Loading…
Evaluating the effectiveness of visual user interfaces for information retrieval
An integrated visual thesaurus and results browser to support information retrieval was designed using a task model of information searching. The system provided a hierarchical thesaurus with a results cluster display representing similarity between retrieved documents and relevance ranking using a...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of human-computer studies 2000-11, Vol.53 (5), p.741-763 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-b8e0b6b0a176c6ddbdd19278eb9c452d46f396d1692efc952c7d8464328283d63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-b8e0b6b0a176c6ddbdd19278eb9c452d46f396d1692efc952c7d8464328283d63 |
container_end_page | 763 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 741 |
container_title | International journal of human-computer studies |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | SUTCLIFFE, A.G. ENNIS, M. HU, J. |
description | An integrated visual thesaurus and results browser to support information retrieval was designed using a task model of information searching. The system provided a hierarchical thesaurus with a results cluster display representing similarity between retrieved documents and relevance ranking using a bullseye metaphor. Latent semantic indexing (LSI) was used as the retrieval engine and to calculate the similarity between documents. The design was tested with two information retrieval tasks. User behaviour, performance and attitude were recorded as well as usability problems. The system had few usability problems and users liked the visualizations, but recall performance was poor. The reasons for poor/good performance were investigated by examining user behaviour and search strategies. Better searchers used the visualizations more effectively and spent longer on the task, whereas poorer performances were attributable to poor motivation, difficulty in assessing article relevance and poor use of system visualizations. The bullseye browser display appeared to encourage limited evaluation of article relevance on titles, leading to poor performance. The bullseye display metaphor for article relevance was understood by users; however, they were confused by the concept of similarity searching expressed as visual clusters. The conclusions from the study are that while visual user interfaces for information searching might seem to be usable, they may not actually improve performance. Training and advisor facilities for effective search strategies need to be incorporated to enhance the effectiveness of visual user interfaces for information retrieval. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1006/ijhc.2000.0416 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57549272</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1071581900904166</els_id><sourcerecordid>26614985</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-b8e0b6b0a176c6ddbdd19278eb9c452d46f396d1692efc952c7d8464328283d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9PwyAYhonRxDm9eubkrRMopXA0y_yRLNGDngmFD8fStRPaJv730syr8fLxkTzvm3wPQreUrCgh4j7sd3bFCCErwqk4QwtKVFWokpDzea9pUUmqLtFVSvtM1ZyQBXrbTKYdzRC6TzzsAIP3YIcwQQcp4d7jKaTRtHhMEHHoBojeWEjY9_M3z0PO9h2OMMQAuesaXXjTJrj5fZfo43Hzvn4utq9PL-uHbWFLLoeikUAa0RBDa2GFc41zVLFaQqMsr5jjwpdKOCoUA29VxWztJBe8ZJLJ0olyie5OvcfYf42QBn0IyULbmg76MemqrnguZP-CTAjKlawyuDqBNvYpRfD6GMPBxG9NiZ4N69mwng3r2XAOyFMA8p1TgKiTDdBZcCFmidr14a_oDzbBgvo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>26614985</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the effectiveness of visual user interfaces for information retrieval</title><source>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>SUTCLIFFE, A.G. ; ENNIS, M. ; HU, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>SUTCLIFFE, A.G. ; ENNIS, M. ; HU, J.</creatorcontrib><description>An integrated visual thesaurus and results browser to support information retrieval was designed using a task model of information searching. The system provided a hierarchical thesaurus with a results cluster display representing similarity between retrieved documents and relevance ranking using a bullseye metaphor. Latent semantic indexing (LSI) was used as the retrieval engine and to calculate the similarity between documents. The design was tested with two information retrieval tasks. User behaviour, performance and attitude were recorded as well as usability problems. The system had few usability problems and users liked the visualizations, but recall performance was poor. The reasons for poor/good performance were investigated by examining user behaviour and search strategies. Better searchers used the visualizations more effectively and spent longer on the task, whereas poorer performances were attributable to poor motivation, difficulty in assessing article relevance and poor use of system visualizations. The bullseye browser display appeared to encourage limited evaluation of article relevance on titles, leading to poor performance. The bullseye display metaphor for article relevance was understood by users; however, they were confused by the concept of similarity searching expressed as visual clusters. The conclusions from the study are that while visual user interfaces for information searching might seem to be usable, they may not actually improve performance. Training and advisor facilities for effective search strategies need to be incorporated to enhance the effectiveness of visual user interfaces for information retrieval.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1071-5819</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9300</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/ijhc.2000.0416</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Computerized information storage and retrieval ; Evaluation ; Searching ; User interface ; Visualization</subject><ispartof>International journal of human-computer studies, 2000-11, Vol.53 (5), p.741-763</ispartof><rights>2000 Academic Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-b8e0b6b0a176c6ddbdd19278eb9c452d46f396d1692efc952c7d8464328283d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-b8e0b6b0a176c6ddbdd19278eb9c452d46f396d1692efc952c7d8464328283d63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,34136</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>SUTCLIFFE, A.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ENNIS, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HU, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the effectiveness of visual user interfaces for information retrieval</title><title>International journal of human-computer studies</title><description>An integrated visual thesaurus and results browser to support information retrieval was designed using a task model of information searching. The system provided a hierarchical thesaurus with a results cluster display representing similarity between retrieved documents and relevance ranking using a bullseye metaphor. Latent semantic indexing (LSI) was used as the retrieval engine and to calculate the similarity between documents. The design was tested with two information retrieval tasks. User behaviour, performance and attitude were recorded as well as usability problems. The system had few usability problems and users liked the visualizations, but recall performance was poor. The reasons for poor/good performance were investigated by examining user behaviour and search strategies. Better searchers used the visualizations more effectively and spent longer on the task, whereas poorer performances were attributable to poor motivation, difficulty in assessing article relevance and poor use of system visualizations. The bullseye browser display appeared to encourage limited evaluation of article relevance on titles, leading to poor performance. The bullseye display metaphor for article relevance was understood by users; however, they were confused by the concept of similarity searching expressed as visual clusters. The conclusions from the study are that while visual user interfaces for information searching might seem to be usable, they may not actually improve performance. Training and advisor facilities for effective search strategies need to be incorporated to enhance the effectiveness of visual user interfaces for information retrieval.</description><subject>Computerized information storage and retrieval</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Searching</subject><subject>User interface</subject><subject>Visualization</subject><issn>1071-5819</issn><issn>1095-9300</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM9PwyAYhonRxDm9eubkrRMopXA0y_yRLNGDngmFD8fStRPaJv730syr8fLxkTzvm3wPQreUrCgh4j7sd3bFCCErwqk4QwtKVFWokpDzea9pUUmqLtFVSvtM1ZyQBXrbTKYdzRC6TzzsAIP3YIcwQQcp4d7jKaTRtHhMEHHoBojeWEjY9_M3z0PO9h2OMMQAuesaXXjTJrj5fZfo43Hzvn4utq9PL-uHbWFLLoeikUAa0RBDa2GFc41zVLFaQqMsr5jjwpdKOCoUA29VxWztJBe8ZJLJ0olyie5OvcfYf42QBn0IyULbmg76MemqrnguZP-CTAjKlawyuDqBNvYpRfD6GMPBxG9NiZ4N69mwng3r2XAOyFMA8p1TgKiTDdBZcCFmidr14a_oDzbBgvo</recordid><startdate>20001101</startdate><enddate>20001101</enddate><creator>SUTCLIFFE, A.G.</creator><creator>ENNIS, M.</creator><creator>HU, J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001101</creationdate><title>Evaluating the effectiveness of visual user interfaces for information retrieval</title><author>SUTCLIFFE, A.G. ; ENNIS, M. ; HU, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-b8e0b6b0a176c6ddbdd19278eb9c452d46f396d1692efc952c7d8464328283d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Computerized information storage and retrieval</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Searching</topic><topic>User interface</topic><topic>Visualization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SUTCLIFFE, A.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ENNIS, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HU, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><jtitle>International journal of human-computer studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SUTCLIFFE, A.G.</au><au>ENNIS, M.</au><au>HU, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the effectiveness of visual user interfaces for information retrieval</atitle><jtitle>International journal of human-computer studies</jtitle><date>2000-11-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>741</spage><epage>763</epage><pages>741-763</pages><issn>1071-5819</issn><eissn>1095-9300</eissn><abstract>An integrated visual thesaurus and results browser to support information retrieval was designed using a task model of information searching. The system provided a hierarchical thesaurus with a results cluster display representing similarity between retrieved documents and relevance ranking using a bullseye metaphor. Latent semantic indexing (LSI) was used as the retrieval engine and to calculate the similarity between documents. The design was tested with two information retrieval tasks. User behaviour, performance and attitude were recorded as well as usability problems. The system had few usability problems and users liked the visualizations, but recall performance was poor. The reasons for poor/good performance were investigated by examining user behaviour and search strategies. Better searchers used the visualizations more effectively and spent longer on the task, whereas poorer performances were attributable to poor motivation, difficulty in assessing article relevance and poor use of system visualizations. The bullseye browser display appeared to encourage limited evaluation of article relevance on titles, leading to poor performance. The bullseye display metaphor for article relevance was understood by users; however, they were confused by the concept of similarity searching expressed as visual clusters. The conclusions from the study are that while visual user interfaces for information searching might seem to be usable, they may not actually improve performance. Training and advisor facilities for effective search strategies need to be incorporated to enhance the effectiveness of visual user interfaces for information retrieval.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1006/ijhc.2000.0416</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1071-5819 |
ispartof | International journal of human-computer studies, 2000-11, Vol.53 (5), p.741-763 |
issn | 1071-5819 1095-9300 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57549272 |
source | Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Computerized information storage and retrieval Evaluation Searching User interface Visualization |
title | Evaluating the effectiveness of visual user interfaces for information retrieval |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T09%3A07%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20effectiveness%20of%20visual%20user%20interfaces%20for%20information%20retrieval&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20human-computer%20studies&rft.au=SUTCLIFFE,%20A.G.&rft.date=2000-11-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=741&rft.epage=763&rft.pages=741-763&rft.issn=1071-5819&rft.eissn=1095-9300&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/ijhc.2000.0416&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E26614985%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-b8e0b6b0a176c6ddbdd19278eb9c452d46f396d1692efc952c7d8464328283d63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=26614985&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |