positive, consistent, or negative feedback regarding their results on a personality test. Affective and cognitive reactions to fictitious feedback were measured as dependent variables. In accordance with prior empirical evidence, affective reactions followed the self‐enhancement theory and cognitive reactions were in line with the self‐consistency theory. Moreover, affective and cognitive reactions were influenced by the elaboration of a self‐conception and the discrepancy between the actual self and a personal standard as predicted. Regarding affective reactions, the predictions of the self‐enhancement theory were more clearly supported when self‐conceptions were less elaborated or when people perceived a high self‐discrepancy. Regarding cognitive reactions, the predictions of the self‐consistency theory were more clearly supported when self‐conceptions were highly elaborated or when people perceived a low self‐discrepancy. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-2772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199908/09)29:5/6&lt;725::AID-EJSP970&gt;3.0.CO;2-G</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EJSPA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition ; Criticism ; Factors ; Feedback ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human behaviour ; Personality. Affectivity ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Responses ; Self ; Self representation ; Self-concept ; Selfconcept ; Selfconsistency ; Selfenhancement ; Social interaction ; Social psychology ; Work standards</subject><ispartof>European journal of social psychology, 1999-08, Vol.29 (5-6), p.725-739</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1999 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5370-773f6db8eea342400df6561edc63fcccf34c41687aee614c6e6e25e408017e9a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,30979,33203</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1865793$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dauenheimer, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stahlberg, Dagmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Lars-Eric</creatorcontrib><title>Self-discrepancy and elaboration of self-conceptions as factors influencing reactions to feedback</title><title>European journal of social psychology</title><addtitle>Eur. J. Soc. Psychol</addtitle><description>Previous research examined the predictions of the self‐enhancement theory and the self‐consistency theory regarding reactions to self‐relevant feedback. In the present study two circumstances that are supposed to moderate self‐enhancement and self‐consistency motives have been examined: the elaboration of a self‐conception and the discrepancy between the actual self and a personal standard. One hundred and fourteen participants received either positive, consistent, or negative feedback regarding their results on a personality test. Affective and cognitive reactions to fictitious feedback were measured as dependent variables. In accordance with prior empirical evidence, affective reactions followed the self‐enhancement theory and cognitive reactions were in line with the self‐consistency theory. Moreover, affective and cognitive reactions were influenced by the elaboration of a self‐conception and the discrepancy between the actual self and a personal standard as predicted. Regarding affective reactions, the predictions of the self‐enhancement theory were more clearly supported when self‐conceptions were less elaborated or when people perceived a high self‐discrepancy. Regarding cognitive reactions, the predictions of the self‐consistency theory were more clearly supported when self‐conceptions were highly elaborated or when people perceived a low self‐discrepancy. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Factors</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human behaviour</subject><subject>Personality. Affectivity</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Responses</subject><subject>Self</subject><subject>Self representation</subject><subject>Self-concept</subject><subject>Selfconcept</subject><subject>Selfconsistency</subject><subject>Selfenhancement</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Work standards</subject><issn>0046-2772</issn><issn>1099-0992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV2LEzEUhgdRsK7-hwFFdi-mzcckmVQR1ulaK8tWqB83wiHNnMjszs7UpGW3_96MU1dQQS9CwuHJOe_hSZIZJWNKCJscrxbl4oQSrbN42DHVWpNiQvQJ01MxkS8VE9Pp6WKWnb1bvdeKvOJjMi6XL1g2v5eM7j7eT0aE5DJjSrGHyaMQLgkhWko-SswKG5dVdbAeN6a1-9S0VYqNWXfebOuuTTuXhp6xXWtx05dCakLqjN12PqR165odtrZuv6YeY_EHsO1Sh1itjb16nDxwpgn45HAfJR_fnH0o32bny_miPD3PrOCKZEpxJ6t1gWh4znJCKieFpFhZyZ211vHc5lQWyiBKmluJEpnAnBSEKtSGHyXPh74b333bYdjCddwKm8a02O0CCJXLXGjxT5AXSqpCsAg-_Q287Ha-jUsALZQiQnBNI_VloKzvQvDoYOPra-P3QAn0GgF6jdDbgN4GDBrjG5gGARKiRoCoEQ4agQOBcgkM5rH9s0MIE6xpnI-S6vBrRiGF0jxiMGA3dYP7PyL8T4K_B_hZihOyYUIdtnh7N8H4K5CKKwGfL-ZwIV-vZp_yAmb8O688z90</recordid><startdate>199908</startdate><enddate>199908</enddate><creator>Dauenheimer, Dirk</creator><creator>Stahlberg, Dagmar</creator><creator>Petersen, Lars-Eric</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQCIK</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199908</creationdate><title>Self-discrepancy and elaboration of self-conceptions as factors influencing reactions to feedback</title><author>Dauenheimer, Dirk ; Stahlberg, Dagmar ; Petersen, Lars-Eric</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5370-773f6db8eea342400df6561edc63fcccf34c41687aee614c6e6e25e408017e9a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Factors</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human behaviour</topic><topic>Personality. Affectivity</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Responses</topic><topic>Self</topic><topic>Self representation</topic><topic>Self-concept</topic><topic>Selfconcept</topic><topic>Selfconsistency</topic><topic>Selfenhancement</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Work standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dauenheimer, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stahlberg, Dagmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Lars-Eric</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 33</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>European journal of social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dauenheimer, Dirk</au><au>Stahlberg, Dagmar</au><au>Petersen, Lars-Eric</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Self-discrepancy and elaboration of self-conceptions as factors influencing reactions to feedback</atitle><jtitle>European journal of social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur. J. Soc. Psychol</addtitle><date>1999-08</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>5-6</issue><spage>725</spage><epage>739</epage><pages>725-739</pages><issn>0046-2772</issn><eissn>1099-0992</eissn><coden>EJSPA6</coden><abstract>Previous research examined the predictions of the self‐enhancement theory and the self‐consistency theory regarding reactions to self‐relevant feedback. In the present study two circumstances that are supposed to moderate self‐enhancement and self‐consistency motives have been examined: the elaboration of a self‐conception and the discrepancy between the actual self and a personal standard. One hundred and fourteen participants received either positive, consistent, or negative feedback regarding their results on a personality test. Affective and cognitive reactions to fictitious feedback were measured as dependent variables. In accordance with prior empirical evidence, affective reactions followed the self‐enhancement theory and cognitive reactions were in line with the self‐consistency theory. Moreover, affective and cognitive reactions were influenced by the elaboration of a self‐conception and the discrepancy between the actual self and a personal standard as predicted. Regarding affective reactions, the predictions of the self‐enhancement theory were more clearly supported when self‐conceptions were less elaborated or when people perceived a high self‐discrepancy. Regarding cognitive reactions, the predictions of the self‐consistency theory were more clearly supported when self‐conceptions were highly elaborated or when people perceived a low self‐discrepancy. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199908/09)29:5/6&lt;725::AID-EJSP970&gt;3.0.CO;2-G</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0046-2772
ispartof European journal of social psychology, 1999-08, Vol.29 (5-6), p.725-739
issn 0046-2772
1099-0992
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57464595
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Cognition
Criticism
Factors
Feedback
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human behaviour
Personality. Affectivity
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Responses
Self
Self representation
Self-concept
Selfconcept
Selfconsistency
Selfenhancement
Social interaction
Social psychology
Work standards
title Self-discrepancy and elaboration of self-conceptions as factors influencing reactions to feedback
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T17%3A33%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Self-discrepancy%20and%20elaboration%20of%20self-conceptions%20as%20factors%20influencing%20reactions%20to%20feedback&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Dauenheimer,%20Dirk&rft.date=1999-08&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=5-6&rft.spage=725&rft.epage=739&rft.pages=725-739&rft.issn=0046-2772&rft.eissn=1099-0992&rft.coden=EJSPA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199908/09)29:5/6%3C725::AID-EJSP970%3E3.0.CO;2-G&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38767852%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5370-773f6db8eea342400df6561edc63fcccf34c41687aee614c6e6e25e408017e9a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877055391&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true