Loading…

Identification with leader: A comparison of perceptions of identification among geographically dispersed and co‐located teams

Geographically dispersed teams have become common in many industries and organizations. Yet previous research on distanced leadership often is done from the perspective of the leader, not the team members. This study examines identification with team leader among distanced and proximate employees in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Corporate communications 2004-01, Vol.9 (2), p.89-103
Main Authors: Connaughton, Stacey L, Daly, John A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c205t-9026de238b72bfbeb5bf548f91a54e93b2a210b003b50f0b36acea398cb6b1a63
container_end_page 103
container_issue 2
container_start_page 89
container_title Corporate communications
container_volume 9
creator Connaughton, Stacey L
Daly, John A
description Geographically dispersed teams have become common in many industries and organizations. Yet previous research on distanced leadership often is done from the perspective of the leader, not the team members. This study examines identification with team leader among distanced and proximate employees in geographically dispersed teams. Through survey research, the study examines the relationship between members' identification with their team leader and four other relevant variables - trust, isolation, accessibility, and information equity. Specifically, the study finds that identification and trust are closely related constructs in both distanced and proximate settings; that perceived isolation is inversely related with leader identification in proximate settings, but not in distanced ones; that accessibility is positively related to identification with leader in both distanced and proximate settings; and that perceived information equity is positively related with leader identification in distanced and proximate settings. Implications for leadership in distanced settings are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/13563280410534294
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57569824</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57569824</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c205t-9026de238b72bfbeb5bf548f91a54e93b2a210b003b50f0b36acea398cb6b1a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkLFOwzAURT2ARAl8AEyd2ALPfn6OPaIKaKVKLDBbtmOLoDQpdirE39OqbAydrnR0dIfD2A2He85BP3AkhUKD5EAohZFnbHZg9R6aC3ZZyicANIabGbtdtXGYutQFN3XjMP_upo95H10b8xU7T64v8fpvK_b-_PS2WNbr15fV4nFdBwE01QaEaqNA7Rvhk4-efCKpk-GOZDTohRMcPAB6ggQelQvRodHBK8-dwordHX-3efzaxTLZTVdC7Hs3xHFXLDWkjBbypIiEqDSn0yIYRbS3K8aPYshjKTkmu83dxuUfy8EeWtp_LfEXlpBmkQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>30965553</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identification with leader: A comparison of perceptions of identification among geographically dispersed and co‐located teams</title><source>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><source>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</source><creator>Connaughton, Stacey L ; Daly, John A</creator><creatorcontrib>Connaughton, Stacey L ; Daly, John A</creatorcontrib><description>Geographically dispersed teams have become common in many industries and organizations. Yet previous research on distanced leadership often is done from the perspective of the leader, not the team members. This study examines identification with team leader among distanced and proximate employees in geographically dispersed teams. Through survey research, the study examines the relationship between members' identification with their team leader and four other relevant variables - trust, isolation, accessibility, and information equity. Specifically, the study finds that identification and trust are closely related constructs in both distanced and proximate settings; that perceived isolation is inversely related with leader identification in proximate settings, but not in distanced ones; that accessibility is positively related to identification with leader in both distanced and proximate settings; and that perceived information equity is positively related with leader identification in distanced and proximate settings. Implications for leadership in distanced settings are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1356-3289</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/13563280410534294</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Leadership ; Surveys ; Teams</subject><ispartof>Corporate communications, 2004-01, Vol.9 (2), p.89-103</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c205t-9026de238b72bfbeb5bf548f91a54e93b2a210b003b50f0b36acea398cb6b1a63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33612,33907,34136,36061</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Connaughton, Stacey L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daly, John A</creatorcontrib><title>Identification with leader: A comparison of perceptions of identification among geographically dispersed and co‐located teams</title><title>Corporate communications</title><description>Geographically dispersed teams have become common in many industries and organizations. Yet previous research on distanced leadership often is done from the perspective of the leader, not the team members. This study examines identification with team leader among distanced and proximate employees in geographically dispersed teams. Through survey research, the study examines the relationship between members' identification with their team leader and four other relevant variables - trust, isolation, accessibility, and information equity. Specifically, the study finds that identification and trust are closely related constructs in both distanced and proximate settings; that perceived isolation is inversely related with leader identification in proximate settings, but not in distanced ones; that accessibility is positively related to identification with leader in both distanced and proximate settings; and that perceived information equity is positively related with leader identification in distanced and proximate settings. Implications for leadership in distanced settings are discussed.</description><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Teams</subject><issn>1356-3289</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkLFOwzAURT2ARAl8AEyd2ALPfn6OPaIKaKVKLDBbtmOLoDQpdirE39OqbAydrnR0dIfD2A2He85BP3AkhUKD5EAohZFnbHZg9R6aC3ZZyicANIabGbtdtXGYutQFN3XjMP_upo95H10b8xU7T64v8fpvK_b-_PS2WNbr15fV4nFdBwE01QaEaqNA7Rvhk4-efCKpk-GOZDTohRMcPAB6ggQelQvRodHBK8-dwordHX-3efzaxTLZTVdC7Hs3xHFXLDWkjBbypIiEqDSn0yIYRbS3K8aPYshjKTkmu83dxuUfy8EeWtp_LfEXlpBmkQ</recordid><startdate>20040101</startdate><enddate>20040101</enddate><creator>Connaughton, Stacey L</creator><creator>Daly, John A</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040101</creationdate><title>Identification with leader</title><author>Connaughton, Stacey L ; Daly, John A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c205t-9026de238b72bfbeb5bf548f91a54e93b2a210b003b50f0b36acea398cb6b1a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Teams</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Connaughton, Stacey L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daly, John A</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><jtitle>Corporate communications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Connaughton, Stacey L</au><au>Daly, John A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identification with leader: A comparison of perceptions of identification among geographically dispersed and co‐located teams</atitle><jtitle>Corporate communications</jtitle><date>2004-01-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>103</epage><pages>89-103</pages><issn>1356-3289</issn><abstract>Geographically dispersed teams have become common in many industries and organizations. Yet previous research on distanced leadership often is done from the perspective of the leader, not the team members. This study examines identification with team leader among distanced and proximate employees in geographically dispersed teams. Through survey research, the study examines the relationship between members' identification with their team leader and four other relevant variables - trust, isolation, accessibility, and information equity. Specifically, the study finds that identification and trust are closely related constructs in both distanced and proximate settings; that perceived isolation is inversely related with leader identification in proximate settings, but not in distanced ones; that accessibility is positively related to identification with leader in both distanced and proximate settings; and that perceived information equity is positively related with leader identification in distanced and proximate settings. Implications for leadership in distanced settings are discussed.</abstract><doi>10.1108/13563280410534294</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1356-3289
ispartof Corporate communications, 2004-01, Vol.9 (2), p.89-103
issn 1356-3289
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57569824
source Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list); Library & Information Science Collection
subjects Leadership
Surveys
Teams
title Identification with leader: A comparison of perceptions of identification among geographically dispersed and co‐located teams
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T20%3A05%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identification%20with%20leader:%20A%20comparison%20of%20perceptions%20of%20identification%20among%20geographically%20dispersed%20and%20co%E2%80%90located%20teams&rft.jtitle=Corporate%20communications&rft.au=Connaughton,%20Stacey%20L&rft.date=2004-01-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=103&rft.pages=89-103&rft.issn=1356-3289&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/13563280410534294&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57569824%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c205t-9026de238b72bfbeb5bf548f91a54e93b2a210b003b50f0b36acea398cb6b1a63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=30965553&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true