Loading…
Is there a special association between self judgements and conscious recollection?
Dual‐process models of recognition memory posit a rapid retrieval process that produces a general sense of familiarity and a slower retrieval process that produces conscious recollections of prior experience. The Remember–Know paradigm has been used to study the subjective correlates of these two pr...
Saved in:
Published in: | Applied cognitive psychology 1999-02, Vol.13 (1), p.29-42 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4371-c42a195a749baafd1c48c96cf47b0a57dcf2519d09095b48d0be61d3e1a42f43 |
container_end_page | 42 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 29 |
container_title | Applied cognitive psychology |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Hirshman, Elliot Lanning, Kristi |
description | Dual‐process models of recognition memory posit a rapid retrieval process that produces a general sense of familiarity and a slower retrieval process that produces conscious recollections of prior experience. The Remember–Know paradigm has been used to study the subjective correlates of these two processes with Remember judgements assumed to index conscious recollection and Know judgements assumed to index familiarity. In this paper we examine Conway and Dewhurst's recent finding that judgements of self during encoding produce more Remember responses than alternative semantic judgements. While one might interpret this result to suggest a special association between self judgement and conscious recollection, we consider the possibility that it occurs because of greater discriminability in this condition. The results of four experiments demonstrate that a self judgement condition produces more, fewer, or an equal number of Remember responses relative to a control condition depending on whether overall discriminability in the self judgement condition is greater than, less than, or equal to that in the control condition. The implications of these results for conceptions of self judgement and the use of the Remember–Know paradigm are detailed. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199902)13:1<29::AID-ACP541>3.0.CO;2-0 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57585650</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1877055779</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4371-c42a195a749baafd1c48c96cf47b0a57dcf2519d09095b48d0be61d3e1a42f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ke2L00AQxoMoWE__hwVF7j6kzr5ls_WNkp5n4LCiJwW_DJvNRlPTpO6m3N1_b0LKCSp-mR2W3zzPME8UvaYwpwDsxennPMvPKGgdg2JwSrXWwM4oX9BXTC8Wy3wVL7OPUtA3fA7zbP2SxXAvmt1N3I9mkKZpLCCFh9GjELYAoBPKZtGnPJD-u_OOGBL2ztamISaEbmj6umtJ4fpr51oSXFOR7aH85nau7QMxbUls1wZbd4dAvLNd0zg7jrx9HD2oTBPck-N7El29O7_K3seX64s8W17GVnBFh8oM1dIooQtjqpJakVqd2EqoAoxUpa2YpLoEDVoWIi2hcAktuaNGsErwk-j5JLv33c-DCz3u6mBd05jWDTuhVDKViYQBfPoHuO0Ovh1WQ5oqBVIqpQfqy0RZ34XgXYV7X--Mv0UKOMaAOMaA41FxPCpOMSDlSJFpxCEGnGJAjoDZGhmO7s-O7iZY01TetLYOv8UTybUYsc2EXdeNu_3L-__W_3Q-_gzK8aRch97d3Ckb_wMTxZXEzYcLpCvFKV99xQ3_BdjptaQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877055779</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is there a special association between self judgements and conscious recollection?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley</source><creator>Hirshman, Elliot ; Lanning, Kristi</creator><creatorcontrib>Hirshman, Elliot ; Lanning, Kristi</creatorcontrib><description>Dual‐process models of recognition memory posit a rapid retrieval process that produces a general sense of familiarity and a slower retrieval process that produces conscious recollections of prior experience. The Remember–Know paradigm has been used to study the subjective correlates of these two processes with Remember judgements assumed to index conscious recollection and Know judgements assumed to index familiarity. In this paper we examine Conway and Dewhurst's recent finding that judgements of self during encoding produce more Remember responses than alternative semantic judgements. While one might interpret this result to suggest a special association between self judgement and conscious recollection, we consider the possibility that it occurs because of greater discriminability in this condition. The results of four experiments demonstrate that a self judgement condition produces more, fewer, or an equal number of Remember responses relative to a control condition depending on whether overall discriminability in the self judgement condition is greater than, less than, or equal to that in the control condition. The implications of these results for conceptions of self judgement and the use of the Remember–Know paradigm are detailed. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-4080</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0720</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199902)13:1<29::AID-ACP541>3.0.CO;2-0</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ACPSED</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Consciousness ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Learning. Memory ; Memory ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Recall ; Relationship ; Selfassessment</subject><ispartof>Applied cognitive psychology, 1999-02, Vol.13 (1), p.29-42</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4371-c42a195a749baafd1c48c96cf47b0a57dcf2519d09095b48d0be61d3e1a42f43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1653940$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hirshman, Elliot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanning, Kristi</creatorcontrib><title>Is there a special association between self judgements and conscious recollection?</title><title>Applied cognitive psychology</title><addtitle>Appl. Cognit. Psychol</addtitle><description>Dual‐process models of recognition memory posit a rapid retrieval process that produces a general sense of familiarity and a slower retrieval process that produces conscious recollections of prior experience. The Remember–Know paradigm has been used to study the subjective correlates of these two processes with Remember judgements assumed to index conscious recollection and Know judgements assumed to index familiarity. In this paper we examine Conway and Dewhurst's recent finding that judgements of self during encoding produce more Remember responses than alternative semantic judgements. While one might interpret this result to suggest a special association between self judgement and conscious recollection, we consider the possibility that it occurs because of greater discriminability in this condition. The results of four experiments demonstrate that a self judgement condition produces more, fewer, or an equal number of Remember responses relative to a control condition depending on whether overall discriminability in the self judgement condition is greater than, less than, or equal to that in the control condition. The implications of these results for conceptions of self judgement and the use of the Remember–Know paradigm are detailed. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Consciousness</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Recall</subject><subject>Relationship</subject><subject>Selfassessment</subject><issn>0888-4080</issn><issn>1099-0720</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ke2L00AQxoMoWE__hwVF7j6kzr5ls_WNkp5n4LCiJwW_DJvNRlPTpO6m3N1_b0LKCSp-mR2W3zzPME8UvaYwpwDsxennPMvPKGgdg2JwSrXWwM4oX9BXTC8Wy3wVL7OPUtA3fA7zbP2SxXAvmt1N3I9mkKZpLCCFh9GjELYAoBPKZtGnPJD-u_OOGBL2ztamISaEbmj6umtJ4fpr51oSXFOR7aH85nau7QMxbUls1wZbd4dAvLNd0zg7jrx9HD2oTBPck-N7El29O7_K3seX64s8W17GVnBFh8oM1dIooQtjqpJakVqd2EqoAoxUpa2YpLoEDVoWIi2hcAktuaNGsErwk-j5JLv33c-DCz3u6mBd05jWDTuhVDKViYQBfPoHuO0Ovh1WQ5oqBVIqpQfqy0RZ34XgXYV7X--Mv0UKOMaAOMaA41FxPCpOMSDlSJFpxCEGnGJAjoDZGhmO7s-O7iZY01TetLYOv8UTybUYsc2EXdeNu_3L-__W_3Q-_gzK8aRch97d3Ckb_wMTxZXEzYcLpCvFKV99xQ3_BdjptaQ</recordid><startdate>199902</startdate><enddate>199902</enddate><creator>Hirshman, Elliot</creator><creator>Lanning, Kristi</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQCIK</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199902</creationdate><title>Is there a special association between self judgements and conscious recollection?</title><author>Hirshman, Elliot ; Lanning, Kristi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4371-c42a195a749baafd1c48c96cf47b0a57dcf2519d09095b48d0be61d3e1a42f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Consciousness</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Recall</topic><topic>Relationship</topic><topic>Selfassessment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hirshman, Elliot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanning, Kristi</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 33</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Applied cognitive psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hirshman, Elliot</au><au>Lanning, Kristi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is there a special association between self judgements and conscious recollection?</atitle><jtitle>Applied cognitive psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Appl. Cognit. Psychol</addtitle><date>1999-02</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>29</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>29-42</pages><issn>0888-4080</issn><eissn>1099-0720</eissn><coden>ACPSED</coden><abstract>Dual‐process models of recognition memory posit a rapid retrieval process that produces a general sense of familiarity and a slower retrieval process that produces conscious recollections of prior experience. The Remember–Know paradigm has been used to study the subjective correlates of these two processes with Remember judgements assumed to index conscious recollection and Know judgements assumed to index familiarity. In this paper we examine Conway and Dewhurst's recent finding that judgements of self during encoding produce more Remember responses than alternative semantic judgements. While one might interpret this result to suggest a special association between self judgement and conscious recollection, we consider the possibility that it occurs because of greater discriminability in this condition. The results of four experiments demonstrate that a self judgement condition produces more, fewer, or an equal number of Remember responses relative to a control condition depending on whether overall discriminability in the self judgement condition is greater than, less than, or equal to that in the control condition. The implications of these results for conceptions of self judgement and the use of the Remember–Know paradigm are detailed. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199902)13:1<29::AID-ACP541>3.0.CO;2-0</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0888-4080 |
ispartof | Applied cognitive psychology, 1999-02, Vol.13 (1), p.29-42 |
issn | 0888-4080 1099-0720 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57585650 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Consciousness Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Learning. Memory Memory Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Recall Relationship Selfassessment |
title | Is there a special association between self judgements and conscious recollection? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T19%3A07%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20there%20a%20special%20association%20between%20self%20judgements%20and%20conscious%20recollection?&rft.jtitle=Applied%20cognitive%20psychology&rft.au=Hirshman,%20Elliot&rft.date=1999-02&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=29-42&rft.issn=0888-4080&rft.eissn=1099-0720&rft.coden=ACPSED&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199902)13:1%3C29::AID-ACP541%3E3.0.CO;2-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1877055779%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4371-c42a195a749baafd1c48c96cf47b0a57dcf2519d09095b48d0be61d3e1a42f43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877055779&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |