Loading…
Response Transfer between Stimuli in Generalized Equivalence Classes: A Model for the Establishment of Natural Kind and Fuzzy Superordinate Categories
Two equivalence classes were formed by college students through training of AB, BC, and CD relations. The A, B, and C stimuli in both classes were nonsense words. The D stimulus in Class 1 was a short line; the D stimulus in Class 2 was a long line. Post-class-formation generalization tests of emerg...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Psychological record 1996-10, Vol.46 (4), p.665-684 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ac10e76a52c955ad7ac96603caaebb7e97a0897f8261a4bbcf88f8fcfb2265bb3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ac10e76a52c955ad7ac96603caaebb7e97a0897f8261a4bbcf88f8fcfb2265bb3 |
container_end_page | 684 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 665 |
container_title | The Psychological record |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Fields, Lanny Adams, Barbara J Buffington, Dawn M Yang, Wei Verhave, Thom |
description | Two equivalence classes were formed by college students through training of AB, BC, and CD relations. The A, B, and C stimuli in both classes were nonsense words. The D stimulus in Class 1 was a short line; the D stimulus in Class 2 was a long line. Post-class-formation generalization tests of emergent relations were conducted to determine which intermediate length lines (variants of the D stimuli) also acted as class members. Those variants and the A, B, C, and D stimuli formed a generalized equivalence class. After different responses were trained to the A1 and A2 stimuli, the response trained to the A1 stimulus transferred to the other Class-1 stimuli and the response trained to the A2 stimulus transferred to the other Class-2 stimuli. Responding also transferred to the variants that acted as members of each generalized equivalence class, indicating that the stimuli in each generalized equivalence class also acted as members of a corresponding functional class. For the line variants that were members of a generalized equivalence class, response transfer from the A stimuli was very highly predicted from the generalization gradients of the emergent relations. The processes that account for the formation of a generalized equivalence class and the transfer of responding between members of such a class will be used to account for the development of natural kind and superordinate fuzzy categories. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF03395191 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57475914</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A18911803</galeid><sourcerecordid>A18911803</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ac10e76a52c955ad7ac96603caaebb7e97a0897f8261a4bbcf88f8fcfb2265bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10t2KEzEUB_BBFKzVG58gKHghjuZjMpl4V0u7iquCu14PZzIn3SzTpJtklO2D-LxGKgiyEpLA4cefcHKq6imjrxml6s27LRVCS6bZvWrBWStq0Uh-v1rQUq-5FuJh9Sila0opa6haVD-_YjoEn5BcRvDJYiQD5h-Inlxkt58nR5wnZ-gxwuSOOJLNzey-w4TeIFlPkBKmt2RFPoURJ2JDJPkKySZlGCaXrvboMwmWfIY8lwTy0fmRQNnb-Xi8JRfzAWOIo_OQS1w5diE6TI-rBxamhE_-3Mvq23ZzuX5fn385-7BenddGaJprMIyiakFyo6WEUYHRbUuFAcBhUKgV0E4r2_GWQTMMxnad7ayxA-etHAaxrF6ccg8x3MyYcr93yeA0gccwp16qRknNmgKf_QOvwxx9eVvPGVeSKtkV9Px_iAnKOKVty4t6dVK70sXeeRtyBLM7tTh4tK6UV6zTjHXl15ZVfQcva8S9M3f5lydvYkgpou0P0e0h3vaM9r-HpP87JOIXfh6vqA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1301200662</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response Transfer between Stimuli in Generalized Equivalence Classes: A Model for the Establishment of Natural Kind and Fuzzy Superordinate Categories</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)</source><creator>Fields, Lanny ; Adams, Barbara J ; Buffington, Dawn M ; Yang, Wei ; Verhave, Thom</creator><creatorcontrib>Fields, Lanny ; Adams, Barbara J ; Buffington, Dawn M ; Yang, Wei ; Verhave, Thom</creatorcontrib><description>Two equivalence classes were formed by college students through training of AB, BC, and CD relations. The A, B, and C stimuli in both classes were nonsense words. The D stimulus in Class 1 was a short line; the D stimulus in Class 2 was a long line. Post-class-formation generalization tests of emergent relations were conducted to determine which intermediate length lines (variants of the D stimuli) also acted as class members. Those variants and the A, B, C, and D stimuli formed a generalized equivalence class. After different responses were trained to the A1 and A2 stimuli, the response trained to the A1 stimulus transferred to the other Class-1 stimuli and the response trained to the A2 stimulus transferred to the other Class-2 stimuli. Responding also transferred to the variants that acted as members of each generalized equivalence class, indicating that the stimuli in each generalized equivalence class also acted as members of a corresponding functional class. For the line variants that were members of a generalized equivalence class, response transfer from the A stimuli was very highly predicted from the generalization gradients of the emergent relations. The processes that account for the formation of a generalized equivalence class and the transfer of responding between members of such a class will be used to account for the development of natural kind and superordinate fuzzy categories.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2933</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2163-3452</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF03395191</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PYRCAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Granville, Ohio, etc: The Association for Behavior Analysis International</publisher><subject>Behavior ; College students ; Equivalence classes ; Feedback (Response) ; Perception ; Response bias ; Responses ; Social psychology ; Stimuli ; Transfer</subject><ispartof>The Psychological record, 1996-10, Vol.46 (4), p.665-684</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 1996 The Association for Behavior Analysis International</rights><rights>Copyright Psychological Record Fall 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ac10e76a52c955ad7ac96603caaebb7e97a0897f8261a4bbcf88f8fcfb2265bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ac10e76a52c955ad7ac96603caaebb7e97a0897f8261a4bbcf88f8fcfb2265bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1301200662/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1301200662?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,21378,21394,21395,27924,27925,30999,31000,33611,33612,33877,33878,34530,34531,43733,43880,44115,74093,74269,74511</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fields, Lanny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Barbara J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffington, Dawn M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhave, Thom</creatorcontrib><title>Response Transfer between Stimuli in Generalized Equivalence Classes: A Model for the Establishment of Natural Kind and Fuzzy Superordinate Categories</title><title>The Psychological record</title><description>Two equivalence classes were formed by college students through training of AB, BC, and CD relations. The A, B, and C stimuli in both classes were nonsense words. The D stimulus in Class 1 was a short line; the D stimulus in Class 2 was a long line. Post-class-formation generalization tests of emergent relations were conducted to determine which intermediate length lines (variants of the D stimuli) also acted as class members. Those variants and the A, B, C, and D stimuli formed a generalized equivalence class. After different responses were trained to the A1 and A2 stimuli, the response trained to the A1 stimulus transferred to the other Class-1 stimuli and the response trained to the A2 stimulus transferred to the other Class-2 stimuli. Responding also transferred to the variants that acted as members of each generalized equivalence class, indicating that the stimuli in each generalized equivalence class also acted as members of a corresponding functional class. For the line variants that were members of a generalized equivalence class, response transfer from the A stimuli was very highly predicted from the generalization gradients of the emergent relations. The processes that account for the formation of a generalized equivalence class and the transfer of responding between members of such a class will be used to account for the development of natural kind and superordinate fuzzy categories.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Equivalence classes</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Response bias</subject><subject>Responses</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>Transfer</subject><issn>0033-2933</issn><issn>2163-3452</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNp10t2KEzEUB_BBFKzVG58gKHghjuZjMpl4V0u7iquCu14PZzIn3SzTpJtklO2D-LxGKgiyEpLA4cefcHKq6imjrxml6s27LRVCS6bZvWrBWStq0Uh-v1rQUq-5FuJh9Sila0opa6haVD-_YjoEn5BcRvDJYiQD5h-Inlxkt58nR5wnZ-gxwuSOOJLNzey-w4TeIFlPkBKmt2RFPoURJ2JDJPkKySZlGCaXrvboMwmWfIY8lwTy0fmRQNnb-Xi8JRfzAWOIo_OQS1w5diE6TI-rBxamhE_-3Mvq23ZzuX5fn385-7BenddGaJprMIyiakFyo6WEUYHRbUuFAcBhUKgV0E4r2_GWQTMMxnad7ayxA-etHAaxrF6ccg8x3MyYcr93yeA0gccwp16qRknNmgKf_QOvwxx9eVvPGVeSKtkV9Px_iAnKOKVty4t6dVK70sXeeRtyBLM7tTh4tK6UV6zTjHXl15ZVfQcva8S9M3f5lydvYkgpou0P0e0h3vaM9r-HpP87JOIXfh6vqA</recordid><startdate>19961001</startdate><enddate>19961001</enddate><creator>Fields, Lanny</creator><creator>Adams, Barbara J</creator><creator>Buffington, Dawn M</creator><creator>Yang, Wei</creator><creator>Verhave, Thom</creator><general>The Association for Behavior Analysis International</general><general>Denison University, etc</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ADABO</scope><scope>BEAJS</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDPSG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PEXHY</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SAAPM</scope><scope>~P9</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19961001</creationdate><title>Response Transfer between Stimuli in Generalized Equivalence Classes: A Model for the Establishment of Natural Kind and Fuzzy Superordinate Categories</title><author>Fields, Lanny ; Adams, Barbara J ; Buffington, Dawn M ; Yang, Wei ; Verhave, Thom</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ac10e76a52c955ad7ac96603caaebb7e97a0897f8261a4bbcf88f8fcfb2265bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Equivalence classes</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Response bias</topic><topic>Responses</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>Transfer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fields, Lanny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Barbara J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffington, Dawn M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhave, Thom</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 3 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 3</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 9.2</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 3.2</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 42</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 9</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Psychological record</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fields, Lanny</au><au>Adams, Barbara J</au><au>Buffington, Dawn M</au><au>Yang, Wei</au><au>Verhave, Thom</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response Transfer between Stimuli in Generalized Equivalence Classes: A Model for the Establishment of Natural Kind and Fuzzy Superordinate Categories</atitle><jtitle>The Psychological record</jtitle><date>1996-10-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>665</spage><epage>684</epage><pages>665-684</pages><issn>0033-2933</issn><eissn>2163-3452</eissn><coden>PYRCAI</coden><abstract>Two equivalence classes were formed by college students through training of AB, BC, and CD relations. The A, B, and C stimuli in both classes were nonsense words. The D stimulus in Class 1 was a short line; the D stimulus in Class 2 was a long line. Post-class-formation generalization tests of emergent relations were conducted to determine which intermediate length lines (variants of the D stimuli) also acted as class members. Those variants and the A, B, C, and D stimuli formed a generalized equivalence class. After different responses were trained to the A1 and A2 stimuli, the response trained to the A1 stimulus transferred to the other Class-1 stimuli and the response trained to the A2 stimulus transferred to the other Class-2 stimuli. Responding also transferred to the variants that acted as members of each generalized equivalence class, indicating that the stimuli in each generalized equivalence class also acted as members of a corresponding functional class. For the line variants that were members of a generalized equivalence class, response transfer from the A stimuli was very highly predicted from the generalization gradients of the emergent relations. The processes that account for the formation of a generalized equivalence class and the transfer of responding between members of such a class will be used to account for the development of natural kind and superordinate fuzzy categories.</abstract><cop>Granville, Ohio, etc</cop><pub>The Association for Behavior Analysis International</pub><doi>10.1007/BF03395191</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-2933 |
ispartof | The Psychological record, 1996-10, Vol.46 (4), p.665-684 |
issn | 0033-2933 2163-3452 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57475914 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Sociology Collection; BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate) |
subjects | Behavior College students Equivalence classes Feedback (Response) Perception Response bias Responses Social psychology Stimuli Transfer |
title | Response Transfer between Stimuli in Generalized Equivalence Classes: A Model for the Establishment of Natural Kind and Fuzzy Superordinate Categories |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A15%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20Transfer%20between%20Stimuli%20in%20Generalized%20Equivalence%20Classes:%20A%20Model%20for%20the%20Establishment%20of%20Natural%20Kind%20and%20Fuzzy%20Superordinate%20Categories&rft.jtitle=The%20Psychological%20record&rft.au=Fields,%20Lanny&rft.date=1996-10-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=665&rft.epage=684&rft.pages=665-684&rft.issn=0033-2933&rft.eissn=2163-3452&rft.coden=PYRCAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF03395191&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA18911803%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ac10e76a52c955ad7ac96603caaebb7e97a0897f8261a4bbcf88f8fcfb2265bb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1301200662&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A18911803&rfr_iscdi=true |