Loading…

Evaluating the effectiveness of visual user interfaces for information retrieval

An integrated visual thesaurus and results browser to support information retrieval was designed using a task model of information searching. The system provided a hierarchical thesaurus with a results cluster display representing similarity between retrieved documents and relevance ranking using a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of human-computer studies 2000-11, Vol.53 (5), p.741-763
Main Authors: SUTCLIFFE, A.G., ENNIS, M., HU, J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-b8e0b6b0a176c6ddbdd19278eb9c452d46f396d1692efc952c7d8464328283d63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-b8e0b6b0a176c6ddbdd19278eb9c452d46f396d1692efc952c7d8464328283d63
container_end_page 763
container_issue 5
container_start_page 741
container_title International journal of human-computer studies
container_volume 53
creator SUTCLIFFE, A.G.
ENNIS, M.
HU, J.
description An integrated visual thesaurus and results browser to support information retrieval was designed using a task model of information searching. The system provided a hierarchical thesaurus with a results cluster display representing similarity between retrieved documents and relevance ranking using a bullseye metaphor. Latent semantic indexing (LSI) was used as the retrieval engine and to calculate the similarity between documents. The design was tested with two information retrieval tasks. User behaviour, performance and attitude were recorded as well as usability problems. The system had few usability problems and users liked the visualizations, but recall performance was poor. The reasons for poor/good performance were investigated by examining user behaviour and search strategies. Better searchers used the visualizations more effectively and spent longer on the task, whereas poorer performances were attributable to poor motivation, difficulty in assessing article relevance and poor use of system visualizations. The bullseye browser display appeared to encourage limited evaluation of article relevance on titles, leading to poor performance. The bullseye display metaphor for article relevance was understood by users; however, they were confused by the concept of similarity searching expressed as visual clusters. The conclusions from the study are that while visual user interfaces for information searching might seem to be usable, they may not actually improve performance. Training and advisor facilities for effective search strategies need to be incorporated to enhance the effectiveness of visual user interfaces for information retrieval.
doi_str_mv 10.1006/ijhc.2000.0416
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57549272</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1071581900904166</els_id><sourcerecordid>26614985</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-b8e0b6b0a176c6ddbdd19278eb9c452d46f396d1692efc952c7d8464328283d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9PwyAYhonRxDm9eubkrRMopXA0y_yRLNGDngmFD8fStRPaJv730syr8fLxkTzvm3wPQreUrCgh4j7sd3bFCCErwqk4QwtKVFWokpDzea9pUUmqLtFVSvtM1ZyQBXrbTKYdzRC6TzzsAIP3YIcwQQcp4d7jKaTRtHhMEHHoBojeWEjY9_M3z0PO9h2OMMQAuesaXXjTJrj5fZfo43Hzvn4utq9PL-uHbWFLLoeikUAa0RBDa2GFc41zVLFaQqMsr5jjwpdKOCoUA29VxWztJBe8ZJLJ0olyie5OvcfYf42QBn0IyULbmg76MemqrnguZP-CTAjKlawyuDqBNvYpRfD6GMPBxG9NiZ4N69mwng3r2XAOyFMA8p1TgKiTDdBZcCFmidr14a_oDzbBgvo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>26614985</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the effectiveness of visual user interfaces for information retrieval</title><source>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>SUTCLIFFE, A.G. ; ENNIS, M. ; HU, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>SUTCLIFFE, A.G. ; ENNIS, M. ; HU, J.</creatorcontrib><description>An integrated visual thesaurus and results browser to support information retrieval was designed using a task model of information searching. The system provided a hierarchical thesaurus with a results cluster display representing similarity between retrieved documents and relevance ranking using a bullseye metaphor. Latent semantic indexing (LSI) was used as the retrieval engine and to calculate the similarity between documents. The design was tested with two information retrieval tasks. User behaviour, performance and attitude were recorded as well as usability problems. The system had few usability problems and users liked the visualizations, but recall performance was poor. The reasons for poor/good performance were investigated by examining user behaviour and search strategies. Better searchers used the visualizations more effectively and spent longer on the task, whereas poorer performances were attributable to poor motivation, difficulty in assessing article relevance and poor use of system visualizations. The bullseye browser display appeared to encourage limited evaluation of article relevance on titles, leading to poor performance. The bullseye display metaphor for article relevance was understood by users; however, they were confused by the concept of similarity searching expressed as visual clusters. The conclusions from the study are that while visual user interfaces for information searching might seem to be usable, they may not actually improve performance. Training and advisor facilities for effective search strategies need to be incorporated to enhance the effectiveness of visual user interfaces for information retrieval.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1071-5819</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9300</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/ijhc.2000.0416</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Computerized information storage and retrieval ; Evaluation ; Searching ; User interface ; Visualization</subject><ispartof>International journal of human-computer studies, 2000-11, Vol.53 (5), p.741-763</ispartof><rights>2000 Academic Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-b8e0b6b0a176c6ddbdd19278eb9c452d46f396d1692efc952c7d8464328283d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-b8e0b6b0a176c6ddbdd19278eb9c452d46f396d1692efc952c7d8464328283d63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,34136</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>SUTCLIFFE, A.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ENNIS, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HU, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the effectiveness of visual user interfaces for information retrieval</title><title>International journal of human-computer studies</title><description>An integrated visual thesaurus and results browser to support information retrieval was designed using a task model of information searching. The system provided a hierarchical thesaurus with a results cluster display representing similarity between retrieved documents and relevance ranking using a bullseye metaphor. Latent semantic indexing (LSI) was used as the retrieval engine and to calculate the similarity between documents. The design was tested with two information retrieval tasks. User behaviour, performance and attitude were recorded as well as usability problems. The system had few usability problems and users liked the visualizations, but recall performance was poor. The reasons for poor/good performance were investigated by examining user behaviour and search strategies. Better searchers used the visualizations more effectively and spent longer on the task, whereas poorer performances were attributable to poor motivation, difficulty in assessing article relevance and poor use of system visualizations. The bullseye browser display appeared to encourage limited evaluation of article relevance on titles, leading to poor performance. The bullseye display metaphor for article relevance was understood by users; however, they were confused by the concept of similarity searching expressed as visual clusters. The conclusions from the study are that while visual user interfaces for information searching might seem to be usable, they may not actually improve performance. Training and advisor facilities for effective search strategies need to be incorporated to enhance the effectiveness of visual user interfaces for information retrieval.</description><subject>Computerized information storage and retrieval</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Searching</subject><subject>User interface</subject><subject>Visualization</subject><issn>1071-5819</issn><issn>1095-9300</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM9PwyAYhonRxDm9eubkrRMopXA0y_yRLNGDngmFD8fStRPaJv730syr8fLxkTzvm3wPQreUrCgh4j7sd3bFCCErwqk4QwtKVFWokpDzea9pUUmqLtFVSvtM1ZyQBXrbTKYdzRC6TzzsAIP3YIcwQQcp4d7jKaTRtHhMEHHoBojeWEjY9_M3z0PO9h2OMMQAuesaXXjTJrj5fZfo43Hzvn4utq9PL-uHbWFLLoeikUAa0RBDa2GFc41zVLFaQqMsr5jjwpdKOCoUA29VxWztJBe8ZJLJ0olyie5OvcfYf42QBn0IyULbmg76MemqrnguZP-CTAjKlawyuDqBNvYpRfD6GMPBxG9NiZ4N69mwng3r2XAOyFMA8p1TgKiTDdBZcCFmidr14a_oDzbBgvo</recordid><startdate>20001101</startdate><enddate>20001101</enddate><creator>SUTCLIFFE, A.G.</creator><creator>ENNIS, M.</creator><creator>HU, J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001101</creationdate><title>Evaluating the effectiveness of visual user interfaces for information retrieval</title><author>SUTCLIFFE, A.G. ; ENNIS, M. ; HU, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-b8e0b6b0a176c6ddbdd19278eb9c452d46f396d1692efc952c7d8464328283d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Computerized information storage and retrieval</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Searching</topic><topic>User interface</topic><topic>Visualization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SUTCLIFFE, A.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ENNIS, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HU, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><jtitle>International journal of human-computer studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SUTCLIFFE, A.G.</au><au>ENNIS, M.</au><au>HU, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the effectiveness of visual user interfaces for information retrieval</atitle><jtitle>International journal of human-computer studies</jtitle><date>2000-11-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>741</spage><epage>763</epage><pages>741-763</pages><issn>1071-5819</issn><eissn>1095-9300</eissn><abstract>An integrated visual thesaurus and results browser to support information retrieval was designed using a task model of information searching. The system provided a hierarchical thesaurus with a results cluster display representing similarity between retrieved documents and relevance ranking using a bullseye metaphor. Latent semantic indexing (LSI) was used as the retrieval engine and to calculate the similarity between documents. The design was tested with two information retrieval tasks. User behaviour, performance and attitude were recorded as well as usability problems. The system had few usability problems and users liked the visualizations, but recall performance was poor. The reasons for poor/good performance were investigated by examining user behaviour and search strategies. Better searchers used the visualizations more effectively and spent longer on the task, whereas poorer performances were attributable to poor motivation, difficulty in assessing article relevance and poor use of system visualizations. The bullseye browser display appeared to encourage limited evaluation of article relevance on titles, leading to poor performance. The bullseye display metaphor for article relevance was understood by users; however, they were confused by the concept of similarity searching expressed as visual clusters. The conclusions from the study are that while visual user interfaces for information searching might seem to be usable, they may not actually improve performance. Training and advisor facilities for effective search strategies need to be incorporated to enhance the effectiveness of visual user interfaces for information retrieval.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1006/ijhc.2000.0416</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1071-5819
ispartof International journal of human-computer studies, 2000-11, Vol.53 (5), p.741-763
issn 1071-5819
1095-9300
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57549272
source Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Computerized information storage and retrieval
Evaluation
Searching
User interface
Visualization
title Evaluating the effectiveness of visual user interfaces for information retrieval
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T09%3A07%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20effectiveness%20of%20visual%20user%20interfaces%20for%20information%20retrieval&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20human-computer%20studies&rft.au=SUTCLIFFE,%20A.G.&rft.date=2000-11-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=741&rft.epage=763&rft.pages=741-763&rft.issn=1071-5819&rft.eissn=1095-9300&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/ijhc.2000.0416&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E26614985%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-b8e0b6b0a176c6ddbdd19278eb9c452d46f396d1692efc952c7d8464328283d63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=26614985&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true