Loading…

Response Transfer between Stimuli in Generalized Equivalence Classes: A Model for the Establishment of Natural Kind and Fuzzy Superordinate Categories

Two equivalence classes were formed by college students through training of AB, BC, and CD relations. The A, B, and C stimuli in both classes were nonsense words. The D stimulus in Class 1 was a short line; the D stimulus in Class 2 was a long line. Post-class-formation generalization tests of emerg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Psychological record 1996-10, Vol.46 (4), p.665-684
Main Authors: Fields, Lanny, Adams, Barbara J, Buffington, Dawn M, Yang, Wei, Verhave, Thom
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ac10e76a52c955ad7ac96603caaebb7e97a0897f8261a4bbcf88f8fcfb2265bb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ac10e76a52c955ad7ac96603caaebb7e97a0897f8261a4bbcf88f8fcfb2265bb3
container_end_page 684
container_issue 4
container_start_page 665
container_title The Psychological record
container_volume 46
creator Fields, Lanny
Adams, Barbara J
Buffington, Dawn M
Yang, Wei
Verhave, Thom
description Two equivalence classes were formed by college students through training of AB, BC, and CD relations. The A, B, and C stimuli in both classes were nonsense words. The D stimulus in Class 1 was a short line; the D stimulus in Class 2 was a long line. Post-class-formation generalization tests of emergent relations were conducted to determine which intermediate length lines (variants of the D stimuli) also acted as class members. Those variants and the A, B, C, and D stimuli formed a generalized equivalence class. After different responses were trained to the A1 and A2 stimuli, the response trained to the A1 stimulus transferred to the other Class-1 stimuli and the response trained to the A2 stimulus transferred to the other Class-2 stimuli. Responding also transferred to the variants that acted as members of each generalized equivalence class, indicating that the stimuli in each generalized equivalence class also acted as members of a corresponding functional class. For the line variants that were members of a generalized equivalence class, response transfer from the A stimuli was very highly predicted from the generalization gradients of the emergent relations. The processes that account for the formation of a generalized equivalence class and the transfer of responding between members of such a class will be used to account for the development of natural kind and superordinate fuzzy categories.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF03395191
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57475914</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A18911803</galeid><sourcerecordid>A18911803</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ac10e76a52c955ad7ac96603caaebb7e97a0897f8261a4bbcf88f8fcfb2265bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10t2KEzEUB_BBFKzVG58gKHghjuZjMpl4V0u7iquCu14PZzIn3SzTpJtklO2D-LxGKgiyEpLA4cefcHKq6imjrxml6s27LRVCS6bZvWrBWStq0Uh-v1rQUq-5FuJh9Sila0opa6haVD-_YjoEn5BcRvDJYiQD5h-Inlxkt58nR5wnZ-gxwuSOOJLNzey-w4TeIFlPkBKmt2RFPoURJ2JDJPkKySZlGCaXrvboMwmWfIY8lwTy0fmRQNnb-Xi8JRfzAWOIo_OQS1w5diE6TI-rBxamhE_-3Mvq23ZzuX5fn385-7BenddGaJprMIyiakFyo6WEUYHRbUuFAcBhUKgV0E4r2_GWQTMMxnad7ayxA-etHAaxrF6ccg8x3MyYcr93yeA0gccwp16qRknNmgKf_QOvwxx9eVvPGVeSKtkV9Px_iAnKOKVty4t6dVK70sXeeRtyBLM7tTh4tK6UV6zTjHXl15ZVfQcva8S9M3f5lydvYkgpou0P0e0h3vaM9r-HpP87JOIXfh6vqA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1301200662</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response Transfer between Stimuli in Generalized Equivalence Classes: A Model for the Establishment of Natural Kind and Fuzzy Superordinate Categories</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)</source><creator>Fields, Lanny ; Adams, Barbara J ; Buffington, Dawn M ; Yang, Wei ; Verhave, Thom</creator><creatorcontrib>Fields, Lanny ; Adams, Barbara J ; Buffington, Dawn M ; Yang, Wei ; Verhave, Thom</creatorcontrib><description>Two equivalence classes were formed by college students through training of AB, BC, and CD relations. The A, B, and C stimuli in both classes were nonsense words. The D stimulus in Class 1 was a short line; the D stimulus in Class 2 was a long line. Post-class-formation generalization tests of emergent relations were conducted to determine which intermediate length lines (variants of the D stimuli) also acted as class members. Those variants and the A, B, C, and D stimuli formed a generalized equivalence class. After different responses were trained to the A1 and A2 stimuli, the response trained to the A1 stimulus transferred to the other Class-1 stimuli and the response trained to the A2 stimulus transferred to the other Class-2 stimuli. Responding also transferred to the variants that acted as members of each generalized equivalence class, indicating that the stimuli in each generalized equivalence class also acted as members of a corresponding functional class. For the line variants that were members of a generalized equivalence class, response transfer from the A stimuli was very highly predicted from the generalization gradients of the emergent relations. The processes that account for the formation of a generalized equivalence class and the transfer of responding between members of such a class will be used to account for the development of natural kind and superordinate fuzzy categories.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2933</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2163-3452</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF03395191</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PYRCAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Granville, Ohio, etc: The Association for Behavior Analysis International</publisher><subject>Behavior ; College students ; Equivalence classes ; Feedback (Response) ; Perception ; Response bias ; Responses ; Social psychology ; Stimuli ; Transfer</subject><ispartof>The Psychological record, 1996-10, Vol.46 (4), p.665-684</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 1996 The Association for Behavior Analysis International</rights><rights>Copyright Psychological Record Fall 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ac10e76a52c955ad7ac96603caaebb7e97a0897f8261a4bbcf88f8fcfb2265bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ac10e76a52c955ad7ac96603caaebb7e97a0897f8261a4bbcf88f8fcfb2265bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1301200662/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1301200662?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,21378,21394,21395,27924,27925,30999,31000,33611,33612,33877,33878,34530,34531,43733,43880,44115,74093,74269,74511</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fields, Lanny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Barbara J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffington, Dawn M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhave, Thom</creatorcontrib><title>Response Transfer between Stimuli in Generalized Equivalence Classes: A Model for the Establishment of Natural Kind and Fuzzy Superordinate Categories</title><title>The Psychological record</title><description>Two equivalence classes were formed by college students through training of AB, BC, and CD relations. The A, B, and C stimuli in both classes were nonsense words. The D stimulus in Class 1 was a short line; the D stimulus in Class 2 was a long line. Post-class-formation generalization tests of emergent relations were conducted to determine which intermediate length lines (variants of the D stimuli) also acted as class members. Those variants and the A, B, C, and D stimuli formed a generalized equivalence class. After different responses were trained to the A1 and A2 stimuli, the response trained to the A1 stimulus transferred to the other Class-1 stimuli and the response trained to the A2 stimulus transferred to the other Class-2 stimuli. Responding also transferred to the variants that acted as members of each generalized equivalence class, indicating that the stimuli in each generalized equivalence class also acted as members of a corresponding functional class. For the line variants that were members of a generalized equivalence class, response transfer from the A stimuli was very highly predicted from the generalization gradients of the emergent relations. The processes that account for the formation of a generalized equivalence class and the transfer of responding between members of such a class will be used to account for the development of natural kind and superordinate fuzzy categories.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Equivalence classes</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Response bias</subject><subject>Responses</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>Transfer</subject><issn>0033-2933</issn><issn>2163-3452</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNp10t2KEzEUB_BBFKzVG58gKHghjuZjMpl4V0u7iquCu14PZzIn3SzTpJtklO2D-LxGKgiyEpLA4cefcHKq6imjrxml6s27LRVCS6bZvWrBWStq0Uh-v1rQUq-5FuJh9Sila0opa6haVD-_YjoEn5BcRvDJYiQD5h-Inlxkt58nR5wnZ-gxwuSOOJLNzey-w4TeIFlPkBKmt2RFPoURJ2JDJPkKySZlGCaXrvboMwmWfIY8lwTy0fmRQNnb-Xi8JRfzAWOIo_OQS1w5diE6TI-rBxamhE_-3Mvq23ZzuX5fn385-7BenddGaJprMIyiakFyo6WEUYHRbUuFAcBhUKgV0E4r2_GWQTMMxnad7ayxA-etHAaxrF6ccg8x3MyYcr93yeA0gccwp16qRknNmgKf_QOvwxx9eVvPGVeSKtkV9Px_iAnKOKVty4t6dVK70sXeeRtyBLM7tTh4tK6UV6zTjHXl15ZVfQcva8S9M3f5lydvYkgpou0P0e0h3vaM9r-HpP87JOIXfh6vqA</recordid><startdate>19961001</startdate><enddate>19961001</enddate><creator>Fields, Lanny</creator><creator>Adams, Barbara J</creator><creator>Buffington, Dawn M</creator><creator>Yang, Wei</creator><creator>Verhave, Thom</creator><general>The Association for Behavior Analysis International</general><general>Denison University, etc</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ADABO</scope><scope>BEAJS</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDPSG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PEXHY</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SAAPM</scope><scope>~P9</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19961001</creationdate><title>Response Transfer between Stimuli in Generalized Equivalence Classes: A Model for the Establishment of Natural Kind and Fuzzy Superordinate Categories</title><author>Fields, Lanny ; Adams, Barbara J ; Buffington, Dawn M ; Yang, Wei ; Verhave, Thom</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ac10e76a52c955ad7ac96603caaebb7e97a0897f8261a4bbcf88f8fcfb2265bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Equivalence classes</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Response bias</topic><topic>Responses</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>Transfer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fields, Lanny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Barbara J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffington, Dawn M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhave, Thom</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 3 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 3</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 9.2</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 3.2</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 42</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 9</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Psychological record</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fields, Lanny</au><au>Adams, Barbara J</au><au>Buffington, Dawn M</au><au>Yang, Wei</au><au>Verhave, Thom</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response Transfer between Stimuli in Generalized Equivalence Classes: A Model for the Establishment of Natural Kind and Fuzzy Superordinate Categories</atitle><jtitle>The Psychological record</jtitle><date>1996-10-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>665</spage><epage>684</epage><pages>665-684</pages><issn>0033-2933</issn><eissn>2163-3452</eissn><coden>PYRCAI</coden><abstract>Two equivalence classes were formed by college students through training of AB, BC, and CD relations. The A, B, and C stimuli in both classes were nonsense words. The D stimulus in Class 1 was a short line; the D stimulus in Class 2 was a long line. Post-class-formation generalization tests of emergent relations were conducted to determine which intermediate length lines (variants of the D stimuli) also acted as class members. Those variants and the A, B, C, and D stimuli formed a generalized equivalence class. After different responses were trained to the A1 and A2 stimuli, the response trained to the A1 stimulus transferred to the other Class-1 stimuli and the response trained to the A2 stimulus transferred to the other Class-2 stimuli. Responding also transferred to the variants that acted as members of each generalized equivalence class, indicating that the stimuli in each generalized equivalence class also acted as members of a corresponding functional class. For the line variants that were members of a generalized equivalence class, response transfer from the A stimuli was very highly predicted from the generalization gradients of the emergent relations. The processes that account for the formation of a generalized equivalence class and the transfer of responding between members of such a class will be used to account for the development of natural kind and superordinate fuzzy categories.</abstract><cop>Granville, Ohio, etc</cop><pub>The Association for Behavior Analysis International</pub><doi>10.1007/BF03395191</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-2933
ispartof The Psychological record, 1996-10, Vol.46 (4), p.665-684
issn 0033-2933
2163-3452
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57475914
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Sociology Collection; BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)
subjects Behavior
College students
Equivalence classes
Feedback (Response)
Perception
Response bias
Responses
Social psychology
Stimuli
Transfer
title Response Transfer between Stimuli in Generalized Equivalence Classes: A Model for the Establishment of Natural Kind and Fuzzy Superordinate Categories
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A15%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20Transfer%20between%20Stimuli%20in%20Generalized%20Equivalence%20Classes:%20A%20Model%20for%20the%20Establishment%20of%20Natural%20Kind%20and%20Fuzzy%20Superordinate%20Categories&rft.jtitle=The%20Psychological%20record&rft.au=Fields,%20Lanny&rft.date=1996-10-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=665&rft.epage=684&rft.pages=665-684&rft.issn=0033-2933&rft.eissn=2163-3452&rft.coden=PYRCAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF03395191&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA18911803%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ac10e76a52c955ad7ac96603caaebb7e97a0897f8261a4bbcf88f8fcfb2265bb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1301200662&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A18911803&rfr_iscdi=true